|European Case Law Identifier:||ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T233214.20200108|
|Date of decision:||08 January 2020|
|Case number:||T 2332/14|
|IPC class:||G01N 33/574|
|Language of proceedings:||EN|
|Download and more information:||
|Title of application:||METHODS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF EPITHELIAL-DERIVED CANCERS, SUCH AS COLORECTAL CANCERS AND KIDNEY CANCERS|
|Applicant name:||UCB Pharma S.A.|
|Opponent name:||Seattle Genetics, Inc.|
|Relevant legal provisions:||
|Keywords:||Lapse of patent in all designated states - termination of appeal proceedings|
Summary of Facts and Submissions
I. The present appeal was lodged by the opponent against the interlocutory decision of the opposition division, according to which European patent No. 1459070 could be maintained in amended form on the basis of the first auxiliary request (Articles 101(3)(a) and 106(2) EPC).
II. A communication of the board dated 6 March 2019 was issued, drawing the parties' attention to the fact that according to the entries in the European Patent Register, the patent had lapsed with effect for all designated Contracting States. Pursuant to Rules 84(1) and 100(1) EPC, the appellant (opponent) was invited to inform the board, within two months from notification of the communication, whether they requested a continuation of the appeal proceedings. The parties were informed that if no request for continuation of proceedings was received in due time, the appeal proceedings might be discontinued.
III. Acknowledgements of receipt dated 13 March 2019 and 12 March 2019 were returned to the EPO by the appellant and by the respondent, respectively.
IV. No reply was received within the time period set in the board's communication.
Reasons for the Decision
1. Pursuant to Rule 84(1) EPC, if the European patent has been surrendered in all the designated Contracting States or has lapsed in all those States, the opposition proceedings may be continued at the request of the opponent filed within two months of a communication from the European Patent Office informing him of the surrender or lapse. According to Rule 100(1) EPC, Rule 84(1) EPC also applies in opposition-appeal proceedings.
2. If no request for continuation of the proceedings is filed within the set time period and the state of the file gives no grounds for the proceedings to be continued by the board of its own motion, the appeal proceedings are terminated (see e.g. decisions T 165/95, T 289/06, T 926/13).
3. In the present case, the communication dated 6 March 2019 informing of the lapse within the meaning of Rule 84(1) EPC was deemed to be delivered to the appellant on 16 March 2019 (Rule 126(2) EPC). Thus, the period of two months for requesting continuation of the appeal proceedings ended on 16 May 2019 (Rule 131(2),(4) EPC). No request for continuation of the appeal proceedings was received within the set time period or within the period under Rule 133(1) EPC. Furthermore, the board sees no reason to continue the proceedings of its own motion. Hence, the appeal proceedings are to be terminated.
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal proceedings are terminated.