T 0231/23 of 08.12.2023
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2023:T023123.20231208
- Date of decision
- 8 December 2023
- Case number
- T 0231/23
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 14807425.5
- IPC class
- E04C 5/16E04G 9/08E04G 9/02E04B 5/32E04G 17/00E04B 5/36E04B 5/21E04G 15/00E04G 11/46E02D 27/01E04G 17/06
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- No distribution (D)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- Abstract on EPC2000 R 136(1)
- Application title
- METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FORMING A FORMWORK FOR A CONCRETE SLAB
- Applicant name
- Parodi, Fabio
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.2.03
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 122(1)European Patent Convention R 130(1)European Patent Convention R 136(1)
- Keywords
- Re-establishment of rights - time limit for filing request for re-establishment
Re-establishment of rights - two months of the removal of the cause of non-compliance (no) - Catchword
- 1.) The removal of the cause of non-compliance with a time limit under Rule 136(1) EPC occurs, as a rule, on the date on which the person responsible for the application vis-à-vis the EPO becomes aware of the fact that the time limit has not been observed, for example by receipt of a loss of rights communication under Rule 112(1) EPC. If a professional representative is appointed, the representative is the person responsible for the application vis-a-vis the EPO (Reasons 3 and 4).
2.) Regarding time limits for the payment of fees, an appointed professional representative remains the person responsible for the application vis-a-vis the EPO, and thus the person whose knowledge matters in assessing when the cause of non-compliance was removed, irrespective of whether a third party other than the representative is responsible for the payment of fees. Hence, also when a time limit for the payment of fees was missed, removal of the cause of non-compliance in principle occurs on the date on which an appointed professional representative receives the corresponding loss of rights communication (Reasons 5). The removal of the cause of non-compliance does not require any additional knowledge on the part of the professional representative about possible reasons for missing the time limit, such as whether the non-payment of renewal fees had been intentional or not (Reasons 7). - Citing cases
- T 1882/23
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.