T 1764/08 of 02.12.2010
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T176408.20101202
- Date of decision
- 2 December 2010
- Case number
- T 1764/08
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 99960701.3
- IPC class
- H04N 7/26
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Distributed to board chairmen (C)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Motion vector processing
- Applicant name
- Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.5.04
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- Act revising the Convention on the Grant of European Patents Art 7(1)Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Art 41(2)Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Art 64(2)Decision President of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the filing of patent applications and other documents by facsimileDecision_AC of 28 June 2001 on the transitional provisions under_Art_7of the Act revising the EPC_Art_001Decision_President_of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the electronic filing of patent applications and other documents_Art_002(1)Decision_President_of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the electronic filing of patent applications and other documents_Art_002(3)Decision_President_of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the electronic filing of patent applications and other documents_Art_012Decision_President_of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the electronic filing of patent applications and other documents_Art_013European Patent Convention Art 106European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 122(1)European Patent Convention Art 122(2)European Patent Convention R 101(1)European Patent Convention R 126(2)European Patent Convention R 131(4)European Patent Convention R 136(1)European Patent Convention R 2(1)European Patent Convention R 99Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13
- Keywords
- Admissibility of appeal - grounds of appeal filed via epoline (no)
Principle of good faith (no)
EPO document submission system unnecessarily complicated (no)
Re-establishment of rights (no)
All due care (no) - Catchword
- See Sections 9 to 10 and 16 to 21
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The request for re-establishment of rights is rejected.
2. The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.