European Patent Office

T 0401/88 (Test piece) of 28.02.1989

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1989:T040188.19890228
Date of decision
28 February 1989
Case number
T 0401/88
Online on
21 March 1989
Petition for review of
-
Application number
84116226.6
IPC class
G01R 31/36
Language of proceedings
German
Distribution
No distribution (D)
Download
-
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
-
Applicant name
Bosch
Opponent name
-
Board
3.4.01
Headnote

A requested amendment which represents an inadmissible extension within the meaning of Article 123(2) EPC cannot be allowed as a correction under Rule 88, second sentence, EPC. An error may be corrected only if a skilled person would regard the correction as necessarily implied by the contents of the documents as originally filed - in the same way as when the admissibility of an amendment under Article 123(2) EPC is assessed. This follows both from Article 138(1)(c) EPC, under which a European patent is revoked if its subject-matter extends beyond the content of the application as filed, and from Article 164(2) EPC, which stipulates that the provisions of the Convention take precedence over those of the Implementing Regulations (see point 2.2 of the Reasons and T 13/83 - 3.3.1 "Polyisocyanurate/ICI Americas, 13 April 1984, OJ EPO 1984, 428).

Keywords
Amendment of claim - omission of a feature - inadmissible
Amendment of claim - correction of errors - inadmissible
Catchword
-
Cited cases
-

ORDER

For these reasons, it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.