4. First communication
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Guidelines for Examination
  4. Table of Contents
  5. Part C
  6. Chapter III
  7. 4. First communication
  8. 4.1 Reasoning
  9. 4.1.1 Reasoned objections
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

4.1 Reasoning

Overview

4.1.1 Reasoned objections 

As with the search opinion, for each objection, the communication should indicate the part of the application that is deficient and the EPC requirement not met, either by referring to specific articles or rules or by other clear indication; it should also give the reason for any objection where not immediately apparent (for more details see B‑XI, 3.2).

The burden of proof and the onus to present the relevant facts about patentability requirements lie initially with the examining division, which must provide evidence and facts to support its objection (see T 655/13). Accordingly, prior-art documents forming the basis for novelty or inventive step objections must be cited in such a way that these conclusions can be checked without difficulty (see E‑X, 2.6).

Rule 71(2)

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility