2. Admissibility in the examination procedure
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Guidelines for Examination
  4. Table of Contents
  5. Part H
  6. Chapter II
  7. 2. Admissibility in the examination procedure
  8. 2.5 Amendments filed in reply to a Rule 71(3) communication
  9. 2.5.3 Exceptional case where amendments must be admitted
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

2.5 Amendments filed in reply to a Rule 71(3) communication

Overview

2.5.3 Exceptional case where amendments must be admitted 

If the application was one of the exceptional cases (i), (ii) or (iii) mentioned in H‑II, 2.2 and no communication under Art. 94(3) has preceded the communication under Rule 71(3), the applicant may amend the description, claims and drawings of their own volition (see C‑III, 2; see also C‑II, 3.1) within the time limit for replying to the communication under Rule 71(3). If the examining division finds that these amendments are allowable, a second communication according to Rule 71(3) is issued based on the text as amended (see C‑V, 4.6).

However, if the examining division is of the opinion that the amendments are not allowable (a finding of inadmissibility with regard to these amendments not being possible), the examination procedure is normally resumed in accordance with C‑V, 4.7.

Rule 137(3)

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility