5. Conflict with other European applications
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Guidelines for Examination
  4. Table of Contents
  5. Part G
  6. Chapter IV
  7. 5. Conflict with other European applications
  8. 5.1 State of the art pursuant to Art. 54(3)
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

5.1 State of the art pursuant to Art. 54(3)

Overview

5.1 State of the art pursuant to Art. 54(3)

The state of the art also comprises the content of other European applications filed or validly claiming a priority date earlier than – but published under Art. 93 on or after – the date of filing date or valid priority date of the application being examined. The priority date counts as the date of filing for both the European application being examined and conflicting European applications under Art. 54(3), on condition that the priority is valid (Art. 89). Such earlier applications are part of the state of the art only when considering novelty and not when considering inventive step. The "content" of a European application means the whole disclosure, i.e. the description, drawings and claims, including:

(i)any matter explicitly disclaimed (with the exception of disclaimers for unworkable embodiments) 

(ii)any matter for which an allowable reference (see F‑III, 8, penultimate paragraph) to other documents is made

(iii)prior art in so far as it is explicitly described. 

However, the "content" does not include any priority document (the purpose of such document being merely to determine to what extent the priority date is valid for the disclosure of the European application (see F‑VI, 1.2)) or, in view of Art. 85, the abstract (see F‑II, 2).

It is important to note that it is the content of the earlier application as filed which is to be considered when applying Art. 54(3). Where an application is filed in a non-official language, as permitted by Art. 14(2) (see A‑VII, 1.1), it can happen that some content is erroneously omitted from the translation into the language of the proceedings and not published under Art. 93 in that language. Even then, it is the content of the original text which is relevant for the purposes of Art. 54(3).

Art. 54(3)
Art. 56
Art. 85
Art. 89

5.1.1 Requirements
5.1.2 Accorded date of filing and content of the application still subject to review
Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility