Access our patent databases and search tools.
Go to overview
Share your feedback on Espacenet and the European Patent Register in our short survey!
Practical information on filing and grant procedures.
Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy
European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.
Deepen your IP knowledge: access our legal texts collection
Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.
From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP
The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning
Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy
Find out more about our work, values, history and vision
Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index
Overview
1
BOARD OF APPEAL AND ENLARGED BOARD OF APPEAL CASE LAW 2015/2016
2
I.PATENTABILITY
A. Exceptions to patentability
1.Patentability of biological inventions
1.1Product claims for plants or plant material
1.2Essentially biological processes for the production of plants
3
2.The term "therapy" – definition of the term
4
B. Novelty
1.Availability to the public – ways of making information available to the public
1.1Publications and other printed documents
1.2Public prior use
5
2.Determining the content of the relevant prior art
7
2.1Taking drawings into account
2.2Reproducibility of the content of the disclosure
3.Non-technical distinguishing features
8
4.First and second medical use
9
4.1Purpose-limited product claims and Swiss-type claims – scope of protection
4.2Novelty of the therapeutic application
11
5.Second (or further) non-medical use – process claims
12
C. Inventive step
13
1.Closest prior art
1.1Determination of closest prior art in general
1.2Selection of most promising starting point
16
2.Technical problem
17
2.1Determination of the technical problem
2.2Reformulation of the technical problem
18
3.Ex post facto analysis
4.Reasonable expectation of success, especially in the field of genetic engineering and biotechnology
19
5.Assessment of inventive step
20
5.1Technical character of the invention
5.2Assessment of features relating to a presentation of information
23
5.3Combination of documents
25
II.PATENT APPLICATION AND AMENDMENTS
26
A. Claims
B. Unity of invention
29
1.Single general inventive concept
2.Unsearched subject-matter – applicability of Rule 137(5) EPC
31
C. Sufficiency of disclosure
32
1.Parts of the application relevant for assessing sufficiency of disclosure
2.Clarity and completeness of disclosure – parameters
3.Reproducibility
33
3.1Repeatability
3.2Reproducibility without undue burden – trial and error
35
3.3Post-published documents
36
4.The requirement of sufficiency of disclosure in the biotechnology field
38
4.1Level of disclosure required for medical use
4.2Deposit of living material
39
5.The relationship between Article 83 and Article 84 EPC
40
D. Priority
42
1.Entitlement to priority – successor in title
2.Inventions relating to nucleotide and amino acid sequences
43
3.Partial priority
44
E. Amendments
46
1.Article 123(2) EPC – added subject-matter
1.1Gold standard
1.2No artificial and semantic construction
1.3Amendment and clarity – inescapable trap
47
1.4Disclaimer
48
1.4.1Applicability of the gold standard set out in G 2/10 to undisclosed disclaimers
1.4.2Drafting of disclaimers – clarity
50
1.4.3Availability of remaining subject matter at filing or priority date
1.5 Ranges – qualifiers "below" and "about"
51
1.6Deletion of essential feature
52
2.Article 123(3) EPC – extension of the protection conferred
53
2.1Narrowing down a generic class or list of chemical compounds (open claims – "comprising")
2.2Replacement of drawings
54
2.3Inescapable trap – not Article 123(2)-(3) EPC trap – lack of novelty due to loss of priority
2.4Change from a claim in Swiss-type form to a claim under the provisions of Article 54(5) EPC
55
F. Divisional applications – requirement of pending earlier application
56
III.RULES COMMON TO ALL PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE EPO
57
A. Legitimate expectations
B. Right to be heard
59
C. Oral proceedings
61
1.Request for oral proceedings – further oral proceedings before the same department
2.Changing the date of oral proceedings
62
3.Purpose of communication under Article 15(1) RPBA
63
4.Oral proceedings conducted by video conference
5.Handwritten amendments during oral proceedings before the board
64
D. Time limits, further processing and interruption of proceedings
E. Re-establishment of rights – merits of request
66
F. Law of evidence
67
1.Witness testimonies and expert opinions
2.Taking of evidence – right to be heard
68
3.Probative value of evidence on a case-by-case basis
70
3.1Witness testimony and written statements
3.2Archives and internet publications
71
4.Standard of proof
73
4.1Public prior use
4.2Public availability of prior art documents
75
5.Burden of proof
76
5.1Apportioning the burden of proof
5.2Shifting the burden of proof
78
G. Suspected partiality
79
H. Formal aspects of decisions of EPO departments
80
I. Corrections of errors in decisions
81
J. European Patent Register
82
K. Observations by third parties
83
L. Representation
84
1.Authorisations for appointment of a representative
1.1Sub-authorisations
85
2.Oral submissions by an accompanying person
86
IV.PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE EPO
87
A. Examination procedure
1.Amendments – discretion of the examining division under Rule 137(3) EPC
2.Additional searches during examination
88
3.Amendments relating to unsearched subject-matter – Rule 137(5) EPC
89
B. Special features of opposition and appeal proceedings
90
1.Transfer of party status
1.1Transfer together with the business assets to which the opposition relates
1.2Effect of finding that no transfer took place during opposition proceedings
91
2.Intervention – procedural status of intervener
92
3.Continuation of opposition proceedings after lapse or surrender
4.Costs
93
C. Opposition procedure
94
1.Filing of opposition in due time
2.Correction of opponent's name – evidence of original intention
95
3.Fresh ground for opposition against amended claim
4.Late-filed submissions in opposition proceedings
96
5.Applicability of Rule 43(2) EPC in opposition proceedings
97
6.Clarity of amendment – feature of granted claim taken out of context – applicability of G 3/14
99
D. Appeal procedure
1.Board competent to hear a case
2.Form and time limit of appeal – appeal filed within the time limit
101
3.Reformatio in peius – exception to the prohibition
102
4.Late-filed submissions in appeal proceedings
103
4.1Relevance
4.2Article 12(4) RPBA – general principles
104
4.3Communication of a board of appeal
4.4Unsubstantiated requests
105
4.5Amendments after arrangement of the oral proceedings
107
4.6Discretion of the boards to admit requests already refused by the department of first instance
4.7Late-filed arguments
111
4.8Documents and evidence admitted
112
4.9New submissions in proceedings resumed before the boards
113
4.10Continuation of the appeal proceedings after the end of oral proceedings
5.Termination of appeal proceedings
114
5.1Conditional withdrawal of appeal
6.Remittal to the department of first instance
6.1Exercise of discretion to remit
6.2Special reasons for not remitting the case
115
6.3Binding effect of decision remitting case to department of first instance
116
7.Reimbursement of appeal fees
118
E. Proceedings before the Enlarged Board of Appeal
121
V.DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF APPEAL
126
1.Marking of Paper C
2.Pre-examination
127
ANNEXES
129
ANNEX 1
Decisions discussed in the Case Law Report 2015/2016
ANNEX 2
141
Cited decisions
ANNEX 3
148
Headnotes to 2016 decisions which have been (or will be) published
ANNEX 4
150
Referrals to the Enlarged Board of Appeal