Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t182503eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 2503/18 15-09-2022
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 2503/18 15-09-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T250318.20220915
Date of decision
15 September 2022
Case number
T 2503/18
Petition for review of
-
Application number
10784259.3
IPC class
F16L 15/06
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 406.8 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Threaded connection

Applicant name

Vallourec Oil and Gas France

Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation

Opponent name
Tenaris Connections BV
Board
3.2.05
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 84
European Patent Convention Art 111(1)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art
Keywords

Remittal - fundamental deficiency in first-instance proceedings (no)

Prohibition of reformatio in peius - main request and auxiliary requests 1 and 2ter

Amendment after summons - auxiliary request 3ter

Amendment after summons - taken into account (yes)

Claims - clarity

Claims - auxiliary requests 3ter and 4 (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0009/92
Citing decisions
-

I. The joint patent proprietors and the opponent lodged an appeal against the opposition division's interlocutory decision in which, account being taken of the amendments made by the patent proprietors during the opposition proceedings according to auxiliary request 4, European patent No. 2 501 974 (the "patent") and the invention to which it related were found to meet the requirements of the EPC.

II. The summons to oral proceedings was issued on 26 July 2021. In a communication under Article 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office as applicable since 1 January 2020 (RPBA 2020, see OJ EPO 2019, A63 and OJ EPO 2021, A35) dated 20 June 2022, the board gave its preliminary opinion.

III. By letter of 12 July 2022 (received on 13 July 2022), the patent proprietors, inter alia, replaced previous auxiliary request 3ter filed on 6 April 2018 with a new auxiliary request 3ter.

IV. The oral proceedings took place as mixed-mode oral proceedings on 15 September 2022.

After all the parties' requests had been discussed in substance and the board had considered them not to be allowable, the patent proprietors withdrew their appeal before the board's decision was announced, thus becoming the respondents in the appeal proceedings at hand.

V. The parties' final requests were as follows.

The opponent (appellant, former appellant II) requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.

The patent proprietors (respondents, former appellants I) requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the opposition be rejected (main request) and, as an auxiliary measure, that the patent be maintained as amended on the basis of the claims according to auxiliary request 1 filed by letter dated 12 May 2017 or according to auxiliary request 2ter or 3ter filed by letter dated 12 July 2022. As auxiliary request 4, they requested that the opponent's appeal be dismissed.

VI. Claim versions

Claim 1 as granted (corresponding to the respondents' main request) reads as follows (the feature references employed by the board are included in square brackets):

"[1.1] A threaded connection (1) which comprises a first and a second tubular component, the first component comprising a male end comprising a distal surface and a threaded zone (5) disposed on its external peripheral surface, the second component comprising a female end comprising a distal surface and a threaded zone (4) disposed on its internal peripheral surface, the threaded zone (5) of the male end being threaded up into the threaded zone (4) of the female end, [1.2] the threaded zones (4, 5) comprising respective male and female threads (40, 50) having a width which increases from the distal surface, [1.3] the threads comprising load flanks (43, 53) having negative angles over at least a portion of their radial dimension, and stabbing flanks (44, 54), [1.4] with a radial clearance subsisting in the connected state between the crests (51) of the male threads and the roots (42) of the female threads and/or between the crests (41) of the female threads and the roots (52) of the male threads, [1.5] with an axial clearance subsisting in the connected state between the stabbing flanks (44, 54) of the male and female threads,

[1.6] the distal surface of the male end and/or female end being brought into axial abutting contact against a corresponding abutment surface, [1.7] characterized in that the female end comprises a substantially tapered surface (12) and a recess (10) between the threaded zone (4) and the abutment surface (8), the recess (10) having a substantially cylindrical surface (14) and a surface of revolution (18) disposed between the threaded zone (4) and the substantially tapered

surface (12), the substantially tapered surface (12) being adjacent to the abutment surface (8)."

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 differs from claim 1 as granted in that the following feature 1.8 is included at the end of the claim:

"[1.8] and in that the male end comprises, between its distal surface and its threaded zone (5), a metal/metal sealing surface cooperating with a corresponding sealing surface provided on the female end."

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2ter differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 in that features 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8 are replaced by the following features:

"[1.6'] the distal surface of the male end being brought into axial abutting contact against a corresponding abutment surface (8) of the female end, [1.7'] characterized in that the female end comprises a substantially tapered sealing surface (12) and a recess (10) between the threaded zone (4) and the abutment surface (8), the recess (10) having a substantially cylindrical surface (14) and a surface of revolution (18) disposed between the threaded zone (4) and the substantially tapered surface (12), the substantially tapered surface (12) being adjacent to the abutment surface (8), [1.8'] and in that the male end comprises, between its distal surface and threaded zone (5), a metal/metal sealing surface cooperating with the corresponding sealing surface (12) provided on the female end."

