Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 1195/01 16-12-2005
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 1195/01 16-12-2005

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2005:T119501.20051216
Date of decision
16 December 2005
Case number
T 1195/01
Petition for review of
-
Application number
91910238.4
IPC class
A61N 1/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 82.05 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Apparatus for magnetic field therapy

Applicant name
BIO-MAGNETIC THERAPY SYSTEMS, INC.
Opponent name

Muntermann, Axel

VST Variable Signal Therapiegeräte GmbH

Board
3.4.01
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973
European Patent Convention Art 123(3) 1973
Keywords
-
Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0001/93
G 0001/03
T 0108/91
T 1018/02
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal was lodged by the patentee (appellant) against the decision of the opposition division, dispatched on 24 August 2001, revoking the European patent No. 0 528 964. The notice of appeal was received on 24 October 2001 and the appeal fee was paid on the same day. The statement setting out the grounds of appeal was received on 3 January 2002.

II. Opposition had been filed against the patent as a whole, inter alia based on Article 100(c) EPC.

III. Oral proceedings were held on 16 December 2005.

Reference is made to the following documents:

E11: US-A-3 915 151

E21: Expert opinion of Prof. Dr. Ing. B. Posch, dated 26 September 2000

E23: Webster's Third New International Dictionary, 1986, 3 pages

E24: The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 1993, 3 pages

E25: Webster's New Universal Unabridged Dictionary, second edition, 1983, pages 74, 1926 and 1927

E28: The New IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical & Electronic terms, 5th Edition, The Institute of Electric & Electronic Engineers Inc., New York, 1993, page 1384

E29: Webster's New World Dictionary, 1994, page 1411, "toroid"

E30: Expert opinion of Prof. Dr. Ing. A. W. Koch dated 15 June 2002, filed with the appellant's letter of 21 September 2005

E31: R. Schulze, "Escaping the inescapable - G 1/03 leads out of The Trap", EPI Information, 3/2005, pages 83, 84

IV. The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and

- that the case be remitted to the first instance for further prosecution due to a procedural violation, or alternatively

- that the patent be maintained as granted (main request), or

- that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of:

- claim 1 according to one of the following auxiliary requests:

- auxiliary requests 1 to 4 filed on 3 January 2002;

- auxiliary request 5 filed on 16 November 2005 as auxiliary request 1 and renumbered in the oral proceedings;

- auxiliary requests 6 to 10 filed on 3 January 2002 as auxiliary requests 5 to 9, respectively, and renumbered in the oral proceedings;

- auxiliary requests 11 to 21 filed on 21 September 2005 as auxiliary requests 10 to 20, respectively, and renumbered in the oral proceedings;

- auxiliary request 22 filed on 16 November 2005 as auxiliary request 20 and renumbered in the oral proceedings;

- with claims 2 to 7, description and drawings as granted.

Furthermore, it was requested that Prof. A. Koch be allowed to make oral submissions during the oral proceedings.

V. The respondents requested that the appeal be dismissed.

Furthermore, it was requested that the expert opinion (document E30) submitted by the appellant, drafted by Prof. A. Koch, the brother of the appellant's representative, not be admitted in the proceedings since it was filed too late, and that Prof. A. Koch not be allowed to make any oral submissions during the oral proceedings. Moreover, it was requested that the number of auxiliary requests be reduced to a reasonable amount.

VI. Claim 1 of the patent as granted reads as follows:

"1. An apparatus for treating a body organ, the apparatus comprising means for subjecting the body organ to an electromagnetic field, characterized by said means including a toroidal coil (t) which is arranged and dimensioned to receive the body organ in the coil opening and means for driving the coil by a pulsed DC-voltage having a rectangular wave form consisting of an abruptly rising and abruptly deteriorating voltage pulsing at the rate of 1-30 pulses per second, the coil and the driving means being arranged to generate an electromagnetic field in the opening of under 20 Gauss".

1. The appeal complies with the requirements of Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 64 EPC and is therefore admissible.

2. Alleged procedural violation

The decision under appeal (cf. page 4) states that "the opposition division ascertains in line with the argumentation brought forward by Opponents II and III and supported by standard dictionary as well as E21 that a toroidal coil in its electrotechnical meaning is a doughnut-shaped coil (cf. Websters New World Dictionary 1994)".

The appellant argued (cf. grounds for appeal, page 3 and 11) that a procedural violation took place in the opposition procedure on the following:

(a) the document "Webster's New World Dictionary 1994" (document E29) was not annexed to the decision so that the grounds on which the decision was based were not fully reasoned,

(b) the document was not pre-published, and

(c) the document had not been previously mentioned in the proceedings.

Regarding the appellant's argument (a), the board finds that annexing of the above document to the decision is unrelated to the issue of the decision being sufficiently reasoned. In particular, Rule 68 EPC does not contain any such requirement. As such, the decision is sufficiently reasoned so that the board sees no procedural violation in this respect.

Regarding argument (b), in the present case the fact that the dictionary referred to was post-published is not considered inappropriate, as it was cited to establish the meaning of the expression "toroidal coil" which as such did not undergo a change in recent times. Furthermore, at any rate the use of a post-published dictionary would not constitute a procedural violation but at the most an error of judgement.

Finally, regarding argument (c), it appears that the above document (E29) was indeed never mentioned before in the procedure. The only "standard dictionary" cited in the procedure was document E28. According to this document, a "toroidal coil" is "a coil wound in the form of a toroidal helix". However, in the oral proceedings (cf. minutes, page 1, point 3) the chairman of the opposition division stated that "the term "toroidal" coil has a well recognised and unequivocal meaning in the field of electrical engineering, namely a cylindrical coil wound to the shape of a doughnut". Accordingly the appellant was given the opportunity to provide its comments on the particular meaning of the term "toroidal coil" used against him for the purpose of Article 123(2) EPC in the contested decision. Therefore, the appellant's right to be heard (Article 113(1) EPC) in this respect is not considered to be violated.

Accordingly, although admittedly the reference to document E29 in the decision under appeal represents a shortcoming of the decision, the board sees no procedural violation in the present case which could justify a remittal to the first instance. The appellant's request for remittal is, thus, rejected.

3. Procedural issues in the appeal proceedings

In view of the fact that the technical issues addressed in the expert opinion of Prof. A. Koch (document E30) are not considered to be excessively complex, the board has decided to admit document E30 into the proceedings. Furthermore, since the Prof. A. Koch, acting as a party expert on behalf of the appellant, was duly announced in advance of the oral proceedings, he was allowed to make submissions on the relevant technical issues during the oral proceedings under the responsibility and control of the appellant's professional representative.

As far as the number of auxiliary requests filed by the appellant, objected to by the respondents, is concerned, the board has decided to admit all requests in spite of their number, considering that the amendments can easily be understood and represent an attempt to meet the objections raised against claim 1 of the patent as granted, in particular to escape from the trap of Articles 123(2), (3) EPC.

4. Main request

4.1 The wording of claim 1 of the main request is in substance based on the wording of the process claims 1, 3 and 5 as originally filed, with the replacement of the "annular coil" by a "toroidal coil" and with the addition that the coil is arranged and dimensioned to receive the body organ in the coil opening.

However, the expression "toroidal coil" as such does not appear in the originally filed application documents.

Thus, the question arises whether the replacement referred to above complies with Article 123(2) EPC.

4.2 The generally acknowledged technical meaning of a "toroidal coil" for a skilled person working in the field of devices for generating electromagnetic fields at issue, is "a coil wound in the form of a toroidal helix" (see document E28). According to document E23, the term "toroid coil" is also used to designate the above coil type.

Furthermore, according to documents E23, E24 and E25 a toroid is a surface generated by the rotation of a plane closed curve about an axis lying in its plane and not intersecting it, or the thereby enclosed body.

A toroidal coil provides a magnetic field within the core of the coil with little stray magnetic fields outside the coil. Accordingly, as far as the coil opening referred to in claim 1 for receiving the body organ is concerned, it may be understood to relate to the cavity in the core of the toroidal coil or to some gap between the beginning and the end of the coil.

In fact, as submitted by the respondents, in the technical field at issue of magnetic field therapy, apparatuses are known with a toroidal coil for generating the magnetic field, with an opening in the coil to receive the body organ to be treated so that it is exposed to the dense magnetic flux in the core of the coil.

Accordingly, the term "toroidal coil" in claim 1 as granted has a clear technical meaning for a skilled reader within the context of subject-matter of the claim, namely a coil wound in the form of a toroidal helix.

4.3 For the purposes of the decision the technical content of the description is considered in the following.

The originally filed description, in its introductory part relating to the prior art, refers to document E11 held to disclose "the idea of imparting a low frequency AC source to a wound toroid into which an ailing limb is inserted". Document E11 in fact discloses an arrangement with a substantially cylindrical coil (solenoid coil) and a coil arrangement with a number of flattened cylinder coils producing an axial magnetic field in the respective part of the body (see figures 1 and 2 and corresponding description). A toroidal coil, i.e. a coil wound in the form of a toroidal helix, is not provided.

The subsequent summary of the invention in the originally filed description underlines the importance of the wave form used for driving the electromagnetic field without further specifying the coil arrangement.

In the brief description of the drawings, then, figure 1 is said to be "a simplified perspective view of a wound toroid energized to develop an electromagnetic field as indicated by flux lines, shown treating a diseased hand". Figure 2 is said to be "a front end view with front of cover removed and showing the coil segments inside the toroid" and figure 3 "a graph showing the voltage flow vs. time as imparted to the toroid air coil to induce the magnetic field under the invention". Moreover, figure 6 is said to be "an enlarged perspective view of the carriage for supporting the toroid".

Next a "description of the preferred embodiment" is given. As stated, "referring to the drawings, the invention involves the creation of an electromagnetic field F. This field is created by energizing a winding in a toroid T such that the field forms a three-dimensional donut in and about the toroid. The toroid T within its case contains a number of coil segments CS spaced by air gaps G as shown in Fig. 2." (see page 4, lines 24 to page 5, line 1). Furthermore, "after much study, it has been found that it is important that voltage be supplied to the toroid winding in a pattern demonstrated in Fig. 3" (see page 5, lines 5 to 7). Also, "inside the toroid housing, as stated, are a series of circularly arranged arcuate segments, of wound coil CS" (see page 6, lines 2 to 4).

Furthermore, an apparatus for torso treatment is disclosed (cf. figures 4 and 5) including a toroid T, "similar to that disclosed in Figs. 1 and 2" (see page 7, lines 15 to 18).

It is clear from the drafting of the application documents as originally filed that the description and the drawings relate to one and the same toroid. Furthermore, it is also clear that this toroid is not a toroidal coil, i.e. a coil wound in the form of a toroidal helix, but rather a toroid shaped housing containing a number of coil segments producing some axial field within its central bore. Although it is not apparent how such coil segments could in fact produce the field lines depicted in figure 1, there is nothing to imply that a different coil arrangement would be used in figure 1, or any other figure. Rather, since the same, erroneous, field lines are shown in the prior art arrangement with a number of flattened cylinder coils of document E11 referred to in the introductory part of the description of the application in suit, presumably figure 1 just contains a drawing error taken over from the prior art document E11.

Furthermore, it is clear that where the originally filed application documents, in the brief description of figure 3, mentions "the toroid air coil", nothing but the toroid referred to earlier in the description is meant, there being nothing to suggest that any other coil arrangement, let alone one with a coil wound in the form of a toroidal helix, would be envisaged.

4.4 Finally, according to claim 1 as originally filed the electromagnetic field is generated by an "annular coil". This, however, cannot provide a basis for the provision of a "toroidal coil" as per granted claim 1 either. In this respect it is immaterial whether "annular" and "toroidal" could be considered synonymous, as held by the appellant, as it is clear that the technical terms "annular coil" and "toroidal coil" have different meanings.

4.5 In view of the above, the application documents as originally filed do not disclose a toroidal coil.

4.6 The appellant argued that the expression toroidal coil in claim 1 as granted should not be attributed the narrow technical meaning of a coil wound in the form of a toroidal helix, since it was evident to the skilled reader both from the wording of the claim itself and from the description and drawings that such a coil could not have been meant since it would not produce an electromagnetic field of a therapeutically useful magnitude in the opening. Accordingly, the term "toroidal coil" should be construed in the light of the description and drawings to mean a "toroid housing with windings". As a matter of fact, figures 1 and 2 did not necessarily relate to one and the same embodiment and at any rate suitable arrangements, such as ones consisting of double Helmholtz coils (see document E30), or of a number of pluggable segments forming together a solenoid type coil, or some other arrangement producing the required axial field would readily occur to the skilled person.

However, as correctly submitted by the respondents, it would not be evident for the skilled person, based on the originally filed application documents, how to reconcile the incomplete and contradictory information in order to obtain a suitable magnetic field, let alone to come up with the double Helmholtz coils (at any rate not producing a field as depicted in figure 1) or the pluggable solenoid segments, for which the originally filed application documents provide no information at all and which cannot be considered a triviality for an average practitioner.

Furthermore, as stated in decision T 1018/02 (point 3.8 of the reasons), the description cannot be used to give a different meaning to a claim feature which in itself imparts a clear technical teaching to the skilled reader. Where an amendment leads to such a claim feature, the description or drawings cannot be used to rule out the imparted teaching if it is inconsistent with the original disclosure. Such an amendment introduces subject-matter which extends beyond the content of the application as filed and is, therefore, inadmissible (Articles 100(c), 123(2) EPC). This is all the more true where the description and drawings do not provide an unambiguous and clear teaching, as in the present case.

As submitted by the respondents, where a claim as such makes technical sense to the skilled reader, third parties should be able, for the sake of legal certainty, to rely on what the granted claim states.

4.7 Accordingly, claim 1 as granted contains subject-matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed (Articles 100(c) and 123(2) EPC).

5. First auxiliary request

In claim 1 of the first auxiliary request, having regard to claim 1 as granted, the term "toroidal coil" has been replaced by "annular coil".

A basis for this amendment is to be found in originally filed claim 1, so that the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC is met.

The appellant submitted that the amendment of a granted claim to replace an inaccurate technical statement, which is evidently inconsistent with the totality of the disclosure of the patent, by an accurate statement of the technical features involved did not infringe Article 123(3) (see T 108/91 (OJ 1994, 228), headnote).

In the present case, however, the description and drawings do not provide a clear and consistent teaching as to which specific type of coil is to be used (see point 4.6, supra). Accordingly, it is in fact not evident that the expression "annular coil" offered as replacement is the accurate expression in the present case.

As claim 1 as amended according to the first auxiliary request no longer requires the provision of a toroidal coil, the amendment extends the protection conferred, contrary to Article 123(3) EPC.

The present case indeed corresponds to the situation of an inescapable trap addressed in decision G 1/93 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (OJ 1994, 541, point 13). Granted claim 1 or any amended claim containing the toroidal coil as a feature is inadmissible under Article 123(2) EPC. Any amendment deleting the toroidal coil, on the other hand, extends the protection conferred, contrary to Article 123(3) EPC.

6. Second auxiliary request

Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request, having regard to claim 1 as granted, has been amended to include "a toroidal coil (t) which includes a winding in a toroid (t) such that the field forms a three-dimensional donut in and about the toroid".

It is, however, unclear how a toroidal coil including a winding in a toroid could produce a field forming a three-dimensional donut in and about the toroid. As discussed above (see point 4.2), in a toroidal coil the magnetic field is confined to the core of the toroidal windings. Claim 1 according to the second auxiliary request, thus, lacks clarity, contrary to the requirement of Article 84 EPC. Furthermore, such subject-matter has not been originally disclosed, so that the amendment infringes Article 123(2) EPC as well.

7. Third and fourth auxiliary request

Claim 1 of the third auxiliary request, with respect to claim 1 as granted, has been amended to include "an annular coil (t) which includes a winding in a toroid (t) such that the field forms a three-dimensional donut in and about the toroid".

Claim 1 of the fourth auxiliary request, with respect to claim 1 as granted, has been amended to include "a winding in a toroid (t) such that the field forms a three-dimensional donut in and about the toroid".

Both claims as amended no longer require the provision of a toroidal coil. Thus, the amendments extend the protection conferred, contrary to Article 123(3) EPC.

8. Fifth auxiliary request

Claim 1 according to the fifth auxiliary request has been drafted in substance in accordance with the "double negation disclaimer" concept presented in document E31. As submitted by the appellant, the general idea behind the claim drafting is to remove the undisclosed and limiting technical feature from the granted claim to comply with Article 123(2) EPC and to add a disclaimer disclaiming any extension of the granted scope to comply with Article 123(2) EPC. Such a disclaimer is held to be necessary for purely legal reasons, to have no effect on the technical information of the application and thus to be another example of an allowable disclaimer in the light of decision G 1/03 (OJ 2004, 413) of the Enlarged Board of Appeal.

In claim 1 of the fifth auxiliary request, having regard to claim 1 as granted, the term "toroidal coil" has been replaced by "annular coil" and the feature "except apparatus without a toroidal coil (t) which is arranged and dimensioned to receive the body organ in the coil opening" has been added.

However, the double negation adds up to nothing more than an unduly complicated affirmation requiring the apparatus to have a toroidal coil, so that the claim does not meet the requirements of clarity and conciseness of Article 84 EPC.

Furthermore, by virtue of the double negation, the disclaimer construction actually adds a feature to the claim. Accordingly, there is no basis for the appellant's contention that the disclaimer has no effect on the technical information of the application. As a matter of fact, it adds that the apparatus has a toroidal coil and thus technical information which was not present in the application as originally filed.

Accordingly, also claim 1 according to the fifth auxiliary request contains subject-matter extending beyond the content of the application as originally filed and, thus, infringes Article 123(2) EPC.

9. Sixth auxiliary request

Claim 1 of the sixth auxiliary request corresponds to claim 1 as granted with the additional feature "wherein the toroidal coil (t) comprises a toroid (t) containing in its case a number of spaced coil segments (CS) and means to energise the coil segments".

A toroidal coil, and all the more one comprising a toroid containing coil segments, has not been originally disclosed in the application (see point 4.5, above). Accordingly, also claim 1 according to the sixth auxiliary request contains subject-matter extending beyond the content of the application as originally filed and, thus, infringes Article 123(2) EPC.

10. Seventh auxiliary request

Claim 1 of the seventh auxiliary request corresponds to claim 1 according to the first auxiliary request discussed above with the additional feature "wherein the annular coil (t) comprises a toroid (t) containing in its case a number of spaced coil segments (CS) and means to energise the coil segments".

As this claim no longer requires the provision of a toroidal coil, the amendment extends the protection conferred, contrary to Article 123(3) EPC (see point 5, above).

11. Eight to tenth auxiliary request

Claim 1 of the eight to tenth auxiliary request corresponds respectively to claim 1 of the second to fourth auxiliary request discussed above, with the addition of the feature "wherein the toroid (t) contains in its case a number of spaced coil segments (CS) and means to energise the coil segments (CS)".

In substance the same objections under Articles 84, 123(2) and 123(3) EPC, held against the second to fourth auxiliary request, respectively, apply to these requests.

12. Eleventh to eighteenth auxiliary request

Claim 1 of the eleventh to eighteenth auxiliary request corresponds in substance to claim 1 of the third, fourth, second and fifth to ninth auxiliary request, respectively, with the replacement of the expression "toroid (t)" by "toroid (t) housing [sic]" and of the expression "winding" by "toroid winding".

In substance the same objections under Articles 84, 123(2) and 123(3) EPC, held against the second to ninth auxiliary request discussed above, apply to these requests.

13. Nineteenth auxiliary request

Claim 1 of the nineteenth auxiliary request, having regard to claim 1 as granted, has been amended to include "a toroidal coil (t) having a toroid housing" and "the toroid housing comprising a winding therein such that the field forms a 3D donut in and around the toroid housing".

Similar to what is held for the second auxiliary request (see point 6, above), it is unclear how a toroidal coil having a toroid housing comprising a winding could produce a field forming a three-dimensional donut in and around the toroid housing. As discussed above, in a toroidal coil the magnetic field is confined to the core of the toroidal windings. Consequently, claim 1 according to the nineteenth auxiliary request lacks clarity, contrary to the requirement of Article 84 EPC. Furthermore, such subject-matter has not been originally disclosed, so that the amendment infringes Article 123(2) EPC.

14. Twentieth auxiliary request

Claim 1 of the twentieth auxiliary request, having regard to claim 1 as granted, has been amended to include "a toroidal coil (t) having a toroid housing" and "the toroid housing comprising therein a number of coil segments spaced by air gaps and forming a winding therein such that the field forms a 3D donut in and around the toroid housing".

As in substance held against the sixth auxiliary request (see point 9, above), a toroidal coil with a housing comprising a number of coil segments has not been originally disclosed (Article 123(2) EPC). Furthermore, in substance the same objections as for the nineteenth auxiliary request under Articles 84 and 123(2) EPC apply.

15. Twenty-first auxiliary request

In claim 1 of the twenty-first auxiliary request (which corresponds to claim 1 of divisional patent EP-B-0 857 494), having regard to claim 1 as granted, the characterising part has been amended to "b) said means including a winding in a toroid (t) and a driving means for driving said winding in a toroid (t) such that the field (f) forms a three-dimensional donut in and about the toroid (t) and is under 20 Gauss in the area of said body organ" and "c) wherein said driving means is adapted for driving the winding in the toroid (t) with a pure DC voltage wave form of a virtually rectangular shape with abruptly rising (c) and falling (d) sides of the waveform comprising sides of a rectangle pulsing at a rate of 1-30 pulses per second".

Since this claim no longer requires the provision of a toroidal coil, the amendment extends the protection conferred, contrary to Article 123(3) EPC (see point 5, above).

16. Twenty-second auxiliary request

Finally, claim 1 of the twenty-second auxiliary request corresponds to claim 1 of the twenty-first auxiliary request with the addition of a "double negation disclaimer" as for the fifth auxiliary request "except apparatus without a toroidal coil (t) which is arranged and dimensioned to receive the body organ in the coil opening".

As in substance held with respect to the fifth auxiliary request (see point 8, above), the claim lacks clarity (Article 84 EPC) and, since it includes a toroidal coil, contains subject-matter extending beyond the content of the application as originally filed (Article 123(2) EPC) (see point 4.5, above).

17. Accordingly, for the reasons given above, none of the appellant's requests can be allowed.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility