Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Find a professional representative
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • About the Observatory
      • Our activities
      • Our topics
      • Our partners and networks
      • Digital library
      • Data desk
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Patent filings
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Detailed methodology
            • Archive
          • Online Services
          • Patent information
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Innovation process survey
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Website
          • Survey on electronic invoicing
          • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
        • Culture Space A&T 5-10
          • Go back
          • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
            • Go back
            • aqua_forensic
            • LIMINAL
            • MaterialLab
            • Perfect Sleep
            • Proof of Work
            • TerraPort
            • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
            • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • The European Patent Journey
          • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
          • Next generation statements
          • Open storage
          • Cosmic bar
        • Lange Nacht 2023
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the Observatory
      • Our activities
      • Our topics
      • Our partners and networks
      • Digital library
      • Data desk
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t200120eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 0120/20 (Link adaptation in wireless telecommunications / Unwired Planet) 15-07-2022
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0120/20 (Link adaptation in wireless telecommunications / Unwired Planet) 15-07-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T012020.20220715
Date of decision
15 July 2022
Case number
T 0120/20
Petition for review of
-
Application number
13177225.3
IPC class
H04L 1/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 363.29 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Link adaptation in a wireless telecommunications system

Applicant name
Unwired Planet International Limited
Opponent name
Purschke, Frank
Board
3.5.05
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 100(c)
European Patent Convention Art 76(1)
European Patent Convention Art 83
European Patent Convention Art 84
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art
Keywords

Divisional application - subject-matter extends beyond content of earlier application (yes)

Amendments - deletion of features (yes)

Sufficiency of disclosure - auxiliary request (no)

Amendment to appeal case - amendment gives rise to new objections (yes)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
-

I. The appellant-opponent appealed against the opposition division's decision to reject the opposition against European patent No. 2 658 159.

II. The decision under appeal made reference, inter alia, to the following documents:

A5 WO 2008/077433 (earliest application as filed, corresponding to European application EP 06 829 876)

A6 US 2006/203891

A8a Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network: Physical channels and mapping of transport channels onto physical channels (FDD) (Release 7), 3GPP TS 25.211, V7.0.0, 1 March 2006

III. In its statement setting out the grounds of appeal, the appellant requested that the decision be set aside, the patent be revoked and the appeal fee be reimbursed.

IV. The respondent-proprietor filed a reply to the appeal and requested that the appeal be dismissed. Failing that, it requested that the patent be maintained in accordance with one of auxiliary requests 1 to 4 filed by letter dated 24 April 2019.

V. In a letter dated 28 October 2020 the appellant submitted further arguments.

VI. The board summoned the parties to oral proceedings and set out its provisional view on the case in a communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020.

VII. By letters dated 21 June 2022 and 8 July 2022 the appellant submitted further arguments.

VIII. In a letter dated 24 June 2022 the respondent submitted claims in accordance with a further auxiliary request 2.A and amended pages of the description.

IX. The oral proceedings took place by videoconference.

X. Final requests of the parties

The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that European patent No. 2 658 159 be revoked.

The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee was withdrawn during the oral proceedings.

The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed, i.e. that the patent be maintained as granted (main request), or alternatively that the patent be maintained on the basis of one of the following auxiliary requests:

- auxiliary request 1 as filed by letter dated 24 April 2019;

- auxiliary request 2 as filed by letter dated 24 April 2019;

- auxiliary request 2', comprising claims 1 to 10 filed as auxiliary request 2 by letter dated 24 April 2019 and amended description pages 2 and 3 as filed by letter dated 24 June 2022;

- auxiliary request 2.A, comprising claims 1 to 10 filed as auxiliary request 2.A by letter dated 24 June 2022 and amended description pages 2 and 3 as filed by letter dated 24 June 2022;

- auxiliary request 3 as filed by letter dated 24 April 2019;

- auxiliary request 4 as filed by letter dated 24 April 2019.

XI. Claim 1 of the respondent's main request (patent as granted) reads as follows:

"A mobile terminal (20) for use in a wireless telecommunications system, the mobile terminal comprising:

a receiver (209) operable to receive a selection message from a base station (10),

the selection message including pre-allocation information relating to channel resources that are pre-allocated by the base station, the selection message also including information concerning a required type of feedback information, the received selection message having been transmitted from the base station using transmit weights determined for the mobile terminal;

a feedback generation unit (203) operable to utilise received pre-allocation information to generate the required type of feedback information;

and

a transmitter (207) operable to transmit the required type of feedback information to the base station in response to reception of the selection message from the base station,

the receiver also being operable to receive data via the pre-allocated channel resources."

XII. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 is based on claim 1 of the main request. The wording "the required type of feedback information" has been replaced by "feedback information of the required type of feedback".

XIII. Claim 1 of auxiliary requests 2 and 2' is based on claim 1 of the main request. The wording "using transmit weights" has been replaced by "in the form of a dedicated pilot signal using transmit weights", and the wording "to generate" has been replaced by "and dedicated pilot channel information to generate".

XIV. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2.A is based on claim 1 of the main request. The wording "wherein the pre-allocation information is transmitted using a dedicated pilot signal" has been added to claim 1.

XV. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 is based on claim 1 of the main request. The wording "wherein the feedback generation unit (203) is operable to estimate channel interference using the selection message" has been added at the end of claim 1.

XVI. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 is based on claim 1 of the main request. The wording "wherein the required type of feedback information is block level feedback information" has been added at the end of claim 1.

1. The patent in suit pertains to a mobile terminal and a method in a wireless telecommunications system. The terminal receives a selection message from a base station and transmits feedback information (e.g. channel quality indicator information) in accordance with the selection message to the base station.

Main request of the respondent: patent as granted

2. Article 100(c) EPC

The board disagrees with the decision under appeal and holds that the patent in suit does not meet the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC.

2.1 No basis is apparent in the earliest application as filed (Document A5) for stating in claims 1 and 6 that the selection message is transmitted from the base station without specifying that the transmission takes place in form of a dedicated pilot signal.

Independent claims 1, 12, 15 and 29 and the corresponding parts in the description's section "Summary of the present invention" of the earliest application as filed consistently disclose this form of transmission.

Claim 30 confirms that a pilot signal is used.

The section of the detailed description from page 9, line 19 to page 10, line 6 of the earliest application as filed teaches that the pre-allocation information (which forms part of the selection message) is transmitted "using respective dedicated pilot signals". Furthermore, the passage on page 10, lines 2 to 4 is clearly to be read in combination with page 9, lines 22 to 26.

Finally, in view of the passage of the description on page 9 relating to step 4C, Figure 4 discloses transmit weights and a dedicated pilot signal in combination.

2.2 The arguments submitted by the respondent did not convince the board that the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC were complied with.

2.2.1 The respondent argued that many passages of the description mentioned transmission of the selection message without also mentioning the pilot signal.

This argument is not convincing. The passages the respondent referred to (page 9, lines 19 to 21, 28 and 31; page 10, line 29) do not describe in what form/how the selection message is transmitted.

2.2.2 The respondent stated that the pre-allocation information did not necessarily form part of the selection message.

The board disagrees. The passage on page 9, lines 21 to 25 of the description does not mention the selection message, but does not teach that the pre-allocation information might be independent from it. Furthermore, all the independent claims of the earliest application and of the patent in suit state that the pre-allocation information forms part of the selection message.

2.2.3 The respondent explained that the passage on page 9, lines 21 to 25 started with "In embodiments ...", thus this passage did not necessarily limit the teaching in lines 19 to 21 on page 9.

Even if arguably not limiting lines 19 to 21, this passage describes a pilot signal together with the pre-allocation information, which is a component of the selection message. What is more, lines 19 to 21 do not describe in what form the selection message is transmitted. Finally, "in embodiments" does not implicitly disclose further, different embodiments.

2.2.4 The respondent stated that the passage on page 9, lines 21 to 25 referred to the pre-allocation information, not to the selection message.

This is correct. However, these lines clearly disclose that at least the pre-allocation information is transmitted using pilot signals. The present claim 1 does not mention pilot signals at all.

2.2.5 The respondent explained that the passage on page 10, lines 2 to 4 was not limited to a pilot signal.

The board agrees. However, it is apparent that these lines and lines 22 to 25 on page 9 are to be read together, because they both refer to step 4C in Figure 4, to transmitting the pre-allocation information and to "power allocations and/or transmit weights".

2.2.6 The respondent argued that the feature "in the form of a dedicated pilot signal" in claim 1 of the earliest application as filed was not essential and hence its omission did not amount to added matter.

This is not convincing, for the following reasons.

The board agrees with the appellant that the earliest application refers to a combination of two problems:

(a) reducing the amount of feedback information signalling required for scheduling and transmission mode adaptation (page 3, lines 6 to 8)

(b) providing a technique whereby high-quality feedback information can be supplied in advance of link adaptation (page 3, lines 1 and 2).

The passage on page 12, lines 14 to 17 of the description of A5 confirms that its invention addresses both problems in combination:

The techniques described above enable a wideband wireless telecommunications system to reduce the amount of bandwidth required in the uplink for transmission of feedback information from the mobile terminals to the basestation, whilst maintaining desirably high quality of timely feedback information.

The board agrees with the appellant that the transmission of the selection message in the form of a pilot signal contributes towards solving problem (b). Hence this feature is essential.

2.2.7 The respondent argued that according to the uplink-directed embodiment on page 12 of A5 the selection message was not transmitted in the form of a dedicated pilot signal.

The board notes that the present claim 1 pertains to the downlink-directed embodiments in A5. Furthermore, in the uplink-directed embodiment the base station generates the channel information (which is equivalent to the feedback information as claimed) and thus must receive the pilot signal, unlike the situation in the downlink-directed embodiments.

2.2.8 According to the respondent, if it were to be assumed hypothetically that the feature "transmission takes place in form of a dedicated pilot signal" was not sufficiently disclosed (Article 83 EPC), then the skilled reader would be presented with unclear and contradictory teaching in the earliest application. The skilled person would be of the opinion that it was not possible to transmit the pre-allocation information (as part of the selected message) using dedicated pilot signals. The skilled person would then disregard this contradictory teaching (referring to case T 609/95) and consider that the transmission did not necessarily need to occur "using respective dedicated pilot signals". Furthermore, in view of the contradictory teaching, the skilled person would consider that the omitted feature was not essential to the invention.

The board is not convinced. Case T 609/95 relates to an evident drafting defect in one sentence of the description. In the case at hand, the feature "in the form of a dedicated pilot signal" is not a drafting defect in a single passage of the earliest application, but is mentioned throughout the claims and the summary section and addresses a problem mentioned in the description. Additionally, the board notes that, as decided for auxiliary request 2, the feature "in the form of a dedicated pilot signal" is not sufficiently disclosed. This does not imply that it is not possible to transmit the pre-allocation information using a dedicated pilot signal.

2.2.9 The respondent further argued that the feature "in the form of a dedicated pilot signal" was not consistently disclosed in the earliest application. In particular, the detailed description differed from the claims.

The board agrees that there are differences between the detailed description and the claims. However, the detailed description also teaches that the pre-allocation information is transmitted using respective dedicated pilot signals.

2.3 Overall, there is no teaching in the earliest application that the selection message may be transmitted not in the form of a pilot signal but in another form.

3. In view of the above observations, the board decided that the ground for opposition under Article 100(c) EPC prejudices maintenance of the patent in suit.

Auxiliary requests 1, 3 and 4 of the respondent

4. Article 76(1) EPC

The board holds that the objection set out in point 2. above applies similarly to the claims of auxiliary requests 1, 3 and 4.

For these reasons, the claims of auxiliary requests 1, 3 and 4 do not meet the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC.

Auxiliary request 2 of the respondent

5. Article 83 EPC

5.1 The appellant argued that transmitting a message in the form of a dedicated pilot signal was contradictory in itself. In particular, a dedicated pilot signal was a predetermined known signal, which was known to the base station and the mobile device in advance. However, if the pilot signal carried information (i.e. the selection message), this led to variations in the signal, contrary to the need for the pilot signal to be predetermined. The appellant pointed to section 5.3.2, Figure 9 and Tables 11 and 12 of A8a and stated that the predetermined pilot patterns described in Table 12 could not be used for transmitting messages.

5.2 The board agrees with the arguments presented by the appellant.

5.2.1 On the other hand, the respondent's explanations are not convincing. It referred to document A6, paragraph 51 as an illustration of the common knowledge of the skilled person. This paragraph discloses that coded data may be multiplexed with pilot data using OFDM techniques. However, patent publications in general do not document the common knowledge of the skilled person. Furthermore, paragraph 51 of A6 does not teach that the result of the multiplexing would be "in the form of a dedicated pilot signal".

5.2.2 The respondent argued that a predetermined known part of the pilot signal could e.g. be associated with particular information. This suggests that components, or only a part, of the selection message would be associated with the pilot signal.

However, claim 1 reads: "the received selection message having been transmitted from the base station in the form of a dedicated pilot signal". There is no room to interpret this wording as transmitting only a part of the selection message in the form of a dedicated pilot signal.

5.2.3 The respondent pointed to Figures 1 and 5 and sections 5.2.1.1 and 5.2.2.1.3 in document A8a and explained that these passages disclosed the transmission of data bits and pilot bits in one slot.

The board is not convinced. According to section 5.2.2.1.3, Figure 5 and Table 8, the 8 pilot bits are known. The TFCI bits, which are transmitted in the same slot, do not form part of the pilot. Section 5.2.1.1 comprises similar teaching.

5.2.4 The respondent explained that the selection message and the pilot signal could be transmitted in a multiplexed manner using any one of the known multiplexing techniques, e.g. OFDM, CDMA or MIMO.

However, as correctly pointed out by the appellant, multiplexing the pilot signal with the selection message results in a signal with a different frequency, code or spatial sub-channel from a dedicated pilot signal. Thus the selection message would not be transmitted in the form of a dedicated pilot signal.

5.2.5 The respondent argued that the wording in claim 1

the selection message including pre-allocation information relating to channel resources that are pre-allocated by the base station, the selection message also including information concerning a required type of feedback information

was to be interpreted broadly, i.e. that the term "including" did not necessarily require that the pre-allocation information and the required type of feedback be included in the selection message "in the sense of separate pieces of information". Rather, the term "include" was to be interpreted as covering also "convey", "specify" and "inform". In summary, the subject-matter of claim 1 required that the selection message include the pre-allocation information and the required type of feedback in the sense of informing the mobile terminal about them.

The board is not convinced. As correctly explained by the appellant, the wording "a message including an information item", in the context of data transmission, is normally understood in the sense that the information item is comprised in the message. That the description of the patent in suit does not set out any details regarding message fields or number of bits does not impose any different meaning on the term "including". The passages in the description on pages 10 and 11 mentioned by the respondent refer to the same term "including". That the required type of feedback information specifies either block level or frame level feedback does not impart a different meaning to the term "including".

5.2.6 Even if, for the sake of argument, it were agreed that the selection message does not explicitly and separately include these two pieces of information, the patent in suit does not sufficiently disclose transmitting the selection message in the form of a dedicated pilot signal.

First, the board agrees with the appellant that the skilled person would not find any hint or disclosure in the patent in suit with regard to the possible implementations mentioned on pages 20 to 24 of the respondent's letter dated 24 June 2022.

Second, the standardised channels pointed at by the respondent (S-CPICH and P-CPICH according to document A8a) might, at least arguably, be seen as forming part of the general knowledge of the skilled person. However, using these channels for specifically transmitting pre-allocation information relating to channel resources that are pre-allocated by the base station and information concerning a required type of feedback information to the mobile terminal does not form part of this general knowledge.

5.2.7 The respondent argued in the oral proceedings that the description of the patent in suit read: "the pre-allocation information is transmitted to the mobile terminals in the selected subset using respective dedicated pilot signals" (column 6, lines 7 to 10 of the B1 publication). The formulation "using" meant that the pre-allocation information was implicitly signalled using a pilot signal. The time slot of the pilot signal could inform the mobile terminal about the pre-allocation.

This argument is not convincing. Claim 1 includes different wording, i.e. the selection message is transmitted in the form of a dedicated pilot signal. Furthermore, using the time slot of the pilot signal to inform the mobile terminal about the pre-allocation is not disclosed in the patent in suit and does not belong to the general knowledge of the skilled person.

6. For these reasons, the claims of auxiliary request 2 do not meet the requirements of Article 83 EPC.

Auxiliary request 2' of the respondent

7. Article 83 EPC

Auxiliary request 2' comprises the same claim 1 as auxiliary request 2. The same objection under Article 83 EPC hence applies to auxiliary request 2'.

Auxiliary request 2.A of the respondent

8. Admission

8.1 This auxiliary request was submitted after the summons to oral proceedings had been issued. Hence its admission is governed by the provisions of Article 13(1) and (2) RPBA.

8.2 Claims 1 and 6 of auxiliary request 2.A was amended by incorporating the following feature from the description:

"wherein the pre-allocation information is transmitted using a dedicated pilot signal".

8.3 At the oral proceedings, the appellant argued that claim 1 as amended was not clear. In particular, it pointed out that the pre-allocation information and the information concerning a required type of feedback were included in the selection message. It was not clear how the selection message as such could be transmitted using transmit weights and one component of the selection message (i.e. the pre-allocation information) could be transmitted using a dedicated pilot signal.

8.4 The respondent argued at the oral proceedings that the selection message was not limited as to its form and that a part of the selection message was transmitted using a pilot signal.

8.5 The appellant's arguments are persuasive. Claim 1 specifies a form of transmission "using transmit weights" for the selection message and another form of transmission "using a dedicated pilot signal" for one of the two components included in the selection message. It is not clear how the two components included in one selection message could be transmitted using different forms of transmission.

The board agrees with the respondent that claim 1 does not limit the form of the selection message. However, claim 1 explicitly states that the selection message includes two components and specifies two forms of transmission.

8.6 Hence claim 1 does not meet the requirements of Article 84 EPC.

8.7 For these reasons, the board decided that auxiliary request 2.A, by giving rise to a new objection, does not meet the criteria set out in Article 13(1) RPBA. Thus auxiliary request 2.A was not admitted into the proceedings.

Consequently, it was not necessary to examine and decide on compliance with the provisions of Article 13(2) RPBA.

9. Conclusion

None of the respondent's admissible requests is allowable.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility