T 1969/08 (Touch screen with layered structure/TAIGUEN) of 07.06.2011
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T196908.20110607
- Date of decision
- 7 June 2011
- Case number
- T 1969/08
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 02771991.3
- IPC class
- G06F 3/033
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Distributed to board chairmen (C)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- A touch control display screen with a built-in electromagnet induction layer of septum array grids
- Applicant name
- Taiguen Technology (Shen_zhen) Co., Ltd., et al
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.5.05
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 106European Patent Convention Art 107European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 111(1)European Patent Convention Art 113(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 84European Patent Convention Art 97(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art (4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(6)
- Keywords
- Sole request filed after summons for oral proceedings returns to subjet-matter abandoned during first-instance proceedings
Non-attendance at oral proceedings
Diverging request prima facie clearly allowable (no)
Sole request admissible (no) - Catchword
- If a feature objected to as "obscure" by the examining division and omitted from all requests subsequently filed by the applicant is then re-introduced in the claims filed one month before oral proceedings during the appeal proceedings without commenting on the objection raised earlier against this feature, the board may refuse to admit these claims into the proceedings at its discretion under Article 12(4) RPBA.
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.