T 0239/20 of 03.05.2022
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T023920.20220503
- Date of decision
- 3 May 2022
- Case number
- T 0239/20
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 09169856.3
- IPC class
- B60N 2/28
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- No distribution (D)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Harness storage system for child car seats
- Applicant name
- Wonderland Nurserygoods Company Limited
- Opponent name
- CYBEX GmbH
Intervener:
Columbus Trading-Partners GmbH & Co. KG - Board
- 3.2.01
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 100(c)European Patent Convention Art 111(1)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(3)European Patent Convention Art 54(2)European Patent Convention Art 83European Patent Convention R 139European Patent Convention R 99(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 011Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(5)
- Keywords
- Correction of error - (yes)
Remittal - direct (no) ; Intervention
Remittal - special reasons for remittal (yes)
Grounds for opposition - subject-matter extends beyond content of earlier application (yes)
Amendment to case - auxiliary request 2
Amendment to case - amendment overcomes objection (no)
Amendments - auxiliary request 21
Amendments - extension beyond the content of the application as filed (no)
Amendments - extension of scope of protection (no)
Discretion not to admit submission - requirements of Art. 12(3) RPBA 2020 met (yes)
Sufficiency of disclosure - auxiliary request 21 (yes)
Novelty - public prior use availability to the public (yes)
Novelty - auxiliary request 21 (yes) - Catchword
- -
- Citing cases
- T 0439/24
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the Opposition Division for further prosecution.