Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t940343eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 0343/94 19-09-1995
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 0343/94 19-09-1995

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1995:T034394.19950919
Date of decision
19 September 1995
Case number
T 0343/94
Petition for review of
-
Application number
85905670.7
IPC class
B29C 45/76
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 628.82 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Injection molding machine capable of monitoring molding process

Applicant name
FANUC LTD.
Opponent name
Battenfeld GmbH
Board
3.2.05
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 52(1) 1973
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
Keywords

Inventive step Main Request (no)

Late filed Auxiliary Request (not allowable)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0095/83
Citing decisions
-

I. European patent No. 201 606, based on application No. 85 905 670.7 filed 8 November 1985 claiming the priority of patent application No. 235 256 84 filed on 9. November 1984 in Japan, was granted on 9 May 1990 and opposed on 9 February 1991.

II. By its decision dated 7 March 1994, the Opposition Division rejected the opposition pursuant to Article 102(2) EPC.

The decision was based on the patent as granted, whose Claim 1 reads as follows:

"An injection molding machine which allows process monitoring, comprising detecting means for detecting the actual value of at least one variable pertinent to a molding cycle, and a display unit (18) for displaying the value detected by the detecting means, characterised by:

first detecting means (T1, T2) for detecting a cycle time (TS) and a mixing time (TM)

second detecting means (SP) for detecting an injection time (TI), a peak injection pressure (PP) and a switched pressure (PC);

third detecting means (P1) for detecting a cushion amount (MC);

current value memory means (14) for storing data corresponding to a plurality of current variables including the cycle time (TS), the mixing time (TM), the injection time (TI), the peak injection pressure (PP), the switched pressure (PC) and the cushion amount (MC) for a current molding cycle;

past value memory means (14) for storing data corresponding to a plurality of past variables including the cycle time (TS), the mixing time (TM), the injection time (TI), the peak injection pressure (PP), the switched pressure (PC) and the cushion amount (MC) for at least two preceding molding cycles, said past value memory means including a first memory section for storing the data corresponding to the plurality of past variables for the first preceding cycle and a second memory section for storing the data corresponding to the plurality of past variables for a second preceding cycle;

display control means (16) for reading data from said current value memory means (14) and said past value memory means (14), and for causing data representing the current variables for the current molding cycle and the past variables for at least two preceding cycles to be simultaneously displayed on said display unit (18); and

updating control means (11) for automatically transferring the data stored in said current value memory means (14) to said past value memory means (14) after the current molding cycle ends, so as to automatically start and execute updating of the data in said past value memory means without manual intervention by an operator, said updating control means (11) being operable to transfer the data stored in said current value memory means and said first memory section of said past value memory means to said first and second memory sections of said past value memory means, respectively, after each molding cycle ends".

III. The following prior art documents were considered during the opposition procedure:

Dl: DE-A-2 615 445 (acknowledged in the patent),

E2: "Neufassung Nr. 2 der Auftragsbestatigungen vom 22. Mai 1984 und 5 Juni 19841" Battenfeld vom 20. Juni 1984,

E3: Pamphlet "CNC 80/85 REGELUNGSSYSTEME FÜR SPRITZGIESSMACHINEN",

E4: Pamphlet "Injection moulding Machines series BA (from 700kN)", and

D2: Sworn affidavit by Mr Holzschuh, submitted with Opponent's letter dated 6 July 1993.

In his grounds of appeal the Appellant cited for the first time the document

E5: pamphlet "English Information" A-71-KEL-12 83, pages 1 to 4.

IV. The Appellant (Opponent) filed a Notice of Appeal on 8. April 1994 and paid the Appeal Fee the same day.

The grounds for appeal were filed on 13 July 1994.

The Appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside, the patent be revoked in its entirety and, subsidiarily, oral proceedings be summoned.

V. The Respondent's (Patentee's) submissions were filed on 11. January 1995.

He requested that the appeal be dismissed and, subsidiarily, oral proceedings be summoned.

VI. Oral proceedings were held on 19 September 1995.

Together with the summons to the oral proceedings, the Board sent to the parties a communication indicating, as its provisional opinion, that the subject-matter of independent Claim 1 was novel, but did not appear to involve an inventive step in view of the considered prior art documents.

VII. In writing and at the oral proceedings, the Appellant made the following submissions.

The closest prior art is represented by the prior use of the moulding machine referred to in document E2 and comprising the elements specified in the sworn affidavit by Mr Holzschuh (document D2).

The decision under appeal had considered that the subject-matter of the patent at issue differed from this state of the art essentially in the following features:

(a) it displays the "switched pressure";

(b) it simultaneously displays the stored variables of the present cycle and of at least the two preceding cycles;

(c) it comprises updating control means operable to automatically update the memory means after each cycle.

The prior art admittedly did not refer to the "switched pressure" (feature (a)). This value, however, was only one point on the recorded pressure curve as shown for example in Figure 2 of the document Dl. There was no contention in the patent at issue that this particular value had a special interest which had not been detected by the prior art, but it was merely mentioned as an information amongst others. Even if, therefore, the mention of this value rendered the subject-matter of the claim novel, it could not justify an inventive step.

The second feature (b) was only one of the various options offered by computers, the decision of whether the data should be displayed successively or simultaneously being a matter of choice at the discretion of the user. In case the data were not simultaneously displayed on the screen, it was always possible to obtain the same result by printing out the successive series of values.

The third feature (c) was an obvious feature of a computer to organise a memory means on the FIFO basis so as to eliminate, after each cycle, the oldest information when entering the most recent one.

Therefore, even if novelty of the subject-matter of Claim 1 could be admitted, it would lack an inventive step.

VIII. In writing and at the oral proceedings, the Respondent made the following submissions.

It was not disputed that the closest prior art was represented by the moulding machine referred to by document E2 and comprising the elements specified by the sworn affidavit by Mr Holzshuh (document D2).

The subject-matter claimed by Claim 1, however, was a combination of features providing for an overall effect which was not predictable in view of the state of the art.

In particular, the obviousness of the invention should not be considered retrospectively, but in view of the state of the art which was available at the priority date of the patent in suit. This state of the art did only disclose the simultaneous display of information relating to the last 15 cycles of one parameter or to its cumulative values, as shown for example in the figures of the document E3. No incentive was given by this state of the art to the person skilled in the art to combine the information in a simultaneous display, for comparison purpose, of all the pertinent parameters relating to a certain number (at least 3) of cycles. Such a display was first rendered possible by the special organisation of the memory and control means suggested by the invention.

Moreover, the "switched pressure", and the display of the value of this parameter, was not only novel but also contributed to the inventiveness of the subject-matter of the claim.

IX. At the end of the oral proceedings the Parties maintained their requests as submitted in writing (see Items IV and V). In addition, the Respondent submitted the auxiliary request that the appealed decision be set aside and the patent be maintained on the basis of a new Claim 1, resulting from the combination of granted Claims 1 and 2.

1. Admissibility

The appeal complies with Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 64 EPC and is therefore admissible.

2. State of the art

Since the Appellant has not proven that document E5 was available to the public before the priority date of the patent in suit, this document cannot be considered as to be part of the state of the art.

Therefore, the state of the art is constituted by prepublished documents Dl, E3 and E4, and the publicly used machine which was sold, according to the sworn affidavit by Mr Holzschuh, to the Firm N. P. Ekco Ltd; this machine differing from the type disclosed in the document E3 only in that it was provided with a colour screen.

This machine was equipped with a computer which allowed to monitor the values of various parameters adopted during the last fifteen cycles. The order form relating to this specific machine (document E2) gives a list of the parameters which were monitored during the operation of the publicly used machine. This document, in combination with the sworn affidavit by Mr Holzschuh, is a proof establishing the list of the various parameters which are monitored, i.e.: the injection time, the mixing time, the cushion amount, the backward final position of the screw, the cycle time, the maximal hydraulic pressure during the injection or the maximal internal pressure in the injection tool.

3. Respondent's Main Request

3.1. Novelty

The closest prior art is represented by the publicly used moulding machine according to the documents E2 and D2.

3.1.1. This prior use discloses an injection moulding machine which allows process monitoring and comprises detecting means for detecting the actual value of at least one variable pertinent to a moulding cycle, and a display unit for displaying the value detected by the detected means; said moulding machine further comprising:

- first detecting means for detecting a cycle time and a mixing time;

- second detecting means for detecting an injection time and a peak injection pressure:

- third detecting means for detecting a cushion amount;

- current value memory means for storing data corresponding to a plurality of current variables including the cycle time, the mixing time, the injection time, the peak injection pressure and the cushion amount for a current molding cycle;

- past value memory means for storing data corresponding to a plurality of past variables including the cycle time, the mixing time, the injection time, the peak injection pressure and the cushion amount for at least two preceding moulding cycles, said past value memory means including a first memory section for storing the data corresponding to the plurality of past variables for the first preceding cycle and a second memory section for storing the data corresponding to the plurality of past variables for a second preceding cycle;

- display control means for reading data from said current value memory means and said past value memory means, and for causing data representing the current variables for the current moulding cycle and the past variables for at least two preceding cycles to be displayed on said display unit; and

- updating control means for automatically transferring the data stored in said current value memory means to said past value memory means after the current molding cycle ends.

3.1.2. The injection moulding machine according to Claim 1 differs from this known machine in that:

(a) it detects, stores and displays the "switched pressure";

(b) it simultaneously displays the stored current and past values of the variables considered;

(c) it comprises updating control means as specified in and operating according to Claim 1, i.e. operating according to the "First In First Out" principle.

3.1.3. Document Dl discloses only the features of the preamble of Claim 1 and also the other cited documents do not go beyond what is known from the prior use. The subject- matter of Claim 1 is, consequently, novel. During the oral proceeding before the Board, the Appellant also no longer contested the novelty either.

3.2. Problem and Solution

In the introductory portion of the patent at issue (see column 1, lines 23 to 35), two prior art documents are acknowledged, namely:

- DE-A-2 615 445, which represents the preamble of Claim 1 and which discloses a process for controlling an injection moulding machine in which the pressure profile in the injection tool is monitored, stored and displayed on a screen throughout each operation cycle, and

- DE-A-3 407 040, which discloses a control system of an injection moulding machine having a display unit for displaying current values of several parameters pertaining to the injection process.

The patent in suit (see column 1, lines 8 to 21) states that this kind of prior art moulding machines comprises the following features:

- only the parameters of the preceding moulding cycle are displayed,

- no comparative reference is available for determining whether or not the injection moulding process is proceeding correctly, and

- this determination must depend on the skill of an operator.

These features result in the drawback that, even if one of the prior art injection moulding machines currently executes abnormal processing, it cannot be detected immediately and a moulded product of high quality cannot be obtained.

The problem to be solved by the invention according to the patent at in suit is, accordingly, to remedy said drawback.

According to Claim 1, said problem is solved by providing an injection moulding machine comprising means for storing various data and notably "switched pressure" for several moulding cycles and for simultaneously displaying the data for the present cycle and for at least the two preceding cycles on a screen, so that an abnormality in the injection process can be determined at an early stage.

Since the machine according to the prior use (E2 and D2) differs from the subject-matter of Claim 1 only by the features (a) to (c) indicated under point 3.1.2 above, it has to be examined, if these features, in view of the basic problem defined above, make a contribution to the known machine which involves an inventive step.

3.3. Inventive step

3.3.1. Feature (a)

It is not contested by the Respondent that, according to Claim 1 and to the whole disclosure of the patent at issue, the means for detecting and storing the values of the "switched pressure" are standard, well known means for detecting and storing any other value of the pressure occurring in the moulding tool during a moulding cycle.

It is, moreover, to be noted that the whole disclosure of the patent at issue does not mention either any peculiar importance or any peculiar effect which the "switched pressure" would provide, in respect of the final quality of the obtained moulded product.

The "switched pressure" is merely mentioned as an example value which is of no higher importance than its neighbouring values. In fact, the state of the art equally provides for the option to freely choose 20 pressure values along the whole pressure curve as set points and to display the respective values actually achieved in the form of a bar diagram.

It is, further, to be noted that neither Claim 1, nor the disclosure of the patent at issue, do specify any particular structural feature of the memory means mentioned in Claim 1, which would render the said memory means specifically adapted to store the detected data concerning the "switched pressure".

Consequently, said memory means mentioned in Claim 1 is merely standard hardware exerting its inherent function.

For these reasons and, since the "switched pressure" may be easily detected and stored - if it is considered as a useful information - from the pressure curve in the tool which is already measured in the known machines according to the state of the art, the fact that the claimed injection moulding machine comprises "means for detecting and storing the switched pressure" may not be considered as representing any contribution to an inventive step.

3.3.2. Feature (b)

In the control technique, it is common use to record the data relating to various parameters of a controlled process, in order to be able to determine the time dependence of all those parameters, which may influence the quality of the products obtained by the controlled process. Such a production data sheet has been made either by handwriting or printing the measured values or by temporary storing the information in electronic registers of adequate capacity.

All these constructional measures are equivalent in allowing the operator to compare the current values with some reference. This well-known fact is even aknowledged by the patent in suit itself (see column 1, lines 30 to 31), when stating that document DE-A-2 615 445 already disclosed to display an ideal pressure profile for purpose of comparison.

The injection moulding machine according to the prior use is conceived, like the machine according to the present invention, to store the information relating to all the mentioned parameters (except the "switched pressure") but, according to the screens represented in document E3, it only displays at a time the information relating to one of these parameters for the last fifteen cycles. Consequently, the person skilled in the art using this machine and wanting to compare all the important data for these cycles, would have to make successive print-outs of the various screen, for all the concerned parameters.

In order to avoid this drawback in the presentation of the pertinent information, the person skilled in the art would have immediately envisaged, instead of displaying the cumulated values of at least two parameter as shown in the figures of document E3, to simultaneously display some or all the parameter values for a given number of cycles. The number of parameters and of cycles which may be displayed simultaneously is, in fact, only restricted by a capacity of the screen and of its memory selected after balancing cost and benefit. Once the choice is made, the programming of a computer and its display unit, in order to simultaneously display the information relating to various parameters, is a standard procedure for a skilled programmer.

For these reasons, the fact that the claimed injection moulding machine comprises "means for simultaneously displaying the stored current and past values of the variables considered" may not be considered as representing any contribution to the inventive step involved by the subject-matter claimed by Claim 1.

3.3.3. Feature (c)

The well known "First In First Out" principle is chosen whenever the most effective data comparison is called for.

It is worth mentioning that the teaching from the machine according to the prior use, i.e. the data to be stored are those pertaining to the last 15 cycles, implies that data pertaining to any cycle "older" that the last 15 ones have to be discarded. This implies that the updating means of this machine must logically operate according either to the "First In First Out" principle or, at least, according to a very analogous one.

For these reasons, the fact that the claimed injection moulding machine comprises "updating control means as specified in and operating according to Claim 1, i.e. operating according to the "First In First Out" principle," may not be considered as representing any contribution to the inventive step involved by the subject-matter claimed by Claim 1.

As a matter of completeness, it is also noted that the patent in suit defines the updating control means by mere functional features and does not specify any particular new means which would be specially adapted to the execution of these functions. Therefore, the claimed means, used to fulfil the mentioned functions, are to be considered as those known for this purpose in the state of the art.

3.4. According to the above, the Respondent's main request is not allowable, since the subject-matter of Claim 1, as granted, does not involve an inventive step pursuant to Article 56 EPC.

4. Respondent's Auxiliary Request

At the end of the Oral Proceedings, the Respondent auxiliarily requested that the patent be maintained on the basis of a new Claim 1 resulting from the combination of all the features mentioned in Claims 1 and 2 as granted.

It is a constant jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal of not admitting into the proceedings new claims which are late filed, if they do not represent a bona fide attempt to answer the grounds of opposition (see, for instance, T 95/83, OJ EPO, 1985, 75).

In the present case, the new auxiliary request has been filed at the latest possible moment and the Respondent has neither presented any submission for explaining the lateness of the filing of this request nor presented any argument for justifying the inventiveness of the subject-matter of the newly proposed claim, in view of the considered prior art.

Moreover, according to the submission of the Respondent himself during the opposition proceedings before the Opposition Division, the features of Claim 2 of the granted patent essentially differ from those of the prior art in that not only the maximum values of given variables are displayed but also their minimum and average values are calculated and displayed.

These additional features represent a quite usual measure and can not be considered as such to justify an inventive step.

For the above reasons, the Respondent's auxiliary request is also not allowable.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility