The state of the art at the search stage
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Guidelines for Examination
  4. Table of Contents
  5. Part B
  6. The state of the art at the search stage
  7. 5. Relevant date for documents cited in the search report; filing and priority date
  8. 5.6 Doubts about the state of the art
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

5. Relevant date for documents cited in the search report; filing and priority date

Overview

5.6 Doubts about the state of the art 

It is the examining division, not the search division, that ultimately decides on novelty (see B‑III, 1.1), and so the search division does not disregard highly relevant documents because it has doubts about, for instance, when exactly they were published or made publicly available (e.g. standards or related preparatory documents, see G‑IV, 7.6) or, where they refer to an oral disclosure, exhibition, etc., what exactly was said or displayed. It tries to remove any such doubts but always cites the documents in the search report anyway, while continuing its search as though they had not been found. It can also cite additional documents providing evidence on the matters in doubt (see B‑X, 9.2.8). It will explain any such matters in detail in the search opinion.

Any date of publication indicated in a document is accepted as correct unless there is good reason to challenge it, e.g. where the search division can show it was published earlier or where the applicant can show in examination proceedings that it was published later. If the indicated date of publication is not precise enough (e.g. because only a month or year is given) to establish whether it was published before the relevant date for the search, the search division will try to determine the exact date or at least narrow it down with enough precision to establish this. A date of receipt at the EPO stamped on the document or a reference in another document, which must then be cited (see B‑X, 9.2.8), can help with this. Whether a document was publicly available may be investigated when the search opinion is drawn up and during substantive examination (see C‑IV, 1). Where, despite the search division's attempts, the date is still not precise enough for it to know whether or not the document was published before or after the priority or filing date date of filing, it will cite it as though it had been published on the earliest possible date. For instance, if only the month and year of publication are known, the search division will cite it as having been published on the first day of that month.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility