Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • Core activities
          • Stories and insights
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2024
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Executive summary
          • Driver 1 – People
          • Driver 2 – Technologies
          • Driver 3 – High-quality, timely products and services
          • Driver 4 – Partnerships
          • Driver 5 – Financial Sustainability
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 2563/17 04-02-2022
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 2563/17 04-02-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T256317.20220204
Date of decision
04 February 2022
Case number
T 2563/17
Petition for review of
-
Application number
06112083.8
IPC class
F25B 41/06
B23P 15/00
C22C 21/00
C22F 1/04
B21C 1/22
B21C 23/08
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 423.56 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Endless capillary tubes in aluminium alloy and lamination valves comprising aluminium alloy capillary tubes

Applicant name

AROTUBI IT S.r.l.

ARO TUBI COMPONENTS POLAND Sp. Z.o.o.

Opponent name
Feinrohren S.p.A.
Board
3.2.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(2)
Keywords

Amendment after summons - exceptional circumstances (no)

Amendment to appeal case - amendment gives rise to new objections (yes)

Amendment to appeal case - amendment overcomes issues raised (no)

Late-filed request - Patent as granted withdrawn and re-submitted during appeal proceedings

Late-filed request - admitted (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0036/12
T 0052/15
T 1695/15
T 0764/16
T 1187/16
T 0042/17
J 0014/19
T 0247/20
T 1891/20
G 0003/14
Citing decisions
T 1656/20
T 1953/22

I. European patent No. 1 840 487 (hereinafter: "the patent") relates to a capillary tube in aluminium alloy, a method for producing it and its use.

II. The opposition division's decision to reject the opposition, posted on 18 September 2017, was appealed by the opponent (hereinafter: "the appellant").

III. With the consent of the parties, oral proceedings before the Board were held on 4 February 2022 by videoconference using the Zoom platform.

IV. At the end of the oral proceedings, the appellant requested that:

- the decision under appeal be set aside

- the patent be revoked.

The patent proprietors (hereinafter: "the respondents") requested that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of the new main request or the auxiliary request, both filed with the submission dated 4 May 2021. If neither of these claim requests should be admitted into the appeal proceedings, the respondents requested that the patent be maintained as granted, as had been requested in the previous main request (which had been unconditionally withdrawn with the submission dated 4 May 2021).

V. During the oral proceedings before the Board, the respondents had raised an objection under Rule 106 EPC due to an alleged violation of their right to be heard because of the Board's conclusion not to admit their request to maintain the patent as granted. This objection was, however, withdrawn at the end of the oral proceedings.

VI. The following evidence, which was relied on in the decision under appeal, is relevant for the present decision:

D14: The Aluminium Automotive Manual, European

Aluminium Association, Part 3, pp. 1-13

(2002)

D16/D16A: Technical report N. 14LA00965- 14LA01111-

14LA01119 conducted at betalab for customer

Feinrohren S.p.a - English/ Italian

VII. Claims of the claim requests relevant for the decision

(a) Independent claims 1 and 4 of the patent as granted read as follows (feature numbering in "[]" as in the decision under appeal, amendments versus claims 1 and 4 of the application as filed in bold, deletions in strike through):

Claim 1:

"[F1] Endless capillary tube in aluminium alloy of the type

[F2] having an internal diameter between the range 0.2 - 4.5 mm and

[F3] a length within the range 100 - 10000 mm, characterised in that

[F4] the flow rate of two segments of the capillary tube having a length of 2500 mm cut from two positions taken at random from the endless capillary tube does not vary by more than ±6%,

[F5] wherein the aluminium alloy consisting of: Si 0.15% in weight max., Fe 0.25% in weight max., Cu 0.10% in weight max., Mn 0.90-1.10% in weight max., Mg 0.06% in weight max., Cr 0.06% in weight max., Zn 0.10% in weight max., Ti 0.06% in weight max., the remainder being aluminium and inevitable impurities."

Claim 4:

"[M1] Method for the production of endless capillary tubes in aluminium alloy as described in the previous claims comprising the following stages:

[M2] · Hot extrusion of a roughed blank;

[M3] · Successive stages of cold drawing, the number of stages depending on the envisaged machining cycle; the external diameter and the tube thickness are reduced with each extrusion stage until the final measurement is obtained;

[M4] · Winding to form wound coils;.

[M5] · Washing of the internal surface to eliminate machining residue [deleted: (lubricants etc.)];

[M6] · Heat treatment to modify the mechanical characteristics of the capillary tube increasing the ductility;"

(b) Claims 1 and 4 of the main request have the following amendments over the corresponding claims of the patent as granted marked in bold and strike-through:

Claim 1:

"A single capillary tube obtained from an endless capillary tube in aluminium alloy of the type having an internal diameter between the range 0.2 - 4.5 mm and a length within the range 100 - 10000 mm, characterised in that the flow rate of two segments of the endless capillary tube having a length of 2500 mm cut from two positions taken at random from the endless capillary tube does not vary by more than ±6%, wherein the aluminium alloy consisting of: Si 0.15% in weight max., Fe 0.25% in weight max., Cu 0.10% in weight max., Mn 0.90-1.10% in weight max., Mg 0.06% in weight max.[deleted: ,] Cr 0.06% in weight max., Zn 0.10% in weight max., Ti 0.06% in weight max., the remainder being aluminium and inevitable impurities."

Claim 4:

"Method for the production of [deleted: endless] single capillary tubes in aluminium alloy as described in the previous claims comprising the following stages:

· Hot extrusion of a roughed blank;

· Successive stages of cold drawing, the number of stages depending on the envisaged machining cycle; the external diameter and the tube thickness are reduced with each extrusion stage until the final measurement is obtained;

· Winding to form wound coils;

· Washing of the internal surface to eliminate machining residue;

· Heat treatment to modify the mechanical characteristics of the endless capillary tube increasing the ductility."

(c) Independent claim 2 of the auxiliary request has the following amendments over claim 10 as granted marked in bold and strike-through:

"Lamination valve for household appliances comprising a single capillary tube [deleted: according to claims, 1-3, 5, 6, 8, 9] wherein the single capillary tube is obtained from an endless capillary tube in aluminium alloy of the type having an internal diameter between the range 0.2 - 4.5 mm and a length within the range 100 - 10000 mm, wherein the flow rate of two segments of the endless capillary tube having a same length of 2500 mm cut from two positions taken at random from the endless capillary tube does not vary by more than ±6%, wherein a geometrical division in two of the endless capillary tube produces two equal sections having the same length, whose respective flow rates do not differ from each other by more than ±6%, wherein the aluminium alloy consisting of: Si 0.15% in weight max., Fe 0.25% in weight max., Cu 0.10% in weight max., Mn 0.90-1.10% in weight max., Mg 0.06% in weight max. Cr 0.06% in weight max., Zn 0.10% in weight max., Ti 0.06% in weight max., the remainder being aluminium and inevitable impurities."

VIII. The appellant's arguments relevant to the present decision can be summarised as follows.

(a) Main request - admittance

The main request should not be admitted into the proceedings. It was filed late without cogent reasons. Furthermore, the amendments to claim 1 gave rise to further objections under Articles 84, 123(2) and 123(3) EPC. Claim 1 was ambiguous on whether the length range referred to the endless or the single capillary tube. This ambiguity was also present in all other claims since they referred back to claim 1. The subject-matter of claim 4 was both unclear and contained added matter since process steps now linked to the single capillary tube had only been disclosed for the endless capillary tube. Also, no division step was included.

(b) Auxiliary request - admittance

The auxiliary request should not be admitted into the proceedings. It was also filed late without cogent reasons. Furthermore, since at least claim 2 incorporated the features of claim 1 of the main request, it was prima facie not allowable for the same reasons. Also, granted claim 10, due to the wording of the back references "according to claims, 1-3, 5, 6, 8, 9", included all features of the referenced claims while only those of claims 1 and 10 were considered in claim 2 of the auxiliary request. This constituted an extension of the scope of protection under Article 123(3) EPC.

(c) Patent as granted - admittance

The re-filing of the patent as granted should not be admitted. The claims of the patent as granted were not prima facie allowable since they contained added matter and involved no inventive step.

Claim 1 extended beyond the subject-matter of the application as filed since it related to an endless capillary tube having a length range not disclosed for the endless capillary tube.

Starting from D14, claim 1 did not involve an inventive step. The selection of the claimed alloy was not linked to a specific effect. Evidence D16 showed that the claimed effect was achievable also for other 3103 aluminium alloys. The respondents did not provide any evidence to the contrary.

IX. The respondents' arguments relevant to the present decision can be summarised as follows.

(a) Main request - admittance

The main request should be admitted since it prima facie overcame the objections raised by the Board in the summons. Its filing was also a direct reaction to objections made more precise only in the preliminary opinion of the Board. When considering the preliminary opinion, procedural economy was also improved with the new request. Claim 1 was clear for a skilled person since a mind willing to understand could only construe that the claim disclosed the length range of a single capillary tube. Claim 4 was further clear from the application as a whole.

Moreover, the objections in the communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020 were more precise than the objections of the appellant.

(b) Auxiliary request - admittance

Due to the deletion of claims 1 and 4 of the main request, the auxiliary request did not give rise to additional objections and was allowable. The back-references of claim 10 of the patent as granted had to be understood as alternatives in the sense of "any of".

(c) Patent as granted - admittance

The re-filing of the patent as granted had to be admitted in the procedure. It was filed in reaction to the surprising development that the main and auxiliary requests had not been admitted. It was furthermore allowable. D14 was not a suitable closest prior art since it related to automotive applications rather than to lamination valves in cooling cycles. Furthermore, it failed to disclose any of features [F2] to [F5]. The specific selection of the claimed alloy had, in addition to the uniformity according to feature [F4], the effect of reducing wear as according to paragraph [0035] of the patent. This effect was not anticipated by the evidence D16 submitted by the appellant. In addition, D16 did not sufficiently show that all 3103 aluminium alloys also have the claimed performance.

Main request - admittance

1. The main request was not admitted into the appeal proceedings for the following reasons.

1.1 The respondents submitted the main request with the letter dated 4 May 2021 after notification of the summons to oral proceedings. Consequently, Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 applies (Article 25(1) and (3) RPBA 2020). In this context, the criteria under Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 may also be taken into consideration (see document CA/3/19, page 43, explanatory remarks on Article 13(2) RPBA 2020).

1.2 The main request constitutes an amendment to the respondents' appeal case (see J 14/19, Reasons 1.5). In accordance with Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, any such amendment made after notification of a summons to oral proceedings shall, in principle, not be taken into account unless there are exceptional circumstances which have been justified with cogent reasons by the party concerned.

1.3 The objection of extension of subject-matter with respect to the combination of the features "endless capillary tube" and "length of 100 to 10000 mm" had been the subject of the opposition proceedings and was part of the decision under appeal. It was furthermore raised again in the appellant's statement of grounds of appeal.

1.4 In its communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020, the Board gave a preliminary opinion on this objection. As to the alleged higher degree of precision in the Board's preliminary opinion, the principle that parties may refine their arguments within the previously established framework without this automatically constituting an amendment to their appeal case (see T 247/20, Reasons 1.3), applies all the more to a Board taking up and refining arguments introduced by a party (see T 1891/20, Reasons 4.1.4).

1.5 A party cannot successfully invoke exceptional circumstances under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 based on the mere fact that the Board gives a preliminary opinion in favour of the other party and in contradiction to the conclusions in the decision under appeal (see T 42/17, Reasons 4.4; T 764/16, Reasons 3.3.2 or T 1187/16, Reasons 3.2). In the case at hand, the respondents instead had to expect that the Board might have a preliminary opinion that differed from the opinion of the opposition division. Therefore, the Board's preliminary opinion in its communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020 can justify neither the late-filing nor the admittance of the main request into the appeal proceedings.

1.6 The respondents further argued that the late-filed main request overcame the objections raised by the appellant and the Board, this also supporting the presence of exceptional circumstances.

It is correct that at the third level of the convergent approach, which applies here, the Board may, on a discretionary basis, also rely on criteria applicable at the second level, such as whether an amendment overcomes the objections raised by another party or the Board. However, a further criterion under Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 is whether an amendment gives rise to new objections. It does in the present case.

1.7 Prima facie allowability of claim 1

The amendments give rise to new objections under Article 84 EPC against claim 1.

By inserting the wording "single capillary tube obtained from" into claim 1, an ambiguity is created regarding the length feature. This ambiguity is a direct consequence of the amendment originating from the original description and thus may be examined for compliance with the requirements of Article 84 EPC (see decision G 3/14, catchword). The claim language as amended lacks a clear and unambiguous relationship between the length range and the claimed product (i.e. the single capillary tube). According to the claim wording the length range can also relate to the precursor (i.e. the endless capillary tube from which the single capillary tube is obtained according to the product-by-process feature). The respondents' argument that a skilled person with a mind willing to understand would not consider the length range to be related to an entity described as "endless" is not convincing. The term "endless" for the capillary tube can only be construed in that a final product is not directly produced but obtained from a longer continuously extruded/drawn production batch. The skilled person is thus well aware that an endless capillary tube also has in fact an end and therefore a certain length, as indeed is illustrated by the patent (in paragraph [0020]). The respondents' argument that in view of the whole specification this ambiguity is resolved is not sufficient since the claim itself has to be clear.

1.8 Prima facie allowability of claim 4

The amendments also give rise to further objections to claim 4 under Article 123(2) and (3) EPC.

1.8.1 Due to the amendment to claim 4, each method steps relates to a single capillary tube, although in the granted version these steps related to the production of an endless capillary tube, i.e. the precursor of the single capillary tube. Thus, the subject-matter of claim 4 is an aliud with respect to claim 4 as granted. Furthermore, method steps such a "winding to form coils" are not disclosed for the single capillary tube in the application as filed. For these reasons, the requirements of Articles 123(2) and (3) EPC are not met.

1.8.2 In addition, the method for obtaining a single capillary tube according to paragraph [0021] of the A-publication requires division from an endless capillary tube. However, such a step is not defined in claim 4. Thus also for this reason, the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC are not met.

Auxiliary request - admittance

2. The auxiliary request was not admitted into the appeal proceedings.

2.1 Like the main request, the auxiliary request was filed after notification of the summons, and no exceptional circumstances have been presented which could justify the late filing and the admittance of the auxiliary request.

2.2 Furthermore, claim 2 of the auxiliary request incorporates the features of claim 1 of the main request. Hence, claim 2 of the auxiliary request is prima facie not allowable under Article 84 EPC either for the same reasons.

Request to maintain the patent as granted - admittance

3. The re-submission of the claim request relating to the patent as granted was not admitted into the proceedings pursuant to Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

3.1 With the letter of 4 May 2021, the respondents explicitly and unconditionally withdrew in the appeal proceedings the request to maintain the patent as granted ("It is therefore no longer requested that the patent be maintained as granted"). This claim request thus no longer formed part of the respondents' appeal case. The re-submission of this claim request during the oral proceedings before the Board is thus an amendment to the respondents' appeal case. Its admittance is subject to the presence of exceptional circumstances and the Board's discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

3.2 When applying Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, the Board may also apply criteria under Article 13(1) RPBA 2020, which include - mutatis mutandis - Article 12(4) to (6) RPBA 2020. Under Article 12(6) RPBA 2020, the Board shall in principle not admit claim requests which were not maintained in the proceedings before the department of first instance. This applies all the more to claim requests not maintained in the appeal proceedings (see T 1695/15, Reasons 4).

3.3 In this respect, a withdrawn claim request relating to the patent as granted is not to be treated differently than any other withdrawn claim request. It would be detrimental to procedural economy if a patent proprietor were allowed to always go back to the patent as granted, regardless of its previous withdrawal of this claim request and the subsequent procedural developments (see T 52/15, Reasons 2.7 and T 36/12, Reasons 2.2).

3.4 Contrary to the respondents' allegations, the mere fact that the main request and the auxiliary request were not admitted into the appeal proceedings does not constitute exceptional circumstances which could justify the re-submission of the claim request related to the patent as granted. A party must always take into consideration that claim requests whose admittance is subject to a Board's discretion may not be admitted by a Board.

3.5 Furthermore, the patent as granted is prima facie not allowable in view of added subject-matter.

3.5.1 The Board agrees with the appellant that according to general principles of claim interpretation, the feature of claim 1 "endless capillary tube" cannot be interpreted as a capillary tube only characterised by a continuous manufacturing process, regardless of the feature "endless". Therefore, it has to be considered a technical feature for the assessment of the ground under Article 100(c) EPC. According to the definition in paragraph [0019] of the A-publication, the term relates to "seamless capillary tubes obtained by means of continuous production" which are preferably "at least 100 metres long". A length range between 1000 to 10000 mm is, on the other hand, only disclosed in paragraph [0021] of the A-publication for the "single capillary tubes" obtained by "simple division" of the endless capillary tube. Since an endless tube having a length from 1000 to 10000 mm is not part of the disclosure of the application as filed, the combination of the features [F1] and [F3] constitutes added matter.

3.5.2 Therefore, the (brief) reasoning in the appealed decision that the wording "endless capillary tube" referred to "a continuous manufacturing process" and that the basis was found in claim 1 and paragraphs [0004], [0005], [0010] and [0019] to [0021] of the A-publication is not convincing.

3.5.3 The above corresponds to the Board's preliminary assessment of the case in its communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020. In the oral proceedings before the Board, the respondents did not provide any convincing arguments which could alter the above assessment.

3.6 The Board further notes that the patent as granted is prima facie not allowable under Article 56 EPC either.

3.6.1 D14 discloses on page 10 drawn aluminium tubes made, inter alia, of 3103 type aluminium ("EN AW-3103"). Claim 1 is not directed to a lamination valve but to an endless capillary tube as such. Hence, the skilled person would consider D14, which deals with aluminium alloy tubes, as a suitable starting point.

3.6.2 The outer diameter of the tubes disclosed as "OD" on page 10 of D14 is in the range of 2 to 25 mm. By further considering the wall thickness range disclosed here as "WT" of 0.3 to 2 mm, an inner diameter inside the claimed range is also directly and unambiguously taught to the skilled person (outer diameter of 2 mm, wall thickness of 0.3 mm and inner diameter of 1.4 mm).

3.6.3 It is already questionable whether the claimed alloy composition according to feature [F5] can be regarded as a novel selection over the 3103 aluminium alloy class used in D14. However, in any case, this selection does prima facie not have a specific technical effect, i.e. the selection is not purposive (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 9th edition, 2019, I.C.6.3.1).

3.6.4 As demonstrated by the appellant with reference to D16, other 3103 aluminium alloys exist which although do not have the low iron and manganese content as claimed do provide a uniform performance in accordance with feature [F4]. This speaks against the alloy composition according to feature [F5] having any specific technical effect. The experimental data in D16 were submitted by the appellant during the opposition proceedings and further relied on in the statement of grounds of appeal. The respondents challenged its relevance neither in their reply to the appeal nor in later written submissions.

3.6.5 During the oral proceedings before the Board the respondents argued for the first time that the specific selection of the alloy of claim 1 had the additional effect of reducing wear during the production of the endless capillary tubes. In the patent, this is only briefly mentioned in relation to the amount of magnesium in paragraph [0035], and no assessment criteria or experimental data for this alleged further effect are provided. Therefore, the Board is not convinced of this alleged further effect.

3.6.6 In the absence of a specific technical effect related to the alloy composition according to feature [F5], the objective technical problem is to provide an alternative capillary tube to achieve controlled flow rates that remain constant.

3.6.7 The Board considers that the skilled person would perform experiments within the 3103 aluminium alloy class used in D14. By doing so, the skilled person would arrive at the claimed subject-matter with the claimed property [F4] in an obvious manner, having in mind that the claimed composition according to feature [F5] broadly overlaps with the 3103 aluminium alloy class. The length according to the range defined by feature [F3] amounts to a usual design choice of the skilled person not related with the other distinguishing features.

4. Due to the absence of any admitted claim request, the patent is to be revoked.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility