European Patent Office

T 0830/91 (Late amendments) of 25.05.1993

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T083091.19930525
Date of decision
25 May 1993
Case number
T 0830/91
Petition for review of
-
Application number
87116757.3
IPC class
A61K 47/00
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
Download
-
Other decisions for this case
T 0830/91 Amendments/WHITBY 1994-09-15
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
Penetration enhancers for transdermal delivery of systemic agents
Applicant name
Whitby Research
Opponent name
-
Board
3.3.02
Headnote

The following questions are referred to the Enlarged Board:

1. In the light of Article 113(2) EPC, is Rule 51(6) EPC to be interpreted such that an approval submitted under Rule 51(4) EPC becomes binding once a communication in accordance with Rule 51(6) EPC has been issued?

2. Is the European Patent Office obliged to consider reservations under Article 167(2) EPC as constituting requirements of the EPC which have to be met according to Article 96(2) EPC?

Keywords
Admissibility of amendments after a Rule 51(6) communication
Reservations under Article 167(2) EPC
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal
Catchword
-
Cited cases
-
Citing cases
J 0030/95

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The following questions are referred to the Enlarged Board:

1. In the light of Article 113(2) EPC, is Rule 51(6) EPC to be interpreted such that an approval submitted under Rule 51(4) EPC becomes binding once a communication in accordance with Rule 51(6) EPC has been issued?

2. Is the European Patent Office obliged to consider reservations under Article 167(2) EPC as constituting requirements of the EPC which have to be met according to Article 96(2) EPC?