Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    EPO TIR study-PV-web-720 x 237

    Technology insight report on advances in photovoltaics

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • Core activities
          • Stories and insights
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2024
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Executive summary
          • Driver 1 – People
          • Driver 2 – Technologies
          • Driver 3 – High-quality, timely products and services
          • Driver 4 – Partnerships
          • Driver 5 – Financial Sustainability
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 2530/19 (Hearing aid's gain model/SONOVA) 25-10-2022
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 2530/19 (Hearing aid's gain model/SONOVA) 25-10-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T253019.20221025
Date of decision
25 October 2022
Case number
T 2530/19
Petition for review of
-
Application number
10752598.2
IPC class
H03G 3/30
H03G 3/32
H04R 25/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 386.99 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Method and system for providing hearing assistance to a user

Applicant name
Sonova AG
Opponent name
Oticon A/S / Widex A/S / GN Hearing A/S
Board
3.5.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56
European Patent Convention Art 83
Keywords

Inventive step - main request and first auxiliary request (no), second auxiliary request (yes)

Sufficient disclosure - second auxiliary request (yes)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeals by the patent proprietor and the opponent lie from the interlocutory decision of the opposition division maintaining the present European patent in amended form on the basis of a "first auxiliary request" filed with a letter of 5 March 2018.

II. In this decision, reference is made to the following prior-art documents:

E1: EP 1 819 195 A2;

E2: EP 1 729 410 A1;

E8: EP 1 748 677 A2;

E9: DE 10 2005 061 000 A1.

III. Oral proceedings were held before the board on 25 October 2022 by videoconference.

The parties' final requests were as follows:

- The appellant/opponent requests that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.

- The appellant/patentee requests that the appeal be dismissed (main request), in the alternative, that the patent be maintained on the basis of one of four auxiliary requests filed with the written reply to the opponent's statement of grounds of appeal.

At the end of the oral proceedings, the board's decision was announced.

IV. Claim 1 of the main request reads as follows (board's labelling):

"A method for providing hearing assistance to a user, comprising:

(a) capturing input audio signals by a microphone arrangement (42);

(b) estimating a speech level of the input audio signals and an ambient noise level of the input audio signals;

(c) applying a gain model to the input audio signals in order to transform the input audio signals into filtered audio signals;

(d) transmitting the filtered audio signals by a transmission unit (10) via a wireless audio link (34) to a receiver unit (14, 36, 38) comprising or being connected to means (18, 26) for stimulating the hearing of a user, the stimulating means being a loudspeaker worn at or in the user's ear; wherein the received audio signals are supplied from the receiver unit to the stimulating means, and

(e) stimulating the user's hearing by the stimulating means according to the audio signals supplied by the receiver unit,

(f) characterized in that for each respective ambient noise level the gain applied to the input audio signals varies as a function of the speech level, wherein the function varies according to the ambient noise level in such a manner that the ratio of the gain at low speech levels and at high speech levels changes as a function of the ambient noise level."

V. Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request differs from claim 1 of the main request in that feature (b) now reads as follows (board's underlining of added text):

(b) "estimating a speech level of the input audio

signals, by an input speech level estimation

unit (52) comprised in a transmission unit (10),

and an ambient noise level of the input audio

signals, by an ambient noise estimation unit(48)

comprised in the transmission unit (10);".

VI. Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request differs from claim 1 of the first auxiliary request in that feature (f) now reads as follows (board's underlining of added text):

(f) "characterized in that for each respective ambient

noise level the gain applied to the input audio signals varies as a function of the speech level, wherein the function varies according to the ambient noise level in such a manner that the ratio of the gain at low speech levels and at high speech levels changes as a function of the ambient noise level, wherein the gain model comprises a linear range in which the gain is constant irrespective of the speech level of the input audio signals and a compressive range which is adjacent to the linear range and in which compressive range the gain decreases with a given slope from the constant gain value of the linear range with increasing speech level of the input audio signals, wherein the boundary between the linear range and the compressive range is formed by a kneepoint, and wherein the position of the kneepoint is a function of the ambient noise level while the slope of the compressive range remains fixed so that the constant gain value of the linear range varies according to the position of the kneepoint."

Independent claim 11 of the second auxiliary request is directed to a "system" adapted to perform the method steps of claim 1.

1. Main request - inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

1.1 The opposed patent relates to a system and a method for providing a hearing assistance, wherein an audio signal is captured by means of a microphone arrangement. More specifically, a speech level and an ambient-noise level of the captured signal are estimated, a "gain model" is applied to the audio signal that is transmitted wirelessly to a receiver unit and a user's hearing is stimulated accordingly. A typical application is disclosed to be a wireless system in which the voice of a teacher is captured and transmitted to children (page 1, lines 13 to 20 of the description as originally filed). According to the gain model, a gain is applied to the audio signal which varies as a function of the incoming signal's speech level ("input speech level"). In a disclosed embodiment, the gain remains constant until a certain speech level is reached (called "kneepoint") and reduced beyond the "kneepoint", thereby causing a dynamic compression of louder input signals (page 4, line 28 to page 5, line 4 as filed).

Furthermore, the ratio of the gain at low speech levels and at high speech levels varies according to the ambient-noise level, i.e. the function of the gain over the speech level varies dependent on the ambient-noise level. In an embodiment, the "kneepoint" is shifted towards lower speech levels with decreasing ambient- noise levels (page 5, lines 5 to 12 as filed). The technical effect of this is that the gain at high speech levels is more decreased compared to the gain at low speech levels at lower ambient noise (see page 8, lines 3 to 14 and Fig. 3). This is said to render the speech signal less susceptive to changes in speech level which may be caused by variations in the distance between the speaker's mouth and the microphone (page 5, lines 5 to 12).

1.2 Claim 1 of the main request includes the following limiting features (board's labelling):

A method for providing hearing assistance to a user, comprising:

(a) capturing input audio signals by a microphone arrangement;

(b) estimating a speech level of the input audio signals and an ambient noise level of the input audio signals;

(c) applying a gain model to the input audio signals in order to transform the input audio signals into filtered audio signals;

(d) transmitting the filtered audio signals by a transmission unit via a wireless audio link to a receiver unit comprising or being connected to means for stimulating the hearing of a user, the stimulating means being a loudspeaker worn at or in the user's ear; wherein the received audio signals are supplied from the receiver unit to the stimulating means, and

(e) stimulating the user's hearing by the stimulating means according to the audio signals supplied by the receiver unit,

(f) characterized in that for each respective ambient noise level the gain applied to the input audio signals varies as a function of the speech level, wherein the function varies according to the ambient noise level in such a manner that the ratio of the gain at low speech levels and at high speech levels changes as a function of the ambient noise level.

1.3 In the proprietor's favour, the board interprets the expression "for each respective ambient noise level" recited in feature (f) such that it encompasses "practically relevant ambient noise levels" for the purpose of the following assessment of inventive step. Hence, for different practically relevant noise levels different gains in dependence of the detected input speech levels are applied to the received audio signals. In addition, as to the second part of feature (f), the parties agreed that the ratio between the gain at low and at high speech levels need not vary solely in dependence of the "ambient-noise levels", i.e. the different "kneepoints", according to its wording. In view of the breadth of that wording, this ratio may, for a particular gain curve, also vary between its "linear range" (implying a constant gain value) and its "compressive range" (implying a decreasing gain value), as illustrated e.g. by Figure 3 of the opposed patent.

1.4 Document E1, which is considered to be the most promising starting point for the assessment of inventive step, discloses a method and a system for providing a hearing assistance including capturing audio signals by means of a microphone arrangement, analysing the audio signals to determine an "audio scheme", setting a gain applied to the audio signals according to the determined audio scheme, transmitting wirelessly the audio signals to a receiver unit and stimulating the user's hearing accordingly (cf. abstract). A typical, disclosed application relates to transmitting a teacher's voice to children that are listening (paragraph [0003]). In a disclosed embodiment, the system includes a "transmission unit" worn by a speaker and a "receiver unit" worn by a listener (paragraph [0023], Fig. 1).

As to features (a) and (d), the "transmission unit" includes a "microphone arrangement" for capturing the speaker's voice and producing audio signals to which data signals are added and which are supplied to a wireless "FM transmitter" (paragraph [0026]).

As to features (d) and (e), the "receiver unit" includes a "receiver 124" for receiving the audio signals and the data signals, a "DTMF decoder" for decoding the data/command signals, an "amplifier 126" followed by a "power amplifier 137" for amplifying the audio signals and a "loudspeaker" for stimulating the listener's hearing accordingly (paragraph [0033]).

As to feature (b), the "radio transmission unit" includes a "voice energy estimator unit" for computing the total energy in the underlying voice spectrum, i.e. speech level, which information is used by a "voice judgement unit" to decide whether a voice signal is present or not, and a "surrounding noise level estimator unit" for estimating the surrounding noise level, i.e. ambient-noise level (paragraphs [0027] to [0029]). The information about the presence of voice and the surrounding noise level is included in the data transmitted to the "receiver unit" and decoded there in the "DTMF decoder" (paragraphs [0029] and [0031] and paragraph [0033], last sentence).

As to features (c) and (f), if the "voice judgement unit" of the "transmission unit" decides that voice is present, it provides the value "Voice ON" and the gain of the "amplifier 126" of the "receiver unit" is set to a given value, whereas in the opposite case, the value "Voice OFF" is provided and the gain is set to a lower value, i.e. the gain varies as a function of the

voice/speech level (paragraph [0036]).

As to feature (f), in a certain embodiment, in the "Voice ON" case, which corresponds only to high speech levels, a "parameter update unit 129" of the "receiver unit" controls the "amplifier 126" depending on the surrounding noise level such that the "amplifier 126" applies an additional gain offset to the audio signal, i.e. the ratio of the gains for low and for high speech levels respectively changes as a function of the ambient-noise level (paragraph [0037], last two sentences, Fig. 6). Thus, in view of the breadth of feature (f) and in contrast to the opposition division's view (cf. Reasons 2.4.2.1 of the appealed decision), this embodiment falls well within the terms of that feature.

1.5 The method of claim 1 therefore differs from the method of E1 only in that the "gain model" is applied to the audio signal prior to its wireless transmission.

1.6 The patentee argued that E1 did not clearly and unambiguously disclose that the "additional gain offset" is only applied in the "Voice ON" event. Furthermore, the additional gain offset would only be applied if the situation of high speech levels were to arise and could not be compared with the gain in the non-existing situation of lower speech levels which is not part of the diagram. Thus, there could not be a change of the gain ratio as required by feature (f) of claim 1.

1.7 The board is not convinced by these arguments. The last two sentences of paragraph [0037] in fact read as follows (board's underlining):

"According to alternative embodiments, the 'surrounding noise level' is estimated only or also during "voice ON". In these cases, during "voice ON", the parameter update unit 129 controls the amplifier 126 depending on the "surrounding

noise level" such that according to the definition stored in the EEPROM 130 the amplifier 126 applies an additional gain offset to the audio signals sent to the power amplifier 137."

The first sentence mentions two cases, in the first of which only in the "Voice ON" situation with higher speech levels the surrounding noise level is estimated. The following sentence refers to both cases, i.e. also to the aforementioned one. The board agrees that the "extra gain" is applied in the "Voice ON" situation which by nature cannot coexist with the "Voice OFF" situation at the same time. However, the "Voice OFF" situation and the rules for calculating the gain in this situation do not disappear because of that. The gains in these two situations can therefore indeed be compared and a change of the gain ratio actually be established in accordance with feature (f).

1.8 The technical effect of shifting the application of the gain model to the transmitter side is merely that the overall processing requirements are shifted to the transmitter side.

1.9 The proprietor argued that the objective technical problem is to be seen in "increasing the speech intelligibility and the user's comfort". The board takes issue with that objective problem. This is because only the different location of where the gain model is eventually applied is acknowledged as distinguishing feature which however has no impact on the speech intelligibility or the user's comfort. The objective technical problem is rather to be seen in reducing signal processing requirements at the receiver side in the hearing system of E1.

1.10 Given the situation that all necessary information for applying the gain model, namely the estimation of the speech level and of the ambient-noise level, is already present on the transmitter side in the system of E1, the skilled person in the field of hearing aids, starting out from E1, would have readily applied the corresponding gain model right away on the transmitter side to reduce implementation complexity on the receiver side without having to exercise inventive skills.

The main request is therefore not allowable under Article 56 EPC.

2. First auxiliary request - inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

2.1 Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request differs from claim 1 of the main request only in that

- the speech level is estimated by an input speech level estimation unit in a transmission unit and

- the ambient noise level is estimated by an ambient noise estimation unit in the transmission unit.

Both features are disclosed in E1 (cf. "voice energy estimator unit 114" and "surrounding noise level estimator unit 117", paragraphs [0028] and [0029], Fig. 4).

2.2 Therefore, the added features cannot contribute to an inventive step and the first auxiliary request is not allowable under Article 56 EPC either.

3. Second auxiliary request - Articles 83 and 56 EPC

3.1 Sufficiency of disclosure (Article 83 EPC)

3.1.1 The opponent argued that there is no sufficient disclosure as to feature (b) and the "ratio" of the gains at "high speech levels" and "low speech levels" in feature (f). Speech was always contaminated by noise and vice versa and it was not trivial to obtain estimates for the speech level and the ambient-noise level. The opposed patent disclosed only speech and a noise estimation units but without any description how such an estimation should work and therefore failed to enable the skilled person to put the claimed

subject-matter in practice. Likewise, the description of the embodiments did not disclose a ratio of the gain at low speech levels and at high speech levels or any indication of how to implement the ratios as a function of the ambient noise level. Finally, it was not disclosed what constitutes a low speech level and a high speech level. The boundary between low and high speech level could theoretically be set at an extreme end of the dynamic range of the user's hearing contravening the gist of the invention. In the embodiment disclosed in paragraph [0031] and Figure 3, the gain would decrease for speech levels above 73 dB irrespective of the kneepoint.

3.1.2 The board holds that it belongs to the common general knowledge of a skilled person in the field of hearing aids to estimate the speech and the noise level in a sound signal, for example by analysing its spectral components. A further detailed teaching is not necessary. The ratio of the gain at lower speech levels and high speech levels simply specifies the quotient between two gain values at two different speech levels and needs no further explanation. The respective speech levels are specified as lower and higher which is

self-explanatory as well. It is further noted that Figures 2 and 3 with their corresponding description on page 8, lines 3 to 14 depict how the gain for lower speech levels can be increased compared to the gain at higher speech levels by shifting the kneepoint toward lower speech levels with decreasing ambient noise levels which results in the three curves in Figure 3, the upper one corresponding the lowest ambient noise level.

3.1.3 The board therefore concludes that the claimed invention is sufficiently disclosed (Article 83 EPC).

3.2 Inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

3.2.1 In claim 1 of the second auxiliary request, the gain model is now limited to

(g) a linear range in which the gain is constant irrespective of the speech level, and

(h) a compressive range which is adjacent to the linear range and in which the gain decreases with a given slope from the constant gain value of the linear range with increasing speech level,

(i) wherein the boundary between the linear range and the compressive range is formed by a kneepoint, wherein the position of the kneepoint is a function of the ambient-noise level,

(j) while the slope of the compressive range remains fixed so that the constant gain value of the linear range varies according to the position of the kneepoint.

Added features (g) to (j) indeed properly reflect that different "gain versus speech level" curves are derived from different "kneepoints" depending on distinct "ambient-noise levels", as also illustrated e.g. in Figures 2 and 3 of the opposed patent. Hence, at high speech levels, the gain decreases with an increasing speech level independently of the ambient-noise level, while, at low speech levels, the gain depends on the ambient-noise level but not on the speech level. Moreover, the transition point between these regions shifts dependent on the ambient-noise level. This apparently brings about the technical advantage that the "effect of the distance of the microphone to the mouth of the speaker on the sound level in quiet conditions and at lower speech levels is reduced" and that "the allowed maximal distance between the speaker and the microphone is increased" (see paragraph [0016] of the opposed patent).

3.2.2 Document E1 is silent as to the added features (g) to (j), which as a whole allow a specific user experience including a consistent compression of higher speech levels and a maximum gain at lower speech levels, while limiting the incurred noise in the amplified audio signal. Thus, the underlying objective technical problem may now be seen in improving the signal processing in the hearing assistance of E1 at all possible speech levels.

3.2.3 The person skilled in the field of hearing aids, starting from E1 and faced with the above objective problem, would have recognised that, in E1, the gain at higher speech levels ("Voice ON" region) is increased and that the additional gain dependent on the

ambient-noise level is applied at higher speech levels and not at lower speech levels. Hence, the skilled person would readily notice that the gain model of E1 goes in exactly the opposite direction compared to that of present claim 1, thereby teaching away from the claimed solution.

3.2.4 In that context, the opponent referred to document E8 (in particular paragraphs [0001] and [0011]) and argued that the document disclosed a gain curve with two essentially linear ranges and a kneepoint in between which is preferably placed below an input signal range. Further, document E9 (in particular Fig. 2) disclosed shifting the kneepoint based on the ambient-noise level which is said to be reflected by a situation classified by a "classifier" based on the respective hearing situation.

3.2.5 As to prior-art document E8, it is apparent to the board that the kneepoint is set statically but is not shifted in dependence on the ambient noise level (cf. paragraph [0011]. Moreover, document E9 discloses two gain curves, each with three linear regions separated by two kneepoints, which are moved up or down, depending on the present hearing situation. A shift of the kneepoints towards higher or lower signal levels is however not disclosed, nor is it disclosed that the hearing situation reflects the respective ambient-noise level.

3.2.6 The board therefore concludes that the skilled person, starting out from E1, considering E8, E9 or common general knowledge and faced with the above objective problem would indeed not arrive at a method with all the features of claim 1 without exercising inventive skills (Article 56 EPC).

3.2.7 In view of the above, claim 1 and also independent claim 11 of the second auxiliary request are allowable under Article 56 EPC.

3.3 Given that no other objections were invoked by the opponent or the board, the claims of the second auxiliary request comply with all requirements of the EPC.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the opposition division with

the order to maintain the patent in the following version:

- Claims 1 to 11 of the second auxiliary request as filed with letter dated 5 March 2020;

- Description, pages 2 and 4 to 6 of the patent specification, page 3 as filed during the oral proceedings before the Board;

- Drawings, figures 1 to 6 of the patent specification.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility