5. Exclusions and exceptions for biotechnological inventions
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Guidelines for Examination
  4. Table of Contents
  5. Part G
  6. Chapter II
  7. 5. Exclusions and exceptions for biotechnological inventions
  8. 5.4 Plant and animal varieties or essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals
  9. 5.4.1 Plant varieties
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

5.4 Plant and animal varieties or essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals

Overview

5.4.1 Plant varieties 

The term "plant variety" is defined in Rule 26(4). A patent cannot be granted if the claimed subject-matter is directed to a specific plant variety or specific plant varieties. The method for the plant's production, be it by recombinant gene technology or by a classical plant breeding process, is irrelevant for considering this issue (see T 1854/07). This means that plant varieties containing genes introduced into an ancestral plant by recombinant gene technology are excluded from patentability (G 1/98). However, the invention is patentable if it concerns plants or animals which are not exclusively obtained by means of an essentially biological process (see G‑II, 5.4, above and G 3/19), and if the technical feasibility of the invention is not confined to a particular plant or animal variety (see G‑II, 5.2).

A claimed plant grouping is not excluded from patentability under Art. 53(b) if it does not meet the definition of a plant variety set out in Rule 26(4).

Art. 64(2) is not to be taken into consideration when examining a claim to a process for the production of a plant variety (see G 1/98). This means that a process claim for the production of a plant variety (or plant varieties) which is not exclusively essentially biological is not excluded from patentability merely because the resulting product constitutes or may constitute a plant variety.

Controlled hybrids with inbred parents are excluded from patentability under Art. 53(b), as they define either a seed or a plant which necessarily belongs to a particular plant grouping within the meaning of plant variety as defined in Rule 26(4).

A claim cannot escape the exclusion of plant varieties under Art. 53(b) by comprising a large number or even hundreds of varieties. Only if the claimed subject-matter comprises at least one embodiment which does not constitute a variety is the claim allowable under Art. 53(b) (see T 1208/12). For instance, a claim directed to a hybrid of a specific deposited Brassica variety with any high-yielding Brassica variety results in a non-patentable Brassica hybrid variety.

Rule 26(4)
Rule 27(b)
Rule 28(2)

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility