Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0222/19 18-05-2022
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0222/19 18-05-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T022219.20220518
Date of decision
18 May 2022
Case number
T 0222/19
Petition for review of
-
Application number
13765911.6
IPC class
C08L 23/04
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 361.39 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

ETHYLENE-BASED POLYMER COMPOSITIONS, AND ARTICLES PREPARED FROM THE SAME

Applicant name
Dow Global Technologies LLC
Opponent name

Borealis AG

Basell Polyolefine GmbH

Board
3.3.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56
Keywords
Inventive step - non-obvious alternative
Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0939/92
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal lies from the interlocutory decision of the opposition division according to which European patent No. 2 895 547 as amended according to the main request (claims 1 to 12) submitted with letter of 23 January 2018 and a description adapted thereto met the requirements of the EPC.

II. The decision was taken having regard to the following documentary evidence amongst others:

D2: US 2011/0034635 A1.

III. According to the reasons for the contested decision which are pertinent in the appeal proceedings, the claims of the main request met the requirements of Articles 123(2), 123(3) and 84 EPC. The requirements of sufficiency of disclosure and novelty were also met. An inventive step was acknowledged when starting from any of the compositions described in examples 1, 8 and 10 of D2 as the closest prior art.

IV. An appeal was lodged by opponent 2 (appellant). In response to the statement of grounds of the appellant, the patent proprietor (respondent) filed a reply, as well as four sets of claims as auxiliary requests 1 to 4. Their wording is not relevant for the present decision.

V. A second appeal filed by opponent 1 was withdrawn. Opponent 1 is accordingly party as of right to the appeal proceedings pursuant to Article 107, second sentence, EPC.

VI. Oral proceedings before the Board were held on 18 Mai 2022.

VII. The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and the patent be revoked.

VIII. The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed (main request), or in the alternative that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of any of auxiliary requests 1 to 4 filed with the reply to the statement of grounds of appeal.

IX. Claim 1 of the main request reads as follows:

"1. A composition consisting of a first composition, wherein the first composition comprises a first ethylene-based polymer and a second ethylene-based polymer, and wherein the first composition has a high load melt index (I21) less than 17, a density greater than, or equal to, 0.952 g/cm**(3), a molecular weight distribution MWD (conv), defined as the ratio of the weight average molecular weight to the number average molecular weight (Mw (conv)/Mn (conv)), greater than, or equal to, 11, and a viscosity ratio, eta(0.01 s**(-1))/eta(100 s**(-1)) at 190°C, greater than, or equal to, 60, an extrudate swell (t300 measured at 300 s**(-1) shear rate and 190°C) greater than, or equal to, 18 seconds, and an extrudate swell (tl000 measured at 1000 s**(-1) shear rate and 190°C) greater than, or equal to, 6 seconds, and an I21/I5 ratio less than, or equal to, 25.0."

Dependent claims 2-11 define preferred embodiments of the composition of claim 1. Claim 12 defines an article comprising at least one component formed from the composition of any of the preceding claims.

X. The appellant's submissions, in so far as they are pertinent, may be derived from the reasons for the decision below. They are essentially as follows:

(a) The subject-matter of claims 1 to 12 of the main request lacks an inventive step over either example 8 or example 10 of D2 as the closest prior art.

XI. The respondent's submissions, in so far as they are pertinent, may be derived from the reasons for the decision below. They are essentially as follows:

(a) The subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request involves an inventive step starting from any of examples 8 and 10 of D2 as the closest prior art.

XII. The party as of right did not make any submissions.

1. The sole issue in dispute is inventive step.

Closest prior art and distinguishing feature(s)

2. The patent in suit aims at providing compositions suitable for use in extrusion blow molded articles (paragraph [0001]). According to paragraph [0002] there remained a need for new compositions that provided improved processability, as well as excellent mechanical properties.

In line with the contested decision, the appellant is of the opinion that each of the compositions described with examples 8 and 10 of D2 represents a suitable starting point for assessing inventive step of the subject-matter of claim 1. As noted by the appellant, D2 describes in paragraphs [0379] that the compositions of examples 8 to 10 are especially suitable for blow molding applications. In the light of paragraphs [0064] and [0159] of the patent in suit, it can be understood that improved processability meant among others higher extrudate swell. The same applies for D2 (paragraphs [0399] to [0401]), the extrudate swell values measured for examples 8 and 10 of that document being almost identical. In fact, the extrudate swell is marginally higher for example 8 than for example 10 at a shear rate of 300 s**(-1), but the converse is true at a shear rate of 1000 s**(-1)(table 11B of D2).

Although the respondent argued in writing that it would be only with the benefit of hindsight that one would also take example 10 as a starting place, since it is the composition of example 8 and not that of example 10 which exhibits the highest extrudate swell, it was no longer disputed at the oral proceedings that each of the compositions described in these two examples would represent a suitable starting point for analysing inventive step.

In view of the above, the Board is satisfied that either example 8 or example 10 of D2 represents a suitable starting point for assessing inventive step.

3. To the exception of a viscosity ratio eta(0.01 s**(-1))/eta(100 s**(-1)) at 190°C greater than, or equal to, 60 for which the parties disagree whether it represents a distinguishing feature of the composition of operative claim 1 over the compositions of examples 8 and 10 of D2, it is undisputed based on the parametric results shown in tables 8A-C, 9A-C and 11A-C of D2 that all other features of operative claim 1, apart from the I21/I5 ratio, are met by the compositions of examples 8 and 10 of D2. Whereas the compositions of present claim 1 must have a I21/I5 ratio being less than, or equal to, 25.0, the compositions of examples 8 and 10 of D2 exhibit a I21/I5 ratio of 31 and 26, respectively (table 9B).

Having regard to the reasons provided below, the conclusion regarding the presence of an inventive step is independent of whether a viscosity ratio eta(0.01 s**(-1))/eta(100 s**(-1)) at 190°C greater than, or equal to, 60 represents a further distinguishing feature of the present claim 1 over the closest prior art. That question can therefore be left unanswered.

Problem successfully solved

4. According to the respondent, the problem solved over the closest prior art would be the provision of a bimodal ethylene-based resin for blow moulded articles exhibiting an improved balance of mechanical properties with respect to flexural modulus and environmental stress crack resistance (ESCR), while maintaining good extrudate swell properties (rejoinder, paragraph bridging pages 4 and 5).

By reference to page 14 of the opposition division's decision, in particular the last paragraph of the contested decision, the respondent relies on a comparison made between the experimental results shown with examples 1 to 3 of the patent in suit, which are all in accordance with the teaching of operative claim 1. It is is submitted that the effect of a lower I21/I5 ratio can be seen by comparing examples 1 and 2 of the patent. In addition, the respondent compares the flexural modulus values obtained with examples 1 to 3 of the patent in suit with those obtained with examples 8 and 10 of D2. The respondent, however, does not rely on any comparative examples, in particular the comparative tests A to E of the patent in suit which are undisputedly more remote than examples 8 and 10 of D2.

5. It is established case law that if a claimed invention is based on a given technical effect, the latter should, in principle, be achievable over the whole area claimed (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 9**(th) edition 2019, I.D.4.3), reference being in particular made to landmark decision T 939/92 (OJ EPO 1996, 309, see point 2.5.4 of the reasons) according to which a purported technical effect can only form the basis for the assessment of inventive step if it could be fairly assumed that this technical effect occurs across the whole breadth of the claim. Therefore, the question arises in the present case whether or not the alleged improved balance of mechanical properties with respect to flexural modulus and ESCR, while maintaining good extrudate swell properties, is likely to occur over the whole breadth of the claim.

5.1 Having regard to the limited number of examples relied upon by the respondent (examples 1 to 3 of the patent in suit), the breadth of operative claim 1 and the absence of technical explanation as to why the flexural modulus values obtained with examples 1 to 3 of the patent in suit, i.e. 231,593, 211,228 and 224,558 psi, respectively, are necessarily representative of the flexural modulus which are generally obtained with the compositions in accordance with operative claim 1, the Board has no reason to assume that the claimed compositions exhibit an improved flexural modulus in comparison to the composition of the closest prior art with values of about 202,000 psi.

As regards ESCR values, example 1 of the patent in suit (table 6, page 14) exhibits with 453 hours a level below that obtained with examples 8 and 10 of D2 (table 9B, page 33).

5.2 As to probative value of any comparison made between examples 1 to 3 of the patent in suit, in particular a comparison between examples 1 and 2, it must be stressed that the compositions of examples 1 to 3 are almost exclusively defined in terms of parameters, the parameters used being as in operative claim 1 the melt index I21, the density, the molecular weight distribution MWD, the dynamic viscosity ratio eta(0.01 s**(-1))/eta(100 s**(-1)), the extrudate swells t300 and t100 and the I21/I5 ratio and in addition the melt index I5, the viscosity values eta(0.01 s**(-1)) and eta(100 s**(-1)) used to compute the viscosity ratio, as well as Mn and Mw used to calculate the molecular weight distribution MWD(conv).

It has to be borne in mind that contrary to compositions which can be defined in an exhaustive manner using solely structural features and for which the existence of a causal link between an alleged technical effect and a structural feature can be easily assessed by modifying only that structural feature, establishing in the present case the existence of a causal relationship between the I21/I5 ratio of the claimed composition and the flexural modulus is a different matter. This is due not only to the very limited number of experiments considered, but also to the fact that (i) the parameters used to describe the exemplified compositions are interrelated, (ii) their relationship is not fully explained on the basis of the parties' submissions, (iii) their degree of interdependence is not established and (iv) these parameters used for characterising the exemplified polymers have not been shown to provide a full description of the polymers under consideration.

On that basis, any comparison made between examples 1 to 3 of the patent in suit cannot be conclusive as to establishing a causal link between a I21/I5 ratio of less than, or equal to, 25.0, possibly in combination with a viscosity ratio eta(0.01 s**(-1))/eta(100 s**(-1)) at 190°C greater than, or equal to, 60, should it represent a further distinguishing feature of the claimed compositions over the closest prior art, and the alleged technical benefits achieved over the closest prior art, i.e. an improved balance of mechanical properties with respect to flexural modulus and environmental stress crack resistance (ESCR), while maintaining good extrudate swell properties.

5.3 Consequently, it follows from the above analysis that the respondent has not presented any corroborating evidence or explanations rendering it credible that the purported technical effect of providing a bimodal ethylene-based resin for blow moulded articles exhibiting in comparison to those obtained in the closest prior art an improved balance of mechanical properties with respect to flexural modulus and ESCR, while maintaining good extrudate swell properties is successfully achieved over the whole breadth of claim 1. Accordingly, any such advantage of the claimed compositions over the closest prior art cannot be taken into account for the purpose of assessing inventive step and the problem underlying the claimed invention can only be seen as the provision of a further bimodal ethylene-based resin suitable for blow moulded articles.

Obviousness of the solution

6. It remains to be decided wether the skilled person desiring to solve the above problem would, in view of the disclosure of D2, possibly in combination with other prior art documents or with common general knowledge, have modified the compositions of example 8 or 10 of D2 in such a way as to arrive at the composition of operative claim 1.

6.1 The appellant submits that selecting an upper limit for the I21/I5 ratio of 25 would be arbitrary and therefore obvious for the skilled person. However, the question to be answered is not only whether the skilled person would have been inclined to provide a composition having a I21/I5 ratio which is within the limit defined in operative claim 1, but also whether the preparation of such composition was obvious, e.g. whether the composition of the closest prior art could be modified not only as to meet the I21/I5 ratio requirement of operative claim 1, but also as to achieve simultaneously the additional requirements of said claim based of the information provided in the available prior art, the common general knowledge and a reasonable amount of experimental work.

6.2 As already pointed above in relation to the parameters used for describing the compositions exemplified in the patent in suit, which are essentially the same as those defined in operative claim 1, these parameters are interrelated and their relationship is not fully explained or known, let alone their degree of interdependence. The appellant's arguments that the I21/I5 ratio is related to the MW distribution and that the skilled person could decrease the I21/I5 ratio of the bimodal composition by adapting the proportion of high molecular weight component (split) which is below 50 wt% for the compositions of the closest prior art is undisputed. The appellant, however, failed to demonstrate that the sole modification of the split would be sufficient to obtain compositions falling within the ambit of claim 1. The appellant did not indicate either if additional measures would need to be applied by the skilled person to obtain a composition meeting all requirements of operative claim 1, should the modification of the split be insufficient to prepare such composition.

Even if it can be accepted, as submitted by the appellant during the oral proceedings, that a modification of the split by increasing the proportion of the low molecular weight component in the case of examples 8 and 10 of D2 would be expected by the skilled person to increase the molecular weight distribution MWD of the overall composition and consequently its I21/I5 ratio, as well as to increase the density, because shorter polymeric chains are less prone to entanglement and therefore more incline to crystallize, this would demonstrate that a modification of the split by increasing the proportion of the low molecular weight component, which would also lead to an increase of the load melt index (I21), is likely to result in a composition exhibiting a I21 of at least 17, i.e. above the limit of less than 17 defined in operative claim 1, since the compositions of examples 8 and 10 of D2 already exhibit I21 values of 15.2 and 16.5, respectively.

Conversely, a modification of the split by decreasing the proportion of the low molecular weight component would be expected by the skilled person to decrease the molecular weight distribution MWD and consequently the I21/I5 ratio of the overall composition, as sought to be achieved by the skilled person, however, at the expense of a reduced density, when density values of 0.953 and 0.952 g/cm**(3) for the compositions of examples 8 and 10 of D2, respectively, are already close to the lower limit of 0.952 g/cm**(3) defined in operative claim 1.

On that basis, it cannot be concluded that a mere modification of the split of the compositions of examples 8 and 10 of D2 for obtaining a I21/I5 ratio of less than, or equal to, 25.0 would necessarily allow the skilled person to obtain compositions being also within the boundaries defined in operative claim 1 for both the melt index I21 and the density.

Moreover, the Board is also left with no submissions of the appellant, let alone corroborating evidence concerning the achievement of a viscosity ratio eta(0.01 s**(-1))/eta(100 s**(-1)) at 190°C, an extrudate swell (t300 measured at 300 s**(-1) shear rate and 190°C) and an extrudate swell (tl000 measured at 1000 s**(-1) shear rate and 190°C) as defined in operative claim 1.

Accordingly, even if to the benefit of the appellant it were accepted that the skilled person using a reasonable amount of experimental work would be able to modify the split of the compositions of examples 8 and 10 of D2 to obtain compositions being within the boundaries defined in operative claim 1 for the I21/I5 ratio, the melt index I21 and the density, one would not be in the position to conclude that such modification of the split would be sufficient to meet also said three additional parametric requirements. In that respect, the mere fact that the compositions of the closest prior art meet the extrudate swell values t300 and tl000 defined in operative claim 1 is not sufficient to conclude that the modification of the closest prior art by changing the split would necessary result in such parametric requirements being still met.

6.3 According to the boards' established case law, each of the parties to the proceedings bears the burden of proof for the facts it alleges. If a party, whose arguments rest on these alleged facts, does not discharge its burden of proof, this is to the detriment of that party, who may not shift the onus of proof onto the other party (Case Law, supra, III.G.5.1.1 and III.G.5.2.1). In the present case, the appellant did not present sufficient submissions, let alone corroborating evidence, showing that the skilled in the light of the prior art, including common general knowledge and applying a reasonable amount of experimental work would be able to modify the teaching of the closest prior art so as to arrive at the composition of operative claim 1.

6.4 For these reasons, the composition of claim 1 has not been shown to be obvious having regard to the state of the art. The same holds true for dependent claims 2 to 11 which define preferred embodiments of claim 1 and claim 12 which uses the composition of any of the preceding claims.

7. Since the sole objection raised against the main request does not succeed, the appeal must be dismissed and it is not necessary to consider any of the auxiliary requests.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility