T 0755/96 (Camptothecin derivatives/RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE) of 06.08.1999
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1999:T075596.19990806
- Date of decision
- 6 August 1999
- Case number
- T 0755/96
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 90310085.7
- IPC class
- C07D 491/22
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- Decision in English
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Analogue de la 10,11-méthylènedioxy-20(RS)camptothécine et de la 10,11-méthylènedioxy-20(s)-camptothécine
- Applicant name
- RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.3.01
- Headnote
In ex parte proceedings, Rule 71a EPC gives the Examining Division a discretion to admit or refuse amended claims until a decision is issued under Article 97 EPC. This discretion must be exercised by considering all relevant factors which arise in a particular case and by balancing the Applicant's interest in obtaining a proper patent protection for his claimed invention and the EPO's interest in bringing the examination procedure to a speedy close by the issue of a decision. If in exercising said discretion amended claims are not admitted, the reasons therefore must be given. The assessment that they were filed too late under Rule 71a EPC does not represent an adequate reasoning in conformity with Rule 68(2) EPC.
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 123 1973European Patent Convention R 71a 1973European Patent Convention R 86(3) 1973
- Keywords
- Discretion to admit or refuse amended claims under Rule 71a EPC (yes)
Adequate reasons for not admitting amended claims (no)
Substantial procedure violation (yes)
Reimbursement of the appeal fee (yes)
Remittal to the first instance for further prosecution - Catchword
- -
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the Examining Division for further prosecution.
3. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is allowed.