Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0919/18 28-06-2022
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0919/18 28-06-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T091918.20220628
Date of decision
28 June 2022
Case number
T 0919/18
Petition for review of
-
Application number
09252462.8
IPC class
F25B 49/02
F25D 11/00
F25D 29/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 421.66 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Controlling chilled state of a cargo

Applicant name

Thermo King Corporation

Emerson Climate Technologies- Transportation

Solutions ApS

Opponent name
BITZER Electronics A/S
Board
3.2.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 100(a)
European Patent Convention Art 100(b)
European Patent Convention Art 54
European Patent Convention Art 56
Keywords

Sufficiency of disclosure - (yes)

Sufficiency of disclosure - clarity of disclosure

Claims - relationship between Article 83 and Article 84

Novelty - (yes)

Inventive step - (yes)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 1404/05
T 0681/02
T 0553/11
G 0003/14
Citing decisions
-

I. European patent No. 2 180 277 relates to a refrigeration system and a method for operating a refrigeration system for a container for refrigerating chilled cargo.

II. With the impugned decision, the opposition division rejected the opposition based on the grounds of Article 100(a) and (b) EPC.

III. Oral proceedings before the Board were held on 28 June 2022.

The final requests were as follows.

The opponent ("appellant") requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.

The patent proprietors ("respondents") requested that the appeal be dismissed or that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of auxiliary requests 1 to 8 submitted with the reply to the statement setting out the grounds of appeal.

IV. The following documents submitted during the opposition proceedings are relevant for this decision:

E1: US 4,663,725 A

E2: US 5,711,159 A

E3: WO 02/090844 A1

V. Independent claims 1 and 8 and dependent claims 2 and 3 of the main request (patent as granted) read as follows (feature numbering relevant for this decision added in "[]").

(a) Claim 1

"A method for operating a refrigeration system for a container for refrigerating chilled cargo,

the refrigeration system (100) including a compressor (110), a condenser (120), and an evaporator (140) connected in series,

an evaporator fan (150) associated with the evaporator (140),

and a heater (180),

the refrigeration system (100) operable to discharge supply air (SA) to the container (200) and to receive return air (RA) from the container (200); the method comprising:

[1.4] determining the temperature of the supply air (SA); determining the temperature of the return air (RA);

[1.5] determining one of a requirement for heating and a requirement for cooling based on the temperature of the return air (TRA ) and the temperature of the supply air (TSA );

[1.6a] activating the evaporator fan (150) when a requirement for heating is determined

[1.6b] and increasing the speed of the evaporator fan (150) when increased heating is determined; and

[1.7a] activating the compressor (110) and the evaporator fan (150) when a requirement for cooling is determined

[1.7b] and increasing the power supplied to the compressor (110) and maintaining the evaporator fan (150) at a low first speed when increased cooling is determined."

(b) Claim 2 (the part relevant for the decision; corresponding features are present in claim 9)

"The method of claim 1, wherein ...;

or wherein the method further comprises deactivating the compressor (110) and the evaporator fan (150) when there is no requirement determined for at least one of heating and cooling; or ..."

(c) Claim 3 (corresponding features are present in claim 10)

"The method of claim 1, increasing the speed of the evaporator fan ( 150) to a second speed faster than the first and increasing the power supplied to the compressor (110) when increased cooling is determined."

(d) Claim 8

"A refrigeration system for a container for refrigerating chilled cargo, the system (100) comprising:

a compressor (110), a condenser (120), and an evaporator (140) connected in series;

an evaporator fan (150) associated with the evaporator (140) and operable to discharge supply air (SA) to the container (200) and to receive return air (RA) from the container (200):

a heater (180);

[8.2] sensors configured to sense the temperature of the supply air (TSA ) and the temperature of the return air (TRA ), and

[8.3] a controller (170) programmed to determine one of a requirement for heating and a requirement for cooling based on the temperature of the return air (TRA ) and the temperature of the supply air (TSA ),

wherein the controller (170) is programmed to

[8.4a] activate the evaporator fan (150) when a requirement for heating is determined

[8.4b] and to increase the speed of the evaporator fan (150) when increased heating is determined,

[8.5] and wherein the controller (170) is programmed to

[8.5a] activate the compressor (110) and the evaporator fan (150) when a requirement for cooling is determined

[8.5b] and to increase the power supplied to the compressor (110) and maintain the evaporator fan (150) at a low first speed when increased cooling is determined"

VI. The appellant's arguments relevant to the present decision may be summarised as follows.

(a) Article 100(b) EPC

The subject-matter of the claims was insufficiently disclosed. A general principle of claim construction as ruled in T 1404/05 required that a feature with a clear literal meaning could not be given a different meaning even in light of the whole specification. In granted claims 1 and 8, the wording "increasing ... when increased heating/cooling is determined" had the clear technical meaning of "determining an increasing/decreasing temperature". The different interpretation according to the decision under appeal was therefore not correct. It was not allowable to give known terms in a claim a different meaning based on the description (see also T 681/02 and T 0553/11). Since the patent did not provide any disclosure of a control step of determining an "increased heating or cooling", the feature was not sufficiently disclosed. Even when considering for the sake of the argument the opposition division's construction of the feature, the fact that one of the possible interpretations was insufficiently disclosed still resulted in non-allowability.

Furthermore, the deactivation of both the compressor and the evaporator fan according to claims 2 and 9 encompassed options in which there was still a requirement for heating or cooling. These options were in contradiction to the method of claim 1 and to the way the controller of claim 8 was programmed and could thus not be reduced to practice.

In addition, claims 3 and 10 included, like claims 1 and 8, a definition of a control action for the situation when "increased cooling" was determined. This control action was, however, different to that defined in the independent claims. This also led to an issue of insufficient disclosure.

(b) Main request - Novelty

The subject-matter of claims 1 and 8 was not novel in view of the disclosure of any of E1, E2 and E3.

E1 disclosed in the table of column 9 and Figure 4a the operation modes "Heat" and "Null" in which the evaporator fan was operated at two different speeds. When switching the set-point from above 24 °F to below 24 °F, features [1.6a] and [1.6b] as well as [8.4a] and [8.4b] were anticipated. Furthermore, the step from the "out of range" stage to the "heat" stage according to Figure 4a, left scheme, had to be considered an indication for "increased heating" as meant by features [1.6b] and [8.4b].

E2 disclosed a refrigeration system in which the evaporator fan was operated independently of the compressor of the cooling cycle. In addition, E2 disclosed a defrosting/de-icing operation in which the compressor was off and the evaporator fan was at maximum speed (column 8, lines 47 to 60). This operation was triggered by a requirement for increased heating as in feature [1.6b] (column 5, lines 47 to 52).

E3 disclosed a chilled mode and a frozen mode with the evaporator fan operating at different speeds in the respective modes. When switching from frozen to chilled mode, features [1.6a] and [1.6b] were anticipated.

Main request - Inventive step

The subject-matter of claims 1 and 9 did not involve an inventive step in view of any combination of documents E1, E2 and E3.

In view of the conclusion of the Board on novelty during the oral proceedings, according to which all of E1, E2 and E3 at least failed to disclose features [1.6b] and [8.4b], the appellant referred to the inventive step arguments on file.

VII. The respondents' arguments relevant to the present decision may be summarised as follows.

(a) Article 100(b) EPC

The subject-matter of the claims was sufficiently disclosed. Features [1.6b]/[8.4b] and [1.7b]/[8.5b] had to be interpreted in the context of all claim features. This resulted in understanding feature [1.6b] as "when a requirement for increased heating/cooling is determined". This interpretation was also supported by the whole patent specification.

The feature in question in claims 2 and 9 had to be construed to mean "NOT A AND NOT B", thus excluding control actions contradictory to claims 1 and 8.

The reference in claims 3 and 10 to "increased cooling" was merely a clarity issue. In light of the application as a whole the skilled person understood that a reference to "further increased cooling" was meant.

(b) Main request - Novelty

The subject-matter of claims 1 and 8 was novel over any of documents E1, E2 and E3.

E1 solely disclosed a single heat mode with a single evaporator fan speed. A switch of the set-point was an operation not disclosed in E1 nor inherent to the control method disclosed in E1. In addition, such a switch was not triggered by a requirement for "increased heating" based on supply and return air temperature determination. Therefore, at least features [1.6b] and [8.4b] were not disclosed in E1.

E2 solely disclosed cooling operations. The defrost/de-icing mode was not part of the control method but an independent operation. It was also not triggered by a requirement for "increased heating". Therefore, at least features [1.6b] and [8.4b] were not disclosed in E2.

E3 did not disclose a method step including a change from the frozen to the chilled mode. Furthermore, in any operational stage including the heating stages, the compressor was in operation. Therefore, at least features [1.6b] and [8.4b] were also not disclosed in E3.

(c) Main request - Inventive step

Since none of the documents E1, E2 and E3 disclosed at least feature [1.6b] and [8.4b], the subject-matter of claims 1 and 8 could not be made obvious from any combination of these documents.

The only objection of lack of inventive step dealt with in the decision under appeal was based on E1 as the starting point. The further objections starting from E2 and E3 could and should have been filed earlier and should thus not be admitted into the proceedings.

1. Article 100(b) EPC

1.1 The appellant raised objections of lack of sufficiency of disclosure to the following features:

- "when increased heating/cooling is determined" (features [1.6b] and [1.7b] of claim 1 and the corresponding features [8.4b] and [8.5b] of claim 8). This objection also applied for the respective wording in claims 3, 4, 10 and 11

- "deactivating/deactivate the compressor and the evaporator fan when there is no requirement determined for at least one of heating and cooling" (claims 2 and 9, emphasis added)

- "increasing/ to increase the power supplied to the compressor when increased cooling is determined" (claims 3 and 10, emphasis added)

The Board agrees with the conclusion in the decision under appeal that the subject-matter of the claims is sufficiently disclosed. As far as the above features in the granted claims appear not to comply with Article 84 EPC, in accordance with the decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal G3/14, "such non-compliance must be lived with".

Furthermore, the following conclusions apply also to the dependent claims which include by their back-references any of these features in question.

1.2 Features "increased heating/cooling is determined" (features [1.6b], [1.7b], [8.4b] and [8.5b]) of claims 1 and 8

1.2.1 To establish insufficiency of disclosure, the appellant-opponent must prove that the patent as a whole does not disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art. In the case at hand, sufficiency of disclosure of the features "activating ... when increased heating/cooling is determined" hinges on the construction of these features.

1.2.2 The appellant considered the features to be clear as such and construed them in accordance with what it considers to be their literal meaning:

- "increasing the speed of the evaporator fan when it is determined that increased heating occurs"

- "maintaining the evaporator fan at a first speed when it is determined that increased cooling occurs."

The respondents and the decision under appeal came to the conclusion that it was obvious to the skilled person that the features were not clearly drafted. Accordingly, they had to be construed in the context of the other claim features and the whole specification. This would lead the skilled person inevitably to the following understanding:

- "increasing the speed of the evaporator fan when a requirement for increased heating is determined",

- "maintaining the evaporator fan at a first speed when a requirement for increased cooling is determined."

1.2.3 In accordance with established case law, the interpretation of the claims in light of the description has limits in that a discrepancy between the claims and the description is not a valid reason to ignore the clear linguistic structure of a claim and to interpret it differently. However, a prerequisite for this approach is that the features of the claims be clear as such and that no further need for their interpretation arise (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 9th edn. 2019, II.A.6.3.1).

In the case at hand, contrary to the appellant's view, the wording "activating ... when increased heating/cooling is determined" is not clear in itself and also not when seen in context with the other claim features. Therefore, the "general principle of construction" referred to by the appellant from T 1404/05 (Reasons 2.3), "that the use of different words indicates that something different is meant" is not applicable here.

1.2.4 The appellant's view that features [1.6b] and [1.7b] clearly convey the meaning "determining an increase/decrease of the temperature" is not persuasive. The terms "heating" and "cooling" refer to a process of heat transfer in general. Heat transfer processes include, inter alia, the transfer of latent heat (during phase transitions) and do not necessarily result in a temperature change (e.g. in de-icing, see point 2.4 below, or when a phase change of the refrigerant is involved).

It is moreover not clear how an "increase" of heating/cooling is to be determined in the context of features [1.4]/[1.5] and [8.2]/[8.3] and to what reference the "increase" relates to.

1.2.5 Finally, when following the interpretation of the appellant (see point 1.2.2), a contradiction with features [1.6a] and [1.7a] arises. It is undisputed that features [1.6a] and [1.7a] refer to a "requirement for heating/cooling", i.e. the opposite to a determined heating or cooling. When following the appellant's interpretation, the control actions of features [1.6b] and [1.7b] would not allow for stable operation. Rather, it would result in a positive feedback response with increased heating/cooling at determined increased/decreased temperatures. This is technically not reasonable and is in obvious contradiction to what should be achieved with features [1.6a] and [1.7a]. The appellant's argument that features [1.6b] would not exclude the use of the compressor to compensate for the excess heating by the fan is, in view of the definition of the states of both the compressor and evaporator fan in the feature groups [1.6a] to [1.7b], not convincing either.

1.2.6 Since the claims have to be construed with a mind willing to understand, the skilled person would in view of the above ambiguities consult the specification to clarify the meaning of the features. The situation in the case at hand also differs to that in cases T 681/01 and T 553/11 cited by the appellant. In these cases, the boards did not see the need to construe the claim features based on the description since these features were considered to be clear as such.

1.2.7 The whole patent specification solely describes the determination of the supply and return air temperatures (or their difference) as the measured input into the controller. This is consistent with the determination of one of a requirement for heating and a requirement for cooling as defined in features [1.5]/[8.3] and the use of these criteria in features [1.6a]/[8.4a] and [1.7a]/[8.5a]. The determination of "heating" or "cooling" (requiring an energy balance including mass flow and temperature difference data) is disclosed neither as a direct nor an indirect measurement. In contradiction, paragraphs [0024] and [0026] and Figure 3 disclose that for moderate heating requirements (interval H1) - as determined from the measured temperatures - such heating can be performed merely by variations of the evaporator fan speed and the resulting friction heat. The patent thus discloses that the speed of the fan will be increased if an increased requirement for heating is determined, thus supporting the interpretation in line with the decision under appeal. This understanding does, in view of the embodiment described, not allow justified objections against sufficiency of disclosure.

1.2.8 To conclude, features [1.6b] and [1.7b] and the corresponding features of claim 8, while being not clear as such, are considered sufficiently disclosed when construed in light of the whole specification. The above reasoning applies likewise to claims 2, 4, 10 and 11, which according to the appellant are affected by the same problem.

1.3 Claims 2 and 9

1.3.1 With respect to the objection against the features "deactivating/deactivate the compressor and the evaporator fan when there is no requirement determined for at least one of heating and cooling" (emphasis added) of claims 2 and 9 the Board also agrees with the reasoning in the appealed decision.

1.3.2 It is true that these features introduce a contradiction into parts of the claims. The respondents' view that the claim wording would be limited to NOT A AND NOT B is in view of the term "at least one of" not convincing. As a result, the claim wording of claim 2 encompasses, contrary to claim 1, the options that both the compressor and the evaporator fan are deactivated even if a requirement either for heating or cooling were determined, which - according to claim 1 or 8 - would require them to be activated.

1.3.3 However, this obvious contradiction between claims 1 and 2 (as well as between claims 8 and 9) merely gives rise to a question of the definition of the "forbidden area" of the claims. In accordance with established case law, this is a matter of Article 84 EPC rather than sufficiency of disclosure (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 9th edn. 2019, II.C.6.6.4). The whole specification and the embodiment of Figure 3 in combination with paragraph [0025] sufficiently enable the "NOT A and NOT B" option encompassed by the feature in question.

1.3.4 Therefore, sufficiency of disclosure cannot be denied. The contradiction between the granted claims is a clarity issue and is not objectionable under Article 100(b) EPC. As a consequence, the contradictory options have to be disregarded when construing claims 2 and 9.

1.4 Claims 3 and 10

1.4.1 A further objection was directed to the features of claims 3 and 10 "increasing/ to increase the power supplied to the compressor when increased cooling is determined" (emphasis added). These features refer to a condition addressed with the same term "increased cooling" as in features [1.7b] and [8.5b], defining, however, different responses to it ("increasing the power supplied to the compressor and maintain the evaporator fan at a low first speed" - see claims 1 and 8 - versus "increasing the power supplied to the compressor" and "increasing the speed of the evaporator fan to a second speed faster than the first" - see claims 3 and 10).

1.4.2 Again, this contradiction is immediately obvious. From the specification as a whole, the skilled person can only conclude that the "increased cooling" in claim 3 refers in fact to cooling increased beyond the increased cooling of claim 1, i.e. it refers to a requirement of "further increased cooling" in relation to the "increased cooling" requirement in claims 1 and 8. In the description, increasing the power of the compressor and the evaporator fan speed is disclosed for the switch from state R1 to R2 (Figure 3). The contradiction is thus merely a clarity deficiency and not a matter of sufficiency of disclosure.

1.5 To conclude, the deficiencies addressed by the appellant do not fall under the ground for opposition under Article 100(b) EPC but are instead clarity deficiencies. In accordance with the principles set out in decision G 3/14, the disputed features - which are part of the claims as granted - are not open to objections under Article 84 EPC. The construction of the features as concluded in the above paragraphs is, however, to be applied in the assessment of patentability.

2. Main request - Novelty

2.1 The appellant challenged the novelty of claims 1 and 8 on the basis of the disclosure of any of the documents E1 to E3.

The Board agrees with the conclusion in the decision under appeal that the subject-matter of claims 1 and 8 is novel. Documents E1 to E3 at least fail to disclose features [1.6b] of claim 1 and [8.4b] of claim 8.

2.2 Novelty in view of E1

2.2.1 The Board agrees with the conclusion in the decision under appeal that E1 fails to disclose feature [1.6b]. An overview of the heating and cooling modes disclosed in E1 is found in the table of column 9. Here, only a single mode of heating ("Heat") is disclosed in which the evaporator fan is operated at a "high speed". The "Heat" mode is further exclusively disclosed for a set-point at or above 24 °F (see also Figures 4a to 4d). There is no disclosure of a second heating state of a (further) increasing of the speed of the evaporator fan in response to a demand for increased heating. A step of simply switching the compressor on as disclosed for the change from "Out of range" to the "Heat" mode is not considered to be encompassed by the wording "increasing the speed" of the already activated evaporator fan (see feature [1.6a]/[8.4a]).

2.2.2 For different set-points, different control schemes are suggested within one algorithm in E1, an example being shown in Figure 4a. While it is true that the table also discloses a "Null" step (see the table in column 9) in which the evaporator fan is operated at a "low speed" and without the compressor of the cooling cycle being turned on, this state is defined only for a control scheme for set-points of below 24° F (see Figure 4a, left and right scheme). Above the set-point of 24 °F, the evaporator is at "high speed" in the "Null" mode.

2.2.3 The appellant argued that for the embodiment of Figure 4a when operating in the "Heat" mode (set-point at or above 24 °F, left control scheme), a switch of the set-point to below 24 °F (as according to the right control scheme) would inevitably bring the system to operate in the "Null" mode at a lower evaporator fan speed and vice versa. However, such a change of the set-point is not considered a step triggered by the "determination of an increased heating requirement" in response to a requirement for increased heating determined from temperature measurements as per features [1.6b] and [8.4b]. Furthermore, it cannot unambiguously be derived from the schemes shown in Figure 4a that such a switch inevitably brings the system, for example, from the right "Null" mode (set-point <24 °F) to the left "Heat" mode (set-point >= 24 °F) - the only sequence in which the evaporator fan speed is increased as required by feature [1.6b] since the two operation modes shown in Figure 4a are normalised to their respective set-point temperatures. When increasing the set-point temperature, it is thus well possible (and even more likely) that the system switches from the "Null" to the "Out of range" mode. Finally, even though the left and right scheme of Figure 4a are parts of one algorithm, E1 fails to disclose that a change of the set-point is envisaged or even possible during operation.

2.2.4 Therefore, at least feature [1.6b] is not disclosed in E1.

2.3 Novelty in view of E2

2.3.1 The disclosure of E2 is focused on cooling steps and does not explicitly address any requirement for heating. The same conclusion was arrived at in the decision under appeal. The passage in column 2, lines 50 to 56 of E2 discloses that the cooling demand is controlled by the speed of the compressor. The statement that the evaporator fan can be controlled "independently" from the compressor is not unambiguous disclosure that the fan is operated while the compressor is turned off. Accordingly, there is no disclosure of activating the evaporator fan in response to the detection of a requirement for either heating or increased heating. It is true that in the "defrost/de-icing option" (column 8, lines 47 to 60) an operation state is disclosed in which the evaporator fan is on (at "maximum speed") and the compressor is off. However, this mode is not disclosed as being triggered by a requirement for increased heating determined by the temperature sensors but by a "need for defrost" not further specified, which is listed as an alternative to temperature measurements (see column 5, line 47 to 52). Furthermore, in the defrost option, the refrigerator compartments are still cooled using the energy stored in the evaporator ice (column 8, lines 58 to 60).

2.3.2 To conclude, at least features [1.6a] and [1.6b] are not disclosed in E2.

2.4 Novelty in view of E3

2.4.1 E3 discloses the operation of the evaporator fan at different speeds in different operation modes (page 28, second and fourth paragraph). The "chilled mode" and the "freeze mode" disclosed here represent two distinct operation modes, each with a different set-point and each with heating and cooling requirements for controlling the temperature close to the respective set-points. Contrary to the appellant's view, E3 discloses neither that a switch between the two modes during operation is envisaged or enabled nor that the switch from the frozen to the chilled mode would follow a "requirement of increased heating" determined by the temperature sensors as required by feature [1.6b]. While no details are disclosed in E3, the selection of the mode is done in line with a pre-selection of a desired cargo space temperature set-point (see page 28).

2.4.2 According to the control scheme disclosed in E3, Figure 5, heating control is achieved by switching the condenser between an operable and inoperable mode by a control valve in a condenser bypass line, such that the net energy balance causes net heating via the evaporator (page 20, paragraph 3 to page 21, paragraph 2). In a first stage (Figure 5, "0" to "-A"), the evaporator fan is operated at low speed and the compressor is operated at low power (page 27, last paragraph to page 28, paragraph 1) with a bypass valve (hot gas valve) of the condenser being adjusted according to the heating power demand. When an increased heating demand is present (stage "-1"), the speed of the compressor is increased with the bypass valve being fully open. At stage "-2", an additional heater is used. The speed of the evaporator fan is held constant during all these heating stages. The appellant's argument that when changing from the "frozen mode" at below -10 °C to the "chilled mode" the evaporator fan would switch from a speed below the maximum speed to the maximum speed which would correspond to steps [1.6a] and [1.6b] is not persuasive. E3 does not disclose that the control system allows for switching from the frozen mode to the chilled mode program during operation. Nor is it inevitable that the switch, even when starting from a heating stage in the frozen mode would result in a heating stage at a different set-point (see also the arguments for E1 above). Furthermore, the switch between modes or the change of the set-point would not be triggered by a determination of an increased heating requirement.

Therefore, at least feature [1.6b] is not disclosed in E3.

2.5 To conclude, the ground for opposition under Article 100(a) EPC in conjunction with Article 54 EPC does not prejudice the maintenance of the patent.

3. Main request - Inventive step

3.1 The appellant raised objections of lack of inventive step based on various combinations of documents E1, E2 and E3. However, since none of these documents discloses at least feature [1.6b] of claim 1 and [8.4b] of claim 8 (see the novelty discussion above), the subject-matter of claims 1 and 8 cannot be made obvious by any of these combinations. Therefore, also the ground for opposition under Article 100(a) EPC in conjunction with Article 56 EPC does not prejudice the maintenance of the patent.

3.2 In view of this, the question of admittance under Article 12(4) RPBA 2007 of the objections of lack of inventive step based on E2 or E3 as the starting point can remain undecided.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility