European Patent Office

T 1684/16 of 03.03.2020

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T168416.20200303
Date of decision
3 March 2020
Case number
T 1684/16
Petition for review of
-
Application number
06774184.3
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
No distribution (D)
OJ versions
No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
CRYSTALLINE FORMS OF 4-[(2,4-DICHLORO-5-METHOXYPHENYL)AMINO]-6-METHOXY-7-[3-(4-METHYL-1-PIPERAZINYL)PROPOXY]-3-QUINOLINECARB-ONITRILE AND METHODS OF PREPARING THE SAME
Applicant name
Wyeth LLC
Opponent name
Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH
Generics [UK] Ltd (trading as Mylan)
Board
3.3.02
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 100(c) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 56 (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1) (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(3) (2007)
Keywords
Grounds for opposition - amendments
New allegation of facts
Inventive step
Catchword
The fact that the skilled person is taught in the prior art to investigate polymorphs in order to isolate the crystalline form having the most desirable properties is in itself not necessarily sufficient to consider a specific polymorphic form having a certain desired property obvious (see point 4.3.4 of the Reasons).
Cited cases
T 0777/08

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the opposition division with the order to maintain the patent with the following claims and a description to be adapted thereto:

claims 1 to 21 of the first auxiliary request, filed with the reply to the statement of grounds of appeal.