Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t180477eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 0477/18 (Locating partial discharges in an electric apparatus / Techimp) 23-09-2022
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 0477/18 (Locating partial discharges in an electric apparatus / Techimp) 23-09-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T047718.20220923
Date of decision
23 September 2022
Case number
T 0477/18
Petition for review of
-
Application number
10712578.3
IPC class
G01R 31/08
G01R 31/12
G01R 31/14
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 374.45 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

DEVICE AND METHOD FOR LOCATING PARTIAL DISCHARGES

Applicant name
Techimp HQ S.R.L.
Opponent name
Omicron Energy Solutions GmbH
Board
3.4.01
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 100(b)
European Patent Convention Art 83
Keywords

Grounds for opposition - insufficiency of disclosure (yes)

evidence for common general knowledge not sufficient

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal was filed by the appellant/patentee against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke European patent 2 411 823. ­

II. The opposition relied on the grounds that the patent did not disclose the invention in a sufficient manner (Article 100(b) EPC) and on the lack of novelty and/or lack of an inventive step of the claimed subject-matter (Article 100(a) EPC).

III. In its decision, the Opposition Division held that the ground for opposition raised under Article 100(b) EPC prejudiced the maintenance of the patent as granted and that auxiliary requests 1 to 4 did not meet the requirements of Article 83 EPC. The other grounds for opposition raised by the opponent were not addressed.

Concretely, the Opposition Division held that the patent specification did not contain any definition of the notion of "shape parameter". With regard to documents:

A1: LEMKE E. et al.; "GUIDE FOR PARTIAL DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS IN COMPLIANCE TO IEC 60270', WG D1.33, CIGRE, pages 1-55, December 1998;

A2: CAVALLINI A. et al.; "A Novel Method to Locate PD in Polymeric Cable Systems Based on Amplitude-Frequency (AF) Map", IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, IEEE SERVICE CENTER, PISCATAWAY, NJ, US, vol. 14, no. 3, 1 June 2007,pages 726-734; and

A3: CAVALLINI A. et al. "Advanced PD Inference in On-Field Measurements; Part I: Noise Rejection"; IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, vol. 12, no. 2, 1 April 2003, pages 216-224;

which had been filed by the patentee, the Opposition Division expressed doubts that the cited documents qualified as evidence for common general knowledge. This applied, in particular, to documents A2 and A3 which were not reference textbooks, but scientific papers. As observed by the Opposition Division, document A1 did also not contain any reference to the term in question, referring, more generally, to the notion of pulse shape.

IV. The appellant/patentee requested, as a main request, that the decision of the Opposition Division be set aside and the patent be maintained as granted. In the alternative, maintenance of the patent according to one of auxiliary requests 1 to 4, filed with the statement of grounds, was requested.

In support of its argumentation, according to which the skilled person would have known about the concepts used throughout the application from its general knowledge, the appellant filed new documents:

A4: BSI Standards publication; "Rotating electrical machines, Part 27-2, On-line partial discharge measurements on the stator winding insulation of rotating electrical machines"; 31 October 2012; PD IEC/TS 60034-27-2 2012; and

A5: IEEE Guide for the Measurement of Partial Discharges in AC Electric Machinery; (IEEE Std 1434**TM-2014 - Revision of IEEE Std 1434-2000); Approved on 3 November 2014;

as further evidence for common general knowledge.

V. The respondent/opponent requested, as a main request, that the appeal be dismissed. In the case that the Board decided that the conditions of sufficiency of disclosure were met, remittal of the case to the Opposition Division for examination of the other grounds for opposition was requested, as an auxiliary request.

In the substance, the respondent reiterated the view that the patent specification did not allow the skilled person to carry out the claimed invention. The mere indication that the "shape parameter" was correlated to the waveform of the corresponding pulse was not sufficient to identify said parameter on the basis of which partial discharges occurring at a discharge site in an electric apparatus would have been located.

The respondent further requested that late-filed documents A4 and A5 not be admitted into the appeal proceedings.

VI. Both parties requested oral proceedings in case their respective requests were not accepted.

VII. In a communication pursuant to Article 15(1) RPBA, the parties were informed of the preliminary view of the Board.

The Board essentially concurred with the Opposition Division in its primary finding that the patent specification did not contain any definition of a "shape parameter". It was observed, in this respect, that the description merely specified that a first shape parameter is correlated with the frequency content of the signal and that a second shape parameter is correlated with its duration, as was recited in the independent claims of the patentee's auxiliary requests. In the absence of any such definition in the patent specification, the question of sufficiency boiled down to determine whether common general knowledge indeed provided the skilled person with the required information.

In view of the evidence made available in the form of documents A1, A2 and A3, it had to be established whether said documents qualified as evidence of common general knowledge and whether the skilled person would have found in A2 or A3 sufficient information to identify a "shape parameter" that would meet the requirements of sufficiency in the context of the claimed invention.

The Board further indicated that it intended not to admit new documents A4 and A5 into the proceedings. While acknowledging that both documents qualify as evidence of common general knowledge, it was stressed that they were both published after the filing date of the patent application. The Board also expressed doubts regarding the substance of said documents and their suitability to provide the required information. There was namely no indication in A4 and A5 that the parameters regarding the equivalent bandwidth and equivalent time length characterising partial discharges (PD) could also be used to recognise homologous PD signals, that is, PD signals received by measuring stations located at different distances from the PD location.

The board was thus not persuaded that the skilled person would have found in any of documents A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5 a definition for a "shape parameter" that would have been adapted to solve the problem addressed by the claimed invention.

VIII. Oral proceedings were cancelled after that the patentee had announced that they would not attend.

IX. Neither the appellant/patentee nor the respondent/opponent commented on the communication of the Board.

X. Claim 1 of the main request (patent as granted) reads:

A method for locating partial discharges occurring at a discharge site (2) in an electric apparatus (3) with elongate geometry, said partial discharges generating corresponding electric pulses (4) propagating in opposite directions along the apparatus (3) from the discharge site (2) when the electrical apparatus (3) is subject to electrical voltage, characterized in that it comprises the following steps:

- detecting (11) the pulses (4) picked up by a first and a second sensor (5, 7), operatively connected to the apparatus (3) in a first and a second detecting station (6, 8) which are spaced out along the apparatus (3), and providing corresponding electric signals representative of the waveform of the pulses (4);

- deriving (15), for each of the signals, at least one shape parameter correlated with the waveform of the corresponding pulse (4);

- assigning (14) to said signals values of a phase parameter representative of the phase of said voltage applied to the electrical apparatus (3) at the instant the signal is detected;

- deriving (16), for said signals, at least one amplitude parameter correlated with the amplitude of the corresponding pulse (4);

- separating (17) the sets of signals detected in each detecting station into respective subsets, so that the signals of each subset have similar shape parameter values;

- identifying (18) the subsets of signals relating to partial discharges and classifying them according to statistical processes based on the values of the amplitude and phase parameters for the signals of each subset considered individually;

- correlating (19) the subsets of signals detected in the first and second detecting stations and similarly classified, within the subsets identified as relating to partial discharges, in order to derive a pair of subsets of signals relating to pulses generated at the same discharge site (2);

- selecting (12), for the pair of correlated subsets, at least one pair of homologous pulses (4) detected in the first and second sensors (5,7), respectively, in the same time interval which is less than a predetermined value;

- calculating (13) the distance, along the apparatus (3), between the discharge site (2) and the detecting stations (6, 8), based on the selected pair of homologous pulses (4).

Independent claim 9 of the main request (patent as granted) is directed to a device. It reads:

A device for locating partial discharges occurring at a discharge site (2) in an electric apparatus (3) with elongate geometry, said partial discharges generating corresponding electric pulses (4) propagating in opposite directions along the apparatus (3) from the discharge site (2), comprising:

- a first and a second sensor (5,7), operatively connected to the apparatus (3) in a first and a second detecting station (6, 8) which are spaced out along the apparatus (3), for detecting the pulses (4) and generating electric signals representative of the waveform of the pulses (4);

- a processing unit (9) connected to the sensors (5,7) for receiving the signals and having a module for selecting at least one pair of signals, detected in the first and second sensors (5, 7) and representative of a pair of homologous pulses relating to the same partial discharge and propagating in opposite directions along the apparatus (3), and a module for calculating the distance between the discharge site (2) and the detecting stations (6, 8) along the apparatus (3) based on the selected pair of homologous pulses (4),

characterized in that it comprises, combined together:

- a module for deriving, from said signals, at least one shape parameter correlated with the waveform of that signal, an amplitude parameter and a phase parameter representative of the phase of the voltage applied to the electrical apparatus (3) at the instant the signal is detected;

- a module for separating the sets of signals detected in each of the detecting stations (6, 8) into respective subsets, so that the signals of each subset have similar shape parameter values;

- a module for identifying the separated subsets of signals relating to partial discharges and configured to statistically process the amplitude and phase parameter values for the signals of each subset processed individually, in order to classify it;

- a module for correlating the subsets of signals detected in the first detecting station and in the second detecting station and similarly classified, within the subsets identified as relating to partial discharges and similarly classified, and configured to derive a pair of subsets of signals relating to pulses generated at the same discharge site (2);

said module for selecting the pair of signals relating to the pair of homologous pulses (4) being configured to select from the signals said pair of correlated subsets.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 includes following limitation at the end of the method claim:

wherein a first shape parameter correlated with the frequency content of the signal and a second shape parameter correlated with the duration of the signal are derived for each of the detected signals, and

wherein the separation step (17) comprises incorporating in a single subset all the signals falling within the same region of a reference plane having as its coordinates said first and second shape parameters.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 was modified with regard to claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 in that the step of calculating the distance has been specified. Said step reads (with added features in bold):

- calculating (13) the distance, along the apparatus (3), between the discharge site (2) and the detecting stations (6, 8), based on the selected pair of homologous pulses (4), wherein the method comprises, before the selection step (12), a step of synchronizing the signals detected in the first sensor (5) and those detected in the second sensor (7), by means of an absolute time reference.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 was modified with regard to claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 in that the step of calculating the distance has been specified. It reads (with added features in bold):

calculating (13) the distance, along the apparatus (3), between the discharge site (2) and the detecting stations (6, 8), based on the selected pair of homologous pulses (4), wherein the sensors (5) and (7) are directional type sensors, configured to detect the propagation direction of the pulses (4) along the apparatus (3).

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 was modified with regard to claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 in that the step of calculating the distance has been specified. Said step reads (with added features in bold):

calculating (13) the distance, along the apparatus (3), between the discharge site (2) and the detecting stations (6, 8), based on the selected pair of homologous pulses (4), wherein the step (13) of calculating the distance of the discharge site (2) from the detecting stations (6, 8) is based on processing the values of an attenuation parameter for the signals of the selected pair of homologous pulses (4), correlated with a quantity that is variable depending on a distance travelled by the pulses (4) from the discharge site (2) to the corresponding detecting station.

Corresponding amendments were made in the independent device claims of each request where the calculation module was amended to reflect the amendments in the method claims.

Sufficiency of disclosure (Article 100(b) EPC, Article 83 EPC)

1. Claim 1 of the main request defines a method for locating partial discharges (PD) occurring at a discharge site in an electric apparatus with an elongate geometry. It comprises the step of "deriving for each of the signals, at least one shape parameter correlated with the waveform of the corresponding pulse". Claim 1 of each of the auxiliary requests contains the further limitation according to which a first and second shape parameter are derived for each of the detected signals, wherein the first shape parameter is correlated with the frequency content of the signal and a second shape parameter is correlated with the duration of the signal. The independent apparatus claim in each auxiliary request contains similar definitions.

2. The patent does not contain any definition of a "shape parameter", merely specifying in paragraph [0086] that a first shape parameter is correlated with the frequency content of the signal and that a second shape parameter is correlated with its duration, as now recited in the independent claims of the auxiliary requests.

3. While the concept of "shape parameter" indeed suggests, as underlined by the patentee, that it defines a parameter representative of the shape of the pulse, this very general definition is not sufficient for the skilled person to carry out the claimed invention.

4. It is observed that this very general statement suggests that any parameter that can be somehow derived from a pulse would be adapted for the claimed purpose. The fact that the amplitude of the pulse would not be sufficient, as acknowledged by the patentee (Minutes of oral proceedings before the Opposition Division, section 5 and 5.1), shows that this is not the case. It is further underlined, in view of the technical problem actually addressed by the invention (cf. paragraphs [0019] to [0034] in the patent specification) regarding the difficulty of reliably identifying partial discharges, that the definition of the shape parameter is indeed essential. The shape parameter constitutes, in the context of the invention, the key parameter on the basis of which homologous pulses originating from the same partial discharge in the apparatus being measured but received at different locations may be recognised.

5. In the absence of any definition in the patent specification, the skilled person can only rely on common general knowledge in the field of the invention to compensate for the missing information.

6. Said knowledge does not however provide sufficient guidance to define the key parameters defining a *shape parameter" required for locating partial discharges occurring at a discharge site in an electric apparatus with elongate geometry.

7. Document A1, which was filed by the patentee to substantiate common general knowledge, is a guide for engineers. It summarises the state of the art of conventional electrical PD measurements (cf. A1, page 4, last paragraph). While undoubtedly intended for a broad public, there is no evidence that the document was indeed used or considered in the relevant circles as a reference textbook.

8. Similarly, as underlined by the Opposition Division, documents A2 and A3 are scientific papers which cannot, on their own, be considered to provide evidence of common general knowledge.

9. Moreover, while it is acknowledged that A1 refers to documents A2 and A3 (cf. A1, pages 32, 52 and 53), it fails to establish that the notion of "shape parameter" is to be understood in the light of these documents.

10. Concretely, the teaching of A1, in combination with the specific approach disclosed in A2 and A3, is not sufficient to establish that the notion of "shape parameter" as it appears throughout the patent specification and in the claims is indeed related to the notion of "pulse shape" in said documents (A1, page 32, last paragraph; A2, section 3.1 "pulses having different shapes"; A3, sections 3 and 7). In the absence of any clear relationship between the terms in question no conclusion as to the meaning of the notion "shape parameter" can be drawn from said documents.

11. As underlined above, the shape parameter is deemed to provide the basis for a discrimination between PD signals of various origins while allowing the identification of homologous PD signals, that is, signals received at two different locations by two measuring stations but originating from the same partial discharge. In this respect, it is stressed that the claimed method includes the step of:

correlating the subsets of signals detected in the first and second detecting stations and similarly classified, within the subsets identified as relating to partial discharges, in order to derive a pair of subsets of signals relating to pulses generated at the same discharge site.

12. Independently of the objections made above, regarding the fact that none of documents A1, A2 and A3 qualifies as evidence for common general knowledge, it is further stressed that the skilled person would have not found in A2 and A3 sufficient information to identify a "shape parameter" that would meet the requirements referred to above. The mapping disclosed in A2 relies on both duration and frequency of the measured signals. It appears to be adapted to group PD signals originating from the same origin and received at the same location. However,there is no indication in A2 that this type of grouping would also be adaptable to correlate clusters obtained from signals measured at different locations. To the contrary, section 2.1 of A2 suggests that the parameters used for discriminating between clusters, based on duration and frequency of the measured pulse signals, are dependant on the distance traveled by the pulse and would thus not be adapted for the claimed purpose. Energy loss is a function of both distance and frequency while duration is affected by dispersion and thus by the distance.

New evidence (A4, A5)

13. The Board concurs with the patentee that documents A4 and A5 may qualify as evidence for common general knowledge. Both documents were published after the filing date of the patent application. While post-published documents may provide evidence of common general knowledge at earlier dates, this is not generally the case. In the absence of further evidence that sections 5.5 in A4 and 7.7 in A5 refer to common general knowledge at the date of filing of the application, A4 (and A5) are not relevant for the issue to be decided.

14. Moreover, while Figure 2 in section 5.5 in A4 indeed supports the view that PD discharges obtained at a certain measuring location can be identified by two parameters (their equivalent bandwidth and equivalent time length), there is no indication in A4 or A5 that these parameters could also be used to recognise homologous PD signals, that is, PD signals received by measuring stations located at different distances from the PD location. Document A2 (cf. above) suggests, on the contrary, that the mapping based on time duration and frequency content is not able to recognise such signals. It follows that A4 (and A5) are also not more relevant for the issue of sufficiency than any of documents A1, A2 and A3.

15. For these reasons, documents A4 and A5 are not admitted into the proceedings.

Conclusion

16. In the absence of a clear definition for the concept of shape parameter in the patent specification and in view of the fact that the patentee did not provide evidence that the missing information formed part of common general knowledge, the skilled person would have not been in a position to reproduce the claimed subject-matter. Thus, the invention is not disclosed in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art (Articles 100(c), 83 EPC). None of the requests on file is allowable.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility