3.3 In examination proceedings
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Guidelines for Examination
  4. Table of Contents
  5. Part H
  6. Chapter III
  7. 3. Auxiliary requests
  8. 3.3 In examination proceedings
  9. 3.3.2 Admissibility of auxiliary requests
  10. 3.3.2.1 Criteria for admissibility of auxiliary requests
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

3.3.2 Admissibility of auxiliary requests

Overview

3.3.2.1 Criteria for admissibility of auxiliary requests 

As a matter of principle, the examining division must, when exercising its discretion under Rule 137(3) not to admit one or more auxiliary requests, balance the interests of the applicant and procedural efficiency (see also H‑II, 2.3, H‑II, 2.5.1, H‑II, 2.6 and H‑II, 2.7).

Thus, an auxiliary request which contains minor deficiencies but otherwise complies with the requirements of the EPC is normally admitted into the procedure.

When deciding on the admissibility of auxiliary requests the principles set out in H‑II are considered for each of the requests, since each request is in fact a set of amended claims.

Auxiliary requests reintroducing subject-matter which has already been considered unallowable and has been removed by the applicant will not be admitted (see also H‑II, 2.3). The same may apply to auxiliary requests introducing new deficiencies.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility