4.6.1 Clarity objections 

Relative or similar terms such as "thin", "wide" or "strong" constitute a potentially unclear element due to the fact that their meaning may change depending on the context. For these terms to be allowed, their meaning must be clear in the context of the whole disclosure of the application or patent.

However, if a relative or similar term is used by the applicant as the only feature to distinguish the subject-matter of a claim from the prior art, the use of this term is objected to under Art. 84 unless it has a well-recognised meaning in the particular art, e.g. "high-frequency" in relation to an amplifier, and this is the meaning intended.

Where the relative term has no well-recognised meaning, the division invites the applicant to replace it, if possible, by a more precise wording found elsewhere in the disclosure as originally filed. Where there is no basis in the disclosure for a clear definition and the term is no longer the only distinguishing feature, it may be retained in the claim because excising it would generally lead to an extension of the subject-matter beyond the content of the application as filed – in contravention of Art. 123(2).