Moreover, the claims of auxiliary request 2ter include an additional independent claim 12 directed to a threaded connection.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3ter differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 2ter in that feature 1.1 is replaced by the following feature:

"[1.1'] A threaded connection (1) which comprises a first and a second tubular component, the first component comprising a male end comprising a distal tapered surface and a tapered threaded zone (5) disposed on its external peripheral surface, the second component comprising a female end comprising a distal surface and a tapered threaded zone (4) disposed on its internal peripheral surface, the female distal surface (6) being perpendicular to an axis (20) of the connection, the female distal surface being terminal and separated from any optional substantially radial surface of the male end, the threaded zone (5) of the male end being threaded up into the threaded zone (4) of the female end, male threaded zone having a taper which is equal to that of the female threaded zone,"

and in that features 1.6', 1.7' and 1.8' are replaced by the following features:

"[1.6''] the distal tapered surface of the male end being brought into axial abutting contact against a corresponding tapered abutment surface (8) of the female end, [1.7''] characterized in that the female end comprises a substantially tapered surface (12) and a recess (10) between the threaded zone (4) and the abutment surface (8), the recess (10) having a substantially cylindrical surface (14) and a surface of revolution (18) disposed between the threaded zone (4) and the substantially tapered surface (12), the substantially tapered surface (12) being adjacent to the abutment surface (8), [1.8''] and in that the male end (3) comprises a lip (9) extending axially beyond the male threaded zone (5) up to the abutment surface (7), such that an outside of the lip comprises a substantially tapered surface (13) with an axial length slightly longer than the axial length of the substantially tapered surface (12) of the female end (2), a portion of the tapered surface (13) of the male end and a portion of the substantially tapered surface of the female end being in mutual radially interfering contact in the connected position of the connection."

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 3ter in that feature 1.1' is replaced by feature 1.1 and in that feature 1.6'' is replaced by feature 1.6'.

VII. The parties' submissions relevant to this decision can be summarised as follows.

(a) Alleged procedural violation

(i) Respondents

The decision under appeal was not sufficiently reasoned on the then main request (rejection of the opposition) since the expression "corresponding technical features of the male end" in point 2.1.2.6 of the Reasons for the decision was not clear. Moreover, the decision under appeal did not take into account all the arguments put forward by the patent proprietors in the first-instance proceedings against the ground for opposition under Article 100(c) EPC.

(ii) Appellant

There was no reason to suspect that the opposition division overlooked any arguments. All decisions made at the oral proceedings on formal grounds had been discussed in full at the oral proceedings.

(b) Principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius

No submissions were made.

(c) Respondents' auxiliary request 3ter

(i) Appellant

Auxiliary request 3ter was late filed and did not deal with the outstanding objections. Claim 1 of this request retained the wording "slightly longer", which was unclear. Moreover, there were no exceptional circumstances justifying the filing of auxiliary request 3ter at this stage of the proceedings. The board's preliminary opinion did not raise any new aspects. Consequently, auxiliary request 3ter filed on 13 July 2022 should not be admitted into the appeal proceedings.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3ter violated Article 84 EPC. The wording "slightly longer" (see feature 1.8'') imported both an upper and a lower limit on the difference between two lengths. Firstly, the difference must be greater than zero. Secondly, the difference must not be great. However, it was not clear from the claim, either when taken alone or with reference to the description, how much longer the substantially tapered surface (13) of the outside of the lip must be compared to the substantially tapered surface (12) of the female end. The skilled person had no basis for determining where the upper limit of the range was. It was not evident based on what technical criteria the upper limit was to be determined. The respondents referred to the technical context, but it was not clear what context they meant. Even if the skilled person considered the precision of machining, the elastic properties of the material and the angle of taper, this did not define an upper limit. Even if all this was known, the skilled person still did not know how the upper limit could be determined based on these properties. The respondents' arguments on this seemed to address the requirements of Article 83 EPC and not those of Article 84 EPC. In the decision under appeal, the opposition division referred to proper sealing contact. However, there was no link between the "slightly longer" feature and the sealing. The wording "slightly longer" also had no established meaning in the art. Hence, the matter for which protection was conferred by claim 1 could not be determined. Third parties would not know whether they were infringing the patent.

(ii) Respondents

The claims of auxiliary request 3ter filed on 13 July 2022 differed from those of the previous version of auxiliary request 3ter filed on 6 April 2018 only by deletion of claim 12 and following, while claims 1 to 11 were retained. Therefore, auxiliary request 3ter filed on 13 July 2022 did not add any new aspects and should be admitted into the appeal proceedings.

Moreover, the wording "slightly longer" was clear to the skilled person, who would understand that the axial length of the substantially tapered surface (13) was slightly longer than the axial length of the substantially tapered surface (12) of the female end. The wording "slightly longer" defined an open range. If there was an open range, the skilled person would find an upper limit in view of the technical context. They would understand that the upper limit must be chosen to ensure that the result was technically feasible and that a length difference that was too large was not useful. The male end could not be prolonged too much. Setting the upper limit was a question of finding appropriate dimensions, this being among the skilled person's routine tasks. The skilled person knew how to find an upper limit based on, for example, the precision of machining and the elastic properties of the material used. The lengths of the substantially tapered surfaces 12 and 13 could be determined based on the angle of taper as indicated on page 7, lines 8 to 10 of the description as filed (see column 5, lines 37 to 39 of the patent specification).

(d) Respondents' auxiliary request 4

(i) Appellant

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 violated Article 84 EPC for the same reasons as set out for claim 1 of auxiliary request 3ter.

(ii) Respondents

The wording "slightly longer" used in claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 was clear for the same reasons as discussed for auxiliary request 3ter.

1. Alleged procedural violation: remittal to opposition division

The respondents submit that a procedural violation took place since the decision under appeal was not sufficiently reasoned as required by Rule 111(2) EPC for their then main request (rejection of the opposition) as the expression "corresponding technical features of the male end" in point 2.1.2.6 of the Reasons for the decision was not clear. Moreover, according to the respondents, the decision under appeal did not take into account all the arguments put forward by the patent proprietors in the first-instance proceedings against the ground for opposition under Article 100(c) EPC. Therefore, the patent proprietors' right to be heard under Article 113(1) EPC had been violated.

In view of these alleged procedural violations, the question of remittal of the case to the opposition division for further prosecution arises (Article 111(1), second sentence, EPC and Article 11 RPBA 2020).

Under Article 11 RPBA 2020, the board should not remit a case to the department whose decision was appealed for further prosecution unless special reasons present themselves for doing so. As a rule, fundamental deficiencies which are apparent in the proceedings before that department constitute such special reasons.

The term "fundamental deficiencies" referred to in Article 11 RPBA 2020 and the notion of a "substantial procedural violation" in Rule 103(1)(a) EPC are used synonymously (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office, 10th edn., July 2022, "Case Law", V.A.9.4.3). A "substantial procedural violation" is an objective deficiency affecting the entire proceedings (see Case Law, V.A.11.6.2).

Even if it was assumed that the procedural violations alleged by the respondents had occurred, these deficiencies would not affect the entire first-instance proceedings. For example, the part of the decision under appeal dealing with auxiliary request 4 would be unaffected by these deficiencies. For this reason, none of the procedural violations alleged by the respondents constitutes a fundamental deficiency under Article 11 RPBA 2020.

The board therefore does not consider it appropriate to set aside the decision under appeal and remit the case to the opposition division for further prosecution without examining the appeal on its merits (Article 111(1), second sentence, EPC and Article 11 RPBA 2020).

2. Respondents' main request and auxiliary requests 1, 2ter and 3ter: principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius

After all the patent proprietors' requests had been discussed at the oral proceedings and the board had considered them not to be allowable, the patent proprietors withdrew their appeal before the board's decision was announced. Consequently, the opponent became the sole appellant and the patent proprietors became the respondents and party to the appeal proceedings as of right under Article 107, second sentence, EPC.

In claim 1 of the patent as granted (main request) as well as in claim 1 of auxiliary requests 1 and 2ter, limiting feature 1.8'' (defining, for example, that the male end comprises a lip) is absent compared to claim 1 of auxiliary request 4, which was considered by the opposition division to meet all requirements of the EPC. Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 of these requests is either broader or an aliud compared to the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 but not a restriction of the claimed subject-matter of auxiliary request 4. This means that maintaining the patent as granted or maintaining the patent as amended according to auxiliary requests 1 or 2ter would put the sole appellant in a worse situation than if it had not filed an appeal. This would contravene the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius as the opponent is the sole appellant (see decision G 9/92, OJ EPO 1994, 875 and Case Law, V.A.3.1 and V.A.3.1.5). The main request as well as auxiliary requests 1 and 2ter are thus to be rejected as inadmissible (see decision G 9/92, cited above, point 2 of the order).

This conclusion does not apply to auxiliary request 3ter, which, although higher in rank, contains in claim 1 all the features of claim 1 of auxiliary request 4. Accordingly, it is concluded that the claims of auxiliary request 3ter do not result in an extension in the scope of protection with respect to the claims of auxiliary request 4. Thus, to this extent at least, the amendments do not contravene the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius. Under these circumstances, auxiliary request 3ter is within the board's jurisdiction, and the board is empowered to decide upon this request in substance.

3. Respondents' auxiliary request 3ter

3.1 Admittance into the appeal proceedings

On 13 July 2022, the respondents filed a new auxiliary request 3ter replacing auxiliary request 3ter filed on 6 April 2018. The appellant takes the view that the current auxiliary request 3ter should not be admitted into the appeal proceedings.

Under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, which applies here in view of Articles 24(1) and 25(3) RPBA 2020, any amendment to a party's appeal case made after notification of a summons to oral proceedings is, in principle, not taken into account unless there are exceptional circumstances, which have been justified with cogent reasons by the party concerned.

In the case at hand, the claims of the current auxiliary request 3ter differ from those of the previous auxiliary request 3ter by the deletion of claim 12 and following. It is uncontested that the current auxiliary request 3ter constitutes an amendment to the respondents' appeal case under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

The deletion of claim 12 and following does not give rise to any new issues. Claim 1 is the only independent claim of current auxiliary request 3ter and is identical to claim 1 of the preceding auxiliary request 3ter. In points 9.0 to 9.6, 11.0 to 11.2 and 15.6 of its reply to the patent proprietors' statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant raised objections against this claim. These objections are also discussed in point 7.3 of the board's communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020.

Consequently, current auxiliary request 3ter did not raise new issues. Moreover, it could be dealt with within the current framework of the appeal proceedings and posed no additional difficulties or surprises for either the appellant or the board. Neither was its admittance detrimental to procedural economy. Hence, the board is satisfied that the circumstances surrounding the amendment of auxiliary request 3ter are exceptional within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

The board therefore exercised its discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 and decided to admit auxiliary request 3ter filed on 13 July 2022 into the appeal proceedings.

3.2 Lack of clarity (Article 84 EPC)

The appellant submits that the wording "slightly longer" in feature 1.8'' of claim 1 caused a lack of clarity as it was not clear from the claim how much longer the substantially tapered surface (13) of the outside of the lip must be compared to the substantially tapered surface (12) of the female end.

It is common ground between the parties that disputed feature 1.8'' is present in claim 1 of auxiliary requests 3ter and 4 and that, therefore, the appellant's objection of a lack of clarity against the wording of this feature applies to both these requests.

For the reasons set out below for auxiliary requests 4, the board finds this objection convincing and concludes that claim 1 of auxiliary request 3ter does not meet the requirements of Article 84 EPC.

4. Respondents' auxiliary request 4: lack of clarity (Article 84 EPC)

The board shares the appellant's view that the wording "slightly longer" in feature 1.8'' of claim 1 causes a lack of clarity as it is not clear from the claim how much longer the substantially tapered surface (13) of the outside of the lip of the male end must be compared to the substantially tapered surface (12) of the female end. While it is evident from feature 1.8'' that the substantially tapered surface (13) of the outside of the lip must be longer than the substantially tapered surface (12) of the female end, the word "slightly" suggests that there is an upper limit to how much longer it must be. However, neither feature 1.8'' nor claim 1 as a whole indicates how much longer it could be to still be considered "slightly longer". The respondents have also not convincingly demonstrated that this would be clear to the skilled person based on their common general knowledge.

The respondents take the view that this was merely a question of finding appropriate dimensions and that the skilled person would be able to establish how much longer the substantially tapered surface (13) of the male end may be compared to the substantially tapered surface (12) of the female end based on, for example, material properties and machining precision.

However, the issue in hand hinges on whether the wording "slightly longer" is clear to the skilled person; not if they would be able to put the claimed invention into practice. The board concurs with the appellant's view that claim 1 indicates neither the technical criteria defining the upper limit, nor on which parameters (for example, material properties or dimensions of other components of the threaded connection) the upper limit depends, nor how the upper limit can be determined based on such parameters. The technical meaning of the term "slightly longer" thus remains unclear.

This also applies in view of the respondents' reference to the passage on column 5, lines 37 to 39 of the patent specification. Firstly, the claims must, as far as possible, be clear in themselves when read by the person skilled in the art, without reference to the content of the description. Secondly, while the passage of the description cited by the respondents discloses ranges for the angle of taper of the sealing surfaces, it does not give any definition of the term "slightly longer".

In point 2.4.3.3 of the Reasons for the decision under appeal, the opposition division took the view that "[t]he skilled man would understand how much slightly longer should the axial length of the nose portion be in order to ensure a proper sealing contact between the two radially interfering surfaces of the male and the female ends".

However, claim 1 does not include anything that would indicate to the skilled person that the term "slightly" was to be understood as implying an upper limit for the axial length difference that was to be determined based on desired sealing properties.

Consequently, claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 does not meet the requirements of Article 84 EPC.

5. Conclusion

The respondents' main request and auxiliary requests 1 and 2ter contravene the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius and are thus to be rejected as inadmissible. The respondents' auxiliary requests 3ter and 4 do not meet the requirements of Article 84 EPC. Therefore, none of the respondents' admissible requests is allowable. The patent must therefore be revoked (Article 101(3)(b) EPC).

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility