T 2061/19 of 11.03.2021
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2021:T206119.20210311
- Date of decision
- 11 March 2021
- Case number
- T 2061/19
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 10187811.4
- IPC class
- B65G 17/08B65G 15/30
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- No distribution (D)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Link for a conveyor chain and multi-link conveyor chain with such links
- Applicant name
- Ramsey Products Corporation
- Opponent name
- Pennine Industrial Equipment Limited
- Board
- 3.2.07
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 104(1) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 106(1) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 113 (2007)European Patent Convention Art 116 (2007)European Patent Convention Art 56 (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2) (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(3) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4) (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(8) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(1) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(3) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 16(1)(c) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 16(1)(d) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 16(1)(e) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 17(2) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 24 (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 25(1) (2020)
- Keywords
- Late-filed argument - admitted (no)
Late-filed facts - submitted with the statement of grounds of appeal
Oral proceedings - non-attendance at oral proceedings in first instance proceedings
Oral proceedings - withdrawal of request for oral proceedings
Apportionment of costs - (no) - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- T 0198/15
- Citing cases
- T 3013/18
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The request for a different apportionment of costs is refused.