European Patent Office

T 1329/04 (Factor-9/JOHN HOPKINS) of 28.06.2005

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2005:T132904.20050628
Date of decision
28 June 2005
Case number
T 1329/04
Petition for review of
-
Application number
94907259.9
IPC class
C12N 15/11
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Distributed to board chairmen and members (B)
OJ versions
No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
Growth differentiation factor-9
Applicant name
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Opponent name
-
Board
3.3.08
Headnote
-
Keywords
Main and auxiliary requests - inventive step (no) - no plausible solution of technical problem is provided
Catchword
The definition of an invention as being a contribution to the art, i.e. as solving a technical problem and not merely putting forward one, requires that it is at least made plausible by the disclosure in the application that its teaching solves indeed the problem it purports to solve. Therefore, even if supplementary post-published evidence may in the proper circumstances also be taken into consideration, it may not serve as the sole basis to establish that the application solves indeed the problem it purports to solve.

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.