Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • Core activities
          • Stories and insights
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 1407/09 (Glass fiber/STM-URSA) 28-09-2012
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 1407/09 (Glass fiber/STM-URSA) 28-09-2012

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T140709.20120928
Date of decision
28 September 2012
Case number
T 1407/09
Petition for review of
-
Application number
00969800.2
IPC class
C03C 13/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 59.64 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

A glass fiber composition

Applicant name

STM Technologies S.r.l.

URSA International GmbH

Opponent name
SAINT-GOBAIN ISOVER
Board
3.3.05
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 54(1)
European Patent Convention Art 54(2)
European Patent Convention Art 54(3)
European Patent Convention Art 56
European Patent Convention Art 84
Keywords

Main request and first auxiliary request: Novelty (no) - Prior use novelty-destroying

Second auxiliary request: Novelty (yes), Inventive step (yes) - prior use conveying implicitly a teaching as starting point - non obvious alternative

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0221/91
T 0055/01
T 0234/09
Citing decisions
-

I. The present appeals lie from the decision of the opposition division concerning maintenance of European patent No. 1 218 304 on the basis of amended claims filed as first auxiliary request on 17 March 2009 during the oral proceedings before the first instance, with claim 1 thereof reading:

"1. A biologically-degradable or bio-soluble glass fiber composition, characterized in that it comprises the following components expressed in percent by weight:

- SiO2 : 61 to 66;

- Al2O3: 1.1 to 1.8;

- (CaO + MgO): higher than 9;

- CaO: 6 to 9;

- MgO: 0 to 5;

- Na2O: higher than 17.5 to 18.50;

- K2O: 0.6 to 1;

- B2O3: 5 to 15;

- P2O5: 0 to 5;

- SO3: 0 to 1;

- Fe2O3: 0 to 0.5;

- Others: less than 2."

II. The following documents filed during the opposition proceedings are relevant for the present decision:

Al: EP 1 048 625 A1

A1a: Translation of Spanish patent application No. P9900960, dated 30 April 1999, priority of A1

A2: FR 2 764 597 Al

A3: US 5 108 957

A4: WO 95/32927

A5: WO 98/30509

A7: US 5 055 428

Declaration of Mr PICARD dated 26 January 2009

B1: Analysis sheet dated 19 April 1999 of a sample of "Fibralene PV 200" glass fibers

B1a: Pictures of a FIBRAVER glass fiber mat before and after opening of its packaging, as well as of its product label, undated

B1b: Image enlargement of the product label in B1a, undated

B1d: Request for analysis dated 2 March 1999 of a sample of "Fibralene PV 200".

III. The contested decision can be summarised as follows:

Regarding the alleged prior use based on document B1, neither the date nor the circumstances relating to the alleged use had been determined.

The subject-matter of claim 1 as granted lacked an inventive step over the glass fiber composition known from document A2, example 8B.

The claims of the first auxiliary request involved an inventive step because starting from any of the documents A2 or A3, it was not obvious for a skilled person to modify the known compositions by changing at least two ingredients in such a way that he would arrive at the claimed composition.

IV. With its statement of grounds of appeal, the opponent (hereinafter "appellant I") contested the above decision in particular on the basis of the alleged prior use of the commercially available glass fibers Fibralene PV 200. Appellant I further argued that the subject-matter as upheld by the opposition division, on the one hand, lacked novelty over the individual disclosure of documents A1 or A2 and, on the other hand, lacked an inventive step over the above prior use or alternatively over the individual disclosure of documents A2 or A3.

V. With their statement of grounds of appeal dated 2 October 2009 the patent proprietors (hereinafter "appellant II") requested that the decision be reversed and that the patent be upheld as granted, i.e. with claim 1 reading as follows (differences to claim 1 as maintained by the opposition division highlighted by the board):

"A biologically-degradable or bio-soluble glass fiber composition, characterized in that it comprises the following components expressed in percent by weight:

- SiO2 : 61 to 66;

- Al2O3: 1.1 to 1.8;

- (CaO + MgO): higher than 9;

- (Na2O + K2O): higher than 18;

- CaO: 6 to 9;

- MgO: 0 to 5;

- Na2O: higher than 17.5 to 18.50;

- K2O: 0.6 to 1;

- B2O3: 5 4 to 15;

- P2O5: 0 to 5;

- SO3: 0 to 1;

- Fe2O3: 0 to 0.5;

- Others: less than 2."

Alternatively, appellant II filed three auxiliary requests, with the set of claims according to auxiliary request 2 being identical to the one upheld by the opposition division.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 reads as follows (amendments in comparison to claim 1 as granted emphasised by the board):

"Glass fibers consisting of a biologically-degradable or bio-soluble glass fiber composition, characterized in that it comprises consists of the following components expressed in percent by weight:

- SiO2 : 61 to 66;

- Al2O3: 1.1 to 1.8;

- (CaO + MgO): higher than 9;

- (Na2O + K2O): higher than 18;

- B2O3: 4 to 15;

- P2O5: 0 to 5;

- SO3: 0 to 1;

- Fe2O3: 0 to 0.5;

- Others: less than 2."

VI. With a letter dated 2 December 2009, appellant I contested in particular the claims of the 1st auxiliary request under Articles 54, 56 and 123(3) EPC and those of the 2nd auxiliary request under Articles 84, 54 and 56 EPC.

VII. Further observations were received from the parties as follows:

From appellant II (patent proprietors): with letter dated 9 February 2010;

From appellant I (Opponent): with letters dated 20 August 2012 and 20 September 2012, each in particular accompanied by a declaration by Ms LESIEUR. The letter dated 20 September 2012 was faxed to appellant II by the board of appeal on the same day.

VIII. With a further letter dated 28 August 2012, appellant II filed two additional sets of amended claims as auxiliary requests 4 and 5, respectively.

IX. At the oral proceedings, which took place on 28 September 2012, appellant II requested as a procedural matter that the declaration by Ms Lesieur filed on 20 September 2012 be disregarded because of its late filing. If this declaration was accepted by the board, appellant II requested the postponement of the oral proceedings.

Appellant I held the claims as granted and those of the first auxiliary request to lack novelty over the alleged prior use of the commercial glass fibers "Fibralene PV200". The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 lacked clarity because its wording was contradictory. The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 further lacked novelty over the disclosure of documents B1, A1 and A2 taken individually, also lacked inventive step over the teachings of documents B1 or A3.

In the course of the discussion, appellant II filed an amended auxiliary request 2 which differed from the one upheld by the opposition division in that dependent claims 5, 6 and 9 to 11 were deleted. Claim 1 thereof reads as indicated in point I. above and the new claims 2 to 6 represent particular embodiments of the subject-matter of claim 1 on which they depend.

X. The parties' requests were established as follows:

Appellant I requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.

Appellant II requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained as granted (main request) or, alternatively, that the patent be maintained on the basis of the claims according to auxiliary request 1 filed on 2 October 2009 or, alternatively, that the patent be maintained on the basis of the claims according to auxiliary request 2 filed during the oral proceedings before the board.

1. Admissibility of the second declaration - request for postponement of the oral proceedings

1.1 The second declaration of Ms Lesieur stating that the analysis sheets from the "Centre de Recherches Industrielles de Rantigny" (hereinafter "CRIR") always expressed the oxide amounts in weight percentages was filed on 20 September 2012. This declaration was preceded by a first one dated 20 August 2012, by which Ms Lesieur declared that the chemical analysis of the glass product Fibralene PV200 had been carried out by using X-Ray fluorescence spectrometry, which allowed the determination of the weight amount of a specific chemical element.

1.2 In the board's view it is undeniable that the declaration of 20 September 2012 was filed at a very late stage of the appeal proceedings, since it was received one week before the oral proceedings.

However, the question whether the elemental amounts in B1 were indicated on a molar or a weight basis had always been a critical issue in the present proceedings. The board observes that appellant II was aware of the first declaration and of its content, since this first declaration had been filed earlier - in November 2010 - in another case involving both parties, namely the opposition proceedings on EP 1048625. Appellant II could not be surprised by the content of the further declaration of 20 September 2012 in which Ms Lesieur simply confirmed and expanded on the first declaration.

1.3 It follows from the above that the board does not see any reason not to admit this declaration into the proceedings. The board does also see no reason to postpone the oral proceedings, since the above topic had always been a critical issue and in this respect appellant II had sufficient time before the oral proceedings to prepare the necessary counter-arguments.

2. Main request - novelty/prior use

2.1 Appellant I having alleged that the glass fiber "Fibralene PV 200" had been made available to the public by means of a commercial prior use before the priority date of the contested patent, the first question to be answered is whether the analytical data shown in B1 - an analysis sheet from the CRIR dated 19 April 1999 reproduced hereinafter - directly and unambiguously disclose a glass composition which falls under the wording of claim 1 as granted.

2.1.1 It is undisputed that the individual numerical values indicated in the above table fall within the corresponding ranges defined in claim 1 at issue.

2.1.2 Appellant II however did not accept that a glass composition according to claim 1 as granted was directly and unambiguously disclosed by B1. It argued in particular that:

(a) B1 did not say whether the data values were by "weight%" or "mole%", and the software associated with the X-ray fluorescence spectrometer used for the analysis could probably have generated both values at the push of a button. Furthermore, the declaration of Ms Lesieur that the values were always expressed "by weight" was void since she was not yet working at the CRIR in April 1999;

(b) the analytical results for Al2O3, Na2O, K2O and B2O3 were outside the analytical limits of the measurement method.

2.1.3 The board does not accept the above arguments for the following reasons.

Document B1's form and content show that the analysis values were recorded on it as a routine task and a basis for further work. Its failure to specify the "%" values means that the CRIR must have operated a standard practice of using always "weight%" or "mole%"; otherwise, the values would have been too vague and given rise to total confusion. Even if Ms Lesieur had not been in charge of working on the analysis values at the time when sheet B1 had been produced, she must have been aware of any change in its standard documentation practice, from "weight%" to "mole%" or vice versa. Otherwise, she could not herself have worked with values documented prior to her employment. Her statement that the CRIR always used "weight%" convinces the board that the data in B1 are based on "weight%".

As explained in point 3 of Ms Lesieur's first declaration of 15 November 2010, the remark "outside of the limits" ("hors des limites") in the above table meant that data had been measured with a lower accuracy in comparison to data falling inside the "analytical limits" ("limites analytiques") of the measurement method. It follows that even if the accuracy for Al2O3, Na2O and K2O is not the highest, one has to admit that the data recorded on sheet B1 fall within the ranges of values defined in claim 1 at issue.

It follows from the above that the composition of the glass fiber sample analysed in April 1999 and recorded on sheet B1 directly and unambiguously falls within the terms of claim 1 at issue.

2.2 The second question to be answered is whether the analysed sample had been made commercially available before the priority date or whether, as alleged by appellant II, it could have been subject to a confidentiality agreement between appellant I and FIBRAVER, manufacturer of the glass fiber "Fibralene PV 200".

2.2.1 The board cannot uphold appellant II's allegations, because if the sample at issue had been obtained within the terms of a confidentiality agreement, clarification was to be expected in the present case, since as established during these appeal proceedings FIBRAVER merged with Poliglas, which itself later merged with URSA, co-proprietor of the contested patent. In any case, as established in a case similar to the one at issue, it was incumbent upon appellant II to seek clarification on this issue (see T 0221/91, point 2 of the reasons, which concerned an alleged prior use of a tyre).

2.2.2 Regarding the alleged commercial availability of the glass fiber sample analysed in April 1999, the analysis sheet B1 reveals that the sample was a glass fiber ("FV: fibre de verre") called "Fibralene PV 200" produced in BEAUCAIRE (FRANCE). The sheet further discloses that the sample was collected on 3 March 1999 and analysed on 16 April 1999, i.e. well before the priority date - 30 September 1999 - of the contested patent.

2.2.3 According to Mr Picard's declaration of 26 January 2009, the glass fiber sample whose data are documented in analysis sheet B1 originates from the packaged/ unpackaged glass fiber mat shown on the photographs in document B1a, said mat having the label shown on the photographs in documents B1a and B1b. This product was freely obtained on the market and was purchased within the framework of the follow-up of the competitors' products. Mr Picard explained - as confirmed by document B1d - that the analysis of the glass sample had been requested on 2 March 1999 by Mr Marle, who was in charge of said product. This corroborated the date of receipt (3 March 1999) of the glass fiber sample at the CRIR, as documented in document B1.

2.2.4 Appellant II argued that there was a contradiction between B1 (which indicated that the product stemmed from a factory in "BEAUCAIRE") and the label in B1a/B1b (which indicated "PRODUCED IN FRANCE, 77442 MARNE-LA-VALLEE CEDEX 2"). The board disagrees, because as indicated by the "Avis technique 5/00-1468" filed by appellant I on 20 August 2012, the factory of FIBRAVER is located in Beaucaire, while its headquarters are located in MARNE-LA-VALLEE.

2.2.5 The board observes that the glass fiber roll called "Fibralène PV Monocouche PV 200" shown on the photographs in document B1a was produced by FIBRAVER. Its packaging (enclosed in a plastic foil) and conditioning (width: 1.20 m, thickness: 200 mm, length: 4 m, kraft paper on one side) are similar to those that can be purchased e.g. in do-it-yourself stores for similar mineral wool products. The label shown on the photograph on document B1a, also reproduced and enlarged on document B1b, furthermore bears the "ACERMI" certificate, which means that said fiber glass roll was certified by the French association for certification of insulating materials.

2.2.6 For the board, all these pieces of evidence lead to the conclusion that the roll of glass fibers shown in documents B1a/B1b and analysed in document B1 was commercially available in April 1999, i.e. well before the priority date of the contested patent.

2.2.7 Appellant's II argument that no receipt or bill was provided in order to show that the product was purchased in a shop can be disregarded because, in analogy to case T 0055/01 (see catchword) which concerned televisions, glass fiber mats or rolls are "mass-produced consumer products and thus no further evidence is necessary to prove that they were actually sold to specified customers".

2.3 For the above reasons, the board is satisfied that all the requirements for establishing prior use are met and that the roll of glass fibers "Fibralene PV 200" had been made available to the public before the priority date of the contested patent, therefore belongs to the state of the art according to Article 54(2) EPC. As its composition - as established in document B1 - falls within the terms of claim 1 as granted, the latter lacks novelty under Article 54(1) and (2) EPC.

3. Auxiliary request 1 - novelty/prior use

Claim 1 of this request concerns "glass fibers consisting of" the glass composition defined in claim 1 of the main request. Since the commercially available product anticipating the subject-matter of claim 1 is precisely in the form of glass fibers, the same reasoning as in points 2.1 to 2.3 above applies to the present request.

4. Auxiliary request 2

4.1 Amendments

The board is satisfied – and nor was it in dispute – that the amended claims find a basis in the application as filed and that the amendment to the sole independent claim 1 is of a restricting nature. Amended claim 1 finds in particular a basis in claims 1, 4 and 5 of the application as filed.

The subject-matter of claim 1 of the second auxiliary request thus meets the requirements of Article 123(2) and (3) EPC.

4.2 Clarity

Appellant I argued that the second auxiliary request lacked clarity, because - by analogy to decision T 0234/09 - there was a contradiction between the three features: i) "(CaO + MgO): higher than 9", ii) "CaO: 6 to 9" and iii) "MgO: 0 to 5" defined in claim 1 at issue.

The board observes that T 0234/09 is not applicable in the present case because feature i) above already existed as such in claim 1 as granted while features ii) and iii) already existed as such in dependent claim 2 as granted. Thus, even if there were a contradiction between the above features, it is established case law that an objection under Article 84 EPC cannot be raised if the lack of clarity already existed, as here, in the granted claims.

4.3 Novelty

4.3.1 The commercial glass fiber "Fibralene PV 200", for which prior use has been acknowledged above, does not anticipate the subject-matter of claim 1 of this request because its K2O content (0.37%) as disclosed in document B1 is lower than the one claimed (0.6 to 1 wt.%).

4.3.2 Document A1 is state of the art under Article 54(3) EPC. Irrespective of whether its priority is valid or not, in particular as regards its claim 3 and Example C6, in the board's view it does not anticipate the subject-matter of claim 1 of this request.

The glass fibers according to Example C6 have a lower K2O content (0.47%) and a higher Al2O3 content (1.85%) than those defined in the claimed subject-matter.

The glass fibers according to claim 3 also do not anticipate claim 1 at issue because, apart from their B2O3 and MgO content which fall within the corresponding ranges in claim 1 at issue, the ranges of values for the other glass constituents defined in claim 3 (namely SiO2 62-68; Al2O3 1.5-2.5; Na2O > 17; K2O 0-3; CaO 5-8) overlap with the corresponding ranges in claim 1 at issue. There is however no disclosure in A1, including its examples, of the five selections to be made in order to fall directly and ambiguously within the particular ranges defined in claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 at issue.

The board agrees with appellant I that the disclosure of a document is not restricted to its examples.

However, in the present case, even if - as argued by appellant I - the skilled person would seriously contemplate values which are close to those defined in example C6 and which simultaneously fall within the ranges of values defined in claim 3, there is still a multiple choice to be performed to arrive at the wording of claim 1 at issue:

- the first choice concerns K2O and whether the value to be chosen is lower or higher than the one (0.47%) in example C6;

- the second choice concerns Al2O3 and whether the value to be chosen is higher or lower than the one (1.85%) in example C6.

Only the choice of a lower value for Al2O3 and a higher value for K2O would lead to subject-matter falling within the terms of claim 1 at issue; each of the other three choices necessary would lead outside the claimed subject-matter. However, document A1 gives the skilled person no information about how these choices are to be done, and it is constant case law that, if more than one choice has to be made in order to arrive at the subject-matter claimed, novelty has to be acknowledged.

4.3.3 In the board's view, document A2, state of the art under Article 54(2) EPC, also does not anticipate the subject-matter of claim 1 at issue. The specific glass fibers exemplified in A2 are distinguished from the claimed subject-matter by three or more differentiating features. The sole fiber which is distinguished therefrom by only two differences is the one according to Example 7B.

If, as argued by appellant I, the skilled person would take into consideration the entire disclosure of document A2 and in particular seriously contemplate the broader glass composition disclosed at page 9, lines 20 to 29 - i.e. the glass composition B - reproduced hereinafter:

- SiO2 : 55 to 65%; preferably 58 to 62%

- Al2O3: 0 to 3%; preferably 1 to 2.5%

- CaO : 6 to 10%; preferably 7 to 9%

- MgO : 0 to 5%; preferably 1 to 4.5%

- Na2O: 15 to 22%; preferably 16 to 20%

- K2O : 0 to 3%; preferably 1 to 2.5%

- B2O3: 3 to 10%; preferably 4 to 8%

- P2O5: 0 to 3%,

he would have to make multiple choices to arrive directly and unambiguously within the terms of claim 1 of this request. For similar considerations as in point 4.3.2 above, claim 1 of this request is therefore novel over A2.

4.3.4 The board is satisfied that the subject-matter of claim 1 at issue is also novel over the content of the documents in the proceedings.

4.3.5 It follows from the above that claim 1, and claims 2 to 6 which depend thereon, meet the requirements of Article 54(1), (2) and (3) EPC.

4.4 Inventive step

4.4.1 The contested patent relates to a biologically degradable or biosoluble glass fiber composition adapted for production of glass wool panels commonly used as heat insulators and/or sound-proofing materials (paragraphs [0001] and [0007]).

4.4.2 As regards the starting point for assessing inventive step, appellant I took the commercial glass fibers "Fibralene PV 200" discussed earlier (see in particular point 2.1). According to EEC directive 97/69/EC, "it seems justified under certain circumstances to exclude some man-made vitreous (silicate) fibres from classification as "carcinogen". The classification as carcinogen need not apply if it can be shown that the substance fulfills" a short-term biopersistence criterion. Appellant I argued in particular that since said commercial fibers were available on the market in 1999 and since their packaging shown on photographs B1a and B1b did not contain any warning that they were potentially hazardous for health, this implicitly meant that they met the requirements of EEC directive 97/69/ECC adopted in December 1998, that mineral wool had to dissolve at an acceptable rate if it entered the human system. It followed that these fibers provided for the same effect as those defined in claim 1 and, since they were distinguished from the subject-matter of claim 1 by only one differentiating feature, they represented the closest state of the art. Alternatively it stated that the closest state of the art document would be A3, as also suggested by appellant II.

Even if according to the jurisprudence of the boards of appeal the closest state of the art is normally a prior-art document disclosing subject-matter aiming at the same objectives as the claimed invention and having the most relevant technical features in common, the board in the present case accepts that the fibers for which prior use has been acknowledged represent the most promising springboard towards the invention, since it appears plausible that they pertain to subject-matter conceived for the same purpose (see EEC directive 97/69/EC), namely a biosoluble glass fiber composition, and require the minimum of structural modifications (the sole difference being the K2O content) to arrive at the subject-matter claimed.

4.4.3 As regards the technical problem to be solved in the light of this state of the art, the parties agreed that it consisted in the provision of a biologically degradable glass fiber with an alternative composition to that of the commercial fibers "Fibralene PV 200".

4.4.4 As a solution to this problem, the contested patent proposes the glass fiber composition according to claim 1, which is characterised in particular by a K2O content of from 0.6 to 1 wt.%.

4.4.5 The next step is to verify the success of the proposed solution. The patent in suit contains biopersistence tests to prove biodegradability in Examples 1, 2 and 3: weighted mean life of fibers lower than the 10 days required by the EEC directive. The examples and figures in paragraphs [0038] to [0052] show that fibers with the claimed glass composition fulfil the bio-degradability requirements of EEC directive 97/69/CE. The board is satisfied that the technical problem as defined under point 4.4.3 is effectively solved.

4.4.6 On the question whether the above solution is obvious in view of the cited prior art, in particular documents B1 and A3 on which appellant I relied, the board observes the following.

Document B1 discloses the chemical composition of the commercial glass fiber "Fibralene PV 200", but does not disclose or suggest any alternative biodegradable glass fiber composition.

Appellant I argued that it was within the competence of a person skilled in the art to find alternatives to the above glass fiber by trying glass compositions close to the specific one disclosed in B1, or alternatively by using the teaching of document A3.

The board cannot follow this approach because even if further alternatives can easily be found by trial and error experimentation around the particular composition disclosed in document B1, the skilled person would not necessarily focus on K2O and increase its content to at least 0.6% with the hope of obtaining a biodegradable glass fiber composition. As he has a multitude of other options at his disposal, he could for instance decrease the K2O content, or vary the content of the other elements (SiO2, Al2O3, MgO, CaO, Na2O, P2O5, Fe2O3 or "Others"), again with two further options: to either increase or reduce the content of each of these oxides.

In the presence of this multitude of options and in the absence of any indication of the specific direction in which to go, the skilled person would not arrive in an obvious manner at the proposed solution.

In the board's view, A3 also does not lead to the claimed subject-matter. Claim 1 of this document discloses a glass fiber decomposable in a physiological medium and comprising:

SiO2: 57 to 70 wt %;

CaO: 5 to 10 wt %;

Na2O + K2O: 13 to 18 wt %;

B2O3: 2 to 12 wt %;

Al2O3: up to about 5 wt %;

MgO: up to about 5 wt %;

F: up to about 1.5 wt %;

Impurities: less than 2 wt %; and

P2O5 in an amount effective in combination with the B2O3 and, when present, the Al2O3, but less than about 4 wt %, to cause the fiber to be decomposable in a physiological medium; wherein said fiber contains more than 0.1% by weight of P2O5 when the percentage by weight of alumina is greater than or equal to about 1%.

In its preferred embodiments, A3 (column 2, lines 42 to 53, claims 3 and 4) requires less Na2O (14 to 17%) than the amount present in the glass fiber "Fibralene PV 200". However, the composition of "Fibralene PV 200" does not fall within the broad definition for biosoluble fibers given in A3, its Na2O + K2O content (18.17%) being higher and its P2O5 (0%) lower than required in the above claim 1 of A3.

It follows that if the skilled person seeking an alternative glass fiber composition to "Fibralene PV 200" was encouraged by the teaching in A3, he would clearly reduce the Na2O content to less than 17% and increase the P2O5 content to more than 0.1%, but by doing so would obtain a composition falling outside the subject-matter defined in claim 1 of the present request.

If, as an alternative, the skilled person started from document A3 as representing the closest state of the art, he would also not arrive at the claimed subject-matter. Indeed - as argued by appellant I - there is a broad overlap between the subject-matter of claim 1 at issue and that of claim 1 of document A3. However, none of the glass fibers exemplified in A3 comprise more than 15.9% Na2O (i.e. 1.6% below the lowest limit of the Na2O range defined in claim 1 at issue). Moreover, among those with a SiO2 content in line with the amount required in claim 1 at issue, none of them has an Al2O3 content which would fall within the range defined in claim 1 at issue. So the skilled person starting from A3, in particular from its examples, does not have any incentive to adjust the Na2O and Al2O3 content to the ranges defined in claim 1 at issue.

4.4.7 For the above reasons, the board concludes that the subject-matter of claim 1 at issue is not obvious for the skilled person in the light of the disclosures of documents B1 and A3, taken either alone or in combination.

4.4.8 The remaining documents cited during the opposition and appeal proceedings do not contain further information pointing towards the claimed solution of the technical problem stated under point 4.4.3.

4.5 For the reasons indicated above, the board concludes that the subject-matter of claim 1 at issue, and by the same token that of dependent claims 2 to 6, which include all the features of claim 1, is not obvious to the skilled person from the cited prior art.

Therefore, the subject-matter of claims 1 to 6 according to the second auxiliary request involves an inventive step within the meaning of Articles 52(1) and 56 EPC.

5. In summary, the patent in its amended form is found to meet the requirements of the EPC.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the department of first instance with the order to maintain the patent on the basis of claims 1 to 6 of the second auxiliary request submitted during the oral proceedings of 28 September 2012, and a description to be adapted accordingly.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility