R 0019/10 of 16.03.2011
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2011:R001910.20110316
- Date of decision
- 16 March 2011
- Case number
- R 0019/10
- Petition for review of
- T 0945/09 2010-06-23
- Application number
- 97950310.9
- IPC class
- A61K 31/495
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Distributed to board chairmen and members (B)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Use of taurolidine or taurultam for the prevention and the treatment of infections in delivery systems
- Applicant name
- Ed Geistlich Söhne AG Für Chemische Industrie
- Opponent name
- TauroPharm GmbH
- Board
- -
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(d)European Patent Convention Art 113European Patent Convention R 102European Patent Convention R 104(b)European Patent Convention R 106European Patent Convention R 107European Patent Convention R 108Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(5)
- Keywords
- Petition for review - clearly unallowable
- Catchword
- It is not a procedural duty of the Boards of Appeal under Rule 104(b) EPC to analyse the submissions of the parties in order to identify potential requests which were not explicitly made by the parties (point 5.2).
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The petition for review is rejected as clearly unallowable.