Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t051476eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 1476/05 13-01-2009
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 1476/05 13-01-2009

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T147605.20090113
Date of decision
13 January 2009
Case number
T 1476/05
Petition for review of
-
Application number
98912354.2
IPC class
H02K 15/04
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 41.9 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Method and apparatus for forming a multi-lobed winding for the stator of an alternator

Applicant name
Atop S.p.A.
Opponent name
Statomat GmbH
Board
3.5.02
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
European Patent Convention Art 83 1973
European Patent Convention Art 60 1973
European Patent Convention Art 107 1973
European Patent Convention R 20(3) 1973
European Patent Convention R 90(1)(a) 1973
Keywords

Parties to appeal - entitlement to appeal - adversely affected (yes)

Examination of appeals - admissible (yes)

Disclosure - sufficiency - (yes) after amendment

Inventive step - (yes) after amendment

Catchword
see points 1 and 2 of the reasons
Cited decisions
G 0009/91
T 0675/93
T 0656/98
T 0015/01
Citing decisions
T 0854/12

I. European patent no. 0 970 558 was granted to Pavesi S.r.l. based on a PCT application that was published under the number WO 98/25444.

II. An opposition was filed by Statomat GmbH against the grant of the patent in the scope of claims 1 and 3 ("im Umfang der Patentansprüche 1 und 3"). Of the various documents and evidence cited during the opposition proceedings, that which according to the opponent remains pertinent to this decision is:

D2: EP 0604797 A2

III. The opposition division issued an interlocutory decision that, account being taken of the amendments made by the patent proprietor during the opposition proceedings, the European patent no. 0 970 558 and the invention to which it relates were found to meet the requirements of the EPC. The decision was taken on the basis of an amended set of claims 1 to 7 filed during oral proceedings before the opposition division.

IV. Two notices of appeal against the interlocutory decision were filed, one in the name of the opponent, Statomat GmbH, and the other "on behalf of the Patent Proprietor". The appeal on behalf of the proprietor was filed in a letter dated 5 December 2005 by the representative who had represented Pavesi S.r.l. in all first instance proceedings. The letter was referenced "Applicant: PAVESI S.r.l.".

V. In a letter dated 21 December 2005 from the same representative of the proprietor a request was made for an assignment of the patent from Pavesi S.r.l. to Atop S.p.A. to be recorded. Evidence was enclosed of an assignment from Pavesi S.r.l. to Axis S.p.A. and a further assignment "from Axis S.p.A. (now Axis S.r.l. in liquidation) to Atop S.p.A.".

VI. In a communication dated 20 January 2006 the transfer service of the EPO invited the proprietor to submit documents:

1. for the change from Axis S.p.A. to Axis S.r.l. and

2. authorising Mr. Lombardi to sign as liquidator on behalf of Axis S.r.l.

VII. In a response dated 6 February 2006, received 10 February 2006, the proprietor filed a copy of a certificate from the Chamber of Commerce of Florence and submitted that the document provided both the evidences requested by the above mentioned communication.

VIII. The opponent filed grounds for appeal in a letter dated 6 February 2006.

IX. The proprietor filed grounds for appeal in a letter dated 10 February 2006.

X. In a letter dated 21 February 2006 the opponent noted having become aware that Pavesi S.r.l. had not existed for some time and that, if this was the case, it should be examined whether an appeal and supporting grounds could be validly filed in the name of Pavesi S.r.l..

XI. In a communication dated 1 March 2006 the transfer service of the EPO advised the parties that the entries pertaining to the proprietor had been amended to Atop S.p.A., that the registration of the changes had taken effect on 10 February 2006 and that the change would be recorded in the Register of European Patents.

XII. An exchange of letters took place, in which the parties responded to each other's appeals and addressed the issues surrounding the changes in proprietorship of the patent.

XIII. The board summoned the parties to oral proceedings. In an annex to the summons the board made observations on the relevant issues. The board indicated inter alia that a question to be discussed at the oral proceedings was whether the patent in suit disclosed the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art in the whole range encompassed by claims 1 and 3 as granted. As a particular example, the question arose whether the patent disclosed the invention sufficiently for the case that the multi-lobed coils were formed as described in document D2, which case appeared to be covered by the claims of the patent.

XIV. Oral proceedings were held before the board on 13 January 2009.

During the oral proceedings the proprietor withdrew earlier requests for maintenance of the patent as granted and requested finally that the appeal of the opponent be rejected as inadmissible and that the decision under appeal be set aside and the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of claims 1 to 7 filed in the oral proceedings and, more precisely, in the following version:

Description:

- Page 2 received during oral proceedings of 13 January 2009

- Pages 3 to 7 of the patent specification

Claims:

- Nos. 1 to 7 received during oral proceedings of 13 January 2009

Drawings:

- Pages 12 to 19 of the patent specification.

The opponent requested that the appeal of the proprietor be rejected as inadmissible and that the decision under appeal be set aside and claims 1 and 3 be rejected.

XV. The independent claims 1 and 3 received during oral proceedings of 13 January 2009 read as follows (changes with respect to the claims as originally filed emphasised by the board):

"1. A method for forming a multi-lobed winding (C1, C2) for the stator of an alternator, the winding comprising turns defining a star-shaped configuration, and having a plurality of radial lobes (l) alternated with hollows (v), characterized in that:

in a first stage a first multi-lobed coil (C1) is formed, by winding a continuously fed wire (w) in a first direction, and

in a second stage a second multi-lobed coil (C2) axially superimposed on the first coil (C1) is formed, without cutting the wire being fed, by winding the wire in the opposite direction, arranging the second coil (C2) at a position angularly shifted relative to the first coil (C1), so that the second coil (C2) has its lobes at the same angular positions as the hollows of the first coil (C1), the wire portion (Wi) connecting the two coils (C1, C2) being bent where the wire reverses its winding direction, so as to form a loop (e) following an annular path matching the profile of one lobe of one of the two coils for one part and the profile of a hollow of the other coil opposite to the lobe for another part, and wherein each of said first and second multi-lobed coils (C1, C2) is formed by winding a wire (w) on radially movable forming elements (3) so as to form a polygonal coil (CP1, CP2), and, after the polygonal coils have been formed, the central portions of the sides of the polygonal coils (CP1, CP2) being pushed radially inwardly to confer the multi-lobed configuration to the coils."

"3. An apparatus for forming a multi-lobed winding (C1, C2) for the stator of an alternator, the winding comprising turns defining a star-shaped configuration and having a plurality of radial lobes (l) alternated with hollows (v), characterized in that the apparatus comprises:

means for forming a first multi-lobed coil (C1), by winding a continuously fed wire (w) in a first direction, means for forming a second multi-lobed coil (C2) axially superimposed on the first coil (C1), without cutting the wire being fed, by winding the wire (w) in the opposite direction, means for arranging the second coil (C2) at a position angularly shifted relative to the first coil (C1), so that the second coil (C2) has its lobes (l) at the same angular positions as the hollows (v) of the first coil (C1), and means for bending the wire portion (Wi) connecting the two coils (C1, C2) where the wire reverses its winding direction, so as to form a loop (e) following an annular path matching the profile of one lobe of one of the two coils for one part and the profile of a hollow of the other coil opposite to the lobe for another part, and wherein each of said first and second multi-lobed coils (C1, C2) is formed by winding a wire (w) on radially movable forming elements (3) so as to form a polygonal coil (CP1, CP2), and, after the polygonal coils have been formed, the central portions of the sides of the polygonal coils (CP1, CP2) being pushed radially inwardly to confer the multi-lobed configuration to the coils."

Claim 2 is dependent on claim 1 and claims 4 to 7 are dependent on claim 3.

XVI. The opponent's arguments relevant to the present decision may be summarised as follows:

The appeal filed on behalf of the patent proprietor was not admissible. Before that appeal was filed, the patent in suit was sold twice, namely by the receiver of bankruptcy "Pavesi S.r.l. in liquidation" to Axis S.p.A. and then by the liquidator of Axis S.r.l. to Atop S.p.A.. These transfers took the form of sales contracts, not universal succession in law. Pavesi S.r.l., that no longer existed, remained registered as proprietor. As a result of the sale of the patent, Pavesi S.r.l. was not adversely affected by the decision of the opposition division in the sense of Article 107 EPC. The representative previously authorised by Pavesi S.r.l. could also not file an appeal calling upon the earlier authorisation. The facts of the case corresponded to those in T 656/98 and the case should be decided accordingly.

The auxiliary request filed during the oral proceedings before the opposition division was also inadmissible (cf. T 15/01, Reasons, paragraph 1), as the representative of Pavesi S.r.l. had no authorisation to act for Axis S.p.A., to whom the patent had by then been sold.

The opponent's own appeal was admissible as the opponent was adversely affected by the decision of the opposition division not only as it held that the validity of the claims of the auxiliary request was not prima facie in doubt, but also due to the impermissible extension, in the sense of Article 123(2) and Article 123(3) EPC, linked to the auxiliary request.

XVII. The proprietor's arguments relevant to the present decision may be summarised as follows:

The single and only request of the opponent in the opposition proceedings was cancellation of granted claims 1 and 3. These claims were held invalid by the Opposition Division with the interlocutory decision dated 7 October 2005. Therefore, the opponent was not adversely affected by that decision in respect of what was his one and only request.

The proprietor's own appeal was admissible. The same representative had represented the interests of the proprietor continuously throughout the procedure. The appeal had been filed in the name of the proprietor. At the time of filing the appeal, Pavesi S.r.l. was recorded as proprietor in the register of European patents. In view of the legal fiction created by Rule 20(3) EPC (1973) it was correct to mention Pavesi S.r.l. in the notice of appeal. It was not relevant whether the patent had been transferred as part of a universal succession in law.

1. Admissibility of the proprietor's appeal

1.1 According to Article 60(3) EPC 1973, the applicant shall be deemed to be entitled to exercise the right to the European patent. Paragraph 1 of Rule 20 EPC 1973, which was in force at the time the appeal was filed, states that a transfer of a European patent application shall be recorded in the Register of European Patents at the request of an interested party and on production of documents satisfying the European Patent Office that the transfer has taken place. According to paragraph 3 of the Rule, a transfer shall have effect vis-à-vis the European Patent Office only when and to the extent that the documents referred to in paragraph 1 have been produced.

1.2 In the present case, at the time when the appeal on behalf of the patent proprietor was filed, Pavesi S.r.l. was recorded as the proprietor in the Register of European Patents and no request had been made for transfer of the patent from Pavesi S.r.l. Hence, although in practice the patent may by then have been transferred, Pavesi S.r.l. was still deemed to be entitled to exercise the right to the European patent in accordance with the legal fiction created by Article 60(3) EPC 1973, taken together with Rules 20 and 61 EPC 1973. The Board could therefore only treat Pavesi S.r.l. as the proprietor and appellant at the date the appeal was lodged. Pavesi S.r.l., being a party adversely affected by the decision under appeal, had the right to appeal (Article 107 EPC).

1.3 Rule 90(1)(a) EPC 1973 requires that proceedings before the EPO be interrupted in the event of the death or legal incapacity of the applicant for or proprietor of a European patent or of the person authorised by national law to act on his behalf. It states however, that "to the extent that the above events do not affect the authorisation of a representative appointed under Article 134, proceedings shall be interrupted only on application by such representative". In the present case, the representative acting for Pavesi S.r.l. in all proceedings before the first instance did not at any stage apply for interruption of the proceedings and has confirmed that it was his intention to attend the oral proceedings before the opposition division, as well as to file the notice of appeal on behalf of the legal person who had party status as proprietor during the opposition and who was adversely affected by the appealed decision (see letter of 19 July 2007, paragraph 2). Hence, irrespective of any alleged legal incapacity of the actual proprietor, proceedings before the EPO were able to continue, with the proprietor's interests being represented by the appointed representative.

1.4 The present situation is similar to that considered in T 0675/93 (not published in the Official Journal). There an appeal was filed in the name of the original proprietor Tarn Pure Limited, who at that time was in liquidation. The board in that case noted that no assignment of the patent had been registered with the EPO and held that they could only treat Tarn Pure Limited as the patentee and appellant at the date the appeal was lodged. Since further a representative had been appointed by Tarn Pure Limited, the board in that case considered the appeal signed by the representative in the name of Tarn Pure Limited to be admissible. The present board sees no reason to deviate from that ruling.

1.5 For these reasons the board considers the appeal filed on behalf of Pavesi S.r.l. to be admissible.

2. Admissibility of the opponent's appeal

2.1 The opposition was filed against the grant of the patent in the scope of claims 1 and 3. During the oral proceedings before the opposition division, the proprietor filed a first auxiliary request, the independent claims 1 and 3 of which were based on claims 1 and 3 as granted, with the addition of a feature which had been part of claim 6 as granted. Claim 6 as granted was dependent on claim 4 as granted.

2.2 In G 9/91 the Enlarged Board of Appeal held that "even if the opposition is explicitly directed only to the subject-matter of an independent claim of a European patent, subject-matters covered by claims which depend on such an independent claim may also be examined as to patentability, if the independent claim falls in opposition or appeal proceedings, provided their validity is prima facie in doubt on the basis of already available information" (see reasons, point 11). In its decision in the present case, the opposition division noted that ruling but found that the validity of the claims of the first auxiliary request was not prima facie in doubt and decided that it did not have the power to examine them (reasons, points 3.2 to 3.5, 4 and 5).

2.3 It is recorded in the minutes of the oral proceedings before the opposition division that "the opponent objected that the new claims of the first auxiliary request extended beyond the application as filed, Art. 123(2), (3) ..." (see page 3, sixth paragraph). It is thus apparent to the board that the opponent considered the patentability of the claims of the first auxiliary request to be prima facie in doubt. The decision of the opposition division held otherwise and at least for that reason the board considers that the opponent was adversely affected by the decision. The board therefore considers the appeal filed by the opponent to be admissible.

3. Amendments

The opponent raised no objections to the present claims under Article 123 EPC. The features added to independent claims 1 and 3 can be seen as having the following basis in the application as originally filed: WO 98/25444, page 6, lines 6 to 17, page 6, line 32 to page 7, line 18, page 19, lines 27 to 32 and page 20, lines 5 to 10. Hence, the board also sees no reason to object to the amendments under Article 123 EPC.

4. Sufficiency of disclosure

The opponent had objected that the patent as granted did not disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art in the whole range encompassed by claims 1 and 3 as granted. The opponent considered that the application only described the invention in the context of the proprietor's own prior art machines, in which each half of a distributed, multi-lobed winding was initially formed as a polygonal coil and thereafter the multi-lobed configuration was conferred by radial deformation. In view of the amendments made to claims 1 and 3, that objection is moot. The opponent did not question the sufficiency of disclosure of the subject-matter of present claims 1 and 3 and the board sees no reason to do so.

5. Novelty and inventive step

5.1 The opponent has not raised novelty or inventive step objections to present claims 1 and 3.

5.2 Claims 1 and 3 are now restricted to a method/apparatus in which multi-lobed coils are formed by winding a wire on radially movable forming elements so as to form a polygonal coil, and, after the polygonal coils have been formed, the central portions of the sides of the polygonal coils being pushed radially inwardly to confer the multi-lobed configuration.

5.3 Document D2 discloses a rather different method of forming the coils, in which the multi-lobed configuration is created during the winding of the wire, by forming the lobes and hollows sequentially as the wire is wound onto a template. There are no polygonal coils formed in D2. For these reasons the board considers that document D2 does not deprive claims 1 and 3 of novelty and, furthermore, is not the most pertinent prior art for assessing inventive step.

5.4 The board considers the closest prior art document to be US 4 512 376 (acknowledged in paragraph [0002] of the patent), as it discloses essentially the same method of forming multi-lobed coils by winding a wire on radially movable forming elements so as to form a polygonal coil, and, after the polygonal coils have been formed, pushing the central portions of the sides of the polygonal coils radially inwardly to confer the multi-lobed configuration.

5.5 Claims 1 and 3 differ from the disclosure of US 4 512 376 in that a first multi-lobed coil is formed and then a second multi-lobed coil is formed, without cutting the wire being fed, by winding the wire in the opposite direction, the wire portion connecting the two coils being bent where the wire reverses its winding direction to form a loop.

5.6 The opponent has not argued that it would be obvious for the skilled person to come to these features starting from US 4 512 376. Prima facie, the board sees no reason why the subject-matter of claims 1 and 3 should not be considered as involving an inventive step.

Order

ORDER

For the above reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the first instance with the order to maintain the patent in the following version:

Description:

- Page 2 received during oral proceedings of 13 January 2009

- Pages 3 to 7 of the patent specification

Claims:

- Nos. 1 to 7 received during oral proceedings of 13 January 2009

Drawings:

- Pages 12 to 19 of the patent specification

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility