T 1101/14 (Inadmissible appeal/PIKSEL) of 12.12.2014
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2014:T110114.20141212
- Date of decision
- 12 December 2014
- Case number
- T 1101/14
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 08743225.8
- IPC class
- G06F 7/00G06Q 30/00
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Distributed to board chairmen (C)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS
- Applicant name
- Piksel, Inc.
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.5.06
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 101(1)European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 122European Patent Convention R 136(1)European Patent Convention R 99(2)
- Keywords
- Admissibility of appeal - appeal sufficiently substantiated (no)
Re-establishment of rights - all due care (no) - Catchword
- A representative who mistakenly signs a statement of grounds of appeal having most of its pages missing must, in the absence of special circumstances which could justify the representative's mistake, be considered not to have taken all due care required by the circumstances (see point 6).
- Cited cases
- T 1095/06
- Citing cases
- J 0001/20
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The request for re-establishment of rights is refused.
2. The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.