Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • Core activities
          • Stories and insights
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2024
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Executive summary
          • Driver 1 – People
          • Driver 2 – Technologies
          • Driver 3 – High-quality, timely products and services
          • Driver 4 – Partnerships
          • Driver 5 – Financial Sustainability
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0070/02 15-03-2002
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0070/02 15-03-2002

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T007002.20020315
Date of decision
15 March 2002
Case number
T 0070/02
Petition for review of
-
Application number
94917284.5
IPC class
A45D 34/04
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 34.09 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Improved product disperser with enlarged non-dispensing application/distribution surface

Applicant name
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Opponent name
-
Board
3.2.04
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 54 1973
European Patent Convention Art 69 1973
European Patent Convention Art 84 1973
European Patent Convention Art 113(1) 1973
European Patent Convention R 51(3) 1973
European Patent Convention R 68(2) 1973
Keywords

Novelty (yes)

Violations of the right to be heard-substantial procedural violation (yes)

Remittal to first instance (yes)

Reimbursement of appeal fee (yes)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0396/99
Citing decisions
T 0674/07
T 1098/07
T 1740/08
T 2120/10
T 1843/11
T 0526/12
T 0655/13
T 1291/13
T 0786/15
T 1653/16
T 0462/18
T 1638/18
T 1640/18
T 2329/18
T 2542/19
T 2915/19
T 0056/21
T 1506/23
T 0868/24

I. The appellant (applicant) lodged an appeal on 9 April 2001, against the decision of the Examining Division, dispatched on 13 February 2001, refusing the European patent application No. 94 917 284.5. The fee for the appeal was paid on 5 April 2001 and the statement setting out the grounds of appeal was received on 12. June 2001.

II. The Examining Division held that the application did not meet the requirements of Article 52(1) EPC in conjunction with Article 54(1) EPC in view of document

D1: GB-A-496 670

III. The application comprises the following documents:

Claims:

No. 1 to 5 filed with letter of 30 September 1999,

No. 6 to 10 filed with letter of 20 February 1998.

Description:

pages 1, 3 to 8 as published (WO-A-95/24141),

pages 2, 9, 10 filed with letter of 20 February 1998,

page 2a filed with letter of 30 September 1999.

Drawings:

Figures 1 to 4 as published (WO-A-95/24141).

IV. The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside, that novelty of claim 1 with regard to the disclosure of D1 be acknowledged, that the case be remitted to the first instance for further prosecution and the appeal fee be reimbursed.

V. Claim 1 reads as follows:

"An applicator adapted to contain and dispense a product, said applicator including a container comprising a body portion (30) adapted to receive said product and having an upper portion which defines a dispensing opening, said applicator further including, in combination:

(a) an applicator member adapted to fixedly engage said upper portion of said container, said applicator member including an aperture (51) disposed over said dispensing opening, said applicator member further including an applicator socket (55) in communication with said aperture and said dispensing opening, said applicator member further including a non-dispensing applicator surface (52) adapted to permit distribution of said product onto a receiving surface, said applicator surface surrounding and extending generally radially outwardly from said aperture (51); and

(b) an applicator element (40) rotatably disposed within said applicator socket and having at any one time a surface facing inwardly of the container and a surface facing outwardly of the container, said applicator element dispensing said product when said applicator element is rotated within said applicator socket (55) by contact with said receiving surface; characterized in that

(c) the applicator member is an applicator dome (50) which partially covers the applicator element (40) such that only a portion of said outwardly facing surface of said applicator element is exposed through said aperture (51)".

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. Interpretation of the independent claim 1:

2.1. The objects of the application are discussed on page 2, lines 2 to 22 (WO-A-95/24141). A drawback of the known applicators is seen in that: "current commercially available packages also tend to have a comparatively large percentage of the rotating element's surface area exposed outside of the package, often on the order of 40 to 45%. The actual contact area of the element in conjunction with most surfaces is much less, on the order of 20 to 25%. Thus, while a comparatively large element is utilized to reduce the curvature of the contact surface, the remaining exposed surface is carrying forth a film of the product which cannot be applied to a corresponding surface ..." (column 2, lines 2 to 8).

2.2. Thus, it is an object of the application to provide a roll-on type product dispenser which, while comprising a large applicator element as usual, provides for a more even, less messy application of the product and which exhibits a reduced tendency to attract and capture loose threadlike elements (column 2, lines 18 to 22).

2.3. These objects are achieved by providing two cooperating features:

(a) an enlarged application/distribution surface in the form of a dome with an aperture for the applicator element, and

(b) by exposing through said aperture only a portion of said outwardly facing surface of the applicator element.

2.4. These features result in:

feature (b) although using a large applicator element as usual (in order to reduce the curvature of the contact surface of the element), the surface area of the applicator element exposed through the aperture is kept small with respect to the total surface of the applicator in contact with the receiving surface and therefore less product is carried out of the container, and

feature (a) excess product not applied to the receiving surface is distributed by the surface of the dome, which functions as a secondary applicator for undistributed product and distributor for evening out the total product distribution.

See application page 2, line 24 to page 3, line 5.

2.5. When considering a claim, a skilled person should rule out interpretations which are illogical or which do not make technical sense. He should try to arrive at an interpretation of the claim which is technically sensible and takes into account the whole disclosure of the patent (Article 69 EPC). The patent must be construed by a mind willing to understand, not a mind desirous of misunderstanding (T 396/99, ultimate paragraph of section 3.5).

2.6. Interpretations of the wording of a broad claim should at least be such that the aims of the patent are met, i.e. that the problem to be solved is in fact solved. Interpretations of the wording of a claim which do not contribute anything to the solution, although according to the patent this wording should clearly do so, cannot reasonably be accepted by the Board.

2.7. In the present case, it is clear from the teaching of the application in suit that, contrary to the Examining Division's opinion expressed in the communication dated 4. August 1998, the feature "the applicator is an applicator dome (50)" has a specific technical meaning and therefore makes technical sense and excludes the interpretation of the Examining Division according to which "there is no contradiction with the additional feature of a depression in the centre", since said "depression" would form a reservoir for the excess product and as a consequence the dome would no longer function as a secondary applicator and distributor for evening out the total product distribution, and the tendency to capture loose, threadlike elements would be increased.

Therefore in the context of the application a "dome" can only be defined as a rounded convex shape in exclusion of any additional feature of shape which would contradict the said definition (see also section 2.4 above).

2.8. The feature "dome (50) which partially covers the applicator element (40) such that only a portion of said outwardly facing surface of said applicator element is exposed through said aperture (51)" seems to express what appears to be generally the case, i e the applicator element is retained in the applicator member by being larger in size than the aperture.

However, neither the term "portion" nor the expression "outwardly facing surface" are clear in this context and should therefore be clarified (see section 5, below).

2.9. Finally the feature "said applicator element dispensing said product when said applicator element is rotated within said applicator socket" should be interpreted as meaning that it is sufficient to rotate the applicator element within said applicator socket in order to achieve dispensing of said product.

3. Novelty with respect to D1:

3.1. D1 (page 3, lines 47 to 118; Figures 1 to 3) discloses an applicator adapted to contain and dispense a product, said applicator including a container comprising a body portion (1) adapted to receive said product and having an upper portion which defines a dispensing opening, said applicator further including, in combination:

an applicator member (cap 2) adapted to fixedly engage said upper portion of said container, said applicator member including an aperture (3) disposed over said dispensing opening, said applicator member further including an applicator socket (5) in communication with said aperture and said dispensing opening, said applicator member further including a non-dispensing applicator surface (top of cap 2) adapted to permit distribution of said product onto a receiving surface, said applicator surface surrounding and extending generally radially outwardly from said aperture (3) (Figure 2); and

an applicator element (9) rotatably disposed within said applicator socket (5) and having at any one time a surface facing inwardly of the container and a surface facing outwardly of the container, said applicator element (9) dispensing said product when said applicator element is depressed within said applicator socket (55) by contact with said receiving surface.

3.2. As can be seen in Figures 1 and 3, the cap (applicator member) of the applicator of D2 is convexly curved and comprises a central depression or countersink (page 3, lines 55 to 61). Therefore, said cap (applicator member) is not forming a dome for the purposes of the application (see section 2.7 above).

3.3. Furthermore, it is said in D1 page 3, lines 9 to 11, 22, 23, 90 to 92 that the distributing roller closes, respectively is pressed against its seating in the delivery aperture (3), and that there is an effective seating all round the roller and on page 3, lines 81 to 84 it is said that "under the influence of the spring 12, the roller thus seats itself in the aperture with a portion of its contour projecting from such aperture".

Although it can therefore be assumed that not all the outwardly facing surface of the applicator element is exposed through the aperture, due to the unclarity introduced by the expression "such that only a portion of said outwardly facing surface of said applicator element is exposed through said aperture (51)" it is not possible to conclude whether said feature is known from D1 or not.

3.4. However, the fact that the roller is pressed against it's seating "thus providing a complete closure" (page 3, lines 91, 92) implies that it is not sufficient to rotate the roller in order to achieve dispensing of the product but that it is necessary to depress it to form a gap between the roller and the opening. Therefore, it cannot be said that the applicator element is dispensing said product when said applicator element is rotated within said applicator socket in the meaning of the application.

3.5. Thus, claim 1 is novel with respect to D1.

4. Request for reimbursement of the appeal fee

4.1. Violation of Rule 51(3) EPC

4.1.1. In it's first communication dated 21 August 1997, the Examining Division pointed to the deficiencies mentioned in the International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER), but did not address any technical issue. The report is general in wording, only referring to documents as a whole.

4.1.2. In response thereto the applicant discussed novelty with respect to D1 to D4 and filed new claims. In addition to redrafting claim 1 in the two-part form, the feature "at least a portion of said applicator element is exposed through said aperture" was modified to read "only a portion of said applicator element is exposed through said aperture". With respect to D1 the applicant argued that in D1 "the entire outside surface of the cylindrical applicator element 9 is exposed".

4.1.3. In it's second communication dated 04 August 1998, the Examining Division objected that "no convincing arguments have been found in your letter ... concerning the inventive step of the independent claim 1 in comparison with D3". The Board observes, that an objection concerning inventive step with respect to D3 had never been raised so far, so that the applicant could not fairly have been required to have dealt with said objection in his reply to the first communication.

4.1.4. In response to the second communication the applicant discussed inventive step with respect to D3 and filed new claims. In order to distinguish the subject-matter of claim 1 from D3 the feature "an applicator member adapted to engage said upper portion of said container" was modified to read "an applicator member adapted to fixedly engage said upper portion of said container".

Since novelty was not objected in the Examining Division's communication, the board finds that the applicant was entitled to assume that novelty was acknowledged.

4.1.5. In it's third communication dated 23 March 1999, the Examining Division objected that "no convincing arguments have been found in your letter ... concerning the inventive step of the independent claim 1 in comparison with D1".

However, again the board must observe that an objection concerning inventive step with respect to D1 had never been raised so far, so that once again one could not fairly have expected a response to deal with an objection that never had been raised. In this communication the Examining Division further stated that the features of the characterizing part of claim 1 were known from D1. Although, no further document was cited, D1 was never clearly said to disclose the features of the precharacterizing part of claim 1 (neither by the Examining Division nor by the applicant) and thus, it was not obvious for the applicant to conclude that the objection should in fact be considered as being a novelty objection.

4.1.6. In response to the third communication the applicant discussed inventive step with respect to D1 and filed new claims with letter of 30 September 1999. In order to clarify the above said feature and to distinguish the subject-matter of claim 1 from D1, the features "applicator element ... having at any one time a surface facing inwardly of the container and a surface facing outwardly of the container" and "such that only a portion of said outwardly facing surface of said applicator element is exposed through said aperture (51)" were added to claim 1. The applicant argued that in D1 the applicator element was fully exposed by the aperture whereas in the application the applicator element was partly covered by the applicator member.

4.1.7. In a fourth communication dated 02 February 2000, in preparation of intended oral proceedings, the Examining Division stated that during oral proceedings inventive step with respect to D1 to D6 would be discussed without addressing any technical details or features, and stated furthermore that "all arguments and objections in the previous communications are still valid". Said communication acknowledged also that "no new objection arises from the last modification of claim 1", i.e. assumably the claim filed on 30. September 1999.

4.1.8. With letter of 10 February 2000 the applicant withdrew the request for oral proceedings and requested a decision on patentability of the application with the claims on file.

4.1.9. No further communication was sent to the applicant until the decision under appeal was issued. The intended oral proceedings did not take place.

4.1.10. The board is forced to drew the conclusion that none of the communications of the Examining Division was in line with the requirements of Rule 51(3) EPC, since no concrete reasons were given, discussing the technical content of the application vis-a-vis the documents on file. The opinion expressed were therefore mere assertions with no support from these documents.

4.2. Violation of Article 113(1) EPC

4.2.1. The Examining Division based its decision to refuse the application on a lack of novelty of claim 1 as last received, i.e. in the appellant's submission in response to the third communication, see point 4.1.6 above, without having applied Article 113(1) EPC which states that "the decisions of the European Patent Office may only be based on grounds or evidence on which the parties concerned have had an opportunity to present their comments".

4.2.2. Apart from the very general reference to the deficiencies mentioned in the IPER, no specific objection based on lack of novelty was raised during the examination against any of the versions of claim 1 filed by the appellant.

4.2.3. Even the third communication of the Examining Division dated 23 March 1999 cannot be interpreted as a novelty objection (although referring to inventive step; see section 4.1.5 above), since it did not make clear which document disclosed the precharacterizing part of claim 1.

Thus the Examining Division based it's decision on an objection raised against the subject-matter of claim 1 on which the applicant had no opportunity to present his comments.

4.2.4. In it's decision the Examining Division states that "this refusal does not contravene Article 113(1)... because Article 54 objection was already raised (in the international examination phase) and this objection was deeply discussed by the applicant in his letter of 30.09.99" (see section 4.1.6, above). However, the claim 1 considered in the decision is not the claim 1 on file during the international examination phase. Indeed, claim 1 was modified three times during the European examination proceedings so that it could not seriously be expected from the applicant to consider that the novelty objection raised during international examination phase would still apply to a subsequent claim 1 yet on file, without precisely stating it, all the more because the Examining Division only raised the question of inventive step in all subsequent communications, so that one would normally assume on a fair reading of these that novelty was no longer objected to.

Furthermore, the letter of the applicant dated 30. September 1999, referred to in the decision, discusses inventive step and not novelty. It is clear from the overall content of the letter which explicitly refers to inventive step and to the "could/would" approach, that the reference made to Article 54 in one single paragraph is a clerical error.

4.2.5. Thus, by basing it's decision on a lack of novelty the Examining Division introduced a new objection against the subject-matter of claim 1 as filed on 30 September 1999 for the first time in the said decision and thus, gave the applicant no opportunity to present his comments. Therefore, the provisions of Article 113(1) EPC were not met.

Each of the deficiencies noted above, in sections 4.1 and 4.2 constitutes a substantial procedural violation justifiying reimbursement of the appeal fee according to Rule 67 EPC.

5. In view of the above, the Board remits the case to the Examining Division for further prosecution. The Examining Division however should take into consideration that before a meaningful discussion of novelty and inventive step can take place, clarity (Article 84 EPC) is normally an important point which should not be forgotten, particularly in a case as the present one. In the opinion of the Board the following expressions should normally be clarified:

- a surface facing inwardly of the container and a surface facing outwardly of the container (could it be that what is meant is the surfaces below respectively above the equatorial region of the applicator element?),

- the applicator member is an applicator dome (it seems that the applicator dome is not formed by the entire applicator member, but that the applicator dome is formed by said non-dispensing application surface (52) which extends downwardly from said aperture (51)),

- a portion of said outwardly facing surface (what is meant by a portion ?).

In this specific case the Board abstained from clarifying the said expressions, since novelty could easily be established due to the fact that the applicator member (the cap) disclosed in D1 is not forming a dome in the meaning of the application and that the applicator element disclosed in D1 is not dispensing said product when said applicator element is rotated within said applicator socket in the meaning of the application.

6. Additionally, the Board is of the opinion that in order to give the applicant a fair chance to challenge the findings of the Examination Division, the latter should have at least once identified where in the closest prior art document each of the features of the claim in suit are disclosed (this was never indicated in any communication, not even in the decision).

Furthermore, by simply stating "no convincing arguments have been found in your letter" in response to letters in which the objections put forward were exhaustively discussed by the applicant, the Examining Division adopted an unfair attitude, leaving the applicant without any indication as to why his arguments were not found to be convincing, so that again he was unable to react against the conclusions of the Examining Division.

7. Finally, in accordance with Rule 68(2) EPC decisions of the European Patent Office which are open to appeal shall be reasoned. In this respect the Board accepts that reasoning does not mean that all the arguments submitted should be dealt with in detail, but it is a general principle of good faith and fair proceedings that reasoned decisions contain, in addition to the logical chain of facts and reasons on which every decision is based, at least some motivation on crucial points of dispute in this line of argumentation in so far as this is not already apparent from other reasons given, in order to give the party concerned a fair idea of why his submissions were not considered convincing and to enable him to base his grounds of appeal on relevant issues.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. Claim 1 filed with letter of 30 September 1999 is novel with respect to D1.

3. The case is remitted to the first instance for further prosecution on the basis of the following documents:

Claims:

No. 1 to 5 filed with letter of 30. September 1999,

No. 6 to 10 filed with letter of 20. February 1998.

Description:

pages 1, 3 to 8 as published (WO-A-95/24141),

pages 2, 9, 10 filed with letter of 20. February 1998,

page 2a filed with letter of 30 September 1999.

Drawings:

Figures 1 to 4 as published (WO-A-95/24141).

4. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is allowed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility