J 0014/12 of 12.12.2013
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2013:J001412.20131212
- Date of decision
- 12 December 2013
- Case number
- J 0014/12
- Online on
- 19 December 2013
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 10185974.2
- IPC class
- C23F 3/00C23F 1/16C23C 14/34
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Distributed to board chairmen (C)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Method of manufacturing enhanced finish sputtering targets
- Applicant name
- Praxair S.T. Technology, Inc.
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.1.01
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- EPC2000 Art 086(1) Sentence 1EPC2000 Art 086(1) Sentence 2European Patent Convention R 51(2)EPC2000 R 051(3) Sentence 1EPC2000 R 051(3) Sentence 2European Patent Convention R 103(1)(a)blankRFees (as amended by the Decision AC of 9 December 2008) Art 005(1)blankRFees (as amended by the Decision AC of 9 December 2008) Art 005(2)blankArrangement for deposit accounts (valid as from 1 April 2009) 6(1)blankArrangement for deposit accounts (valid as from 1 April 2009) 6(2)blankArrangement for deposit accounts (valid as from 1 April 2009) 6(3)blankSchedule of fees and expenses of the EPO (applicable as from 1 April 2010) 1.A(5)blankRFees (as amended by the Decision AC of 9 December 2008) Art 002(1)
- Keywords
- Refund of additional fees relating to renewal fees
Reimbursement of appeal fee - (no) - Catchword
- -
- Citing cases
- T 1474/19
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside insofar as the refund of the additional fees relating to the renewal fees for the 3rd to 10th years is concerned. For the remainder the appeal is rejected.
2. The reimbursement of the additional fees relating to the renewal fees for the 3rd to 10th years is ordered.
3. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is refused.