Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0956/98 20-10-2000
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0956/98 20-10-2000

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2000:T095698.20001020
Date of decision
20 October 2000
Case number
T 0956/98
Petition for review of
-
Application number
90114887.4
IPC class
H01B 12/06
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 31.09 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Superconductive conductor

Applicant name
SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, LTD.
Opponent name
Siemens AG
Board
3.5.02
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 54 1973
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
Keywords

Novelty (yes)

Inventive step (no)

Twofold problem, whereby the non-inventive solution to a problem is also suitable to the solution of the other problem (Bonus effect)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0021/81
T 0069/83
Citing decisions
-

I. The appellant contests the decision of the opposition division to revoke European patent No. 0 412 442. The reason given for the revocation was that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request and claim 1 of the auxiliary request then on file did not involve an inventive step, having regard to the prior art cited by the opponent.

II. In reply to the summons to attend oral proceedings, the appellant filed with the letter dated 12 September 2000 new claims 1 and 2 in replacement of the claims considered in the decision under appeal, and new pages 2, 2a, 2b, 3 and 4 of the description in replacement of pages 2, 3 and 4 of the patent specification. With the letter dated 11 October 2000 the appellant filed a further set of claims 1 and 2 in respect of an auxiliary request.

III. In the oral proceedings held on 20 October 2000 the appellant filed an amended page 2 of the description for the main request and for the auxiliary request.

IV. Claim 1 of the main request is worded as follows:

"A superconductive conductor (8) comprising

at least three longitudinal superconducting wires (3) extending parallel to each other;

a longitudinal supporting member (9) having a symmetrical cross-section, for supporting said superconducting wires (3) which are arranged parallel to said supporting member and which partially or entirely cover the periphery thereof, such that the superconducting wires (3) are symmetrically arranged when viewed in cross-section, and

each superconductive wire (3) comprises a superconductive member (4) and a stabilizing member (5) enclosing said superconductive member (4),

characterized in that

said superconducting wires (3) are tape-shaped wires,

said superconductive members (4) are oxide superconductors,

each superconductive wire (3) is extending linearly in the longitudinal direction of said supporting member (9),

wherein said supporting member (9) is a hollow tube of polygonal cross-section, and said superconducting wires (3) are arranged on the outer periphery of said hollow tube,

the surfaces of said tape-shaped superconducting wires (3) are disposed to face radially from the center of the polygonal cross section so that each of said tape-shaped superconducting wires (3) is disposed completely on a side of the polygonal cross section, and

said tape-shaped superconducting wires (3) are disposed adjoining to one another, the width dimension of each of said tape-shaped superconducting wires (3) being approximately equal to the side dimension of each side of the polygonal cross-section."

Claim 1 of the auxiliary request differs from claim 1 of the main request in that the superconductive conductor (8) comprises "at least five longitudinal superconducting wires" and in that the polygonal cross-section of the hollow tube is specified as "having at least five sides".

Claim 2 is dependent on claim 1 of each request.

V. The following documents cited in support of the opposition have been taken into consideration in the appeal procedure:

D1: DE-A-2 035 654,

D2: Takeshi HIKATA et al., "Ag-Sheathed Bi-Pb-Sr-Ca-Cu-O Superconducting Wires with High Critical Current Density", Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 28, No. 1, January 1989; pages L82 to L84,

D4: DE-A-2 749 052,

D10: DE-B-1 952 148,

D11: DE-A-2 029 076,

D12: DE-A-2 136 019.

VI. With the statement of grounds of appeal the appellant patent proprietor submitted a sheet of explanatory Figures A, B, C and D, and referred to the following documents:

Document A: KEN-ICHI SATO et al., "Electromagnetic Properties and Structures of BiPbSrCaCuO Superconducting Wires", Advances in Superconductivity II, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Superconductivity (ISS '89), 14-17 November 1989, Tsukuba, Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1990,

Document B: Munetsugu Ueyama et al., "Transport Properties of Silver-sheathed Bi(2223) Superconducting Wires and Coils for High-Field", Proceedings of the 9th US-Japan Workshop on HIGH-FIELD SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS, WIRES AND CONDUCTORS and STANDARD PROCEDURES FOR HIGH-FIELD SUPERCONDUCTING WIRES TESTING, 13-15 March 1995, Holiday Inn Kyoto, K. Osamura et al. Editors.

VII. With the letter dated 11 September 2000 the respondent opponent cited the following additional documents:

D13: G.A. Whitlow et al. "SILVER ENCASED HIGH TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTOR RIBBONS PRODUCED BY ROLLING", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 25. NO. 2, MARCH 1989, pages 2317 to 2319.

D14: M. MIMURA et al. :"Improvement of the critical current density in the silver sheathed Bi-Pb-Sr-Ca-Cu-O superconducting tape", Applied Physics Letters, 54 (16), 17 April 1989, pages 1582 to 1584.

VIII. The appellant argued essentially as follows:

D1 described a superconductive conductor according to the pre-characterizing part of claim 1 of the main request. Document A (Figure 7) and document B (Figure 2) showed that the critical current density in oxide superconductors greatly decreased under the influence of a magnetic field applied in a direction perpendicular to the plane of a tape-shaped wire as compared with the decrease of critical current density produced by a magnetic field applied in a direction parallel to the plane of the tape-shaped wire. The detrimental influence of this field anisotropy in oxide high-temperature superconductive materials did not occur in the low-temperature superconductive materials mentioned in documents D1, D4, D10, D11 and D12, so the skilled person seeking to eliminate or reduce this influence in oxide superconductors would not look for a solution in the field of conventional low-temperature superconductors.

The arrangement specified in claim 1 was efficient in that it minimized the spacing between adjacent tape-shaped wires and provided for the width dimension of each of the tape-shaped wires to be approximately equal to the side dimension of each side of the polygonal cross-section of the supporting member, as depicted for example in Figure D of the sheet submitted with the statement of grounds of appeal. This arrangement insured a substantial cancellation of the vertical components of the magnetic field produced by current flowing in the conductor and resulted in a higher value of the critical current density.

The field anisotropy problem did not arise in the low-temperature tape-shaped metal superconductors disclosed in D4 and D10. In D4 (see in particular Figure 5) the superconductors were accommodated in recesses and were not disposed adjoining to one another as specified in claim 1. In D10, although the superconductors were disposed adjoining to one another, their width was not equal to the side dimension of each side of the rectangular cross-section. Even if it was admitted that a person skilled in the art might by chance arrange tape-shaped oxide superconductors in one of the geometrical arrangements of the tape-shaped metal superconductors wires disclosed in D4 or D10, he could not have expected to obtain the field anisotropy compensation effects obtained by the present invention. This conclusion also applied when considering the arrangements which could be obtained from various combinations of the teachings of other documents such as D11 which dealt with low-temperature metal superconductors.

IX. The respondent's arguments can be summarised as follows:

The problem underlying the alleged invention should first be correctly defined. It was known from the prior art disclosed in D2, for example, that a problem might be seen in the fact that the component of the magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of a tape-shaped oxide superconductive wire heavily reduced the value of the critical current density in this wire. It was known to the skilled person that a current flowing through a conductor produced a magnetic field, including the vertical field component referred to by the appellant as being responsible for the decrease of the value of the critical current density in a tape-shaped oxide superconductive conductor. It was obvious that the effect of this component should be eliminated or reduced.

It was known that the strength of the magnetic field produced by an electric current flowing through a wire decreased with increasing distance from the wire. According to the appellant, the desired reduction of the net vertical magnetic field component was obtained by adjoining the tape-shaped wires to one another on the sides of the polygonal support member. However, the only material with superconductive properties was the oxide enclosed in the stabilizing metal matrix, not the metal matrix itself. Since claim 1 did not define the spacing between neighbouring oxide superconductive zones or of the value of the angle formed by the adjoining extremities of the tape-shaped wires, the geometry of the arrangement according to claim 1 did not differ from that known from D10, which described a superconductive conductor comprising tape-shaped superconductive metal wires disposed on the sides of a hollow supporting member having a polygonal cross-section (see claim 5 of D10) in such a manner that the wires adjoined to one another and the width of each wire was approximately equal to the side dimension of each side of the supporting member. D10 had to be considered as the document representing the prior art closest to the invention.

D10 was relevant to the claimed superconductive conductor because it concerned the problem of cooling which was a problem common to all types of superconductor. Superconductive conductors using tape-shaped oxide superconductive materials were known from the prior art disclosed in D2. Once they became available, it was obvious to try them instead of the low-temperature superconductors in D10. This was a mere analogous substitution, cf Guidelines for examination in the European Patent Office, Part C, Chapter IV-Annex, 1.1 (iv). Since efficient cooling was important in high-temperature oxide superconductive devices as well as in low-temperature metal devices, the skilled person would have tried arranging the tape-shaped oxide superconductive materials in the same or a similar manner as that taught by D10 for superconductive conductors with metal tape-shaped wires, in the expectation of obtaining efficient cooling.

X. The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and the patent be maintained as amended

- with claims 1 and 2 and pages 2a, 2b, 3 and 4 of the description filed with the letter dated 12. September 2000, page 2 of the description submitted during the oral proceedings before the Board and the drawings of the patent specification (main request), or

- with claims 1 and 2 filed with the letter dated 11. October 2000, description and drawings as per main request (auxiliary request).

XI. The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed.

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. The Board considers that document D10 discloses the closest prior art, namely a superconductive conductor having the following features:

- four longitudinal superconductive wires 3 extending parallel to each other,

- a longitudinal supporting member 1 having a symmetrical cross-section, for supporting said superconducting wires 3 which are arranged parallel to said supporting member 1 and which entirely cover the periphery thereof, such that the superconducting wires 3 are symmetrically arranged when viewed in cross-section, whereby

- each superconducting wire 3 comprises superconductive members 4 and a stabilizing member enclosing said superconductive members 4,

- said superconducting wires 3 are tape-shaped wires, each superconductive wire 3 extending linearly in the longitudinal direction of said supporting member 1, wherein said supporting member 1 is a hollow tube of polygonal cross-section (see Figure 1, column 4, lines 19 to 22. and claim 5 of D10) and said superconducting wires 3 are arranged on the outer periphery of said hollow tube,

- the surfaces of said tape-shaped superconducting wires 3 are disposed to face radially from the center of the polygonal cross-section so that each of said tape-shaped superconducting wires 3 is disposed on a side of the polygonal cross-section, and

- said tape-shaped superconducting wires 3 are disposed adjoining to one another, the width dimension of each of said tape-shaped superconducting wires 3 being approximately equal to the side dimension of each side of the polygonal cross-section.

3. Novelty

3.1. The subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request differs from the superconductive conductor disclosed in D10 in that:

- according to claim 1, the superconductive members are oxide superconductors, whereas in D1 they are metal superconductors, and

- according to claim 1 each of the tape-shaped superconducting wires is disposed completely on a side of the polygonal cross-section, whereas in D10 they are shown in Figure 1 as each extending beyond one edge of the side of the cross-section by an amount equal to the thickness of the adjoining tape.

3.2. Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request is new.

4. Inventive step

4.1. It is stated in the contested patent (see the printed patent specification, column 2, lines 31 to 36) that the object of the present invention is to provide a superconductive conductor capable of implementing a superconductive cable or a current lead, which can suppress the amount of evaporation of a cooling medium absolutely or substantially with no Joule loss caused by energization. It is also stated at column 3, lines 6 to 16 that according to the invention the superconducting wires are arranged ... so that the electromagnetic force and magnetic fields provided by the superconducting wires cancel each other. Therefore it is possible to reduce distortion and influence by applied magnetic fields. Thus, according to the present invention, it is possible to obtain a superconductive conductor which has excellent superconduction properties such as a critical current.

4.2. In the prior art known from document D10 the superconducting wires are arranged so that the magnetic fields provided by the superconducting wires cancel each other, thereby promoting a high critical current density, at least to the extent achieved by the arrangement specified in claim 1 of the main request. Furthermore, the prior art known from document D10 provides good cooling efficiency. Thus, starting from the prior art known from document D10, the objective problem underlying the contested patent is to provide a superconductive conductor having lower Joule losses, while retaining a high critical current density.

4.3. Document D10 dates from the time before the discovery of high-temperature superconductive materials such as oxide superconductors. Thus it teaches how to provide effective cooling for "classical" low-temperature superconductors. Documents D2, D13 and D14, published nearly 20 years after the filing date in respect of D10, describe the manufacture of tape-shaped superconductive wires made of oxide superconductor embedded in a stabilizing metal member. Oxide superconductors are high-temperature superconductive materials whose transition temperatures are above 77 K, permitting them to be cooled with liquid nitrogen instead of requiring the more expensive liquid helium necessary for cooling classical superconductors. The Board agrees with the respondent that it was therefore obvious to any person skilled in the art to try to substitute the recently available tape-shaped superconductive wires made of oxide superconductor embedded in a stabilizing metal member (D2, D13, D14) for the tape-shaped superconductive wires made of classical low-temperature superconductor embedded in a stabilizing metal members (D10). The skilled person would expect this to lead to lower Joule losses, and the teaching of D10 to dispose the plane surfaces of the tape-shaped wires on the plane sides of the polygonal cross-section of the hollow tube to obtain an optimum heat transfer from the wires to the cooling medium within the tube is quite obviously applicable independently of the nature of the superconductive material.

4.4. As shown in Figure 1 of D10, a small region at one edge of the surface of each of the superconductive wires extends beyond the edge of the side of the hollow tube by an amount equal to the thickness of the adjoining tape and is soldered to the end of the adjacent superconductive wire. It is obvious to the skilled person that this small region is not cooled as well as the rest of the tape because it is not in contact with the hollow tube and that the cooling efficiency would be improved if the tape-shaped superconductive wires were disposed completely on the sides of the tube.

4.5. As pointed out by the appellant, the problem of field anisotropy was not and could not be mentioned in D10 because this problem simply does not occur in low-temperature metal superconductors. The Board observes, however, that this problem is known from the prior art disclosed in D2, D13 and D14. An example indicated in D2 (page L83, right-hand column, second paragraph) shows that the value of the critical current density JC in a magnetic field of 0.1 T reduced to 900 A/cm2 when the magnetic field is perpendicular to the plane of the tape-shape wire in comparison with its value (1660 A/cm2) when the field is parallel to this plane. As pointed out by the respondent, in reciting that "said tape-shaped superconducting wires (3) are disposed adjoining to one another", claim 1 specifies that the extremities of the adjacent stabilizing members, not those of the oxide superconductive members (4), are adjoining to one another. No information is given in the claim about the spacing between the extremities of the magnetic field producing oxide superconductive members, or about the angle subtended between adjacent superconductive wires.

4.6. Under such circumstances, the skilled person, starting from the prior art known from D10 and updating it to take advantage of the high-temperature oxide superconductor tape-shaped wires disclosed in D2, as explained in paragraphs 4.2 to 4.4 above, would also have obtained the additional advantageous effect, possibly unforeseen by this person, of a reduction of the vertical component of the magnetic field. According to the established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO (see for example the published decisions T 21/81 (OJ EPO 1983, 15) and T 69/83 (OJ EPO 1984, 357)) such a "bonus effect" is not regarded as an indication of inventive step.

4.7. Summarising, the Board concludes that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request can be derived without inventive step from the prior art disclosed in D2 and D10.

4.8. Claim 1 of the auxiliary request differs from claim 1 of the main request only in that the superconductive conductor (8) comprises "at least five longitudinal superconducting wires" and in that the polygonal cross-section of the hollow tube is specified as "having at least five sides".

4.9. As was explained in the oral proceedings, the Board need not decide whether "polygonal", as used in the patent in suit, implies "at least five". If it doesn't, the auxiliary request would contravene Article 123(2) EPC because "at least five" is not disclosed expressis verbis in the application as originally filed. If "at least five" is implied by "polygonal", as used in the patent in suit, it is equally implied by "Polygonform" and "polygonförmig", as used in D10, see D10: claim 5 and column 4, lines 19 to 22. Thus this feature could not contribute to inventive step.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility