Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t181098eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 1098/18 27-05-2022
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 1098/18 27-05-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T109818.20220527
Date of decision
27 May 2022
Case number
T 1098/18
Petition for review of
-
Application number
12000533.5
IPC class
F16L 55/165
F16L 55/179
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 388.68 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Device for repairing a pipe

Applicant name
LMK Technologies, LLC
Opponent name
Per Aarsleff A/S
Board
3.2.05
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 76(1)
European Patent Convention Art 108
European Patent Convention R 99(2)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(2)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 25(3)
Keywords

Admissibility of appeal (yes)

Amendment after summons - admittance (third auxiliary request: yes)

Divisional application - subject-matter extends beyond content of earlier application (all requests: yes)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0001/05
G 0001/06
T 1668/14
Citing decisions
-

I. The patent proprietor lodged an appeal against the opposition division's decision to revoke European patent No. 2 447 589 (the patent). The patent is based on a divisional application from the earlier application No. 08798479.5 published as WO 2009/029516 A1.

II. The opposition was filed against the patent as a whole based on the grounds of Article 100(a) (in conjunction with Article 54 EPC (lack of novelty) and Article 56 EPC (lack of inventive step)), Article 100(b) and Article 100(c) EPC.

III. In the decision under appeal, the opposition division decided that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the patent as granted and auxiliary requests 1 and 2 extended beyond the content of the application as filed (Article 123(2) EPC).

IV. On 7 July 2021, the board issued a summons to oral proceedings. In a communication under Article 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 (RPBA 2020 - see OJ EPO 2019, A63) dated 28 March 2022, the board gave its preliminary opinion.

V. Oral proceedings before the board were held on 27 May 2022 in mixed mode with the consent of the parties. The appellant (patent proprietor) was remotely connected while the respondent (opponent) and the board were present at the premises of the Boards of Appeal.

VI. Requests

The appellant (patent proprietor) requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained as amended on the basis of the claims of the main request or, in the alternative, the claims of the first or second auxiliary request, all filed with the statement of grounds of appeal, or the third auxiliary request filed during the oral proceedings.

The respondent (opponent) requested that the appeal be rejected as inadmissible or that the appeal be dismissed as unallowable.

VII. Independent claims 1 and 9 of the main request have the following wording (amendments compared to claim 1 of the patent as granted are underlined; the parties' feature numbering appears in square brackets):

"1. An apparatus for repairing a main pipe line (50) and a lateral pipe line (52) connected thereto and in communication therewith to form a pipe joint, comprising: a bladder assembly (16) comprising a main bladder tube (34) and a lateral bladder tube (36);

[1.1.1] a liner assembly (14) comprising a main liner member (38) at least partially surrounding the main bladder tube (34) and a lateral liner tube (40) [1.1.3] extending from the main liner member (38) at a liner juncture, [1.1.2] the liner assembly being made of a resin absorbent material;

the lateral bladder tube (36) and the lateral liner tube (40) being adapted to extend within the lateral pipe line (52) with the lateral bladder tube (36) being inside the lateral liner tube (40) and the lateral liner tube (40) being between the lateral pipe line (52) and the lateral bladder tube (36);

and [1.1.4] the lateral liner tube (40) and lateral bladder tube (36) are movable between a first position wherein the lateral liner tube (40) and lateral bladder (36) tube are inverted within the main bladder tube (34), and a second position wherein the lateral liner tube (40) and lateral bladder tube (36) are everted into the lateral pipe line (52); and

[1.1.5] a gasket (56), being made of hydrophilic material capable of swelling in reaction to contact with a liquid or [1.1.6] being made of impermeable compressible material, thereby forming a seal between the liner assembly and main and lateral pipe lines at the joint; characterized in that [1.1.7] the gasket (56) is disposed on the main liner member (38) and [1.1.8] surrounding a portion of the lateral liner tube (40) at the liner juncture."

"9. An apparatus for repairing a main pipe line (50) and a lateral pipe line (52) connected thereto and in communication therewith to form a pipe joint, comprising:

a bladder assembly (16) comprising a main bladder tube (34) at least partially surrounding the main bladder tube (34) and a lateral bladder tube (36); [9.1.1] a liner assembly (14) comprising a main liner member (38) and a lateral liner tube (40) [9.1.3] extending from the main liner member (38) at a liner juncture, [9.1.2] the liner assembly being made of resin absorbent material;

the lateral bladder tube (36) and the lateral liner tube (40) being adapted to extend within the lateral pipe line (52) with the lateral bladder tube (36) being inside the lateral liner tube (40) and the lateral liner tube (40) being between the lateral pipe line (52) and the lateral bladder tube (36); [9.1.4] and the lateral liner tube (40) and lateral bladder tube (36) are movable between a first position wherein the lateral liner tube (40) and lateral bladder tube (36) are inverted within the main bladder tube (34), and a second position wherein the lateral liner tube (40) and lateral bladder tube (36) are everted into the lateral pipe line (52); and the lateral liner tube (40) and lateral bladder tube (36) are movable between a first position wherein the lateral liner tube (40) and lateral bladder tube (36) are inverted within the main bladder tube (34), and a second position wherein the lateral liner tube (40) and lateral bladder tube (36) are everted into the lateral pipe line (52); and

[9.1.5] a ring shaped and (62) [sic] being made of hydrophilic material capable of swelling in reaction to contact with a liquid or [9.1.6] being made of an impermeable compressible material, thereby foaming [sic] a seal between the liner assembly and main and lateral pipe lies [sic] at the point [sic] joint;

characterised in that the band (62) is positioned on the main liner tube (38) and extending around the juncture between the main liner tube (38) and the lateral liner tube (40)."

VIII. Auxiliary requests

Compared with claims 1 and 9 of the main request, claims 1 and 9 of the first auxiliary request replace the wording "in reaction to contact with" with "in response to being exposed to" and the verb "everted" with "inverted". In claim 9 of the first auxiliary request, the added feature "at least partially surrounding the main bladder tube (34)" further specifies the "main liner member (38)" instead of the "main bladder tube (34)" as in claim 9 of the main request.

Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request is amended with respect to claim 1 of the first auxiliary request by incorporating the features of claim 2 of the first auxiliary request ("wherein the gasket (56) includes a tubular portion (60) having a first end and a second end and a flange portion (58) extending outwardly from one of the first and second ends of the tubular portion (60)"). Independent claim 8 of the second auxiliary request corresponds to independent claim 9 of the main request and replaces the wording "in reaction to contact with" with "in response to being exposed to" and the verb "everted" with "inverted" as in claim 9 of the first auxiliary request.

Claim 1 of the third auxiliary request is based on claim 9 of the first auxiliary request in which feature [9.1.1] is amended and reads: "a liner assembly (14) comprising a main liner tube (38) surrounding the main bladder tube (34) and a lateral liner tube (40)".

IX. The parties' submissions, to the extent that they are relevant to this decision, may be summarised as follows:

Admissibility of the appeal

- Appellant (patent proprietor)

The appellant referred to the board's communication provisionally finding that the statement of grounds of appeal gave sufficient reasons for setting aside the decision under appeal. It was possible to infer that the amended claims were caused by the objections identified by the opposition division under Article 123(2) EPC and were filed with the aim of overcoming these objections. Therefore, the appeal was admissible.

- Respondent (opponent)

The appeal was inadmissible because the appellant implicitly accepted the opposition division's decision by filing an amended main request. Contrary to the requirements of Article 108 EPC, Rule 99(2) EPC and Article 12(2) RPBA 2020, the appellant did not provide reasons why the appealed decision was wrong.

Main request: allowability of amendments

- Appellant (patent proprietor)

The feature "at least partially surrounding the main bladder tube (34)" should have been inserted in feature [9.1.1] as in corresponding claim 1 of the main request and as done in claim 9 of the first auxiliary request.

- Respondent (opponent)

As observed in the board's communication (see board's communication, point 10.4.2), the feature of claim 9 "a main bladder tube (34) at least partially surrounding the main bladder tube (34)" contravened the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC.

Claim 1 of the first and second auxiliary requests: allowability of amendments (features [1.1.1])

- Appellant (patent proprietor)

Basis for feature [1.1.1] could be found in the published earlier application (document D0), page 4, line 31 to page 5, line 2 together with Figures 1 to 3. The liner assembly 14 included a main liner tube 38 and a lateral liner tube 40, and the bladder assembly was fitted on the interior of the liner assembly 14. From the drawings, especially Figure 2 of document D0, it was apparent that the main liner member 38 did not fully surround the main bladder tube 34 since the main bladder tube further extended in the longitudinal direction. It was not relevant that claim 1 of the first auxiliary request mentioned a main liner member 38 while the passage on page 4, line 31 of document D0 referred to a main liner tube because a main liner member and a main liner tube were functional equivalents. A main liner member was disclosed on page 3, line 5, for instance.

- Respondent (opponent)

There was no direct and unambiguous disclosure for feature [1.1.1] in document D0. The passage on page 4, line 31 of document D0 referred to a main liner tube. A main liner member and a main liner tube were not equivalents. A main liner member was broader compared to a main liner tube. This was evident from dependent claim 3 of document D0 where it was claimed that "the main liner member (38) is formed as a tube". Furthermore, the main liner tube fully surrounded the bladder tube in the circumferential direction. There were two ways of repairing a tube: the so-called "tube solution" according to US practice with a tube surrounding the pipeline by 360 degrees and the so-called "hat installation solution" according to European practice with a main liner member partially surrounding the main bladder tube. The earlier application and the patent were restricted to the "tube solution". A main liner member partially surrounding the main bladder tube related to the "hat installation solution" and thus went beyond the content of document D0.

Third auxiliary request: admittance

- Appellant (patent proprietor)

The third auxiliary request should be admitted into the appeal proceedings since it did not raise new issues but addressed all existing objections. There were exceptional circumstances because the respondent provided its arguments concerning the allowability of feature [1.1.1] of claim 1 of the first and second auxiliary requests at a very late stage, i.e. after the board's communication. The respondent outlined the difference of US and European pipeline joints only during the oral proceedings before the board. This constituted exceptional circumstances.

- Respondent (opponent)

The third auxiliary request should not be admitted into the appeal proceedings. The appellant could have filed this request earlier, at the latest in reaction to the board's communication. It raised new issues by deleting the expression "at least partially". Furthermore, it was prima facie not allowable as it constituted an intermediate generalisation due to the omission of the features "launcher device" and "overlapping edges". Furthermore, no exceptional circumstances justified with cogent reasons had been brought forward by the appellant.

Third auxiliary request: allowability of amendments

- Appellant (patent proprietor)

Taking the respondent's interpretation of the term "surrounding" being related to the diameter of the pipe, page 4, line 31 to page 5, line 2 and Figures 1 to 3 of document D0 clearly and unambiguously formed a basis for feature [9.1.1] "a liner assembly (14) comprising a main liner tube (38) surrounding the main bladder tube (34) and a lateral liner tube (40)". It was not an unallowable intermediate generalisation as the overlapping edges were not disclosed as an essential feature. Furthermore, the launcher device of Figures 1 to 3 was not inextricably linked to the main bladder tube. For instance, claim 26 of document D0 referred to the bladder assembly per se without the launcher device.

- Respondent (opponent)

The amended feature [9.1.1] constituted an unallowable intermediate generalisation of the disclosure in document D0. The basis given by the appellant related to an embodiment. Several features had been omitted, such as the overlapping edges and the launcher device. Both were essential features. The provisions of Article 76(1) EPC were therefore not met.

1. Admissibility of the appeal

1.1 In accordance with Article 108, third sentence, and Rule 99(2) EPC, for an appeal to be admissible, a statement of grounds of appeal must be filed in which the appellant indicates the reasons for setting aside the decision impugned or the extent to which it is to be amended and the facts and evidence on which the appeal is based.

It is not an absolute requirement for admissibility that the appellant attacks the opposition division's decision as flawed. Where amended claims are filed with the statement of grounds of appeal, the appeal may also be considered admissible if sufficient reasons are provided why the amendments are apt to remedy the deficiencies identified by the opposition division (see, inter alia, T 1668/14, point 2.2 of the Reasons). Whether these arguments are convincing or likely to be ultimately successful is not relevant for determining admissibility of the appeal. Thus, contrary to the respondent's view, an appeal is not necessarily inadmissible for the sole reason that the patent proprietor/appellant filed amended claims (and defended them) in the statement of grounds of appeal. It is also not necessary for an appeal to be admissible that the patent proprietor/appellant filed grounds in defence of a version of claims (those on which the decision of the opposition division was based) that it is no longer defending in appeal.

1.2 In this case, the appellant indicated in the statement of grounds of appeal sufficient reasons for setting aside the decision under appeal since it is possible for the board and the other party to infer that the amended claims were caused by the objections identified by the opposition division under Article 123(2) EPC (see section 2 of the Reasons for the decision under appeal) and were filed with the aim of overcoming these objections. They additionally addressed the other objections raised by the respondent in opposition proceedings and provided reasons against them. It is therefore possible for the board to understand the reasons put forward why the decision under appeal must be set aside.

1.3 In view of the above, the statement of grounds of appeal complies with Article 108, third sentence, and Rule 99(2) EPC. Since it is uncontested that the further admissibility requirements set out in Articles 106 to 108 EPC and Rules 97 and 99(1)(b) and (c) EPC are met, the appeal is admissible.

2. Main request: allowability of amendments

2.1 The patent is based on a divisional application from the earlier European patent application No. 08798479.5 published as WO 2009/029516 A1 (document D0). The description and the figures of the application as originally filed are identical to the description and the figures of the earlier application as originally filed (document D0).

2.2 Article 76(1) EPC provides that a divisional application may be filed only for subject-matter which does not extend beyond the content of the earlier application as filed. To determine whether subject-matter extends beyond the content of the earlier application (Article 76(1) EPC), the same principles are to be applied as for Article 123(2) EPC. Thus, the subject-matter must be directly and unambiguously derivable from the earlier application as filed (see G 1/05, OJ EPO 2008, 271 and G 1/06, OJ EPO 2008, 307).

2.3 As confirmed by the appellant, the additional wording "at least partially surrounding the main bladder tube (34)" was inserted at the wrong section of claim 9 of the main request. It should have been inserted in feature [9.1.1] as in corresponding claim 1 of the main request and as was done in claim 9 of the first auxiliary request. Thus, there is agreement that there is no basis in the earlier application for the feature "a main bladder tube (34) at least partially surrounding the main bladder tube (34)".

2.4 Conclusion on allowability of amendments in the main request

The subject-matter of claim 9 of the main request does not fulfil the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC.

3. First auxiliary request: allowability of amendments

3.1 Feature [1.1.1] "a liner assembly (14) comprising a main liner member (38) at least partially surrounding the main bladder tube (34) and a lateral liner tube (40)" of claim 1 was disputed as extending beyond the content of the earlier application as filed (document D0).

3.2 The appellant cited page 4, line 31 to page 5, line 2 and Figures 1 to 3 of document D0 as basis for feature [1.1.1]. This passage reads as follows: "Similarly, the T-shaped or Y-shaped liner assembly 14 includes a main liner tube 38 and a lateral liner tube 40. The bladder assembly 16 is fitted on the interior of the liner assembly 14." However, this passage and Figures 1 to 3 of document D0 refer to a main liner tube, while feature [1.1.1] refers to a main liner member. As can be seen from dependent claims 3 and 9 of document D0, according to which the main liner member is formed as a tube, "main liner tube" and "main liner member" are not used synonymously in the earlier application. Rather, "main liner member" constitutes the general disclosure in document D0, while "main liner tube" is the specific disclosure. Therefore, the above cited passage and Figures 1 to 3 of document D0 referring to the specific disclosure "main liner tube" do not directly and unambiguously disclose feature [1.1.1] directed at the general wording "main liner member".

In that respect, the appellant argued that the main liner member and the main liner tube were functional equivalents. However, even if this were true, arguing that an amended claim feature was functionally equivalent to an originally disclosed feature is not sufficient for proving a direct and unambiguous disclosure.

3.3 Moreover, in the present case the board understands the term "partially surrounding" in the circumferential and not the longitudinal direction. Thus, a partial surrounding of the main bladder tube is neither implied by the term "is fitted on" nor shown by the figures of document D0.

3.4 Conclusion on allowability of amendments in the first auxiliary request

The subject-matter of claim 1 of the first auxiliary request does not fulfil the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC.

4. Second auxiliary request: allowability of amendments

Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request equally contains the amended feature "a liner assembly (14) comprising a main liner member (38) at least partially surrounding the main bladder tube (34) and a lateral liner tube (40)" of claim 1 of the first auxiliary request. Thus, the subject-matter of claim 1 of the second auxiliary request does not fulfil the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC for the same reasons as set out above for claim 1 of the first auxiliary request.

5. Third auxiliary request: admittance

5.1 In the case in hand, the summons to oral proceedings was notified after the date on which the revised version of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA 2020, OJ EPO 2019, A63) entered into force, i.e. 1 January 2020 (see Article 24(1) RPBA 2020). Thus, in accordance with Article 25(3), Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 applies.

5.2 The appellant filed this request during the oral proceedings before the board as a reaction to the respondent's arguments on the allowability of feature [1.1.1] presented at a very late stage, i.e. after the board's communication and during the oral proceedings before the board. In particular, the appellant referred to the fact that the respondent raised the issue of the distinction between "main liner member" and "main liner tube" in the disclosure of document D0 for the first time during the oral proceedings before the board. Also the difference between US and European pipeline joints were outlined only during the oral proceedings before the board. This late development of the respondent's arguments presented in the letter of 31 March 2022, led the board to the conclusion - departing from that expressed in its preliminary opinion (see communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020, point 10.3.1) - that the first and the second auxiliary requests did not meet the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC.

5.3 Under these exceptional circumstances, the board is satisfied that the appellant justified the filing of the third auxiliary request with cogent reasons within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020. On account of the principles set out in Article 13(1) RPBA 2020, the board is also satisfied that the third auxiliary request does not involve new subject-matter to be discussed and is therefore not detrimental to procedural economy.

In view of the above, the board exercised its discretion in accordance with Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 and decided to admit the appellant's third auxiliary request into the appeal proceedings.

6. Third auxiliary request: allowability of amendments

6.1 The amended feature [9.1.1] of claim 1 reads as follows: "a liner assembly (14) comprising a main liner tube (38) surrounding the main bladder tube (34) and a lateral liner tube (40)". The appellant cited page 4, line 31 to page 5, line 2 and Figures 1 to 3 of document D0 as basis for this feature.

6.2 According to this text passage, the bladder assembly, comprising a main bladder tube and a lateral bladder tube, is fitted on the interior of the liner assembly which comprises a main liner tube and a lateral liner tube. However, it cannot be directly and unambiguously derived from this disclosure that the main liner tube is surrounding the main bladder tube. The term "fitted on" is not synonymous with the term "surrounding". Figures 1 to 3 (as well as related Figures 4 to 6) of document D0 and the corresponding parts of the description show that the main liner tube surrounds the main bladder tube, but only when the edges of the main liner tube overlap, as specifically shown in Figure 1 (or 4). Since this limitation is missing from claim 1 of the third auxiliary request, there is an unallowable intermediate generalisation of the disclosure of document D0.

6.3 Conclusion on allowability of amendments in the third auxiliary request

The subject-matter of claim 1 of the third auxiliary request does not fulfil the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC.

7. Overall conclusion

Since none of the appellant's requests is allowable, the appeal has to be dismissed.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility