European Patent Office

T 0858/18 of 20.05.2019

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2019:T085818.20190520
Date of decision
20 May 2019
Case number
T 0858/18
Petition for review of
-
Application number
10702347.5
IPC class
H05B 37/02
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Distributed to board chairmen (C)
OJ versions
No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
Lighting Control System Responsive to Ambient Lighting Conditions
Applicant name
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Opponent name
B.E.G. Brück Electronic GmbH
Board
3.5.02
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 99(1)European Patent Convention R 50(3)European Patent Convention R 77(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 20Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1986) Art 31
Keywords
Opposition inadmissible - Statement according to Rule 76(2)(c) EPC filed after lapse of opposition period.
According a date of receipt to documents according to Rule 50(3) EPC if facsimile transmission extends beyond midnight.
Catchword
If a facsimile transmission of a document within the meaning of Rule 50(3) EPC begins on an earlier date and extends beyond midnight to a later date, the entire document is accorded the later date as single date of receipt. There is no legal basis for according the earlier date as date of receipt to the part of the document arriving at the EPO before midnight
(see in particular point 6 and for the term "document" point 4 and for the "date of receipt" point 5 of the reasons).
Deviating from decisions T 2061/12 and T 2317/13
(see points 7.3 and 7.4 of the reasons).
Citing cases
T 2307/15T 0480/21

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The opposition is rejected as inadmissible.