European Patent Office

T 0882/17 of 21.06.2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T088217.20220621
Date of decision
21 June 2022
Case number
T 0882/17
Petition for review of
-
Application number
12161435.8
IPC class
A61B 19/00
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Distributed to board chairmen (C)
OJ versions
No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
Surgical planning
Applicant name
KINGS COLLEGE LONDON
DePuy International Limited
Opponent name
Calibre Search Ltd.
Board
3.2.02
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 106(2)European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention R 99(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
Keywords
Admissibility of appeal - appeal sufficiently substantiated (yes)
Admissibility of opposition
Appeal decision - extent of examination
Appeal decision - reformatio in peius
Late-filed evidence - submitted shortly before oral proceedings
Late-filed evidence - admitted (no)
Novelty - (yes)
Inventive step - (yes)
Catchword
If the opponent is the sole appellant against an interlocutory decision maintaining a patent in amended form, an objection related to the inadmissibility of the opposition is subject to the principle of the prohibition of reformatio in peius. In such a procedural situation, the Board is prohibited from ordering the maintenance of the patent as granted due to the inadmissibility of the opposition (Reasons 3.19).

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.