R 0002/12 of 17.10.2012
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2012:R000212.20121017
- Date of decision
- 17 October 2012
- Case number
- R 0002/12
- Petition for review of
- T 1022/09 2011-10-27
- Application number
- 02732216.3
- IPC class
- B65D 25/14C12G 1/00B65D 79/00B67C 3/02B65D 1/12B21D 51/26B65B 31/02B67C 3/00B32B 15/08B65D 85/72
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Distributed to board chairmen and members (B)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- R 0002/12 2012-09-26
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Process for packaging wine in aluminium cans
- Applicant name
- Barokes Pty Ltd.
- Opponent name
- Sektkellerei Schloss Wachenheim AG/Vintalia Weinhandels GmbH & Co. KG
Rexam Beverage Can Company
CROWN Packaging UK PLC
Prinz Max Emmanuel von Thurn & Taxis
Gargantas De Lata S.R.L.
Hermann Pfanner Getränke GmbH
Aloys, Günther
Sektkellerei Peter Herres GmbH - Board
- -
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 112aEuropean Patent Convention Art 113European Patent Convention R 104European Patent Convention R 106
- Keywords
- Petition clearly unallowable[yes]:
- First ground of the petition for review: violation of the right to be heard because of the automatic dismissal of auxiliary requests- objection under Rule 106 EPC raised [no]; exception to this rule [no]- clearly inadmissible[yes]
-Second and third grounds of the petition: violation of the right to be heard, no opportunity to discuss the Article 123(2) EPC objection regarding Auxiliary Request III; no sufficient time given to the petitioner due to the cancellation of the second day of oral proceedings - clearly inadmissible [no]- clearly unallowable [yes] - Catchword
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The petition is rejected as clearly unallowable.