Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0101/18 10-12-2021
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0101/18 10-12-2021

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2021:T010118.20211210
Date of decision
10 December 2021
Case number
T 0101/18
Petition for review of
-
Application number
07253963.8
IPC class
C23C 4/02
C23C 4/10
C23C 4/18
C23C 28/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 347.24 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Segmented abradable coatings and process(es) for applying the same

Applicant name
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Opponent name
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Board
3.2.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 013(2) (2020)
European Patent Convention 056 (2007)
European Patent Convention 100(b) (2007)
Keywords

Sufficiency of disclosure - enabling disclosure (no)

Sufficiency of disclosure - main request (no)

Amendment to appeal case - suitability of amendment to resolve issues raised (yes)

Inventive step - non-obvious modification

Amendment after summons - exceptional circumstances (yes)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0172/17
J 0014/19
Citing decisions
-

I. European patent No. 1 908 856 B1 ("the patent") relates to segmented abradable ceramic coatings comprising yttria-stabilised zirconia layers.

II. An opposition was filed against the patent, based on the grounds of Article 100(b) and (c) EPC and Article 100(a) EPC in conjunction with Article 56 EPC.

The opposition division concluded that the patent met the requirements of the EPC and rejected the opposition.

III. This decision was appealed by the opponent ("the appellant"). In the statement setting out the grounds of appeal it requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked. In particular, the appellant contested the sufficiency of disclosure of claims 21 and 22 and the non-obviousness of claim 1 as granted.

IV. With the summons to oral proceedings, the Board sent a communication pursuant to Articles 15(1) and 17(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) 2020 indicating to the parties its preliminary opinion of the case that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request involved an inventive step and that the subject-matter of claims 21 and 22 was insufficiently disclosed.

V. With its submission dated 13 August 2021, the patent proprietor ("the respondent") filed an auxiliary request.

VI. Oral proceedings were held on 10 December 2021 as a videoconference with the agreement of both parties.

At the end of the oral proceedings, the following requests were confirmed by the parties:

The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.

The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed and that the patent be maintained as granted (main request) or, alternatively, on the basis of the auxiliary request filed with the submission dated 13 August 2021 and the description and figures of the patent specification.

VII. Evidence cited in the decision

The appellant referred to the following documents, which had already been cited during the opposition proceedings:

D1: EP 0 765 951 A2;

D2: EP 0926 254 A2;

D3: EP 1013795 A1.

VIII. The independent claims of the patent and of the auxiliary request read as follows:

Claim 1:

"A segmented abradable ceramic coating, comprising:

a bond coat layer (24; 46);

at least one segmented 7 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia layer (28; 48) disposed upon said bond coat layer;

characterised by further comprising:

at least one 12 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia layer (30; 50) disposed upon said at least one segmented 7 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia layer."

Claim 6:

"A coated article (20; 40), comprising:

a substrate (22; 42) having at least one surface (24; 44); and

a segmented abradable ceramic coating as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said bond coat layer (26; 46) is disposed upon said at least one surface."

Claim 9:

"A process for applying a segmented ceramic coating on an article, comprising:

(i) depositing an amount of bond coat material sufficient to form a bond coat layer upon at least one surface of an article (10);

(ii) depositing an amount of 7 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia sufficient to form a 7 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia layer upon said bond coat layer (12);

(iii) heating said article to expand said 7 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia layer and promote vertical crack propagation therein to form a segmented 7 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia layer (14);

(iv) depositing an amount of 12 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia sufficient to form a 12 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia layer upon said segmented 7 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia layer to form a coated article (16); and

(v) heating treating said coated article (18)."

IX. The appellant's arguments can be summarised as follows.

(a) Main request - sufficiency

The patent did not provide any information as to how specifically the heat treatment of the coated article should be performed in order to form a segmented yttria-stabilised zirconia (YSZ) layer having a thickness as defined in claims 21 and 22.

(b) Admittance of the auxiliary request

The auxiliary request was submitted only after the summons to oral proceedings had been issued and thus was late-filed. Hence, it should not be admitted into the proceedings under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

(c) Auxiliary request - inventive step

D1 disclosed a segmented abradable ceramic coating comprising a bond coat, a segmented zirconia base coat foundation layer stabilised with 6 to 8 weight percent of yttria, a graded interlayer and an abradable top layer, wherein the latter two comprise a blend of yttria-stabilised zirconia.

The subject-matter of claim 1 differed from the coating of D1 in that the coating comprised a 7 weight percent yttria-stabilised zirconia (7YSZ) layer and a 12 weight percent yttria-stabilised zirconia (12YSZ) layer.

The problem to be solved could be formulated as how a more stable thermal insulation of the ceramic layer can be provided.

Starting from document D1, the skilled person would have consulted D2 or D3, since they both related to thermal insulation coatings for gas turbine parts.

Although D2 referred to an abrasive coating while D1 aimed at an abradable coating, the skilled person would nevertheless have taken D2 into account when starting from D1, since D1 mentioned both abrasive and abradable coatings.

Furthermore, the terms "abradable" and "abrasive" have relative meanings. They do not refer to intrinsic properties associated with a particular material. Thus, the skilled person would not have simply disregarded D2 because of those vague and relative terms.

D2 and D3 described the advantageous properties of a coating layer of 12YSZ and thus provided an incentive for the skilled person to use such a layer to further improve the coating described in D1.

X. The respondent's counter arguments to each of the above points can be summarised as follows.

(a) Main request - sufficiency

The contested patent described in detail in paragraph [0024] how a segmented 7 weight percent yttria-stabilised zirconia layer could be obtained. The further heat treatment step was described in paragraph [0028].

Therefore, the skilled person was able to obtain sufficient information from the patent as to how to perform the process defined in claims 21 and 22 as granted.

(b) Admittance of the auxiliary request

The auxiliary request corresponded to the granted claims, except that claims 21 and 22 had been deleted.

Aside from the fact that such a deletion of dependent claims does not constitute an amendment of the appeal case within the meaning of Article 13 RPBA 2020, the auxiliary request clearly and obviously overcame the sufficiency objection without introducing any new issues or points of discussion into the proceedings. The deletion of the dependent claims was therefore not detrimental to procedural economy and instead actually simplified the matters to be discussed.

(c) Auxiliary request - inventive step

The patent and D1 aimed at a segmented abradable ceramic coating. D2, however, related to an abrasive coating for gas turbine blade tips. Although the terms "abrasive" and "abradable" are relative terms, in a technical context they have opposite meanings for the skilled person. Therefore, D2 would not be consulted by the skilled person when starting from D1.

Even if D2 were to be considered by the skilled person, it disclosed, similar to D3, a thermal coating comprising a single layer. Neither D2 nor D3 provided an incentive for the skilled person to use a 12 weight percent yttria-stabilised zirconia layer as the top layer in the multi-layered coating described in D1.

1. Main request - sufficiency

1.1 It is uncontested that a coating comprising a segmented yttria-stabilised zirconia (YSZ) layer can be obtained by the skilled person by using a conventional plasma spray coating process in line with the disclosure in paragraphs [0018] to [0027] of the patent.

1.2 Claims 21 and 22 define preferred process steps of the process for applying a segmented ceramic coating on an article as defined in claim 9 as granted.

They read as follows:

Claim 21:

"The process of any of claims 9 to 20, wherein heat treating said coated article (18) comprises forming a segmented 7 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia layer having a thickness of about 1 mil (0.0254 mm) to about 60 mils (1.524 mm)."

Claim 22:

"The process of any of claims 9 to 21, wherein heat treating said coated article (18) comprises forming a segmented 12 weight percent yttria-stabilized zirconia layer having a thickness of about 1 mil (0.0254mm) to about 60 mils (1.524 mm)."

Thus, not only do both claims define the thickness of the segmented YSZ layer, as is argued by the respondent, but in addition they also define that there is a specific link between the final heat treatment (step V of claim 9) of the completely coated article and the formation of a segmented YSZ layer having the claimed thickness.

Although the patent discloses that the thickness of the YSZ layer is determined by the conditions of the plasma spray coating process, see paragraphs [0018] to [0027] of the patent, it does not provide any information as to how the thickness of the coated article can be further adjusted merely by way of a final heating step, as required by claims 21 and 22.

Moreover, it has not been demonstrated that the skilled person can rely on general knowledge in order to perform the process steps as defined in claims 21 and 22. In particular, the skilled person does not know the conditions in which the already coated article, having a thickness resulting from the conditions of the plasma spraying process, has to be heated in order to achieve segmentation, while at the same time obtaining the thickness as defined in claims 21 and 22.

According to paragraph [0028] of the patent, a final heat treatment can result in stress relief. However, stress relief is not the same as segmentation and usually does not allow significant adjustments of the thickness as required by claims 21 and 22. Instead, segmentation is achieved by monitoring the temperature during the plasma spraying process and is helped by heating the article during the plasma spraying, see paragraph [0023] of the patent.

Defining on the one hand the heating conditions for the plasma spraying process and on the other hand the heating conditions for a final stress relief does not constitute an incentive for a further heating step to be performed on the final coated article for a completely different purpose.

Consequently, the skilled person is confronted, with undue burden, with finding the appropriate conditions for a final heat treatment of the coated article which results in segmentation and an adjustment of the thickness of the coating to obtain the values defined in claims 21 and 22.

The ground of opposition pursuant to Article 100(b) EPC thus prejudices the maintenance of the patent as granted.

2. Auxiliary request - admittance

2.1 As the auxiliary request was filed after the the summons to attend oral proceedings before the Board had been issued, Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 applies. According to this provision, any amendment to a party's appeal case shall, in principle, not be taken into account unless there are exceptional circumstances, which have been justified with cogent reasons by the party concerned.

2.2 Any part of a party's appeal case which is not directed to the requests, facts, objections, arguments and evidence contained in the statement of grounds of appeal or the reply thereto constitutes an amendment to a party's appeal case within the meaning of Article 13(1) and (2) RPBA 2020. This includes the filing of an amended claim request (see J 14/19, Reasons 1.4 and 1.5).

2.3 In view of the above and contrary to the respondent's assertion, the deletion of one or more claims in a claim request also constitutes an amendment of the appeal case within the meaning of Article 13(1) and (2) RPBA 2020. The assessment of the effect of such a claim amendment on the appeal proceedings, for example in terms of procedural economy, is in the Board's view no longer part of the question of whether the amendment constitutes an amendment of the party's appeal case within the meaning of Article 13(1) and (2) RPBA 2020. Instead, this assessment concerns the question of whether or not the amended claim request is to be admitted into the appeal proceedings by the Board when exercising its discretion.

2.4 In this context, the Board reiterates the fact that the Board's decision on whether or not to admit an amendment to a party's appeal case is a discretionary one under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 as well. Moreover, when exercising its discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, the Board may also rely on criteria as set out in Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 (see T 172/17, Reasons 5.4).

2.5 In the case at hand, the Board had indicated in its communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020 that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request (patent as granted) involved an inventive step, and that the subject-matter of claims 21 and 22 was insufficiently disclosed. In reaction thereto, the respondent filed the auxiliary request. The auxiliary request corresponds to the main request, with the only difference being that dependent claims 21 and 22 - i.e. the only claims the Board considered to have been validly objected to - have been deleted. The amendment in the auxiliary request directly addresses the objection of insufficient disclosure, which the Board had considered valid, and it is immediately apparent why the amendment overcomes that objection. The amendment is also strictly limited to overcoming this objection. It does not shift the discussion or give rise to any new objections. Furthermore, the amendment did not create any additional burden for the other party. Overall, although the respondent amended its appeal case only in reaction to the Board's preliminary opinion, it did so in a manner which clearly served procedural economy.

2.6 The Board considered the above circumstances to be exceptional under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020. It therefore exercised its discretion under that provision to take the auxiliary request in the appeal proceedings into account.

3. Auxiliary request - inventive step

3.1 The patent aims at thermally resistant abradable ceramic coatings. D1 addresses the same general problem and, in line with the arguments of the parties and the reasoning of the contested decision, it is regarded as an appropriate starting point for the assessment of inventive step.

3.2 D1 discloses in the example on pages 6 and 7 a nickel-based turbine duct segment comprising a coating system. The coating system comprises a bond coat and three ceramic layers comprising yttria-stabilised zirconia (YSZ), including:

- a segmented 6 to 8 weight percent YSZ base coat

foundation layer disposed upon said bond coat layer,

- a graded interlayer of varied composition disposed

upon said segmented 6 to 8 weight percent YSZ layer

- an abradable top layer comprising a blend of

7 weight percent YSZ (7YSZ) and

20 weight percent YSZ (20YSZ) (page 7, line 8).

3.3 It is uncontested by the appellant that the subject-matter of claim 1 differs from the embodiment of D1 in that:

(i) the first YSZ layer contains 7 weight percent

yttria (7YSZ) and

(ii) the second YSZ layer contains 12 weight percent

yttria (12YSZ).

3.4 The problem to be solved can be considered to be how a more stable thermal ceramic coating system can be provided, as argued by the appellant.

3.5 The solution to this problem as proposed by claim 1 is not obvious when considering D1 while taking into account D2 and D3.

3.5.1 D1 describes on page 7, lines 11 to 13, that the combination of all three ceramic layers contributes to achieving the desired properties.

Hence, D1 does not provide an incentive to modify one of the ceramic layers disclosed in the example and in particular it does not hint that the underlying problem could be solved by using a coating system comprising only the two ceramic layers as defined in claim 1.

3.5.2 D2 discloses in paragraphs [0011] to [0012] and examples 1 to 3 a thermal abrasive coating for blade tips.

Although terms such as "abrasive" and "abradable" are relative terms, they nevertheless provide a clear teaching for the skilled person in a specific technical field. This is also confirmed by D1 on page 6, lines 5 to 7, where it discloses that the abradable "coating system is suited to interact with blade tips which are coated on their free end with an abrasive material" to provide an effective sealing system.

The skilled person would therefore not consider a document such as D2 which proposes abrasive coatings when aiming at the opposite, namely an abradable coating as disclosed in D1.

3.5.3 Should the skilled person nevertheless take D2 into account, they are taught by paragraphs [0011] and [0012] of D2 that a zirconia coating comprising 11 to 14 weight percent yttria has certain advantages such as a lower thermal conductivity compared to a zirconia coating comprising 6 to 9 weight percent yttria. Accordingly, the examples of D2 (see paragraphs [0049], [0054] and [0059]) describe a thermal barrier coating composed of a single layer of zirconia comprising 12 weight percent yttria (12YSZ).

However, D2 does not provide an incentive for the skilled person to consider an abrasive layer as a suitable alternative to the abradable top coating proposed by the example of D1. Such an incentive is not provided by D1 either. On the contrary, D1 emphasises that only a blend achieves the required balance between corrosion resistance and abradability (see page 7, lines 8 to 13). Hence, starting from D1 the skilled person has no incentive to replace the top coat of the coating system of D1 with the coating layer described in D2.

Even if the skilled person were to consider the thermally insulating coating described in D2 in spite of its abrasive nature, they would instead replace the base coat foundation layer or the graded interlayer of the coating system of the example of D1 with a layer of 12YSZ according to D2, since the 12YSZ layer serves at least the same purpose of providing thermostability as the base layer and the interlayer of the ceramic system of D1 together, see page 4, lines 28 to 31, and page 7, lines 11 to 12, of D1.

This, however, would not lead the skilled person to the subject-matter of claim 1 of the auxiliary request.

In summary, the subject-matter of claim 1 is not obvious when starting from D1 and taking D2 into consideration.

3.5.4 D3 discloses in paragraph [0018] a durable thermal barrier coating for a gas turbine blade surface comprising a columnar ceramic layer deposited on a bond coat. Depending on the temperature range in which the gas turbine is intended to be operated, the ceramic layer comprises preferably either 6 to 8 or 11 to 13 weight percent yttrium oxide (yttria).

D3 provides no incentive for the skilled person to combine an inner 7YSZ layer, which provides the desired toughness and durability, with an upper 12YSZ layer, which provides the desired crystalline structure, low thermal conductivity and insulating properties, in order to achieve an improved coating compared to the more complex coating systems disclosed in D1. In particular, it provides no incentive to replace only the top coat of the coating system of D1 with one of the coating layers as described in D3.

The argument of the appellant with regard to D3 is based on hindsight.

Thus, the subject-matter of claim 1 is not obvious when starting from D1 and taking D3 into consideration.

3.6 Hence, the ground of opposition pursuant to Article 100(a) EPC does not prejudice the maintenance of the patent in amended form on the basis of the auxiliary request.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the opposition division with the order to maintain the patent as amended in the following version:

- claims 1-20 of the auxiliary request filed with the

submission dated 13 August 2021

- description and drawings of the patent specification

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility