Part C – Guidelines for Procedural Aspects of Substantive Examination
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Guidelines for Examination
  4. Table of Contents
  5. Part C
  6. Chapter VI
  7. 3. Further ways to accelerate examination
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

Chapter VI – Time limits and acceleration of examination

Overview

3. Further ways to accelerate examination 

Where the applicant files a request for examination before the search report is transmitted to them, they may also dispense with the need to comply with the invitation pursuant to Rule 70(2) and file a categorical request for examination whatever the search result may be, thereby also accelerating the procedure (see the notice from the EPO dated 30 November 2015, OJ EPO 2015, A93). In this case, confirmation that they desire to proceed further with their application is deemed given when the search report is transmitted to them so that in accordance with Rule 62(1) the search report is not accompanied by a search opinion. Under these circumstances, if the application is not in order for grant, a communication under Art. 94(3) and Rule 71(1) and Rule 71(2) is transmitted to the applicant. Own-volition amendments under Rule 137(2) may in that case be submitted by the applicant in reply to this communication (see C‑III, 2).

If the application is in order for grant, the subsequent procedure will depend on whether it is possible at that time to carry out the search for conflicting European patent applications according to Art. 54(3) (see C‑IV, 7.1 and B‑XI, 7). If it can, and assuming no conflicting applications are identified, then the communication under Rule 71(3) is transmitted to the applicant. If it cannot yet be carried out, then the communication from the examining division will be postponed until the said search is completed. If the European patent application is subsequently withdrawn before the substantive examination has begun, the examination fee will be refunded in full. If substantive examination has already begun, withdrawal of the application may still result in a refund of 50% of the examination fee in the cases laid down in Art. 11(b) RFees (for more details, see A‑VI, 2.5 and OJ EPO 2016, A49).

The applicant can also accelerate the processing of Euro-PCT applications by waiving the right to the communication under Rule 161 and Rule 162 (see E‑IX, 3.1) or by filing an explicit request for early processing of an international application by the EPO as designated/elected Office (see E‑IX, 2.8).

Rule 70(2)
Art. 11(b) RFees
Rule 62(1)

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility