3. Analysis of the application and content of the written opinion
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. PCT-EPO Guidelines
  4. Table of Contents
  5. PCT Part B
  6. Chapter XI
  7. 3. Analysis of the application and content of the written opinion
  8. 3.2 Reasoned objections
  9. 3.2.2 Multiple independent claims
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

3.2 Reasoned objections

Overview

3.2.2 Multiple independent claims 

Multiple independent claims in one category are per se not a reason for a restriction of the search (see GL/PCT‑EPO B‑VIII, 4).

If appropriate, an objection as to clarity and conciseness under Article 6 may be made under Box VIII (see GL/PCT‑EPO F‑IV, 3.2). As an alternative, for cases where multiple independent claims in one category do not affect the clarity of the definition of the invention, a minor objection may be raised under Box VII.

GL/ISPE 5.13 and 5.14

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility