J 0025/96 (Re-establishment) of 11.04.2000

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2000:J002596.20000411
Date of decision: 11 April 2000
Case number: J 0025/96
Petition for review of: -
Application number: 91915567.1
IPC class: -
Language of proceedings: English
Distribution: Distributed to board chairmen (C)
Download: Decision in English
OJ versions: No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case: -
Abstracts for this decision: -
Application title: -
Applicant name: -
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.1.01
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions: European Patent Convention Art 111(1) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 122 1973 European Patent Convention Art 157(2)(b) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 158(2) 1973 European Patent Convention R 104b 1973 European Patent Convention R 69 1973 European Patent Convention R 85a 1973
Keywords: Re-establishment - time limits for entry into the regional phase before the EPO
Admissibility - yes - transitional case
Allowability - due care of US representative - no
Application of principle of proportionality - no
Catchword: -
Cited cases: G 0003/91 G 0005/93 J 0005/80 J 0003/88 J 0031/90 J 0022/92 J 0044/92 J 0048/92 J 0004/93 J 0011/93 J 0016/93 T 0112/89 T 0869/90 T 0111/92
Citing cases: J 0004/07 J 0005/18 J 0001/20 T 0541/04 T 1401/05 T 1022/14 T 1222/19 T 3085/19

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside so far as it concerns the rejection of the request for re-establishment as inadmissible under point 1 of that decision.

2. The request for re-establishment is refused.

3. Except as ordered above, the appeal is dismissed.