Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t191167eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 1167/19 19-04-2023
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 1167/19 19-04-2023

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2023:T116719.20230419
Date of decision
19 April 2023
Case number
T 1167/19
Petition for review of
-
Application number
07008330.8
IPC class
G06Q 10/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 371.5 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

System for providing information to a user

Applicant name
Bissantz, Nicolas, Dr.rer.Pol.
Opponent name
-
Board
3.4.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 52(1)
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art
Keywords

Inventive step - main request (no)

Inventive step - mixture of technical and non-technical features

Late-filed request - submitted with the statement of grounds of appeal

Late-filed request - admitted (no)

Late-filed request - request could have been filed in first instance proceedings (yes)

Statement of grounds of appeal - party's complete case

Statement of grounds of appeal - mere reference to first instance proceedings

Amendment after summons - cogent reasons (no)

Amendment after summons - exceptional circumstances (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0641/00
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal concerns the decision of the Examining Division to refuse European patent application no. 07 008 330. In the contested decision, the Examining Division set out that the subject-matter of the claims of the main request and of five auxiliary requests then on file did not involve an inventive step within the meaning of Article 56 EPC starting from a notorious data processing system.

II. In the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant requested that the contested decision be set aside and that a European patent be granted, as a main request based on the claim wording as originally filed, according to a new auxiliary request 1 introduced with the statement of grounds of appeal, or based on any of the auxiliary requests 1 to 5 filed during the examination proceedings (i.e. auxiliary requests 1 to 5 referred to in the contested decision, labelled Auxiliary Request I, Ia, II, IIa and III, respectively). The appellant further requested, should the Board of Appeal deem further substantive examination necessary, that the case be remanded back to the Examining Division. In addition, the appellant had requested in the notice of appeal that the appeal fee be refunded to the applicant.

III. In a communication under Article 15(1) RPBA preparing the oral proceedings before the Board, the Board set out its preliminary opinion that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request lacked an inventive step, that admission of the new auxiliary request 1 would have to be discussed during oral proceedings (pointing out that it did not perceive how the amendment of claim 1 corresponded to new detailed comments and objections debated in the course of the first instance oral proceedings) and that it was minded not to admit auxiliary requests 1 to 5 filed during the examination proceedings for lack of proper substantiation.

In that communication, the Board further provided some brief comments concerning lack of inventive step of the independent claims of all auxiliary requests.

IV. With letter dated 14 November 2022, the appellant submitted arguments why the new auxiliary request 1 was a reaction the first instance oral proceedings and therefor should be admitted.

With the same letter, the appellant filed arguments why the subject-matter of respective claim 1 of all auxiliary requests was inventive. It further submitted that auxiliary requests 1 to 5 should be admitted.

V. With a communication dated 20 January 2023, the Board indicated that the admission of the new auxiliary request 1 filed with the statement of grounds of appeal and auxiliary requests 1 to 5 filed during the examination procedure would be discussed during the oral proceedings scheduled for 14 February 2023 as set out in the Board's communication under Article 15(1) RPBA. The Board further indicated that it was preliminarily minded not to admit the submissions of the appellant filed with date of 14 November 2022, which were apparently made to remedy the lacking substantiation of the auxiliary requests 1 to 5 filed during examination proceedings and pursued in the appeal. The same applied to the corresponding requests.

VI. With letter dated 31 January 2023, the appellant indicated that it would not be present at the oral proceedings and requested a decision on the state of the file.

VII. Claim 1 of the main request has the following wording:

System for providing information to a user, said system comprising

a screen for showing the information to the user,

information generating means for generating at least one graphical and/or textual information,

first selecting means for enabling the user to select at least one of said graphical and/or textual information,

first generating means for generating first data which are related to said selected information,

wherein said first data are grouped according to a criterion,

changing means for changing said criterion to at least one further criterion,

and triggering means which are adapted to trigger said changing means upon activation by the user of the system.

VIII. Claim 1 of new auxiliary request 1 differs from claim 1 of the main request in that the last feature ("and triggering means ...") is replaced by the following feature:

and a mouse wheel adapted to trigger said changing means upon activation by the user of the system.

IX. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 (labelled "Auxiliary Request I") filed during the examination proceedings differs from claim 1 of the main request in that it comprises, at its end, the following additional features:

characterised in that

the criterion according to which the first data are grouped is determined according to the spread of the data for different criteria,

wherein the criterion having the highest spread of data is initially selected.

X. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 (labelled "Auxiliary Request Ia") filed during the examination proceedings differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 filed during the examination proceedings in that it comprises, at its end, the following additional feature:

and the changing means is adapted to change the criteria so that a criterion having a higher spread of data is selected prior to a criterion having a lower spread of data.

XI. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 (labelled "Auxiliary Request II") filed during the examination proceedings differs from claim 1 of the main request in that it comprises, at its end, the following additional feature:

characterised in that

said first generating means is adapted to only display those data contributing to the sum of data to a predetermined minimum extent.

XII. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 (labelled "Auxiliary Request IIa") filed during the examination proceedings differs from claim 1 of the main request in that it comprises, at its end, the following additional features:

characterised in that

the data comprise at least one sparkline, and

said first generating means is adapted to only display those data contributing to the sum of data to a predetermined minimum extent.

XIII. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 (labelled "Auxiliary Request III") filed during the examination proceedings differs from claim 1 of the main request in that it comprises, at its end, the following additional features:

characterised in that

the graphical and/or textual information and/or the data comprise at least one sparkline,

the system comprises means for zooming the sparkline,

and the means for zooming the sparkline is adapted to create a space on one or both sides of a bar of the sparkline and to provide one or more values explaining the absolute or relative values or changes of a selected bar of the sparkline into said space(s).

XIV. The appellant argued essentially as follows:

(a) Main request

The claimed subject-matter involved an inventive step over a notorious data processing system.

(b) New auxiliary request 1 filed with the grounds of appeal

The new auxiliary request 1 should be admitted into the proceedings as it was an attempt to overcome all objections without giving rise to new ones.

(c) Auxiliary requests 1 to 5 filed during the first instance proceedings

The subject-matter of auxiliary requests 1 to 5 involved an inventive step and should be taken into account during the appeal proceedings.

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. The invention

The invention relates to the display of a large amount of data using "sparklines". Sparklines are word-sized, minimized graphical diagrams, e.g. column or bar diagrams. The displayed data is grouped initially according to a particular criterion. This criterion can be changed by changing means triggered by triggering means upon activation by the user.

3. Main request, claim 1

3.1 The Examining Division identified the following technical features in this claim:

A system comprising a screen, information generating means, first selecting means, first generating means, changing means and triggering means.

It further held that these technical features corresponded to a system with a screen, input means (selection means) and abstract processing means (generation, changing and triggering means). It considered the closest prior art to be a notorious data processing system (points 1.3 to 1.4 of the contested decision).

The Examining Division then found that the differences between the subject-matter of claim 1 and such a system related to the particular set of processing steps which the system was programmed to carry out, namely a set of abstract business rules to be programmed in a straightforward, obvious manner by the skilled person.

3.2 The appellant did not contest the existence of such notorious data processing systems nor the selection of such a system as the closest prior art (page 3, third paragraph of the grounds of appeal).

However, it submitted that the specific processing steps served to achieve the technical effect of saving power/reducing the energy consumption of the system and allocating display space with maximum efficiency.

They thereby contributed to solving a technical problem. Therefore, all features recited in the claim had to be taken into account when assessing inventive step (page 3, last paragraph to page 5, third paragraph of the statement of grounds of appeal). The reasoning in the decision represented an ex post facto view (page 6, second and third paragraphs of the statement of grounds of appeal).

3.3 The Board accepts the view of the Examining Division and the appellant that a notorious data processing system may be seen as representing the closest prior art.

Moreover, the Board notes that it was also notorious knowledge at the effective date of the application that such systems, for instance general purpose standard personal computers, generated information to be shown to the user and that at least a part of the shown information could be selected by the user, resulting in related data to be displayed. Examples are, for instance, simple drop-down menus, adventure games or, more in a business context as the application, various programs available in the 1990s for tracking the stock market, e.g. the Comdirect online brokering system or, even closer to the application, the program "Quotetracker", which was the first implementation of the "sparklines", invented by Edward Tufte and referred to in the application, as early as 1998.

Using the wording of the claim, it was thus also notorious to provide, in a data processing system in the form of a general purpose standard personal computer as set out above, the functions of and means for "showing the information to a user", "generating at least one graphical and/or textual information", "enabling the user to select at least one of said graphical and/or textual information" and "generating first data which are related to said selected information" in combination. In addition, it is inevitable that any (first) data, when displayed, is grouped according to a (first) criterion since a decision must be taken and implemented where and how to arrange the data.

3.4 It follows therefrom that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request differs from a notorious general purpose standard computer as described above only by

- changing means adapted for changing said criterion to at least one further criterion, and

- triggering means which are adapted to trigger said changing means upon activation by the user of the system.

3.5 The Board does not see how these distinguishing features (or more generally, the "specific processing steps" referred to by the appellant) would achieve the technical effect of saving power/reducing the energy consumption of the system and allocating display space with maximum efficiency referred to by the appellant (e.g. grounds of appeal, page 4, first to fifth paragraphs). The submission of the appellant that only the most relevant items of information are displayed and that the same amount of information can be displayed on only one screen where previously two screens would have been necessary (grounds of appeal, page 6, last paragraph to page 7, first paragraph) actually even supports that view of the Board since it makes clear that a cognitive decision is taken which information is relevant and therefore to be displayed, while less relevant information is simply not displayed.

Thus, the distinguishing features/the "specific processing steps" merely allow that a cognitive decision is implemented which information is to be displayed in which manner. They do therefore not contribute to the solution of a technical problem, contrary to the submissions of the appellant.

3.6 The Board notes that the claim, including all processing steps, is formulated in a very broad and abstract manner. Thus, irrespective of whether the processing steps are considered to be technical or not, most of them have been part of the notorious knowledge at the priority date of the application, contrary to the submission of the appellant (grounds of appeal, page 6, fourth paragraph).

Furthermore, the distinguishing features defined above are also formulated in a very broad and abstract manner. For instance, they do not define that the criterion can be changed to the further criterion while the first data is displayed, or if that is the case, that display is changed immediately upon a change of the criterion. Nor is there any indication in the claim about what the criterion might be.

Irrespective thereof, the manner in which data to be displayed is grouped will normally be done depending on the content of the data, i.e. the information to be displayed. In the present case, the information to be displayed is purely business related (for instance, revenues, see page 3, last paragraph of the original application).

That is, neither the content of the data displayed nor the manner in which the displayed data is grouped contributes to the solution of a technical problem.

Hence, the criteria according to which the (non-technical) first data is to be grouped as well as the number of these criteria or the wish to change between different criteria also do not contribute to the solution of a technical problem and will thus normally be given to the technically skilled person as part of the requirement specification.

Consequently, the objective technical problem may be formulated in the present case as how to implement the changing and triggering functions defined in the distinguishing features.

The Board notes that formulating the objective technical problem as being the implementation of a non-technical requirement specification corresponds to the well-known "COMVIK-approach" and the appellant's submission relating to an ex post facto view does not apply (see point 7. of the "COMVIK"-decision T641/00).

The implementation of the changing and triggering functions, at least at the abstract level claimed of providing corresponding "means for" performing them, would have been a straightforward task for the skilled person.

Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request is not inventive (Article 52(1) EPC) under Article 56 EPC 1973 in view of a notorious general purpose standard personal computer as set out above combined with common general knowledge.

4. New auxiliary request 1 filed with the grounds of appeal

Claim 1 of the new auxiliary request differs from claim 1 of the main request in that the triggering means are defined to be a mouse wheel.

This request was not discussed during the examining proceedings. Pursuant to Article 12(4) RPBA 2007, the Board thus has the discretion not to admit it if it comes to the conclusion that it could have been presented in the first instance proceedings.

The appellant submitted that it had transpired from the oral proceedings that the Examining Division considered that the software means recited in the claim wording were defined in insufficient technical detail to support an inventive step. Therefore, in the new auxiliary request 1, at least one abstract software means (the triggering means) had been substituted with a specific hardware component (the mouse wheel), providing more technical detail and focusing the proceedings on an embodiment that appeared to be of commercial interest (see letter dated 14 November 2022, page 2, first and second paragraphs).

The Board notes that even the European search opinion already set out that the technical features claimed were considered to be well-known in the art of data processing and merely served their well-known functions (point 2.3 of the European search opinion). In a communication dated 4 April 2018 accompanying the summons to oral proceedings, the Examining Division further set out in detail that the triggering means were considered to be technical but notoriously known (point 3.3 of that communication), i.e. that the triggering means could not support an inventive step. Thus, contrary to the appellant's submission, substituting the triggering means by a mouse wheel cannot be considered as responding to any new comments and objections debated in the course of the oral proceedings (see also the statement of grounds of appeal, page 8, antepenultimate and penultimate paragraph).

Instead, the Board comes to the conclusion that the new auxiliary request 1 not only could but should have been presented in the examination proceedings, in reaction to the communication dated 4 April 2018 or at the latest during the oral proceedings before the Examining Division.

The Board therefore decides not to admit the new auxiliary request 1 into the proceedings under Article 12(4) RPBA 2007.

5. Auxiliary requests 1 to 5 filed during the examination proceedings and also underlying the contested decision

5.1 With respect to the independent claims of auxiliary requests 1 to 5 filed during the examination proceedings, the Examining Division essentially set out that the description was silent with respect to any technical considerations concerning the adaptation of a notorious data processing system to carry out the additional process steps defined in the claims of these requests. It further stated that it had been unable to identify any further or surprising technical effect resulting from this adaptation.

Therefore, the Examining Division came to the conclusion that the subject-matter of the independent claims of each these requests lacked an inventive step within the meaning of Article 56 EPC.

5.2 The appellant, when discussing auxiliary requests 1 to 5 filed during examination proceedings in its statement setting out the grounds of appeal, merely referred to its rea­sons outlined with regards to the main request and to the written submissions made during the examination proceedings (grounds of appeal, page 10, fourth para­graph). Only in its letter dated 14 November 2022 the appellant submitted arguments relating to the Article 56 EPC objections set out by the Examining Division in the contested decision for each of these requests.

5.3 The mere reference to the reasons of the main request and to the submissions made during the examination proceedings in the statement setting out the grounds of appeal does not relate to the objections set out by the Examining Division in the contested decision (i.e., at the end of the first instance proceedings) for auxiliary requests 1 to 5. Therefore, it does not amount to a proper substantiation of the appeal with respect to these requests as required by Articles 12(2) and (4) RPBA 2007 in combination with Article 25(2) RPBA 2020 (it is noted that Article 12(3) RPBA 2020 essentially stipulates the same requirements as Article 12(2) RPBA 2007 and formally also applies to appeals filed before the entering into force of the RPBA 2020).

5.4 The additional arguments with respect to these requests submitted by the appellant with letter dated 14 November 2022, even if relating to requests which were filed earlier, were not part of the notice of appeal or the statement setting out the grounds of appeal and therefore do not fall under what should be taken into account by the Board under Article 12(4) RPBA 2007. Instead, they are to be considered as amendments falling under the provisions of Article 13(2) RPBA, with the consequence that these submissions shall, in principle, not be taken into account, unless there are exceptional circumstances, which have been justified with cogent reasons by the appellant. This was already set out in the Board's communication pursuant to Article 15(1) RPBA 2020 (see point 8. of that communication).

An explanation of such exceptional circumstances is not apparent from any of the submissions of the appellant. Hence, these submissions and consequently the affected auxiliary requests 1-5 filed during the proceedings before the Examining Division are not taken into account under Article 13(2) RPBA and Article 12(4) RPBA 2007, respectively.

6. Request to remand the application back to the Examining Division

In view of the foregoing, the Board comes to the conclusion that it can take a final decision and that therefore no further examination of the Examining Division is necessary. A remittal of the application to the Examining Division is not necessary in the case at hand.

7. Refund of the appeal fee

The request for refund of the appeal fee made in the notice of appeal was not mentioned in the statement setting out the grounds of appeal. The request is therefore not substantiated. In any case, the Board is unaware of any circumstances in the current case that would justify such a refund, as already indicated in the preliminary opinion of the Board.

8. Summary

The subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request is not inventive under Article 56 EPC.

New auxiliary request 1 and auxiliary requests 1 to 5 as filed during the first-instance proceedings are not admitted. The requests for a remittal of the application to the Examining Division and for the refund of the appeal fee are refused.

In the absence of any allowable request in the proceedings, the appeal must fail.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility