Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 3280/19 28-02-2023
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 3280/19 28-02-2023

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2023:T328019.20230228
Date of decision
28 February 2023
Case number
T 3280/19
Petition for review of
-
Application number
09804262.5
IPC class
F28D 9/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 449.88 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Brazed plate heat exchanger

Applicant name
SWEP International AB
Opponent name
Alfa Laval Corporate AB
Board
3.2.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 100(a)
European Patent Convention Art 100(b)
European Patent Convention Art 100(c)
European Patent Convention Art 54
European Patent Convention Art 56
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(6)
Keywords

Sufficiency of disclosure - (yes)

Amendments - added subject-matter (no)

Novelty - (yes)

Inventive step - (yes)

Amendment to case - reasons for submitting amendment in appeal proceedings (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
-

I. European patent 2 370 774 concerns a brazed plate heat exchanger.

II. An opposition was filed against the patent based on the grounds under Article 100(c) EPC, Article 100(b) EPC and Article 100(a) EPC in conjunction with Articles 54 and 56 EPC. The Opposition Division decided to reject the opposition. That decision was appealed by the opponent ("appellant").

III. At the end of the oral proceedings before the Board, the parties confirmed the following requests.

The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.

The patent proprietor ("respondent") requested that the appeal be dismissed or, alternatively, that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of one of auxiliary requests 1 and 2 submitted with the reply to the statement setting out the grounds of appeal.

IV. The following evidence relevant to this decision was cited in the opposition proceedings.

D1: WO 2006/110090 A1

D2: GB 134,277 A

D3: DE 199 39 264 A1

D4: JP 2000-320986 A (and translation)

D5: US 2004/134637 A1

D6: GB 2 056 648 A

D7: DE 197 22 074 A1

D8: US 5,125,453 A

D9: JPS 61-89681 U (and translation)

D10: US 7,007,749 B2

D11: RU 2 137 076 C1 (and translation)

D12: RU 2 366 879 C1 (and translation)

D13: RU 2 059 186 C1 (and translation)

The following documents were filed with the statement setting out the grounds of appeal for the first time:

D14: WO 98/48230 A1

D15: GB 2 026 676 A

D16: DE 854 363 C

V. Claim 1 of the main request (patent as granted) reads as follows (amendments versus claim 1 as originally filed marked in bold and strike-through; feature numbering added in "[]"):

"[a] A brazed plate heat exchanger (100; 200) for exchanging heat between fluids,

[b] the heat exchanger (100; 200) comprising a number of heat exchanging plates (110; 210) provided with a pressed pattern of ridges (120; 220) and grooves (130; 230),

[c] said heat exchanger plates (110; 210) being stacked onto one another such that flow channels (211, 212) are formed between said plates (110; 210),

[d] said flow channels (211, 212) being in selective communication with port openings (140, 240),

[e] [deleted: characterized by] wherein port skirts (170; 250, 260) are arranged on the heat exchanging plates (110; 210),

[f] said port skirts (170; 250; 260) at least partly surrounding the port openings (140;240)[deleted: ,] and extending in a generally perpendicular direction as compared to a plane of the heat exchanger plates (110; 210),

characterized in that

[deleted: and being arranged to overlap one another].

[g] the port skirts (170; 250; 260) are arranged such that a port skirt (170; 250; 260) of one heat exchanging plate (110; 210) overlaps port skirts (170; 250; 260) of neighbouring plates (110; 210) to form a pipe like configuration or a part thereof,

[h] wherein the port skirts (170; 250, 260) of neighbouring heat exchanging plates (110, 210) stacked onto one another all extend in the same direction."

VI. The appellant's arguments relevant to the present decision can be summarised as follows.

(a) Main request - Sufficiency of disclosure

The subject-matter of claim 1 was not disclosed in a manner sufficiently clear and complete given the lack of information in the patent about the necessary overlap between the claimed port skirts.

(b) Main request - Added subject-matter

The subject-matter of claim 1 was unallowably extended beyond the application as filed. The added features were not disclosed for the option "part of a pipe-like configuration". Furthermore, the inclusion of features [g] and [h] constituted an unallowable intermediate generalisation since the following characteristics disclosed in context with the added features were omitted: openings provided in the port skirts, every other flow channel being in fluid communication with a port opening, each heat exchanger plate comprising a port skirt and being in mutual overlap with all neighbouring plates, the downward extension of the port skirts and the further details of the embodiments of Figures 1 and 2.

(c) Admission of documents D14 to D16

Documents D14 to D16 should be admitted into the proceedings since special circumstances presented themselves. On the one hand D14 to D16 were very similar to the disclosure of D2 such that they allowed understanding the features of D2 in a clearer way and were thus prima facie relevant for the understanding of D2. On the other hand, D14 to D16 were prima facie relevant on their own for patentability of the main request and were thus suitable for addressing the issues which led to the decision under appeal.

D14 to D16 were filed under the previous RPBA and the related case law, under which prima facie relevance played an important role when deciding on admittance.

(d) Main request - Novelty

The heat exchanger disclosed in the embodiment shown in, inter alia, Figure 5 of D2 was novelty-destroying for the subject-matter of claim 1.

(e) Main request - Inventive step

The subject-matter of claim 1 was not inventive in view of the embodiments of Figures 5 or 6 of D1 as the starting point in combination with any of the teachings of D2 to D13. The sole distinguishing feature was feature [h]. However, an arrangement of port skirts according to features [g] and [h] was a known principle for the skilled person and was obvious in view of any of D2 to D13.

VII. The respondent's arguments relevant to the present decision can be summarised as follows.

(a) Main request - Sufficiency of disclosure

The subject-matter of claim 1 was disclosed in a manner sufficiently clear and complete. Furthermore, the new arguments filed for the first time with the statement setting out the grounds of appeal should not be admitted into the appeal proceedings.

(b) Main request - Added subject-matter

The subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request was not unallowably extended. The amendments made were mere clarifications which did not restrict the subject-matter of claim 1 as filed. Even if the amendments made were considered a restriction, these had sufficient basis in the embodiments of Figures 1 and 2.

(c) Admission of documents D14 to D16

Documents D14 to D16 and the objections based on them were submitted late without justifying circumstances being present and should not be admitted into the appeal proceedings. They were further prima facie not suitable for challenging the patentability of the subject-matter of claim 1.

(d) Main request - Novelty

D2 was not novelty destroying for claim 1. Inter alia, it disclosed neither a brazed heat exchanger nor a selective communication of port holes and flow channels.

(e) Main request - Inventive step

The subject-matter of claim 1 involved an inventive step. The arguments based on D9 and D10 brought forward by the appellant only during oral proceedings should not be considered under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020. None of the combinations of D1 with any of D2 to D8 rendered the subject-matter of claim 1 obvious.

1. Since the statement of grounds of appeal and the reply were submitted after the date specified in Article 25(1) RPBA 2020, the transitional provisions of Article 25(2) RPBA 2020 do not apply to the case at hand.

2. Article 100(b) EPC

The patent discloses the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art.

2.1 The appellant argued that the required extent of the claimed overlap was not disclosed in the patent. Furthermore, the term "overlap" did not require a contact between the port skirts of neighbouring heat exchanger plates in the area of overlap but it was not disclosed in the patent how a heat exchanger without contacting port skirts could be embodied.

This is not persuasive.

2.2 According to the usual technical understanding of a skilled person, an overlap of two skirts having a defined direction of extension (as in claim 1 according to feature [f]) is established along an axis parallel to their direction of extension, and not as well perpendicular thereto as suggested by the appellant. A skirt which is pointing with its end tip towards another skirt is thus not considered to form an overlap with this other skirt.

2.3 The appellant is correct in that the term "overlap" in general encompasses overlapping structures not being in physical contact. However, this is not the case for the term as used in the context of the features of claim 1. Claim 1 defines that a port skirt overlaps with port skirts of neighbouring heat exchanger plates to form a pipe-like configuration or part thereof. The skilled person would thus not consider a series of overlapping skirt sections forming gaps in between the skirts to form a pipe-like configuration as meant by feature [g].

Even assuming - for the sake of the argument - that the claim was ambiguous and the skilled person construed the claim in the light of the whole specification, this would not lead to a different conclusion. Paragraph [0019] of the specification clarifies that the overlap is in the form of a contact ("port skirts ... will contact, i. e. overlap"). Also, paragraph [0012] confirms this understanding ("contact one another to form a pipe"), and nothing else is shown in Figures 1 and 2.

To conclude, a contact of the skirts in the area of their overlap is implied by the features of claim 1 and thus forms part of its subject-matter.

2.4 As to the extent of the overlap, it is true that there is no restriction defined in the claim. As long as there is a lateral contact between skirts of neighbouring heat exchanger plates, this falls within the scope of the overlap defined by feature [g]. It might be difficult to decide in particular cases - e.g. with a very small overlap region - whether this still falls within the scope of the claim. However, this is an issue related to Article 84 EPC and not sufficiency of disclosure (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 10th edition 2022, II.C.6.6.4). Thus, this is not open to be discussed in opposition proceedings, including the appeal proceedings (see G 3/14).

2.5 In view of this conclusion, the respondent's request not to admit new arguments filed for the first time in the appeal proceedings on the ground for opposition under Article 100(b) EPC can be left undecided.

3. Article 100(c) EPC

The subject-matter of claim 1 does not extend beyond the application as filed.

3.1 Contrary to the appellant's view, the fact that features [g] and [h] do not (necessarily) address all heat exchanger plates within the claimed heat exchanger is not an issue of added subject-matter.

3.1.1 It is undisputed that the overlap between a port skirt and the port skirts of neighbouring plates defined in feature [g] has a literal basis in the description of both embodiments of Figures 1 and 2 (see page 3, line 34 to page 4, line 2 and page 4, lines 26 to 28). It is also common ground that the "same direction" of the extension of the port skirts according to added feature [h] has - though not literally disclosed in the description - a basis in the embodiments shown in Figures 1 and 2.

3.1.2 Features [b] to [h] of claim 1 define certain heat exchanger plates. Since feature [b] is not limited to all heat exchanger plates of the heat exchanger claimed ("comprising a number of heat exchanger plates", emphasis added), features [b] to [h] are, inter alia, directed to a sub-assembly of heat exchanger plates of the heat exchanger. According to feature [e], in this sub-assembly every heat exchanger plate has a port skirt which comprises the further features [f] to [h].

3.1.3 The characterising part of claim 1 defines that "the port skirts are arranged such ... to form a (part of a) pipe-like configuration" (feature [g]). This is achieved by overlaps of the port skirts or neighbouring heat exchanger plates ("to form a"). Even though the claim addressed here a port skirt, it is directly and unambiguously clear from the context that all "the port skirts" of the heat exchanger plates defined in claim 1 mutually overlap those of the neighbouring plates since otherwise they cannot form the claimed pipe-like configuration. This interpretation is further supported by feature [e], which defines that "port skirts are arranged on the heat exchange plates" (emphasis added). By use of the definite article for the heat exchanger plates, this wording is equivalent to "port skirts arranged on each of the heat exchange plates" of the sub-assembly of heat exchanger plates addressed in feature [b]. Thus, features [g] and [h] apply to all heat exchanging plates defined in claim 1.

3.1.4 Feature [b] - directed only to a sub-assembly of plates as demonstrated above - was already present in claim 1 as filed. Also Figures 1 and 2 show only sub-assemblies of heat exchanger plates and not a complete heat exchanger. Thus, contrary to the appellant's argument, the original disclosure did not require that features [g] and [h] apply to all heat exchanger plates within the claimed heat exchanger (i.e. including those not defined in claim 1) since they were originally disclosed only in connection with a sub-assembly of heat exchanging plates.

3.2 For the same reason also the appellant's argument that the added features [g] and [h] were not disclosed in combination with the option "to form a part of a pipe like configuration" is not persuasive. It is apparent to a skilled person that the port skirt(s) of the sub-assemblies of plates shown in Figures 1 and 2 require a further fluid connection (e.g. in the header plate) to extend or finalise the pipe-like structure formed by the skirts.

3.3 The appellant further argued that the inclusion of features [g] and [h] resulted in an unallowable intermediate generalisation. In its view, the following features were inextricably linked to the added features and were thus unallowably omitted.

(a) Both embodiments required openings in the port skirts.

(b) In both embodiments, every other flow channel was disclosed in fluid communication with a port opening.

(c) Both embodiments had further specific and different details (such as a uniform vs. changing overlap), all of which were omitted in claim 1.

(d) The specific "downward" extension direction of the port skirts disclosed in Figures 1 and 2 was also omitted.

This is also not persuasive.

3.3.1 Concerning point a)

The port openings are an implicit part of the subject-matter of claim 1.

As explained above, the wording "overlaps ... to form a [part of a] pipe like configuration" requires that the overlapping sections of the skirts also be in contact with each other. In view of this interpretation and the requirement of feature [d] that the flow channels be in selective fluid communication with the port openings in the port skirts, openings have to be provided in the skirts (such as the bores in Figure 1 or the cut-outs in Figure 2). The openings are therefore an implicit part of the subject-matter of claim 1.

3.3.2 Concerning point b)

Feature [d] requires "selective communication" between flow channels and port openings. Contrary to the appellant's view, this excludes configurations in which every flow channel is in fluid contact with every port opening. It is true that in Figures 1 and 2 this selective communication is embodied by providing fluid connection with every other flow channel. However, it is not a necessary requirement inextricably linked to the added features [g] and [h]. E.g. in the description of the embodiment of Figure 2, this is only described as a preferred configuration (see e.g. page 4, lines 22 to 25: "usually such that"). Therefore, the omission of this restriction does not constitute an unallowable intermediate generalisation.

3.3.3 Concerning point c)

While it is true that the embodiments of Figures 1 and 2 comprise further (partly different) details, it was not substantiated by the appellant why their omission constitutes an unallowable intermediate generalisation, i.e. why each of the details was inextricably linked to the invention that its omission resulted in subject-matter which the skilled person could have not foreseen when reading the original disclosure.

3.3.4 Concerning point d)

The extension of the port skirts is not disclosed as being "downward" in the application as filed. A "downward" direction of the port skirts is not derivable from the embodiments of Figures 1 and 2 since their "absolute" direction depends on the orientation of the plates with regard to gravity, and this is not defined in the original disclosure.

4. Admittance of documents D14, D15 and D16

Documents D14 to D16 and the objections of lack of patentability based on these documents are not admitted into the appeal procedure under Articles 12(4) and (6) RPBA 2020.

4.1 Contrary to the allegations of the appellant, the statement of grounds of appeal did not benefit from the transitional provisions of the RPBA 2020 on the application of Article 12, paragraphs 2 to 6 RPBA 2020 (see point 1. above).

4.2 Documents D14 to D16 were submitted by the appellant for the first time with the statement setting out the grounds of appeal and are thus an amendment within the meaning of Article 12(4) RPBA 2020. Their admittance is thus subject to the discretion of the Board. Furthermore, these documents are used in support of further objections of lack of patentability against the main request, which is - as in the opposition proceedings - the patent as granted. For this reason also the requirements of Article 12(6) RPBA 2020 are to be considered. Under these requirements, the Board shall not admit evidence and objections which should have been submitted in the proceedings leading to the decision under appeal unless the circumstances of the appeal case justify it.

This is, however, not the case.

4.3 The appellant argued that documents D14 to D16 were relevant for the understanding of D2.

However, it was not further substantiated which aspects of D2 were clarified in view of these disclosures. It was further not substantiated by the appellant or apparent from the appealed decision that there was any surprising development in the opposition proceedings, and in particular in the oral proceedings before the Opposition Division, that justified the submission of this new evidence.

4.4 Instead, the appellant raised new objections of lack of patentability based on D14 to D16 against the main request, which is still the patent as granted. These objections could and should have been raised already with the notice of opposition.

4.5 In addition - contrary to the view of the appellant - none of documents D14 to D16 is prima facie novelty-destroying for the subject-matter of claim 1 of the patent.

4.5.1 D14 does at least not disclose a plate heat exchanger which is brazed. Concerning methods for joining the heat exchanger plates, the only information provided in D14 is found on page 2, last paragraph: "joined pressure-tightly to one another, for example by soldering". Undisputedly, it is common general knowledge that the terms "soldering" and "brazing" are not synonyms for the same process. Compared to soldering brazing is e.g. performed at higher temperatures and with other joining metals. The appellant's argument that the patent does not distinguish between brazing and soldering is not relevant since the patent always refers to brazing only, thus unambiguously referring to the specific process generally known in the art. Whether the term "soldering" in D14 was in fact intended to mean "brazing" is mere speculation and not a basis for a clear and unambiguous anticipation of feature [a] of claim 1.

4.5.2 The heat exchanger in D15 also at least does not disclose brazing as a manufacturing method (feature [a]). The only joining method for the heat exchanger parts mentioned in D15 is welding (see page 3, lines 1 to 16).

4.5.3 D16 does at least not disclose port openings with port skirts forming a pipe-like configuration by means of overlaps. Instead, in D16 the stacked heat exchanger plates form lateral side openings (7,8,9,10) which can be connected to flow channels arranged at the lateral sides of the stack (see Figures 1 and 2).

5. Novelty

The subject-matter of claim 1 is novel over the disclosure of D2. D2 does at least not disclose features [a] and [d].

5.1 Feature "brazed heat exchanger"

D2 discloses as a "principal object" not to use soldering as the method for connecting the elements of the heat exchanger, not mentioning brazing (see page 1, lines 19 to 24). While it is mentioned that the edges of the tubular elements may be jointed by soldering (and not by brazing, see point 4.5.1 above), this method is excluded for joining the elements together (see page 3, lines 39 to 42). Therefore, D2 does not disclose a brazed plate heat exchanger as required by feature [a].

5.2 Feature "flow channels in selective communication with port openings"

In D2, the flow channels formed by the skirts of the heat exchanger plates (A) comprise openings (A6) connected to any of the first set of flow channels (i.e. the closed vertical channels defined within the A elements) but to none of the second flow channels formed at the outside of the heat exchanger plates of the radiator (i.e. the open channels defined between each two A elements, where air flows). In other words, the port openings are only provided for a first fluid, while the second fluid is outside the radiator (see D2, Figure 1 or 7).

However, feature [d] requires that the flow channels formed between the plates (see feature [c]) be in "selective communication" with the port openings. The Board construes this feature - in line with the decision under appeal - such that any flow channel has to be in fluid contact with a given port opening. Therefore, the appellant's interpretation of feature [d] that the term "selective" encompasses also the option that only any second flow channel is in connection with a port opening is not persuasive. The selective communication according to feature [d] defines - according to the usual technical understanding - an option of being connected to either one or the other port opening and not the option between "connection" and "no connection". Even if - for the sake of the argument - the term were considered ambiguous, the whole patent specification supports only the usual understanding (see e.g. paragraphs [0016] and [0022]). Thus, feature [d] is not disclosed in D2.

6. Inventive step

The subject-matter of claim 1 involves an inventive step.

6.1 In its statement of grounds of appeal the appellant has raised objections of lack of inventive step based on D1 as the starting point in combination with any of D2 to D13.

6.2 Objections based on D1 in combination with any of D2 to D8

6.2.1 Distinguishing features over D1

It is common ground that D1 discloses at least features [a] to [f] of claim 1 and does not disclose feature [h]. It was only contested by the respondent that feature [g] was disclosed in D1.

According to feature [g], the port skirts are arranged such that a port skirt of one heat exchanging plate overlaps with the port skirts of neighbouring plates, i.e. with both, if present (the respective top and bottom plates can only form an overlap with one neighbouring plate). Furthermore, claim 1 clearly defines that the "port skirts" are only those parts of the plates "extending in a generally perpendicular direction as compared to a plane of the heat exchanger plates" (see feature [f]).

Although the appellant referred to paragraph [0014] of the patent specification to demonstrate the contrary, this is not convincing. Even though in the embodiment of Figure 1 of the contested patent an additional sealing surface 150 is specified in the plane of the heat exchanger plates, the port skirts in claim 1 are defined as the parts extending generally perpendicularly to the plates. Sealing surfaces in port skirts falling under this definition are also disclosed in the embodiments of the patent (see Figure 2 "sealing portion 280"). Furthermore, as outlined above (see point 2.1), feature [g] requires an overlap in the direction of extension of the port skirts.

Such a mutual overlap with the neighbouring port skirts ("collars 23") is not shown in Figures 5 and 6 of D1. Each skirt disclosed in Figure 6 of D1 overlaps only with one neighbouring skirt. In the embodiment of Figure 5 of D1, no overlap between the vertically extending port skirts is present at all. Even if - for the sake of the argument - the contact point or the projection of the vertically extending skirts in Figure 5 was considered an overlap by the skilled person, this overlap is formed only with one neighbouring skirt, contrary to the requirements of feature [g].

Accordingly, the embodiment of Figure 6 of D1 is the most promising starting point for the assessment of the requirements of Article 56 EPC, and features [g] and [h] are the distinguishing features, as was also concluded in the decision under appeal.

6.2.2 Objective technical problem

The appellant argued that feature [h] is not linked to a particular effect and does not contribute to solve the objective technical problem, since it was originally filed as an optional feature only. This is not persuasive. First, feature [h] is not the only distinguishing feature. Second, the effect of increased strength of the stack of heat exchanger plates due to the overlaps (with contact) of the port skirts extending in one direction when compared to the embodiment of Figure 6 in D1 is persuasive even in the absence of further supporting evidence. Therefore, the objective technical problem linked to the distinguishing features is to provide a heat exchanger with increased strength to withstand higher internal pressure, as also disclosed in paragraph [0011] of the patent.

6.2.3 Obviousness of features [g] and [h]

As set out in the following paragraphs, none of the prior art documents D2 to D8 provides a teaching which points the skilled person towards a modification including features [g] an [h]. Moreover, the individual patent documents D2 to D8 do not provide sufficient evidence for the alleged underlying common general knowledge which would lead the skilled person towards the modification of the heat exchanger in Figure 6 of D1 towards that of claim 1, in particular not in view of the objective technical problem.

6.2.4 D2 discloses a heat exchanger with port skirts ("inwardly bent flanges") all oriented in one direction (see Figure 5). However, one skirt only contacts the next skirt with its edge. This solution is disclosed in D2 as essential for forming "distance pieces" in order to achieve a "light and strong construction". Apart from whether the edges of these flanges form, together with the opposite bent wall, an "overlap" as in feature [g], this arrangement contradicts the intention of the arrangement in D1 to avoid interference with the edges (see D1, page 11, line 28 to page 12, line 9). For this reason alone, the skilled person starting from D1 would not consider the teaching of D2 and, even if they did, they would not arrive at the claimed subject-matter.

6.2.5 D5 discloses a tube-like structure formed by overlapping skirts of the same orientation ("collars/flanges 31", see Figures 5 to 7). However, as also concluded in the decision under appeal, these tube-like structures are only meant to form a closed space housing a pressure sensor not in fluid communication with the flow channels (see paragraphs [0030] and [0040]). No openings are therefore provided in the skirts. There is thus no pointer for the skilled person to consider such a design for fluid ports in selective communication with the flow channels.

6.2.6 D6 discloses in the embodiment of Figure 6 overlapping port skirts ("tube portions 15a") having the same orientation and having holes formed in them. This configuration is disclosed in D6 only to render the structure suitable for seawater applications by providing a filtration effect (see page 2, lines 11 to 19). It is not apparent why the skilled person would - based on this teaching - consider a redesign of the heat exchangers of D1 to solve the objective technical problem.

6.2.7 The tube-like structure in the embodiment of Figure 2 of D7 formed by overlapping skirts ("Kragen 7") of the same orientation is intended to form through-holes for receiving connector bolts (16) and not for providing ports in selective communication with flow channels. This structure does not contribute to solving the problem (since this is achieved by compression bolts and gaskets: "Dichtringe 10"). Furthermore, similarly to D5, the through-holes are not intended or even suitable to be in fluid communication with the flow channels.

6.2.8 Neither document D3, D4 nor D8 discloses port skirts with mutual overlap with the port skirts of the neighboring heat exchanger plates as according to the understanding of feature [g]. This was also acknowledged by the appellant (see statement of grounds, page 19, point "Document D1+D3/D4/D8").

Therefore, at least feature [g] cannot be made obvious from any of these documents.

6.3 Lack of substantiation of objections based on D1 in combination with any of D9 to D12

6.3.1 In the written appeal proceedings the appellant has not provided any arguments for the combination of D1 with the teaching of any of the documents D9 to D13, in particular about how they would point the skilled person towards features [g] and [h].

6.3.2 The arguments for the combination of D1 with D9 or D10 submitted for the first time in oral proceedings before the Board are not admitted into the appeal proceedings since no exceptional circumstances justifying this late submission were presented with cogent reasons by the appellant (see Article 13(2) RPBA 2020).

6.3.3 Therefore, the objections based on D1 in combination with any of D9 to D13 are not sufficiently substantiated and are not further considered in the decision.

7. Since none of the grounds for opposition held against the patent as granted prejudices its maintenance, the impugned decision is correct. Thus, the appeal is not allowable.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility