Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Find a professional representative
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t141636eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 1636/14 26-08-2015
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 1636/14 26-08-2015

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2015:T163614.20150826
Date of decision
26 August 2015
Case number
T 1636/14
Petition for review of
-
Application number
04762301.2
IPC class
C07C 29/62
C07C 31/36
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 324.54 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

METHOD OF PREPARING DICHLOROPROPANOLS FROM GLYCERINE

Applicant name

Spolek Pro Chemickou A Hutni Vyrobu, Akciova

Spolecnost

Opponent name

AKZO NOBEL CHEMICALS INTERNATIONAL B.V.

SOLVAY (SOCIETE ANONYME)

THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY

Board
3.3.10
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 100(c)
European Patent Convention Art 84
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
Keywords

Main request - added subject-matter (yes)

Claims - clarity

Claims - auxiliary requests (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0823/96
T 0337/95
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal lies from the decision of the opposition division to revoke European patent No. 1 663 924.

II. Three oppositions had been filed on grounds which included that of added subject-matter (Article 100(c) EPC).

III. The opposition division concluded that the claims of the patent as granted as well as those of the two auxiliary requests then pending contained added subject-matter.

IV. Under cover of a letter dated 29 July 2015 the appellant (patent proprietor) filed a main request and auxiliary requests I to XXIII. Auxiliary requests I to XVIII were subsequently withdrawn during the oral proceedings before the board, which took place on 26 August 2015 and during which auxiliary request XXIV was filed.

Claim 1 of the main request is identical to claim 1 of the patent as granted and reads as follows:

"A method of preparing the dichloropropanols 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol and 2,3-dichloro-1-propanol by hydrochlorination of glycerine and/or monochloropropanediols with gaseous hydrogen chloride with catalysis of a carboxylic acid at reaction temperatures in the range of 70-140ºC, characterized in that said hydrochlorination is carried out solvent-free in at least one continuous reaction zone at atmospheric or elevated pressure and with continuous removing of the water of reaction by distillation at reduced pressure in distillation zone linked to the reaction zone, the liquid feed containing at least 50% by weight of glycerine and/or monochloropropanediols."

In claim 1 of auxiliary requests XIX to XXIII, the feature "solvent-free" has been replaced by "without additional compounds".

Lastly, claim 1 of auxiliary request XXIV reads as follows:

"A method of preparing the dichloropropanols 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol and 2,3-dichloro-1-propanol by hydrochlorination of glycerine and/or monochloropropanediols with gaseous hydrogen chloride with catalysis of a carboxylic acid at reaction temperatures in the range of 70-140ºC, characterized in that said hydrochlorination is carried out in at least one continuous reaction zone at atmospheric or elevated pressure and with continuous removing of the water of reaction by distillation at reduced pressure in distillation zone linked to the reaction zone, the liquid feed containing at least 50% by weight of glycerine and/or monochloropropanediols wherein the method is carried out without additional compounds."

V. The arguments of the appellant relevant for the decision were the following:

The feature "solvent-free" in claim 1 of the main request found a basis in the passage on page 3, lines 27-28 of the application as originally filed and in the implicit disclosure of the application as a whole, in particular taking into account page 2, line 9 to page 3, line 12. The declaration of Prof. Anderson, filed with the statement setting out the grounds of appeal, corroborated the fact that the skilled reader would find this feature disclosed in the application as originally filed. For this reason, claim 1 of the main request did not contain subject-matter extending beyond that of the application as originally filed.

Auxiliary requests XIX to XXIII had been filed four weeks before the oral proceedings, which should be sufficient time for the respondents to consider them, in particular as the board had already informed the parties that it would only be dealing with the issues of added subject-matter and clarity.

Auxiliary request XXIV, filed during the oral proceedings before the board, was filed in response to an objection which arose for the first time during said proceedings and should thus be admissible, since the appellant should be given the possibility to address such an objection.

Lastly, the feature "without additional compounds", which was present in all the auxiliary requests, was clear since it excluded from the claimed method any compound other than those which are usually found as impurities in low-grade starting materials.

VI. Respondent 1 (opponent 1) did not file any arguments during the appeal proceedings.

VII. The arguments of respondents 2 and 3 (opponents 2 and 3) relevant for the decision were the following:

There was no basis, either implicit or explicit, in the application as originally filed for the feature "solvent-free", with the consequence that claim 1 of the main request contained added subject-matter.

Auxiliary requests XIX to XXIII had been filed just four weeks before the scheduled oral proceedings, thereby depriving the respondents of the time required to adequately prepare their cases. For this reason, these requests should not be admitted into the proceedings.

The feature "without additional compounds" could be interpreted in three technically sound ways all of which in agreement with the disclosure of the patent in suit, namely as (1) excluding every compound further to those explicitly mentioned in claim 1, (2) excluding compounds further to those which are usually found in low-grade starting materials and (3) excluding those compounds having a material impact on the operation of the process. For this reason alone, it could not be unambiguously established which subject-matter was claimed, so that claim 1 of all the auxiliary requests on file was not clear.

VIII. The final requests of the parties were the following:

- The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the case be remitted to the opposition division for further prosecution on the basis of the main request or - alternatively - on the basis of one of the auxiliary requests XIX to XXIII, filed with letter dated 29 July 2015 or the auxiliary request XXIV, filed during the oral proceedings before the board.

- The respondents requested that the appeal be dismissed.

At the end of the oral proceedings, the decision was announced.

1. The appeal is admissible.

Main request, amendments:

2. Claim 1 of the main request contains the feature "said hydrochlorination is carried out solvent-free".

2.1 As a basis for this feature, the appellant relied on the passage on page 3, lines 27-28 of the description and on the implicit disclosure in the application as originally filed, reflected for example in the passages on page 2, line 9 to page 3, line 12. In its opinion, the declaration of Prof. Anderson filed with the statement setting out the grounds of appeal corroborated the appellant's reading of the application.

2.2 In order to determine whether the feature "solvent-free" represents added subject-matter, it has to be examined whether it provides technical information which a skilled person would not have objectively and unambiguously derived, either explicitly or implicitly, from the application as originally filed.

Implicit disclosure means no more than the clear and unambiguous consequence of what is explicitly disclosed (see T 823/96, point 4.5 of the reasons, not published in OJ EPO), and should not be construed to mean matter that is not part of the content of the technical information provided by a document, but may be rendered obvious on the basis of that content.

2.3 The passage on page 3, lines 27-28, which refers back to the method of preparing dichloropropanols disclosed in its preceding paragraph, reads:

"This method does not need any additional compounds like solvents to reach industrially acceptable yields."

This passage discloses that the method "does not need any additional compounds" and cites, as an example of said components, solvents. It discloses as an essential condition the absence of any additional compound, whereas the absence of solvents, although a necessary condition, is not a sufficient one.

Thus, the feature solvent-free, which allows the presence of further compounds in the claimed method provided that they are not solvents, represents technical information which was not disclosed in the afore-mentioned passage.

2.4 The appellant argued that the feature "solvent-free" was implicitly disclosed in the application as originally filed, as understood by the skilled reader.

The board agrees with the reading of the application put forward by Prof. Anderson, who concludes that it discloses a hydrochlorination reaction "run neat" (see point 2.10 of his declaration). Prof. Anderson further states that "neat" implies "solvent-free", which is not questioned, either.

However, "neat" implies not only that the reaction is carried out "solvent-free", but also that there is an absence of any additional compound, in line with the disclosure on page 3, lines 26-27 of the application, since a solvent-free reaction containing a further component which is not a solvent (a further catalyst, a stabiliser, a scavenger, molecular sieves, to cite some examples) will not be carried out "neat". Thus, the reading of the application as a whole fails to implicitly disclose to the skilled reader the solvent-free method subject-matter of claim 1.

2.5 With respect to the implicit disclosure on page 2, line 9 to page 3, line 12 of the application as originally filed, these passages refer to the state of the art and, for this reason alone, cannot provide a basis for the feature "solvent-free".

Notwithstanding the above, only the process (of the prior art) disclosed on page 2, lines 25-33 and on page 3, lines 1-3 are carried out in the presence of various solvents. Page 3, lines 9-10 discloses that the use of "significant portions" of "inert solvents" is undesirable, but this does not amount to disclosing a process in the complete absence of any kind of solvent, as required by the feature "solvent-free" in claim 1.

2.6 The appellant further argued that no suggestion or hint to the use of a solvent could be found in the application as originally filed.

However, even though the application as originally filed does not disclose that solvents are required, claim 1 of the main request states that they are not to be used, which is a different teaching.

This argument of the appellant is thus dismissed.

2.7 The appellant also argued that the skilled reader would immediately recognise that the key advantage of the invention was that the claimed method could be carried out without solvents.

However, the application as originally filed does not formulate the problem it aims to solve as avoiding the use of solvents but, at the most, avoiding the use of a large amount of solvents of a specific type (see page 3, lines 13-16).

This argument of the appellant is also unsuccessful.

2.8 For these reasons, it is concluded that the feature "solvent-free" does not find the required basis in the application as originally filed, with the consequence that the main request is not allowable.

Auxiliary requests XXII, XXIII and XXIV, admissibility:

3. The purpose of an appeal is mainly to give an adversely affected party the possibility of challenging the decision of the first instance. According to Article 12(2) RPBA, the statement of grounds of appeal shall contain an appellant's complete case. If, at a later stage of the proceedings, the appellant wants other requests to be considered, admission of these requests into the proceedings is a matter of discretion for the board of appeal (Article 13(1) RPBA).

4. Auxiliary requests XXII and XXIII were filed under cover of a letter dated 29 July 2015, four weeks before the oral proceedings before the board.

The appellant filed on that date 24 requests, of which 15 were fresh requests and the remaining 9 were identical to those filed with the grounds of appeal.

Respondents 2 and 3 argued that none of these 15 fresh requests, 13 of which were subsequently withdrawn, should be admitted into the proceedings, as they were belated, addressed objections already raised during the opposition proceedings and had been filed without any explanation as to why they could overcome any deficiency present in those previously on file.

The 24 requests filed on 29 July 2015 amount to almost every possible combination of two features, being each of them selected from among five alternatives. From these alternatives, only two with respect to the first feature and two with respect to the second were not present in the requests filed with the grounds of appeal.

The board had already informed the parties that it would deal with the issues of added subject-matter and clarity only, and would remit the case to the opposition division for further prosecution if any other issue needed to be examined.

Under these circumstances, the respondents did not have to prepare a complete argumentation on every possible issue arising from the amendments carried out. Instead, they had to prepare their positions on added subject-matter and clarity, for which they should not have required longer than the four weeks which were available.

For these reasons, the board makes use of its discretion under Article 13(1) RPBA to admit auxiliary requests XXII and XXIII into the proceedings.

5. Auxiliary request XXIV was filed towards the end of the oral proceedings before the board. This request, however, was filed in response to objections which were raised for the first time during the oral proceedings and against which the appellant could not have reacted earlier. Respondents 2 and 3 had no objection to its admission.

The board makes use of its discretion to admit auxiliary request XXIV into the proceedings (Article 13(1) RPBA).

Auxiliary requests XIX-XXIV, clarity:

6. Article 84 in conjunction with Rule 43(1) EPC stipulates that the claims must be clear and must define the matter for which protection is sought in terms of the technical features of the invention. These requirements serve the purpose of ensuring that the public is not left in any doubt as to which subject-matter is covered by a particular claim and which is not (see T 337/95, OJ EPO 1996, 628, Reasons 2.2 to 2.5).

7. Claim 1 of auxiliary requests XIX-XXIV contains the feature "without additional compounds", which is not present in claim 1 as granted and is taken from the description of the patent in suit.

The parties provided different interpretations of this feature during the written appeal procedure and at the oral proceedings before the board. These interpretations are summarised as follows:

7.1 "Without additional compounds" could be interpreted as excluding from the claimed method the presence of every compound other than those explicitly mentioned in claim 1, i.e. the reaction media may only contain glycerine, dichloropropanols, monochloropropanediols, HCl, carboxylic acid and water.

This interpretation makes technical sense, since the claimed method can be carried out in the absence of any compound other than those explicitly mentioned.

This interpretation is, further, in agreement with the disclosure of the patent in suit, since examples 1-3 are carried out in the absence of any compound other than those mentioned above.

7.2 "Without additional compounds" could, as argued by the appellant during the oral proceedings before the board, also be regarded as excluding any additional compound further to those which are usually found in low-grade starting materials.

This interpretation also makes technical sense, since there is no apparent reason why low-grade glycerine would not be a suitable starting material for the claimed method.

This interpretation is also in line with the general disclosure of the patent in suit, taking into account the fact that claim 1 refers to a feed containing "at least 50% by weight of glycerine and/or monochloropropanediols", which, conversely, indicates that there can be up to a 50% by weight impurities in the starting material, and that paragraph [30] mentions that glycerin of different purity grades may be used, without disclosing that any previous purification would be required.

7.3 Lastly, as submitted by the appellant in the grounds of appeal (paragraph 11.3), the feature "without additional compounds" should be construed narrowly to exclude only those compounds having a material impact on the operation of the process.

This is also a sensible interpretation from the technical viewpoint, despite the difficulty in determining the boundaries of the requirement for "a material impact on the operation".

7.4 It is apparent from the above that the skilled reader could arrive at three different, technically sound interpretations of the feature "without additional compounds", all of them in line with the disclosure of the patent in suit. It is thus not clear which of these three interpretations apply to the feature introduced in claim 1, with the consequence that the subject-matter of claim 1 lacks clarity, under Article 84 EPC.

None of auxiliary requests XIX to XXIV is thus allowable.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility