Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Find a professional representative
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t192345eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 2345/19 (Power system/Brilliant Light Power) 26-10-2022
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 2345/19 (Power system/Brilliant Light Power) 26-10-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T234519.20221026
Date of decision
26 October 2022
Case number
T 2345/19
Petition for review of
-
Application number
12715500.0
IPC class
H01M 4/86
H01M 4/94
H01M 4/96
H01M 8/18
H01M 8/22
H01M 14/00
H01M 8/06
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 368.26 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

H2O - BASED ELECTROCHEMICAL HYDROGEN - CATALYST POWER SYSTEM

Applicant name
Brilliant Light Power, Inc.
Opponent name
-
Board
3.3.05
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 83
Keywords
Sufficiency of disclosure - (no)
Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0541/96
T 0018/09
T 1785/06
T 1842/06
T 1620/12
Citing decisions
-

I. This appeal is against the examining division's decision to refuse European patent application No. 12 715 500. The patent application concerns an H2O-based electrochemical hydrogen-catalyst power system.

II. The independent claims underlying the impugned decision relate to an electrochemical power system and to a power system that generates thermal energy, respectively. They read as follows:

Claim 1:

"An electrochemical power system that generates at least one of electricity and thermal energy comprising a vessel closed to atmosphere, the vessel comprising

at least one cathode;

at least one anode,

at least one bipolar plate, and

reactants that constitute hydrino reactants during cell operation with separate electron flow and ion mass transport, the reactants comprising at least two components chosen from:

a) at least one source of H2O;

b) at least one source of catalyst or a catalyst comprising at least one of the group chosen from nH, OH, OH**(-), nascent H2O, H2S, or MNH2, wherein n is an integer and M is alkali metal; and

c) at least one source of atomic hydrogen or atomic hydrogen,

one or more reactants to form at least one of the source of catalyst, the catalyst, the source of atomic hydrogen, and the atomic hydrogen;

one or more reactants to initiate the catalysis of atomic hydrogen to form hydrinos; and

a support,

wherein the combination of the cathode, anode, reactants, and bipolar plate maintains a chemical potential between each cathode and corresponding anode to permit the catalysis of atomic hydrogen to form hydrinos to propagate, and

the system further comprising an electrolysis system."

Claim 24:

"A power system that generates thermal energy comprising:

at least one vessel capable of a pressure of at least one of atmospheric, above atmospheric, and below atmospheric; at least one heater,

reactants that constitute hydrino reactants comprising:

a) a source of catalyst or a catalyst comprising nascent H2O;

b) a source of atomic hydrogen or atomic hydrogen;

c) reactants to form at least one of the source of catalyst, the catalyst, the source of atomic hydrogen, and the atomic hydrogen; and

one or more reactants to initiate the catalysis of atomic hydrogen to form hydrinos

wherein the reaction occurs upon at least one of mixing and heating the reactants."

III. The examining division found that the requirements of Articles 57, 83 and 84 EPC were not met. This conclusion was based inter alia on the following considerations:

No group of scientists had clearly and unambiguously confirmed the existence of hydrinos, and most of the scientific world dismissed the underlying theory.

Even supposing that hydrinos did exist, it was not known how to separate the process of their formation from the process of their regeneration into the hydrogen ground state to achieve a net power and/or heat benefit.

Claims 1 and 24 were very broad and defined features of common power systems; the skilled person could not derive from the application whether or not hydrinos would be formed in a conventional system of this kind; the feature "catalysis of atomic hydrogen to form hydrinos" was so ill-defined that the skilled person was unable, on the basis of the disclosure as a whole and using common general knowledge, to identify without undue burden the technical measures necessary for generating net power or heat by means of formed hydrinos, i.e. the skilled person did not learn how to modify a conventional power system accordingly.

IV. The decision under appeal referred, inter alia, to the following documents:

D3|A. Rathke: "A critical analysis of the hydrino model", New Journal of Physics, vol. 7, 19 May 2005, 127 |

D4|A.K. Vijh: "Hydrino atom: novel chemistry or invalid physics?", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 26, no. 3, 2001, 281|

D5|Antonio S. de Castro: "Orthogonality criterion for banishing hydrino states from standard quantum mechanics", ARXIV.ORG, 2007, DOI: 10.1016/J.PHYSLETA.2007.05.006|

D6|Norman Dombey: "The hydrino and other unlikely states", ARXIV.ORG, 2006 DOI: 10.1016/J.PHYSLETA.2006.07.069 |

D7|"BlackLight Power - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia", internet citation, 22 October 2015, retrieved from the internet: URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackLight_Power [retrieved on 2015-12-04]|

V. With their grounds of appeal, the applicant (appellant) re-submitted the claims dealt with in the impugned decision and additionally submitted the following documents:

A1|R. Mills: "Response to a comment to Catalyst-Induced Hydrino Transition (CIHT) electrochemical cell of D. Sundholm," Int. J. of Energy Res. 2014 |

A2|R.L. Mills and Y. Lu: "Time-resolved hydrino continuum transitions with cutoffs at 22.8 nm and 10.1 nm", Eur. Phys. J. D 64, 2011, 65-72 |

A3|R.L. Mills: "The grand unified theory of classical physics" (GUTCP), Vol. 1, "Atomic Physics", December 10, 2018 Edition |

A4|W. Xie et al.: "MILLSIAN 2.0: A molecular modeling software for structures, charge distributions, and energetics of biomolecules", Physics Essays 24, 2011, 200-12 |

A5|R.L. Mills et al.: "Total bond energies of exact classical solutions of molecules generated by MILLSIAN 1.0 compared to those computed using modern 3-21 G and 6-31 G* basis sets", Physics Essays 23, 2010, 153-99|

A6|R.A. Booker: "Report on the evaluation of Chapter 10 in 'The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics' by Dr. Randell L. Mills", June/December 2018 |

A7|US 9,994,450 B2 |

A8|J. Va'vra: "A new way to explain the 511 keV signal from the center of the Galaxy and its possible consequences", SLAC, Stanford University, September 2018 |

VI. In reply to the board's communication pursuant to Article 15(1) RPBA 2020, the appellant submitted the following further document:

A9| W.R. Hagen, R.L. Mills: "Electron paramagnetic resonance proof for the existence of molecular hydrino", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(56), 2022, 23751-61|

VII. The appellant's arguments, where relevant to the present decision, can be summarised as follows:

The examining division, when basing its objection on D3-D7, had ignored the measured data in the application.

The application (on pages 222-258) provided sufficient details and experiments to prove the utility of the invention, including the details of the charging and discharging cycles. For example, in cell 121311GZC1-904 it had a "run schedule of charging to 0.8V, discharging for 4s if V>0.6V" (page 239). The application provided analytical techniques for measuring certain spectroscopic signals, for example FTIR (page 265). A person of ordinary skill could perform FTIR measurements. Signatures of hydrinos had been detected.

The documents cited in the impugned decision had been published several years before the application was filed. They relied only on mathematical calculations, and did not attempt to reproduce the appellant's experiments. By contrast, there was mounting evidence for the existence of hydrinos in the 22 years since the documents had been published. Documents A1-A8 as well as the very recent document A9 (from 2022) showed that hydrino signatures could be detected. A1-A5 had passed independent peer review. These documents showed that the appellant's theory had been validated by physicists.

The claims did not relate to hydrinos as such. The claims merely cited a set of reactants undergoing a reaction which produced energy. Even if the examining division took issue with alleged conflicts between hydrino theory and quantum mechanics, there was no basis for rejecting the claims.

VIII. The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that a patent be granted on the basis of the claims underlying the appealed decision, re-submitted with the statement of grounds of appeal.

1. Articles 83 and 57 EPC relate closely to the applicant's obligation to give a sufficient description of the invention (T 541/96, Reasons 6.1; T18/09, Reasons 16.). An alleged invention which did not comply with the generally accepted laws of physics would be incompatible with the requirements of Articles 57 and 83 EPC, because it cannot be used and therefore lacks industrial application; also the description would be insufficient to the extent that the applicant would not be able to describe how it could be made to work (T 541/96, Reasons 6.1).

In the case at issue, the board focuses on whether the requirements of Article 83 EPC are met.

2. Article 83 EPC

2.1 As stated in the above-mentioned decision T 541/96, if the invention seems, at least at first, to offend against the generally accepted laws of physics and established theories, the disclosure should be detailed enough to prove to a skilled person conversant with mainstream science and technology that the invention is indeed feasible (T 541/96, Reasons 6.2; see also the later decisions T 1785/06, Reasons 3.4.3; T 1842/06, Reasons 2; T 1620/12, Reasons 1.4). The more a new invention contradicts previously accepted technical wisdom, the greater the amount of technical information and explanation is required in the application to enable the invention to be carried out by the average skilled person to whom only that conventional knowledge is available (T 1785/06, Reasons 3.4.3).

2.2 These general considerations also apply to this case, in which the invention relies on a theory that remains highly controversial among scientists.

The theory postulates the existence of "hydrinos", which are described as hydrogen atoms in lower-energy states than previously thought possible, being lower in energy than unreacted atomic hydrogen and corresponding to a fractional principal quantum number (application as originally filed, see paragraph bridging pages 17-18 concerning Equations (1)-(3)).

As outlined in the impugned decision with reference to D3-D7, a number of scientific articles reject the existence of hydrinos because of their incompatibility with standard quantum mechanics, and dismiss the hydrino theory as being unphysical (point 3 of the impugned decision).

The appellant did not contest that there were scientific articles rejecting the hydrino theory. However, the appellant made the criticism that these articles had been published several years before the application under consideration had been filed and relied only on mathematical calculations. The appellant stressed that there had been no attempt to repeat the appellant's experiments. By contrast, according to the appellant, documents A1-A8, including peer-reviewed articles, as well as the very recent document A9 showed that hydrino signatures could be detected.

However, documents A1-A9 do not change the assessment of the hydrino theory as being highly controversial. A1-A5 were authored or co-authored by the inventor himself and thus do not demonstrate independent repetition or general acceptance of the hydrino theory, even if some of these were published in peer-reviewed journals. The author of the report A6, according to his profile (https://www.unca.edu/programs/physics/faculty-staff/), is an energy consultant working with Brilliant Light Power since 2005 and thus also affiliated to the appellant. A7 is a patent document, not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. A8 mentions a model of small hydrogen but acknowledges that it had not yet been observed (Table 1, "Strange atomic states"); it does not reference the hydrino theory. Document A9 was also co-authored by the inventor: rather than proving independent verification of the hydrino theory, it shows that the authors of A9 were still seeking recognition and confirmation of their experiments even at the time when A9 was published, long after the filing of the application under consideration (A9, second page, left-hand column, second paragraph, "Mill's GUTCP theory has been evaluated - both positively and negatively - by others, however, thus far only on the basis of theoretical arguments" [the GUTCP theory being the appellant's underlying theory termed "Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics", see A3] and page 23758, Conclusions section: "..it is also offered as an urgent invitation to academia at large to repeat and extend the described experiments in lieu of refutation on quantum mechanical theory grounds").

2.3 In the light of the above, there is no convincing proof of wider recognition or independent validation of the hydrino theory, let alone any indication that a generally recognised approach as to how this theory could be implemented practically was available at the filing date of the application, to allow for instance the generation and in particular the detection of hydrinos.

2.4 At the same time, carrying out the claimed invention requires, as essential features, that "reactants that constitute hydrino reactants" are present and that the "catalysis of atomic hydrogen to form hydrinos" is initiated (claims 1, 24). These features amount to specifying the desired result to be achieved. The claims do not specify what these reactants are and how the intended formation of hydrinos can be achieved.

Irrespective of whether hydrinos exist at all, there is in any case no common general knowledge that would allow the skilled person to predict, in particular in view of the broad scope of the independent claims, whether a(ny) given combination of reactants would result in the formation of hydrinos, and using what precise experimental conditions their formation would be initiated.

The skilled person wishing to carry out the claimed invention would thus need to find all the necessary information in a high level of detail in the present application, in line with the general considerations set out under point 2.1 above.

2.5 While the application provides a section on "A. Exemplary CIHT Cell Test Results" (starting on page 222 of the application), it is not very detailed regarding the indicated essential features requiring the presence of hydrino reactants and the catalysis of atomic hydrogen to form hydrinos. In particular, this section does not set out how exactly the step according to which "[d]uring discharge, the reactions and the current were reversed to form nascent H2O catalyst and hydrinos to give rise to excess current and energy such that a net excess electrical energy balance was achieved" (page 222) was carried out; this step too merely reflects the desired result.

The application provides lists of data and parameters of cells, including the mention of a cell "121311GZC1-904" with a "run schedule of charging to 0.8V, discharging for 4s if V>0.6V" (page 239). Irrespective of whether these cells can be reproduced based on the data provided, in any case there is no explanation of how the desired result, namely the formation of hydrinos, was verified; hydrinos are not even mentioned in this context.

2.6 An essential step in any attempt to reproduce the invention in this case is verifying the desired functioning of the claimed system, which involves verifying whether the desired result is achieved and thus whether hydrinos are formed. The skilled person is not provided with a suitable test method for this purpose. The section on "A. Exemplary CIHT Cell Test Results" (starting on page 222 of the application) is silent as to how the formation of hydrinos was verified, as indicated. The application contains a separate section on "C. Spectroscopic Identification of Molecular Hydrino" (starting on page 258). It describes that CIHT cells served as electrode and electrolyte samples for an analytical analysis for the production of the theoretically predicted molecular hydrino product (page 260). However, the CIHT cells were closed cells sealed in a vacuum chamber (page 260, first full paragraph), which thus do not reflect the conditions during the normal operation of the cell encompassed by the claims (claim 14: H2O vapor pressure from 0.001 to 100 atm; balance inert gas to achieve at least atmospheric pressure). Furthermore, this application section C describes phenomena observed using various spectroscopic techniques and provides explanations based on the hydrino theory, but fails to specify the concrete experimental steps performed. That certain spectroscopic signals were described and assigned to hydrino - whether in the present application or elsewhere by the inventor - cannot be seen as an instruction on how to carry out the measurement to verify the functioning of the claimed system. Even though for example FTIR is a widely known spectroscopy method, applying FTIR to verify the formation of hydrinos in (electrochemical) power systems is not. In this case, merely specifying the FTIR instrument used cannot be regarded as a practical measuring protocol enabling the skilled person to repeat the measurement, because this would, for instance, include the concrete steps taken to obtain and prepare a hydrino-containing sample for the analysis, and details of how the analysis was performed.

2.7 The skilled person - who, as indicated, cannot rely on any common general knowledge about the analytical verification of hydrinos (see point 2.3) - is not provided with a practical measuring protocol for the purpose of conclusively verifying, in a routine manner, whether hydrinos are formed during operation of a chosen (electrochemical) power system.

2.8 In summary, irrespective of whether hydrinos exist, the skilled person would in any case not have known how their formation can be achieved and verified in the claimed systems.

2.9 In the light of the above, the requirements of Article 83 EPC are not met, and the board can see no fault in the impugned decision.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility