Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • Core activities
          • Stories and insights
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2024
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Executive summary
          • Driver 1 – People
          • Driver 2 – Technologies
          • Driver 3 – High-quality, timely products and services
          • Driver 4 – Partnerships
          • Driver 5 – Financial Sustainability
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0453/99 (Wet oxidation/U.S. FILTER) 20-09-2001
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0453/99 (Wet oxidation/U.S. FILTER) 20-09-2001

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2001:T045399.20010920
Date of decision
20 September 2001
Case number
T 0453/99
Petition for review of
-
Application number
91308493.5
IPC class
C02F 11/08
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 27.9 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Caustic sulfide wet oxidation process

Applicant name
U.S. FILTER/ZIMPRO, INC.
Opponent name
Nippon Petrochemical Co. Ltd.
Board
3.3.05
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
Keywords
Inventive step - no, obvious solution of a known problem.
Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal is from the decision of the Opposition Division to reject the opposition against European patent No. 0 513 454. The patent was based on the European patent application No. 91308493.5. The patent was granted with 6 claims. Claim 1 thereof reads as follows:

"A process for treatment of a caustic sulfide liquor by wet oxidation in a nickel-based alloy system comprising the steps:

a) analyzing the caustic sulfide liquor to determine the initial concentrations therein of total alkalinity, total sulfides, mercaptans, COD, thiosulfate, total carbonate and pH, and determining from the results of this analysis the amount of nonsulfidic alkalinity which would be consumed by said liquor upon wet oxidation treatment and the amount of nonsulfidic alkalinity initially available in said liquor;

b) adding a sufficient amount of additional nonsulfidic alkalinity to said caustic sulfide liquor such that the sum of the initially available nonsulfidic alkalinity and said additional nonsulfidic alkalinity exceeds the amount of nonsulfidic alkalinity which will be consumed upon wet oxidation treatment as determined in step a; and

c) carrying out said treatment process of wet oxidation upon said caustic sulfide liquor within said nickel-based alloy system to destroy sulfides and mercaptans and produce a treated liquor containing excess nonsulfidic alkalinity."

II. In the decision, inter alia, the following prior art documents were considered:

D1: JP-B-49-33845,

D3: JP-A-54-108462,

D4: JP-A-52-150778,

D6: "Chemical Analysis of Industrial Water", James W. McCoy (1969), pages 125 to 153,

D7: US-A-4 350 599.

The opposition grounds were lack of novelty and lack of inventive step (Article 100(a) EPC). The Opposition Division held that D1 represented the closest prior art. The process of granted claim 1 would differ therefrom in that

- the oxidation treatment took place in a nickel-based alloy system,

- the caustic sulfide liquor was not only analysed for pH, thiosulfate and COD as disclosed in D1 but also for the initial concentrations of total alkalinity, total sulfides, mercaptans and total carbonate, and

- on the basis of this analysis the amount of nonsulfidic alkalinity, which would be consumed by said liquor upon oxidation treatment, and the amount of nonsulfidic alkalinity initially available were determined in order to determine the necessary amount of additional nonsulfidic alkalinity.

It was argued that the corrosion problems in D1 were not comparable to those of the patent in suit. The waste liquor in D1 was less caustic, different bases were added and the equipment used in D1 was probably made of stainless steel. The process of the patent in suit could achieve a more accurate calculation of the necessary amount of base to be added. The said differences made it possible to safely treat high alkaline waste waters and involved an inventive step. The other documents were considered not to add anything to the teaching of D1.

III. In the statement of the grounds of appeal, the appellant(opponent) maintained the objections raised before the first instance. Novelty of claim 1 was attacked on the basis of D1 . An inventive step of the processes according to claim 1 was denied in view of D1 in combination with D6 . During oral proceedings, which were held on 20 September 2001, novelty was no longer disputed. With respect to inventive step further reference was made to D7.

The appellant's arguments may be summarized as follows:

As evidenced by D7, it was common general knowledge in the art of wet oxidation treatment of caustic sulfide liquor to use a nickel-based alloy reactor system if the pH of the liquor was high. D7 also showed that it was common general knowledge that acid was produced during the oxidation treatment and that under acid conditions the reactor system would be corroded. D1 specifically disclosed the addition of an ammonia containing gas liquor to a caustic sulfide waste liquor in an amount necessary for neutralisation, which is calculated from the amount of ammonia contained in the gas liquor and the concentrations of thiosulfates and sulfur in the waste liquor. The other components mentioned in claim 1 needed not to be determined if it was known beforehand that the waste water could not contain them. The waste liquors treated according to the examples did not contain all the components mentioned in claim 1 so that the method according to claim 1 covered also waste liquors which did not contain all the components mentioned therein. No technical problem beyond D1 was solved.

IV. During oral proceedings the Board drew the parties' attention also to D3 and D4, both concerning a wet oxidation treatment of a caustic sulfide liquor under such conditions that the pH was reduced but remained basic.

V. The respondent's (proprietor) arguments may be summarized as follows:

A nickel-based alloy system was only used for the treatment of a highly alkaline caustic liquor. At the pH range from 8 to 10, as mentioned in D1, stainless steel was normally used. According to D1 ammonia gas liquor was added to the waste liquor for neutralizing the acid formed during the wet oxidation. The examples of D1 showed that after the treatment the pH was higher so that the amount of alkalinity already present in the waste liquor was not taken into consideration. Both the waste liquor and the neutralizing agent according to D1 were different from those used in the patent in suit. There was no reason for the skilled person to analyse the waste liquor of D1 for total alkalinity, total sulfides, mercaptans and total carbonates. The fact that D6 disclosed how to measure the concentrations of all possible components did not make it obvious to do so. D3 and D4 related to different processes. According to D3 a copper catalyst was added and according to D4 a caustic hydrogen peroxide was used for the oxidation of the waste liquor. Although the object of the invention was to prevent corrosion, it had the additional advantage that conditions could be so chosen that the treated liquor was less alkaline, requiring less acid for neutralisation prior to discharge to the environment. The skilled person was not motivated to determine each potentially acidic component or each neutralizing agent that might also be present in the waste liquor and to take it into account for determining the amount of neutralizing agent to be added to prevent corrosion.

VI. The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the European patent No. 513 454 be revoked.

The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed.

1. Novelty was no longer disputed during the oral proceedings. From the following analysis of inventive step it is evident that the subject-matter of claim is new.

2. According to claim 1 the caustic sulfide liquor is treated in a reactor made of a nickel-based alloy. Such an alloy is much more expensive than conventional stainless steel and is only used if the liquor has a high pH value. The technical problems related to the treatment of high caustic liquors are generally different from those encountered in low caustic liquors. The treatment of a high caustic liquor requiring the use of a nickel-based alloy has been disclosed in D7, but not in D1. The Board, therefore, holds that D7 is more suitable as a starting point for an inventive step analysis than D1.

3. D7 discloses that it is known in the art to treat sulfide-containing caustic waste liquors of a pH of about 13 effectively by wet oxidation for almost complete destruction of the pollutants, whereby sulfides are oxidized to sulfates and the organic substances are primarily converted to carbon dioxide and water. It further discloses that the high preheat and reaction temperatures require special construction materials of the wet oxidation system to prevent corrosion, and that high nickel alloys such as Incoloy 800 are resistant to alkali at higher temperatures but are expensive (column 1, lines 6 to 15 and lines 38 to 43). Starting from this prior art teaching, the problem underlying the invention can be seen in preventing corrosion of a nickel-based alloy reactor system in the treatment of a caustic sulfide liquor by wet oxidation. The patent in suit proposes to solve this problem by steps (a) and(b) of claim 1, thereby ensuring that during the wet oxidation treatment the liquor does not become acidic. It is common general knowledge that nickel-based alloys, like all alloys based on a metal which are more electronegative than hydrogen, are not resistant to acids. Since it is evident that by the method according to claim 1 the formation of acid is prevented the Board is satisfied that the process according to claim 1 actually solves the above-mentioned problem.

4. D7 does not specifically relate to the problem of avoiding corrosion in a nickel-based alloy system but is directed to operational conditions which make it possible to perform the process safely in a stainless steel reactor. To this end D7 proposes to add an acid or carbon dioxide to the caustic waste liquor in order to reduce the pH of the liquor below 11.0 but preferably not below 7 and to contact the additional incoming raw caustic waste liquor with a carbon dioxide containing gas to neutralize the caustic waste. The use of carbon dioxide ensures that the pH remains on the alkaline side in view of the alkali metal carbonate content of the solution (column 2, lines 16 to 57). With respect to a nickel alloy system it is observed in D7 that preheating of the feed must be performed in the presence of oxygen because of high corrosion rates under oxygen deficient conditions (column 1, lines 41 to 47 and column 5, lines 43 to 49). D7 does not disclose additional measures to ensure that the solution does not turn acidic during the wet oxidation treatment. For waste liquors with a high amount of hydroxide and a relatively low amount of sulfur compounds as used in Example 1 of D7 the liquor will remain alkaline during the wet oxidation treatment without adding additional alkali. The skilled person will realize that only for waste liquors having a relatively low amount of hydroxide and a high amount of acid forming pollutants, such as sulfides and organic substances, measures must be taken to prevent the treated liquor from becoming strongly acidic. In such a situation the skilled person will look into other documents concerning wet oxidation treatment and consider the solutions for this problem given therein.

5. The parties agreed that the skilled person would have considered D1. This document, a patent publication of the Japanese Patent Office was submitted by the appellant together with an English translation thereof. The translation was not contested by the respondent (the following references to D1 relate in fact to the English translation thereof). D1 relates to a process for treatment of waste liquor from a coke oven plant and discloses that such a waste liquor contains sulfur and sulfur compounds which, when subjected to an oxidation treatment, are easily oxidized to produce sulfuric acid so that the liquor becomes strongly acidic and that this is a serious problem for the material of the apparatus (paragraph bridging pages 3 and 4). In order to avoid the formation of free acid D1 proposes to add an amount of ammonia containing gas liquor necessary for neutralization which is calculated from the amount of ammonia contained in the gas liquor and the concentrations of thiosulfates and sulfur in the waste liquor, whereby the pH can be maintained at a suitable value for release of the treated liquor and the material of the treating apparatus (paragraph bridging pages 4 and 5). The only acid forming pollutants identified in the examples are thiocyanate and thiosulfate.

However, if a skilled person has to solve the related problem of treating a waste liquor in which other acid forming substances were also present, such as sulfides and mercaptans, it is within the ordinary skills of such person to take their concentration also into account for calculating the necessary amount of gas liquor to be added. It is also routine to determine the pH and COD values of the liquor (D1, Tables and D7, Example 1). In D1 an ammonia containing gas liquor is added as neutralizing agent because it is available as a waste product on the coke oven plant. Other neutralizing agents such as sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate were also contemplated but rejected for cost reasons (page 4, lines 6 to 11). In other gas washing processes, such as the washing of cracked gas from a naphtha cracker, sodium hydroxide solutions are used; see D4 (English translation, Example 2). In such a process, where sodium hydroxide is available on the plant in large quantities , a skilled person would certainly consider the use of sodium hydroxide as a neutralizing agent if necessary. Crack gases always contain some carbon dioxide so that the spent liquor will also contain sodium carbonate and, depending on the pH, sodium bicarbonate. It is then also obvious not only to determine the amount of sodium hydroxide in the liquor but also the amounts of sodium carbonate and bicarbonate. From table 1 of D4 it is apparent that in practice the concentrations of all the components mentioned in step (a) of present claim 1 are determined if they can be expected to be present. It is true that the process according to D4 is a wet oxidation process using hydrogen peroxide as an oxidant and not a high pressure wet oxidation process with gaseous oxygen. Present claim 1 seems, however, also to cover the oxidation treatment according to D4. But even if treatment by wet oxidation according to claim 1 would exclude the hydrogen peroxide treatment according to D4, the fact remains that D4 shows that in the art of wet oxidation of caustic sulfide liquors normally the concentrations of all caustic and sulfur containing compounds are determined.

6. The corrosion problem by acid attack which might occur during the wet oxidation of a caustic sulfide liquor is also discussed in D3 (last paragraph of page 3 of the English translation). D3 proposes to adjust the pH of the waste liquor so that after treatment it will remain neutral to alkaline even after a free acid has been produced by the oxidation (page 5, second full paragraph). This teaching is not invalidated by the fact that D3 also proposes to add a copper catalyst solution. Thus not only the problem of corrosion risk during the wet oxidation treatment was known in the art but also the solution of this problem by adjusting the pH through additional alkali. It is obvious for a skilled person not to add more alkali than necessary for neutralization of the acid formed during the wet oxidation treatment because, before the treated liquor can be discharged in the environment, any surplus of alkali must be neutralized (D3, page 5, second full paragraph). In order to know whether additional alkali is necessary and, if so, how much is necessary to secure alkaline conditions without making it unnecessarily caustic, the initial concentrations of all the relevant components must be determined.

7. The chemical analysis of caustic sulfide liquors is disclosed in D6. For the estimation of hydroxide, sulfide, mercaptan and carbonate, D6 teaches to determine the concentrations of total alkalinity, total sulfide, mercaptan and total carbonate. With the knowledge of pH it is then possible to accurately determine the concentrations of hydroxide, carbonate, bicarbonate, sulfide, bisulfide, mercaptan (pages 139 to 151). If thiosulfates and organics may also be present it is obvious to determine the concentrations of these compounds because the skilled person knows that these compounds produce alkali-consuming acids by oxidation. The determination of thiosulfate in the presence of sulfide is done by a routine analysis; see D6, pages 134 to 137. The amount of organics follows from the standard determination of the COD value after subtracting the inorganic oxygen consuming species.

8. From the above it follows that the skilled person trying to prevent corrosion was aware of the need to add an additional amount of alkali to a caustic sulfide liquor if the amount of non-sulfidic alkali in the liquor was not sufficient to neutralize the acid formed during wet oxidation. In order to determine the necessary amount of additional alkali he will, as a matter of routine, analyse the liquor by standard methods and calculate how much acid will be produced and how much alkali remains available for neutralization. Nothing more is proposed by present claim 1.

9. The respondent's argument that following the teaching of D1 the skilled person would not take into account the non-sulfidic alkali present in the caustic sulfide liquor, is not convincing. In D1 the waste liquor treated in the examples have a low pH (<9) and a high content of acid forming, sulphur containing, substances such as thiocyanate and thiosulfate. In these circumstances the amount of non-sulfidic alkali must have been low so that there was no need to determine it and to take it into account for calculating the amount of additional alkali. Therefore, D1 does not show that in the case of strong caustic waste liquors having a high pH (about 13), such as disclosed in D3, D4 and D7, for which it is not clear, without complete analysis of the liquor, whether additional alkali is required for neutralization or not, the skilled person would not have considered to determine the available non-sulfidic alkali and take it into account for calculating the required amount of additional alkali.

10. For these reasons the Board holds that the process according to present claim 1 is the result of obvious considerations which a skilled person, guided by the prior art, would apply for solving the above-mentioned problem . Such a method, requiring not more than basic chemical skills, therefore does not involve an inventive step.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility