Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • Core activities
          • Stories and insights
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2024
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Executive summary
          • Driver 1 – People
          • Driver 2 – Technologies
          • Driver 3 – High-quality, timely products and services
          • Driver 4 – Partnerships
          • Driver 5 – Financial Sustainability
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 2256/17 08-11-2022
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 2256/17 08-11-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T225617.20221108
Date of decision
08 November 2022
Case number
T 2256/17
Petition for review of
-
Application number
14724585.6
IPC class
H04N 19/70
H04N 19/88
H04N 21/44
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 428.38 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

IMPROVED RTP PAYLOAD FORMAT DESIGNS

Applicant name
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Opponent name
-
Board
3.5.04
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(2)
European Patent Convention Art 56
Keywords

Amendment after summons - exceptional circumstances (yes)

Inventive step - (yes)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal is against the examining division's decision to refuse European patent application No. 14 724 585.6, published as international patent application WO 2014/160970 A1. The application claims the priority of US 61/806,705, filed on 29 March 2013, and of US 14/228,164, filed on 27 March 2014.

II. The prior-art documents cited in the decision under appeal included the following:

D2 Y.-K. Wang et al., "RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video", Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Request for Comments: 6184, May 2011, pages 1 to 101, XP015075997

D4 T. Schierl et al., "Wireless broadcasting using the scalable extension of H.264/AVC", 2005 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 6 July 2005, pages 884 to 887, XP002484405

III. The decision under appeal was based on the ground that the subject-matter of none of the claims of the sole request then on file involved an inventive step within the meaning of Article 56 EPC in view of prior-art documents D2 and D4.

IV. With the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant maintained the set of claims according to the sole request on which the impugned decision was based and provided arguments to support its opinion that these claims met the requirements of Article 56 EPC.

V. The board issued a summons to oral proceedings and a communication under Article 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal in the 2020 version (RPBA 2020, see OJ EPO 2019, A63). In this communication, the board gave the following preliminary opinion.

(a) The objection of lack of inventive step raised by the examining division was not justified.

(b) The priority of US 61/806,705, which was filed on 29 March 2013, was not validly claimed for the subject-matter of independent claims 1, 7 and 8.

(c) Since the priority of US 61/806,705 was not valid, the following document, cited in the international preliminary report on patentability, was prior art under Article 54(2) EPC:

D1: T. Schierl et. al., "RTP Payload Format for High Efficiency Video Coding draft-schierl-payload-rtp-h265-02.txt", Network Working Group, Internet Draft, 11 June 2013, pages 1 to 69, XP015090627

(d) The subject-matter of claims 1, 7 and 8 of the main request did not involve an inventive step in view of the disclosure of document D1 (Article 56 EPC).

VI. By letter dated 15 September 2022, the appellant filed amended claims according to a first and a second auxiliary request. It also re-filed the claims of the sole request underlying the decision under appeal as its main request. The appellant provided a basis for the claimed subject-matter and argued why the first and second auxiliary requests should be admitted into the appeal proceedings. Furthermore, the appellant provided arguments to support its opinion that the priority was validly claimed for the subject-matter of the independent claims of the main request, first auxiliary request and second auxiliary request. The appellant took the view that document D1 did not belong to the prior art and that the claimed subject-matter was not obvious in view of the available prior art.

VII. On 8 November 2022, oral proceedings were held before the board.

During the oral proceedings, the appellant filed claims according to an amended first auxiliary request and a corresponding description.

The appellant then made the amended first auxiliary request its sole request and withdrew all of the other requests on file.

The appellant's final requests were that the decision under appeal be set aside and that a European patent be granted on the basis of the claims of the sole request and the description, both filed during the oral proceedings on 8 November 2022, and the drawings of the application as filed.

At the end of the oral proceedings, the chair announced the board's decision.

VIII. The independent claims 1, 3, 4 and 7 of the sole request read as follows:

"1. A method of processing video data, the method comprising:

receiving a first aggregation packet according to a real-time transfer protocol (RTP), wherein the first aggregation packet comprises a payload header followed by payload data comprising a first aggregation unit, that is the first aggregation unit of the first aggregation packet, including a first network abstraction layer (NAL) unit, the payload data further comprising a second aggregation unit, that follows the first aggregation unit in the first aggregation packet, including a second NAL unit, wherein if a transmission mode is equal to multi-session transmission, MST, or if the maximum number of NAL units that precede a NAL unit in a de-packetization buffer in reception order and follow the NAL unit in decoding order is greater than 0, the first aggregation unit further includes a first syntax element and the second aggregation unit further includes a second syntax element;

wherein the first syntax element consists of the 16 least significant bits of the decoding order number for the first NAL unit;

wherein the second syntax element plus 1 specifies a difference between the decoding order number for the first NAL unit and the decoding order number for the second NAL unit; and

determining a decoding order for the second NAL unit included in the second aggregation unit, wherein the decoding order for the second NAL unit included in the second aggregation unit is derived as equal to the first syntax element plus the second syntax element plus 1 modulo 65536.

3. A method of processing video data, the method comprising:

packetizing two or more network abstraction layer (NAL) units into a first aggregation packet according to an RTP protocol, wherein the first aggregation packet comprises a payload header followed by payload data comprising a first aggregation unit, that is the first aggregation unit of the aggregation packet, including a first NAL unit, the payload data further comprising a second aggregation unit, that follows the aggregation unit in the aggregation packet, including a second NAL unit, wherein if a transmission mode is equal to multi-session transmission, MST, or if the maximum number of NAL units that precede a NAL unit in a depacketization buffer in reception order and follow the NAL unit in decoding order is greater than 0, the first aggregation unit further including a first syntax element and the second aggregation unit further including a second syntax element;

setting a value for the first syntax element of the first aggregation unit, the first syntax element consisting of the 16 least significant bits of the decoding order number for the first NAL unit; and

setting a value for the second syntax element of the second aggregation unit, and wherein the second syntax element plus 1 specifies a difference between the decoding order number for the first NAL unit included in the first aggregation unit and a decoding order number for the second NAL unit, wherein the value for the second syntax element is derived as equal to a decoding order for the second aggregation unit minus the first syntax element minus 1 modulo 65536.

4. A device for processing video data, the apparatus comprising:

a memory;

a receiver configured to receive real-time transport protocol (RTP) packets;

one or more processors configured to:

receive a first aggregation packet according to a real-time transfer protocol (RTP), wherein the first aggregation packet comprises a payload header followed by payload data comprising a first aggregation unit, that is the first aggregation unit of the first aggregation packet, including a first network abstraction layer (NAL) unit, the payload data further comprising a second aggregation unit, that follows the first aggregation unit in the first aggregation packet, including a second NAL unit, wherein if a transmission mode is equal to multi-session transmission, MST, or if the maximum number of NAL units that precede a NAL unit in a de-packetization buffer in reception order and follow the NAL unit in decoding order is greater than 0" the first aggregation unit further includes a first syntax element and the second aggregation unit further includes a second syntax element;

wherein the first syntax element consists of the 16 least significant bits of the decoding order number for the first NAL unit;

wherein the second syntax element plus 1 specifies a difference between the decoding order number for the first NAL unit and the decoding order number for the second NAL unit; and

determine a decoding order for the second NAL unit included in the second aggregation unit, wherein the decoding order for the second NAL unit included in the second aggregation unit is derived as equal to the first syntax element plus the second syntax element plus 1 modulo 65536.

7. A computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that when executed by one or more processors cause the one or more processors to perform the method according to any one of claims 1 to 3."

Claim 2 is dependent on claim 1. Claims 5 and 6 are dependent on claim 4.

IX. In the decision under appeal, the examining division held that document D2 was the closest prior art with regard to the subject-matter of claim 1 of the sole request then on file.

The subject-matter of claim 1 of the sole request then on file differed from the disclosure of document D2 in that the first parameter (i.e. the first syntax element in claim 1 of the current sole request) consisted of the 16 least significant bits of the decoding order for the first NAL unit.

The problem to be solved by the present invention was how to alternatively signal the decoding order number for the first NAL unit of an aggregation packet.

The feature of including the decoding order number in the first NAL unit instead of the header of the aggregation packet was considered an obvious development that the person skilled in the art would have considered when deploying the system according to document D2 in other networking environments, such as in document D4, page 3, left column, lines 2 to 7.

The examining division therefore held that the subject-matter of claim 1 did not involve an inventive step within the meaning of Article 56 EPC.

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. Sole request - admittance (Article 13(2) RPBA 2020)

2.1 The sole request was filed during the oral proceedings and therefore constitutes an amendment within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

2.2 The board found that the objection of lack of inventive step raised by the examining division was not justified. However, the board held that the claimed priority was not valid and raised an objection of lack of inventive step starting from document D1 for the first time in its communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020 (see point V. above). In response to this communication, the appellant filed further requests. During the oral proceedings, the board raised objections of lack of clarity against these further requests for the first time. In response, the appellant filed another set of claims with the aim of overcoming these new objections. These are exceptional circumstances within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020. Exercising its discretion under this provision, the board has thus decided to admit the sole request into the appeal proceedings.

3. Sole request - added subject-matter (Article 123(2) EPC)

3.1 Claim 1 combines the features of claims 1 to 5 as originally filed.

3.2 Claim 1 has been further amended to specify that "if a transmission mode is equal to multi-session transmission, 'MST', or if the maximum number of NAL units that precede a NAL unit in a de-packetization buffer in reception order and follow the NAL unit in decoding order is greater than 0".

This amendment finds a basis in paragraphs [0073] and [0076] of the application as filed, which read "If tx-mode is equal to 'MST' or sprop-depack-buf-nalus is greater than 0, the DONL field MUST be present in an aggregation unit that is the first aggregation unit in an AP" and "If tx-mode is equal to 'MST' or sprop-depack-buf-nalus is greater than 0, the DOND field MUST be present in an aggregation unit that is not the first aggregation unit in an AP".

The sprop-depack-buf-nalus parameter mentioned therein is defined in paragraph [0101] of the application as filed as "the maximum number of NAL units that precede a NAL unit in the de-packetization buffer in reception order and follow the NAL unit in decoding order".

3.3 In addition, claim 1 has been amended to specify that the first aggregation unit further includes a first syntax element and the second aggregation unit further includes a second syntax element.

This amendment finds a basis in paragraph [0071] of the application as filed, which reads "The first aggregation unit in an AP may consist of an optional 16-bit DONL field", and paragraph [0074], which reads "An aggregation unit that is not the first aggregation unit in an AP may consist of an optional 8-bit DOND field".

3.4 Claim 1 has been further amended to specify that the first syntax element consists of the 16 least significant bits of the decoding order number for the first NAL unit.

This amendment finds a basis in paragraph [0072] of the application as filed, which reads "The DONL field, when present, specifies the value of the 16 least significant bits of the decoding order number of the aggregated NAL unit".

3.5 Claim 1 has been further amended to specify that the second syntax element plus 1 specifies a difference between the decoding order number for the first NAL unit and the decoding order number for the second NAL unit.

This amendment finds a basis in paragraph [0075] of the application as filed, which reads "When present, the DOND field plus 1 may specify the difference between the decoding order number values of the current aggregated NAL unit and the preceding aggregated NAL unit in the same AP".

3.6 Claim 1 has been further amended to specify that the decoding order for the second NAL unit included in the second aggregation unit is derived as equal to the first syntax element plus the second syntax element plus 1 modulo 65536.

This amendment finds a basis in paragraph [0073] of the application as filed, which reads "the variable DON for the aggregated NAL unit is derived as equal to the value of the DONL field", and paragraph [0076], which reads "the variable DON for the aggregated NAL unit is derived as equal to the DON of the preceding aggregated NAL unit in the same AP plus the value of the DOND field plus 1 modulo 65536".

3.7 Claim 3 combines the features of original claims 28 to 30. Furthermore, amendments corresponding to those set out under points 3.2 to 3.6 apply.

3.8 Claim 4 combines the features of original claims 10 to 14. Furthermore, amendments corresponding to those set out under points 3.2 to 3.6 apply.

3.9 Dependent claim 2 is based on original dependent claim 6 and the original application paragraphs [0073] and [0076].

3.10 Dependent claim 5 is based on original dependent claim 15 and the original application paragraphs [0073] and [0076].

3.11 Dependent claim 6 corresponds to original claim 19.

3.12 Claim 7 is based on original claim 20.

3.13 In view of the above, the claims of the sole request meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC.

4. Sole request - validity of the claimed priority

4.1 The application claims priority from the following US applications:

P1: US 61/806,705 (filing date 29 March 2013)

P2: US 14/228,164 (filing date 27 March 2014).

4.2 Document P1 discloses the features of claim 1 as follows:

A method of processing video data, the method comprising:

receiving a first aggregation packet according to a real-time transfer protocol (RTP) (see paragraph [0019], which reads "A receiver can identify the type of an RTP packet payload ... The three different payload structures are as follows ... Aggregation packet (AP)"), wherein the first aggregation packet comprises a payload header followed by payload data comprising a first aggregation unit, that is the first aggregation unit of the first aggregation packet, including a first network abstraction layer (NAL) unit, the payload data further comprising a second aggregation unit, that follows the first aggregation unit in the first aggregation packet, including a second NAL unit (see paragraph [0029], which reads "Each NAL unit to be carried in an AP is encapsulated in an aggregation unit. ... An AP consists of a payload header (denoted as PayloadHdr) followed by one or more aggregation units"), wherein if a transmission mode is equal to multi-session transmission, MST, or if the maximum number of NAL units that precede a NAL unit in a de-packetization buffer in reception order and follow the NAL unit in decoding order is greater than 0, the first aggregation unit further includes a first syntax element and the second aggregation unit further includes a second syntax element (see paragraph [0034], which reads "If tx-mode is equal to 'MST' or sprop-depack-buf-nalus is greater than 0, the DONL field MUST be present in aggregation unit that is the first aggregation unit in an AP", and paragraph [0037], which reads "If tx-mode is equal to 'MST' or sprop-depack-buf-nalus is greater than 0, the DOND field MUST be present in an aggregation unit that is not the first aggregation unit in an AP", and paragraph [0062], which reads "sprop-depack-buf-nalus: This parameter specifies the maximum number of NAL units that precede a NAL unit in the de-packetization buffer in reception order and follow the NAL unit in decoding

order");

wherein the first syntax element consists of the 16 least significant bits of the decoding order number for the first NAL unit (see paragraph [0032], which reads "The first aggregation unit in an AP consists of an optional 16-bit DONL field", and paragraph [0033], which reads "The DONL field, when present, specifies the value of the 16 least significant bits of the decoding order number of the aggregated NAL unit");

wherein the second syntax element plus 1 specifies a difference between the decoding order number for the first NAL unit and the decoding order number for the second NAL unit (see paragraph [0036], which reads "When present, the DOND field plus 1 specifies the difference between the decoding order number values of the current aggregated NAL unit and the preceding aggregated NAL unit in the same AP"); and

determining a decoding order for the second NAL unit included in the second aggregation unit, wherein the decoding order for the second NAL unit included in the second aggregation unit is derived as equal to the first syntax element plus the second syntax element plus 1 modulo 65536 (see paragraph [0037], which reads "the variable DON for the aggregated NAL unit is derived as equal to the DON of the preceding aggregated NAL unit in the same AP plus the value of the DOND field plus 1 modulo 65536").

Hence, for claim 1 the priority claimed from document P1 is valid.

4.3 The same applies to independent method claim 3, which comprises features corresponding to those of claim 1 but in the form of packetising NAL units into an aggregation packet. Claim 1 of document P1 discloses a method of processing video operating in packetisation mode.

4.4 The same applies to independent device claim 4, which comprises the same features as claim 1 but in the form of one or more processors configured to carry out the method steps of claim 1. Claim 13 of document P1 discloses a video processing device configured to perform previously specified method steps and comprising one or more processors.

4.5 The same applies to the computer-readable storage medium of claim 7 (see paragraph [0112] of document P1).

4.6 In view of the above, the priority claimed from document P1 (filing date 29 March 2013) is valid for independent claims 1, 3, 4 and 7.

As a consequence, for the assessment of inventive step of these independent claims, document D1, which was published on 11 June 2013, is not prior art under Article 54 EPC.

5. Sole request - inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

5.1 Both the examining division and the appellant regarded document D2 as the closest prior art for the assessment of inventive step of the subject-matter of claim 1. The board concurs with this finding.

5.2 Document D2 specifies RTP payload formats for H.264 video. Under point 5.7.2 on pages 25 to 29, document D2 discloses:

- receiving an RTP packet including an aggregation packet containing two aggregation units (see description of Figure 12)

- the aggregation packet payload consists of a 16 bit decoding order number base (DONB) and one or more aggregation units each containing a network abstraction layer (NAL) unit (see point 5.7.2, first paragraph, and Figure 9)

- the DONB is the decoding order number of the first NAL unit in decoding order among the NAL units in the aggregation packet (see point 5.7.2, first and second paragraphs)

- each aggregation unit includes a NAL unit and a syntax element identifying the decoding order number difference (DOND) for the NAL unit (see page 26, first paragraph)

- the decoding order number (DON) for a NAL unit contained in an aggregation unit is equal to (DONB + DOND) modulo 65536 (see page 26, second paragraph)

5.3 It follows that document D2 does not disclose the following distinguishing features of claim 1:

(a) the first syntax element consists of the decoding order number for the first NAL unit in the aggregation packet

(b) the first syntax element is included in the first aggregation unit

(c) the second syntax element plus 1 specifies a difference between decoding numbers

(d) transmission mode is equal to multi-session transmission, MST, or the maximum number of NAL units that precede a NAL unit in a de-packetization buffer in reception order and follow the NAL unit in decoding order is greater than 0

5.4 Hence, the board finds that there are more distinguishing features than those identified by the examining division for claim 1 of the sole request then on file (see point IX. above).

5.5 The technical effect of distinguishing features (a) and (b) is to specify the decoding order numbers for the NAL units within an aggregation packet in an alternative manner which reduces the number of bits required.

Distinguishing feature (c) is a mere shift of the value range of the second syntax element which has no identified technical effect.

Distinguishing feature (d) concerns the transmission of aggregation packets via multiple RTP flows. This aspect is unrelated to the payload format within a single RTP packet as defined by the distinguishing features (a), (b) and (c). During the oral proceedings, the appellant could not identify a technical effect resulting from distinguishing feature (d).

5.6 The objective technical problem may thus be formulated as how to specify the decoding order numbers for the NAL units within an aggregation packet in an alternative manner.

5.7 In this regard, the person skilled in the art would consider document D4 because it discloses a modified aggregation unit within an aggregation packet (see D4, Figure 4: "modified Multi Time Aggregation Unit"). However, document D4 teaches to replace the decoding order number difference (DOND) within an aggregation unit with an absolute value of a decoding order number (see D4, page 3, left column, first paragraph). Applying this teaching to the RTP payload specified in document D2 would lead to a format in which the decoding order numbers would be given as absolute values for all aggregation units. This would not lead to the claimed subject-matter according to which the second syntax element specifies a difference between decoding order numbers.

Therefore, the board does not share the examining division's view that distinguishing features (a) and (b) were rendered obvious by the combined disclosures of documents D2 and D4 (see point IX. above).

5.8 However, the question arises as to whether the person skilled in the art would have regarded the subject-matter of claim 1 as an obvious alternative to the solution proposed in D2.

5.8.1 One straightforward modification that the skilled person would have considered was to shift a syntax element from a higher layer to a lower layer in order to increase adaptivity.

However, in the present case, shifting the decoding order number base from the general payload data to the first aggregation unit would not have led to the claimed subject-matter. Indeed, the decoding order number base would then still be the decoding order number of the first NAL unit in the decoding order within the aggregation packet, but not the decoding number of the first NAL unit in the aggregation packet as in claim 1.

5.8.2 As an alternative modification, the person skilled in the art might have considered determining the decoding order number base of document D2 in a different manner, for example as the decoding order number of the first NAL unit, or as a mean value of all decoding order numbers in the aggregation packet.

Yet even this would not have led to the feature(s) of claim 1, according to which the first syntax element is included in the first aggregation unit.

5.8.3 In order to arrive at both distinguishing features (a) and (b), the person skilled in the art would have needed to change both the meaning of the first syntax element (from the lowest decoding order number of all aggregation units to the decoding order number of the first aggregation unit) and its position within the RTP payload format (from the general payload to the first aggregation unit).

The board does not find this to be obvious on the basis of common general knowledge, as it would significantly change the structure of an aggregation packet from the uniform structure in document D2, where all aggregation units have the same length and syntax elements, to a structure where the first aggregation unit would have a length and a syntax element differing from those of the subsequent aggregation units.

5.9 Therefore, the board does not consider the subject-matter of claim 1 to be obvious in view of the disclosure of document D2 when combined with either the disclosure of document D4 or the common general knowledge of the person skilled in the art.

5.10 The same applies to the subject-matter of independent claims 3, 4 and 7, which comprises features corresponding to those of claim 1.

5.11 Moreover, the board cannot see any other document or combination of documents on file from which the person skilled in the art would have arrived at the subject-matter of the independent claims in an obvious manner.

5.12 Claims 2, 5 and 6 are dependent claims. Therefore, the subject-matter thereof is not obvious either.

5.13 In view of the above, the claimed subject-matter involves an inventive step within the meaning of Article 56 EPC.

6. The features of the independent claims reflect the structure of an RTP payload. Using a two-part form would distort this structure and is thus not appropriate (Rule 43(1)(b) EPC).

7. The description has been amended in line with the claims of the sole request and complies with the EPC.

8. Conclusion

In view of the above, the present case is to be remitted to the examining division with the order to grant a patent on the basis of the appellant's sole request.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the department of first instance with the order to grant a patent in the following version:

Description

Pages: 1 to 35 filed during the oral proceedings on 8 November 2022

Claims

Nos.: 1 to 7 according to the sole request filed as amended first auxiliary request during the oral proceedings on 8 November 2022

Drawings

Sheets: 1/11 to 11/11 as originally filed

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility