Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. D 0012/88 (Advertising by firm of patent agents) 15-11-1990
Facebook X Linkedin Email

D 0012/88 (Advertising by firm of patent agents) 15-11-1990

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1990:D001288.19901115
Date of decision
15 November 1990
Case number
D 0012/88
Petition for review of
-
Application number
-
IPC class
-
Language of proceedings
DE
Distribution
-

Download and more information:

Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
DE
FR
Versions
OJ
Application title
-
Applicant name
-
Opponent name
-
Board
-
Headnote

1. The ban on advertising contained in point 2 of the Code of Professional Conduct results in a restriction of the fundamental right to freedom of expression which is compatible with Article 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights - ECHR). In the last analysis, Article 134(8) EPC provides the legal basis for this regulation in the Code of Professional Conduct for professional representatives before the European Patent Office (Code of Professional Conduct).

2. The ban on advertising imposed on professional representatives before the European Patent Office represents a balance between the right to freedom of expression on the one hand and, on the other, the need for the law to protect the reputation of others (i.e. here: to preserve the dignity of the profession of professional representatives before the European Patent Office) and the rights of others (here in particular: ensuring fairness in competition between members of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office). A restriction on the fundamental right to freedom of expression enshrined in law and based on such a balance satisfies the principle of proportionality contained in Article 10(2) ECHR.

3. A member of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the EPO is responsible for articles in the press with an advertising character based on information supplied by him. It is not sufficient for members of the press to be referred expressly to the ban on advertising in the Code of Professional Conduct since, by virtue of the constitutional guarantee of press freedom, the press is not bound by the provisions governing the professional conduct of professional representatives before the EPO or by wishes regarding the content of its reports.

Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 134(8) 1973
EPI_Code_of_conduct_2
Keywords
Ban on advertising by a firm of patent agents
Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
-

A professional organisation of patent agents notified the Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office (EPI) in writing that it was possible the appellant, a patent agent, had contravened the ban on advertising contained in point 2 of the Code of Professional Conduct for professional representatives before the European Patent Office (hereinafter the Code of Professional Conduct). The professional organisation's action was prompted by a number of newspaper articles and interviews published by various journalists over a six-month period which described in detail the quality of service and the achievements of the appellant's firm. The professional organisation took issue with claims contained in the articles to the effect that the firm in question, which had branches in a number of other countries, was the best in its own country since no other firm was able to offer comparable services.

In his reply to these accusations the appellant stated that: Some of the newspaper articles cited had been published following a press conference called by him at the request of the local press to mark his firm's anniversary; others were neither prompted nor influenced by him. Furthermore, as part of a trend towards liberalisation of the rules of professional conduct at European level the ban on advertising had been relaxed in a number of States. This ought to be reflected by giving point 2 of the Code of Professional Conduct a broad interpretation in favour of the professional representative concerned. Moreover, the Commission on Human Rights had ruled that Article 10 ECHR also encompassed professional freedom of expression. The remarks objected to thus enjoyed the protection of freedom of expression even if they had been a form of advertising. The Code of Professional Conduct's total ban on such an expression of opinion went beyond the limitations of freedom of expression laid down in law and allowed by Article 10(2) ECHR. The Disciplinary Committee issued a warning to the appellant for breaching the ban on advertising. The patent agent appealed against that decision and requested that the Disciplinary Committee's decision be set aside in its entirety, the complaint be rejected and the matter dismissed; he also requested that the costs necessarily incurred by him be borne by the EPI and that oral proceedings be convened.

The Disciplinary Committee had failed to appreciate the legal significance of point 2(g) of the Code of Professional Conduct which prohibited the publication of a remark only if it was "calculated or likely" to have an advertising character. He had tried to rule out both these possibilities by drawing the journalists' attention at the beginning of the interview to the strict rules imposed by the Code of Professional Conduct. He could not, therefore, have foreseen that subsequent publication would have an advertising character. Moreover, the Disciplinary Committee had disregarded Article 10 ECHR. Incriminating administrative measures such as the warning could not, in any case, be based on the Code of Professional Conduct because the latter was not supported by Article 134(8)(c) EPC. The Disciplinary Board of Appeal's proceedings were conducted orally.

1. The appeal complies with Article 22(1) of the Regulation on Discipline for Professional Representatives (OJ EPO 1978, 91), hereinafter referred to as the Regulation on Discipline; it is admissible.

2. The first question to be examined is whether the restrictions on freedom of expression laid down in point 2 of the Code of Professional Conduct (OJ EPO 1986, 331) accord with the principles set out in Article 10 ECHR:

2.1. Article 134(8)(c) EPC stipulates that the Administrative Council may adopt provisions governing any disciplinary power to be exercised by the Institute over professional representatives. The Administrative Council adopted the Regulation on Discipline by virtue of that authority.

2.2. Article 1 of the Regulation sets out the general professional obligations in the form of a blanket clause, since it would be difficult to list them individually. This blanket clause naturally includes general, i.e. non-specific, legal concepts, such as "conscientiously", "in a manner appropriate to its dignity", ..." shall conduct himself in such a manner as not to prejudice the necessary confidence in his profession", the specific implications of which have to be spelt out by the bodies responsible for applying the law. Articles 2 and 3 also contain general legal concepts.

2.3.Under Article 4(c) of the Regulation on the Establishment of an Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office (OJ EPO 1978, 85), hereinafter referred to as the Regulation on the Establishment of an Institute, which was adopted by the Administrative Council on the basis of Article 134(8)(b) EPC, the Institute must ensure that its members comply with the Rules of Professional Conduct in Articles 1 to 3 of the Regulation on Discipline. For this reason the Institute's Council, drawn from its membership, adopted the Code of Professional Conduct (cf. Articles 7(1) and 9(3) of the Regulation on the Establishment of an Institute).

2.4. The Institute's Council has a Disciplinary Committee consisting of Institute members (cf. Article 11(1) and (2) of the Regulation on the Establishment of an Institute). Under Article 5(a) of the Regulation on Discipline, the Disciplinary Committee considers infringements of the Rules of Professional Conduct set out in Articles 1 to 3 of that Regulation. It must therefore examine every complaint submitted to it in writing concerning infringement of the Rules of Professional Conduct and then decide what action is to be taken (cf. Article 6(1) and (2) of the Regulation on Discipline). The Disciplinary Committee is thus responsible for applying the law enshrined in the Rules of Professional Conduct and is therefore empowered to spell out the specific implications of the general legal concepts set out therein (cf. 2.2 above). In doing so, however, it must act within the limits of its discretionary powers.

2.5. Rules of Professional Conduct were enshrined in Articles 1 to 3 of the Regulation on Discipline with the intention of guaranteeing the good name and trustworthiness of professional representatives who are Institute members. The Code of Professional Conduct elucidates the substance of these rules and represents, furthermore, a means by which the object referred to in Article 4(c) of the Regulation on the Establishment of an Institute can be achieved (cf. 2.3 above). Since the Disciplinary Committee can also impose penalties to oblige members of the Institute to comply with the Rules of Professional Conduct (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation on Discipline), the Code also sets out the specific implications inferred by the Disciplinary Committee (cf. 2.4 above) from the general legal concepts contained in those Rules (cf. 2.2 above).

2.6. Article 10(1) ECHR states that the right to freedom of expression "shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers". Since, however, the exercise of these freedoms carries with it duties and responsibilites, paragraph 2 of this Article lays down that freedom of expression may be subject, inter alia, to certain restrictions prescribed by law and necessary in a democratic society for the protection of the reputation or rights of others. The following conclusions may be drawn from the above:

- The fundamental right of freedom of expression may be restricted only by legislation (principle of the primacy of law).

- This restriction must satisfy the requirement of proportionality, i.e. a balance must exist between the fundamental right to freedom of expression on the one hand and, on the other, the obligation - which restricts that fundamental right - to protect the reputation or rights of others. Thus, it would be disproportionate to restrict the fundamental right to freedom of expression where there was insufficient reason for doing so or where doing so would in the final analysis render that restricted fundamental right ineffective.

2.7. Article 1 of the Regulation on Discipline stipulates that a professional representative must exercise his profession in a manner appropriate to its dignity. Point 2 of the Code of Professional Conduct sets out the specific implications of the general legal concept contained in that Article and worded "... in a manner appropriate to its dignity" (cf. 2.2 above), a step necessary to enable the Disciplinary Committee to perform the task of applying the law enshrined in Article 1, which falls to it under Article 6 of the Regulation on Discipline. The said point 2 states that it is contrary to the dignity of the professional representatives' profession to attract clients through advertising. The restrictions on the fundamental right to freedom of expression set out therein are thus intended to prevent activities of this kind, declared to be incompatible with the dignity of the professional representatives' profession. After a detailed examination, the Board has concluded that the provisions of point 2 of the Code of Professional Conduct accord with the intent and purpose of the general professional obligations laid down in Article 1 of the Regulation on Discipline and are compatible with the principle that administrative bodies must act within the limits of their discretionary powers (cf. 2.4, last sentence, above). They therefore require no additional legal basis. Article 1 of the Regulation on Discipline, adopted in accordance with the powers conferred by Article 134(8)(c) EPC, thus constitutes a legal basis for making provisions, as required by Article 10(2) ECHR, for the restriction of freedom of expression (cf. 2.6 above, principle of the primacy of law). Nor is the position in any way altered by the fact that Article 1 of the Regulation on Discipline makes no direct mention of advertising or statements of opinion in connection therewith (cf. 2.5 above). The appellant's objection that this Article cannot therefore serve as a legal basis for the Code of Professional Conduct is thus unfounded.

2.8. These considerations are fully in line with a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (point 46 of the Reasons for that Decision; cf. GRUR Int. 1985, 469) which states that legislative authority in respect of rules governing a profession can be derived from the autonomous right of professional organisations to promulgate rules by virtue of the statutory power given them, and that accordingly rules adopted by such organisations by virtue of that power are deemed to be "laws" within the meaning of Article 10(2) ECHR.

2.9. Point 2 of the Code of Professional Conduct is founded on the conviction that the dignity of the professional representatives' profession is diminished if Institute members endeavour to obtain work by comparing services or give an impression of so endeavouring. It is also felt that such conduct is contrary to the principle of fairness to which, as is generally recognised, pre-eminent importance is attached in competition between Institute members. These provisions, accordingly, are intended to prevent Institute members from issuing communications which have or could have an advertising character. On the other hand, the ban does not apply to the communication of information and ideas without any advertising effect. The appellant's stated view that these provisions totally rule out communications by Institute members is thus incorrect. Moreover, the freedom of Institute members to hold opinions and to receive information and ideas remains unaffected. The Board therefore believes that the restrictions on the fundamental right to freedom of expression set out in point 2 of the Code of Professional Conduct satisfy the requirement of proportionality laid down in Article 10 ECHR (and also the principles elaborated by the Court of Justice of the European Communities and the European Court of Human Rights in case law relating to that Article). This is because they are based on a balance between that fundamental right on the one hand and, on the other, the obligations - which restrict that fundamental right - relating to good name and reputation (dignity of the professional representatives' profession) and the rights of others (fairness in competition between Institute members).

2.10. The Board considers that the appellant has not sufficiently substantiated his assertion that there has been a general trend in the EPC Contracting States towards a more liberal application of the rules of professional conduct. For that reason alone, therefore, the appellant's request made in conjunction with that assertion for account to be taken of this allegedly more liberal application of the rules of professional conduct at European level when interpreting the provisions laid down in point 2 of the Code of Professional Conduct is without foundation. Moreover, the appellant's representative conceded in the course of oral proceedings that the articles in the press cited against the appellant would also be in breach of the extremely liberal regulations currently applying to advertising by the legal profession in at least one Contracting State.

2.11. In the Board's view, the only possible way of giving proper legal effect to an alleged liberalisation of the rules of professional conduct at European level is to revise the Code of Professional Conduct. As an instance that applies the law, however, the Board of Appeal is not authorised to make such changes, but is obliged to apply the Code of Professional Conduct from time to time in force. Furthermore, the Code quite clearly does not permit the more liberal application of the rules of professional conduct, as was submitted by the appellant. That is another reason why the appellant's request (cf. 2.10 above) cannot be allowed.

2.12. Accordingly, the restrictions on the fundamental right to freedom of expression laid down in point 2 of the Code of Professional Conduct accord with the principles of Article 10 ECHR. They are therefore legally binding on Institute members insofar as their work relates to the European Patent Convention (EPC).

3. That the appellant let it be known that he is a professional representative before the EPO is not in doubt. This emerges clearly from a number of passages in the articles which appeared in the press. Nor is this disputed by the appellant, who is, moreover, a member of the Institute since his name figures on the list of professional representatives (cf. Article 5(1) of the Regulation on the Establishment of an Institute). The Disciplinary Committee was therefore able to impose on the appellant one of the disciplinary measures provided for in Article 6(2)(b) of the Regulation on Discipline in the event that the Rules of Professional Conduct (Articles 1 to 3 of the Regulation on Discipline) had not been complied with.

4. The extracts from articles in the press contain an abundance of information which, in the Board's view, can only have come from the appellant himself because they contain for the most part relatively detailed and, according to the appellant, accurate particulars of the worldwide business connections, organisational structure, range of services and achievements of the firm of patent agents run by the appellant. Since this information was thus supplied by an Institute member it needs to be established whether that information, in the form of articles in the press, contravenes the provisions laid down in the Rules of Professional Conduct (Articles 1 to 3 of the Regulation on Discipline) and in point 2 of the Code of Professional Conduct. No legal significance can of course be attached to the fact that the appellant informed the press that he was prevented by rules of professional conduct from indulging in any form of advertising. The same applies to the associated request not to write too much about him (the appellant). The facts of the matter are as follows: in the first place, the provisions referred to above do not apply to the activities of the press, who accordingly do not have to adhere to them. Secondly, by virtue of the press freedom guaranteed in a democratic State, members of the press were not obliged to comply with the appellant's wishes. The appellant could not therefore realistically expect them to publish only information in line with those provisions. Nor is there any reason for assuming that the appellant took steps to eliminate or at least reduce the advertising character of the articles in the press. Moreover, the appellant was, as he himself said, fully aware of the ban on advertising contained in the Code of Professional Conduct. It follows from the foregoing that the appellant cannot disclaim responsibility for the published information.

5. Clearly, the greater part of the content of these extracts from the press has an advertising character. ...

6. These extracts, for whose content the appellant must moreover assume full responsibility (cf. 4 above), thus clearly contravene the provisions of point 2(g) of the Code of Professional Conduct in view of their advertising character. That would be true even if the requirements of point 2(a), second paragraph, of the Code were met in the present case. That is not at all the case, however. The Board has to agree with the body of first instance when it says that there is no similarity between the commencement of the activities of an Institute member - or the other activities referred to in point 2(a), second paragraph, of the Code - and the situation created by the anniversary of a firm of patent agents.

7. Because he infringed point 2(g) of the Code of Professional Conduct, the appellant was in breach of the Rules of Professional Conduct (Articles 1 to 3 of the Regulation on Discipline). The Disciplinary Committee accordingly issued a warning to the appellant under Article 6(2)(b) of the said Regulation. This is the mildest disciplinary measure (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation on Discipline) and is therefore in no way inappropriate in the present case.

8. The contested decision must therefore be upheld. The appellant's requests for this decision to be set aside or for the complaint to be rejected and for the matter to be dismissed are thus refused. The same applies to the request that the costs necessarily incurred by the appellant be borne by the Institute. The latter request could only be allowed if the matter were dismissed (cf. Article 27(2), last sentence, of the Regulation on Discipline).

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

- The appeal against the decision of the Disciplinary Committee dated 15 November 1988 is dismissed.

- The request that the costs be borne by the Institute is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility